Skip to main content
Log in

Isoload vs isokinetic eccentric exercise: a direct comparison of exercise-induced muscle damage and repeated bout effect

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sport Sciences for Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study compared the exercise induced muscle damage and repeated bout effect after isoload vs isokinetic eccentric supra-maximal single session.

Methods

Thirty sport science male students were randomly divided in isokinetic (IK) and isoload (IL) eccentric training. Creatin kinase (CK) serum activity, muscle soreness and strength decrement measured both in dynamic and isometric modalities were recorded at baseline, immediately after and up to 4 days following 48 supramaximal IK or IL eccentric contractions. Same protocol was repeated after 4 weeks. A three-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to detect differences in dependent variables comparing group × bout × time.

Results

No three-way interaction occurred in dependent variables. Bout × time resulted in a significant interaction in all dependent variables. Muscle damage markers resulted significantly altered compared to baseline up to 4 days. However, IL showed significantly greater CK, muscle soreness and strength deficit compared to IK. All parameters were significantly reduced after second compared to first bout. Difference between IL and IK after second bout was not overall significant.

Conclusion

IK vs IL supra-maximal eccentric contraction is showed to have different muscle damage symptoms. Protection conferred by first bout reduced muscle damage after 4 weeks and decreased difference between IL and IK.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nosaka K, Clarkson PM (1995) Muscle damage following repeated bouts of high force eccentric exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27:1263–1269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen TC, Nosaka K (2006) Effects of number of eccentric muscle actions on first and second bouts of eccentric exercise of the elbow flexors. J Sci Med Sport 9:57–66. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2006.03.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hubal MJ, Rubinstein SR, Clarkson PM (2007) Mechanisms of variability in strength loss after muscle-lengthening actions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39:461–468. doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000247007.19127.da

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kostek MC, Chen Y-W, Cuthbertson DJ et al (2007) Gene expression responses over 24 h to lengthening and shortening contractions in human muscle: major changes in CSRP3, MUSTN1, SIX1, and FBXO32. Physiol Genomics 31:42–52. doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00151.2006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chapman DW, Newton M, McGuigan M, Nosaka K (2008) Effect of lengthening contraction velocity on muscle damage of the elbow flexors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40:926–933. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e318168c82d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clarkson PM, Hubal MJ (2002) Exercise-induced muscle damage in humans. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 81:S52–S69. doi:10.1097/01.PHM.0000029772.45258.43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nosaka K, Sakamoto K, Newton M, Sacco P (2001) The repeated bout effect of reduced-load eccentric exercise on elbow flexor muscle damage. Eur J Appl Physiol 85:34–40. doi:10.1007/s004210100430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lavender AP, Nosaka K (2006) Comparison between old and young men for changes in makers of muscle damage following voluntary eccentric exercise of the elbow flexors. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 31:218–225. doi:10.1139/h05-028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jamurtas AZ, Theocharis V, Tofas T et al (2005) Comparison between leg and arm eccentric exercises of the same relative intensity on indices of muscle damage. Eur J Appl Physiol 95:179–185. doi:10.1007/s00421-005-1345-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen TC, Chen H-L, Lin M-J et al (2009) Muscle damage responses of the elbow flexors to four maximal eccentric exercise bouts performed every 4 weeks. Eur J Appl Physiol 106:267–275. doi:10.1007/s00421-009-1016-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen TC, Nosaka K, Sacco P (2007) Intensity of eccentric exercise, shift of optimum angle, and the magnitude of repeated-bout effect. J Appl Physiol 102:992–999. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00425.2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stupka N, Tarnopolsky MA, Yardley NJ, Phillips SM (2001) Cellular adaptation to repeated eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage. J Appl Physiol 91:1669–1678

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith LL, Fulmer MG, Holbert D et al (1994) The impact of a repeated bout of eccentric exercise on muscular strength, muscle soreness and creatine kinase. Br J Sports Med 28:267–271. doi:10.1136/bjsm.28.4.267

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nosaka K, Sakamoto KEI, Newton M, Sacco P (2001) How long does the protective effect on eccentric exercise induced muscle damage last? Med Sci Sport Exerc 33:1490–1495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen TC, Nosaka K (2006) Responses of elbow flexors to two strenous eccentric exercise bouts separated by three days. J Strength Cond Res 20:108–116

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Howatson G, Van Someren K, Hortobágyi T (2007) Repeated bout effect after maximal eccentric exercise. Int J Sports Med 28:557–563. doi:10.1055/s-2007-964866

