Abstract
The pretreatment methods for enhancing biogas production from oat straw under study include hot maceration, steam explosion, and pressure shockwaves. The micropore area (9, 55, and 64 m2 g-1) inhibitor formations (0, 15, and 0 mL L-1) as well as the overall methane yields (67, 179, and 255 CH4 VS t-1) were robustly analyzed. It was confirmed that the operating conditions of the steam explosion must be precisely tailored to the substrate. Furthermore, it was beneficial to prepend the hot maceration before the steam explosion and the pressure shockwaves. The second alternative may give increased methane yields (246 in comparison to 273 CH4 VS t-1); however, the application of pressure shockwaves still faces limitations for deployment on a commercial scale.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amon T, Amon B, Kryvoruchko V, Zollitsch W, Mayer K, Gruber L (2007) Biogas production from maize and dairy cattle manure—influence of biomass composition on the methane yield. Agric Ecosyst Environ 118:173–182
Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E (1938) Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc 60:309–319
Dererie DY, Trobro S, Momeni MH, Hansson H, Blomqvist J, Passoth V, Schnürer A, Sandgren M, Ståhlberg J (2011) Improved bio-energy yields via sequential ethanol fermentation and biogas digestion of steam exploded oat straw. Bioresour Technol 102:4449–4455
Fan LT, Lee YH, David H (1980) Mechanism of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: effects of major structural features of cellulose on enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 22:177–199
Herrmann A (2012) Biogas production from maize: current state, challenges and prospects. 2. Agronomic and environmental aspects. Bioenerg Res. doi:10.1007/s12155-012-9227-x
Herrmann C, Heiermann M, Idler C, Scholz V (2007) Parameters influencing substrate quality and biogas yield. In: Proceedings of the 15th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, Berlin, Germany, Florence, Italy: ETA-Renewable Energies, pp 809–819
Higa O, Matsubara R, Higa K, Miyafuji Y, Gushi T, Omine Y, Naha K, Shimojima K, Fukuoka H, Maehara H, Tanaka S, Itoh S (2012) Mechanism of the shock wave generation and energy efficiency by underwater discharge. Int J Multiphys 6:89–98
Himmel ME (2008) Biomass recalcitrance: deconstructing the plant cell wall for bioenergy. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Singapore
Krátký L, Jirout T, Nalezenec J (2012) Lab-scale technology for biogas production from lignocellulose wastes. Acta Polytech 52:54–59
Lemmer A, Oechsner H (2001) Co-fermentation of grass and forage maize. Landtechnik 56:412–413
Maroušek J (2013) Removal of hardly fermentable ballast from the maize silage to accelerate biogas production. Ind Crop Prod 44:253–257
Maroušek J, Kawamitsu Y, Ueno M, Kondo Y, Kolář L (2012) Methods for improving methane yield from rye straw. Appl Eng Agric 28:1–9
Noike T, Endo G, Chang JE, Yaguchi JI, Matsumoto JI (1985) Characteristics of carbohydrate degradation and the rate-limiting step in anaerobic digestion. Biotechnol Bioeng 27:1482–1489
Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B (2000) Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour Technol 74:25–33
Prochnow A, Heiermann M, Drenckhan A, Schelle H (2005) Seasonal pattern of biomethanisation of grass from landscape management. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal, Manuscript EE 05 011, vol. VII, Manuscript EE 05 011. Available at: http://cigrjournal.org/index.php/Ejournal
Ress BB, Calvert PP, Pettigrew CA, Barlaz MA (1998) Testing anaerobic biodegrability of polymers in a laboratory-scale simulated landfill. Environ Sci Technol 32:821–827
Richter F, Graß R, Fricke T, Zerr W, Wachendorf M (2009) Utilization of semi-natural grassland through integrated generation of solid fuel and biogas from biomass. II. Effects of hydrothermal conditioning and mechanical dehydration on anaerobic digestion of press fluids. Grass Forage Sci 64:132–143
Rovira P, Vallejo VR (2002) Labile and recalcitrant pools of carbon and nitrogen in organic matter decomposing at different depths in soil: an acid hydrolysis approach. Geoderma 107:109–141
Shiralipour A, Smith PH (1984) Conversion of biomass into methane gas. Biomass 6:85–92
Shirato Y, Yokozawa M (2006) Acid hydrolysis to partition plant material into decomposable and resistant fractions for use in the Rothamsted carbon model. Soil Biol Biochem 38:812–816
Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K (2008) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review. Int J Mol Sci 9:1621–1651
Wachendorf M, Richter F, Fricke T, Graß R, Neff R (2009) Utilization of semi-natural grassland through integrated generation of solid fuel and biogas from biomass. I. Effects of hydrothermal conditioning and mechanical dehydration on mass flows of organic and mineral plant compounds, and nutrient balances. Grass Forage Sci 64:132–143
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a grant from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maroušek, J. Prospects in straw disintegration for biogas production. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20, 7268–7274 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1736-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1736-4