Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A computational study of the dynamics of LTR retrotransposons in the Populus trichocarpa genome

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Tree Genetics & Genomes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Retrotransposons are an ubiquitous component of plant genomes, especially abundant in species with large genomes. Populus trichocarpa has a relatively small genome, which was entirely sequenced; however, studies focused on poplar retrotransposons dynamics are rare. With the aim to study the retrotransposon component of the poplar genome, we have scanned the complete genome sequence searching full-length long-terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons, i.e., characterised by two long terminal repeats at the 5′ and 3′ ends. A computational approach based on detection of conserved structural features, on building multiple alignments, and on similarity searches was used to identify 1,479 putative full-length LTR retrotransposons. Ty1-copia elements were more numerous than Ty3-gypsy. However, many LTR retroelements were not assigned to any superfamily because lacking of diagnostic features and non-autonomous. LTR retrotransposon remnants were by far more numerous than full-length elements, indicating that during the evolution of poplar, large amplification of these elements was followed by DNA loss. Within superfamilies, Ty3-gypsy families are made of more members than Ty1-copia ones. Retrotransposition occurred with increasing frequency following the separation of Populus sections, with different waves of retrotransposition activity between Ty3-gypsy and Ty1-copia elements. Recently inserted elements appear more frequently expressed than older ones. Finally, different levels of activity of retrotransposons were observed according to their position and their density in the linkage groups. On the whole, the results support the view of retrotransposons as a community of different organisms in the genome, whose activity (both retrotransposition and DNA loss) has heavily impacted and probably continues to impact poplar genome structure and size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

RE:

Retrotransposon

LTR RE:

LTR retrotransposon

LTR:

Long terminal repeat

MY:

Million of years

MYA:

Million years ago

References

  • Ammiraju JS, Zuccolo A, Yu Y, Song X, Piegu P, Chevalier F, Walling JG, Ma J, Talag J, Brar DS, SanMiguel PJ, Jiang N, Jackson SA, Panaud O, Wing RA (2007) Evolutionary dynamics of an ancient retrotransposon family provides insights into evolution of genome size in the genus Oryza. Plant J 52:342–351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baucom RS, Estill JC, Chaparro C, Upshaw N, Jogi A, Deragon JM, Westerman RP, SanMiguel PJ, Bennetzen JL (2009a) Exceptional diversity, non-random distribution, and rapid evolution of retroelements in the B73 maize genome. PLoS Genet 5:e1000732. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baucom RS, Estill JC, Leebens-Mack J, Bennetzen JL (2009b) Natural selection on gene function drives the evolution of LTR retrotransposon families in the rice genome. Genome Res 19:243–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beguiristain T, Grandbastien MA, Puigdomenech P, Casacuberta JM (2001) Three Tnt1 subfamilies show different stress-associated patterns of expression in tobacco. Consequences for retrotransposon control and evolution in plants. Plant Physiol 127:212–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennetzen JL, Ma J, Devos KM (2005) Mechanisms of recent genome size variation in flowering plants. Ann Bot 95:127–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benson G (1999) Tandem Repeat Finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucl Acids Res 27:573–580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boeke JD, Corces VG (1989) Transcription and reverse transcription of retrotransposons. Ann Rev Microbiol 43:403–434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallini A, Natali L, Zuccolo A, Giordani T, Jurman I, Ferrillo V, Vitacolonna N, Sarri V, Cattonaro F, Ceccarelli M, Cionini PG, Morgante M (2010) Analysis of transposons and repeat composition of the sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genome. Theor Appl Genet 120:491–508

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Charles M, Belcram H, Just J, Huneau C, Viollet A, Couloux A, Segurens B, Carter M, Huteau V, Coriton O, Appels R, Samain S, Chalhoub B (2008) Dynamics and differential proliferation of transposable elements during the evolution of the B and A genomes of wheat. Genetics 180:1071–1086

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devos KM, Brown JKM, Bennetzen JL (2002) Genome size reduction through illegitimate recombination counteracts genome expansion in Arabidopsis. Genome Res 12:1075–1079

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eckenwalder JE (1996) Systematics and evolution of Populus. In: Stettler RF, Bradshaw HD, Heilman PE, Hinckley TM (eds) Biology of Populus and its implications for management and conservation. NRC Research Press, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, pp 7–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaut BS (1998) Molecular clocks and nucleotide substitution rates in higher plants. In: Hecht MK, Macintyre RJ, Clegg MT (eds) Evolutionary Biology, vol 30. Plenum, New York, pp 93–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover C, Hawkins J, Wendel J (2008) Phylogenetic insights into the paceand pattern of plant genome size evolution. In: Volff JN (ed) Plant genomes. Genome dynamics, vol 4. Karger, Basel, pp 57–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins JS, Kim HR, Nason JD, Wing RA, Wendel JF (2006) Differential lineage-specific amplification of transposable elements is responsible for genome size variation in Gossypium. Genome Res 16:1252–1261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins JS, Hu G, Rapp RA, Grafenberg JL, Wendel JF (2008) Phylogenetic determination of the pace of transposable element proliferation in plants: Copia and LINE-like elements in Gossypium. Genome 51:11–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang X, Madan A (1999) CAP3: A DNA sequence assembly program. Genome Res 9:868–877