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lavender AP, Nosaka K (2008) A light load eccentric exercise confers protection against a subsequent bout of more demanding eccentric exercise. J Sci Med Sport 11:291–298. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2007.03.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McHugh MP, Connolly DA, Eston RG et al (2001) Electromyographic analysis of repeated bouts of eccentric exercise. J Sports Sci 19:163–170. doi:10.1080/026404101750095295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McHugh MP, Tetro DT (2003) Changes in the relationship between joint angle and torque production associated with the repeated bout effect. J Sports Sci 21:927–932. doi:10.1080/0264041031000140400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chapman DW, Newton MJ, Zainuddin Z et al (2008) Work and peak torque during eccentric exercise do not predict changes in markers of muscle damage. Br J Sports Med 42:585–591. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2007.037929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Howatson G, van Someren KA (2007) Evidence of a contralateral repeated bout effect after maximal eccentric contractions. Eur J Appl Physiol 101:207–214. doi:10.1007/s00421-007-0489-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chapman DW, Newton M, McGuigan MR, Nosaka K (2008) Comparison between old and young men for responses to fast velocity maximal lengthening contractions of the elbow flexors. Eur J Appl Physiol 104:531–539. doi:10.1007/s00421-008-0806-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Guilhem G, Cornu C, Guével A (2011) Muscle architecture and EMG activity changes during isotonic and isokinetic eccentric exercises. Eur J Appl Physiol 111:2723–2733. doi:10.1007/s00421-011-1894-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Guilhem G, Cornu C, Maffiuletti NA, Guével A (2012) Neuromuscular Adaptations to Isoload versus Isokinetic Eccentric Resistance Training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e31826e7066

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nosaka K, Newton M, Sacco P (2002) Delayed-onset muscle soreness does not reflect the magnitude of eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage. Scand J Med Sci Sports 12:337–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Brzycki M (1993) Strength testing—predicting a one-rep max from reps-to-fatigue. J Phisical Edu Recreat Danc 68:88–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Paddon-Jones D, Keech A, Lonergan A, Abernethy P (2005) Differential expression of muscle damage in humans following acute fast and slow velocity eccentric exercise. J Sci Med Sport 8:255–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cleak MJ, Eston RG (1992) Muscle soreness, swelling, stiffness and strength loss after intense eccentric exercise. Br J Sports Med 26:267–272. doi:10.1136/bjsm.26.4.267

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Paschalis V, Koutedakis Y, Baltzopoulos V et al (2005) Short vs long length of rectus femoris during eccentric exercise in relation to muscle damage in healthy males. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 20:617–622. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Guilhem G, Guével A, Cornu C (2010) A standardization method to compare isotonic vs. isokinetic eccentric exercises. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 20:1000–1006. doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.03.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pincivero DM, Salfetnikov Y, Campy RM, Coelho AJ (2004) Angle- and gender-specific quadriceps femoris muscle recruitment and knee extensor torque. J Biomech 37:1689–1697. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chapman D, Newton M, Sacco P, Nosaka K (2006) Greater muscle damage induced by fast versus slow velocity eccentric exercise. Int J Sports Med 27:591–598. doi:10.1055/s-2005-865920

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shepstone TN, Tang JE, Dallaire S et al (2005) Short-term high- vs. low-velocity isokinetic lengthening training results in greater hypertrophy of the elbow flexors in young men. J Appl Physiol 98:1768–1776. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01027.2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jones DA, Newham DJ, Round JM, Tolfree SE (1986) Experimental human muscle damage: morphological changes in relation to other indices of damage. J Physiol 375:435–448

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jones DA, Newham DJ, Torgan C (1989) Mechanical influences on long-lasting human muscle fatigue and delayed-onset pain. J Physiol 412:415–427

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nosaka K, Clarkson PM (1996) Variability in serum creatine kinase response after eccentric exercise of the elbow flexors. Int J Sports Med 17:120–127. doi:10.1055/s-2007-972819

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kanda K, Sugama K, Sakuma J et al (2014) Evaluation of serum leaking enzymes and investigation into new biomarkers for exercise-induced muscle damage. Exerc Immunol Rev 20:39–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Paschalis V, Baltzopoulos V, Mougios V et al (2008) Isokinetic eccentric exercise of quadriceps femoris does not affect running economy. J Strength Cond Res 22:1222–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Byrne C, Eston RG, Edwards RH (2001) Characteristics of isometric and dynamic strength loss following eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage. Scand J Med Sci Sports 11:134–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Le Pera D, Graven-Nielsen T, Valeriani M et al (2001) Inhibition of motor system excitability at cortical and spinal level by tonic muscle pain. Clin Neurophysiol 112:1633–1641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Proske U, Weerakkody NS, Percival P et al (2003) Muscle mechanics and energetics : a comparative view force-matching errors after eccentric exercise attributed to muscle soreness. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 30:576–579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Morgan DL (1990) New insights into the behavior of muscle during active lengthening. Biophys J 57:209–221. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82524-8

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hortobagyi T, Houmard J, Fraser D et al (1998) Normal forces and myofibrillar disruption after repeated eccentric exercise. J Appl Physiol 84:492–498

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pizza FX, Davis BH, Henrickson SD et al (1996) Adaptation to eccentric exercise: effect on CD64 and CD11b/CD18 expression. J Appl Physiol 80:47–55

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by XXIV doctorate cycle fund scholarship, University of Verona.

Conflict of interest

G. Coratella and L. Bertinato declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Coratella.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coratella, G., Bertinato, L. Isoload vs isokinetic eccentric exercise: a direct comparison of exercise-induced muscle damage and repeated bout effect. Sport Sci Health 11, 87–96 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-014-0213-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-014-0213-x

Keywords

Navigation