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Islam-Faridi MN, Nelson CD, DiFazio SP, Gunter LE, Tuskan GA (2009) Cytogenetic analysis of Populus trichocarpa—ribosomal DNA, telomere repeat sequence, and marker-selected BACs. Cytogenet Genome Res 125:74–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang N, Jordan IK, Wessler SR (2002) Dasheng and RIRE2. A nonautonomous long terminal repeat element and its putative autonomous partner in the rice genome. Plant Physiol 130:1697–1705

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jurka J, Kapitonov VV, Pavlicek A, Klonowski P, Kohany O, Walichiewicz J (2005) Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet Genome Res 110:462–467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalendar R, Tanskanen J, Immonen S, Nevo E, Schulman AH (2000) Genome evolution of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) by BARE-1 retrotransposon dynamics in response to sharp microclimatic divergence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:6603–6607

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalendar R, Vicient CM, Peleg O, Anamthawat-Jonsson K, Bolshoyb A, Schulman AH (2004) Large retrotransposon derivatives: abundant, conserved but nonautonomous retroelements of barley and related genomes. Genetics 166:1437–1450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kashkush K, Feldman M, Levy AA (2003) Transcriptional activation of retrotransposons alters the expression of adjacent genes in wheat. Nat Genet 33:102–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klevebring D, Street NR, Fahlgren N, Kasschau KD, Carrington JC, Lundeberg J, Jansson S (2009) Genome-wide profiling of Populus small RNAs. BMC Genomics 10:620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Bennetzen J (1999) Plant retrotransposons. Annu Rev Genet 33:479–532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Le Rouzic A, Dupas S, Capy P (2007) Genome ecosystem and transposable elements species. Gene 390:214–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lisch D (2009) Epigenetic regulation of transposable elements in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 60:43–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma J, Bennetzen JL (2004) Rapid recent growth and divergence of rice nuclear genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:12404–12410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma J, Devos KM, Bennetzen JL (2004) Analyses of LTR-retrotransposon structures reveal recent and rapid genomic DNA loss in rice. Genome Res 14:860–869

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maestrini P, Cavallini A, Rizzo M, Giordani T, Bernardi R, Durante M, Natali L (2009) Isolation and expression analysis of low temperature-induced genes in white poplar (Populus alba). J Plant Physiol 166:1544–1556

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers BC, Tingey SV, Morgante M (2001) Abundance, distribution, and transcriptional activity of repetitive elements in the maize genome. Genome Res 11:1660–1676

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ming R, Hou S, Feng Y, Yu Q, Dionne-Laporte A, Albert H, Suzuki JY, Tripathi S, Moore PH, Gonsalves D (2008) The draft genome of the transgenic tropical fruit tree papaya (Carica papaya Linnaeus). Nature 452:991–997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moisy C, Garrison KE, Meredith CP, Pelsy F (2008) Characterization of ten novel Ty1/Copia-like retrotransposon families of the grapevine genome. BMC Genomics 9:469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morse AM, Peterson DG, Islam-Faridi MN, Smith KE, Magbanua Z, Garcia SA, Kubisiak TL, Amerson HV, Carlson JE, Nelson CD, Davis JM (2009) Evolution of genome size and complexity in Pinus. PLoS One 4:e4332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Gojobori T (1986) Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol Biol Evol 3:418–426

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann P, Koblizkova A, Navratilova A, Macas J (2006) Significant expansion of Vicia pannonica genome size mediated by amplification of a single type of giant retroelement. Genetics 173:1047–1056

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Bruggmann R, Dubchak I, Grimwood J, Gundlach H, Haberer G, Hellsten U, Mitros T, Poliakov A, Schmutz J, Spannagl M, Tang H, Wang X, Wicker T, Bharti AK, Chapman J, Feltus FA, Gowik U, Grigoriev I, Lyons E, Maher CA, Martis M, Narechania A, Otillar RP, Penning BW, Salamov AA, Wang Y, Zhang L, Carpita NC, Freeling M, Gingle AR, Hash CT, Keller B, Klein P, Kresovich S, McCann MC, Ming R, Peterson DG, Rahman M, Ware D, Westhoff P, Mayer KFX, Messing M, Rokhsar DS (2009) The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 457:551–556

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paux E, Roger D, Badaeva E, Gay G, Bernard M, Sourdille P, Feuillet C (2006) Characterizing the composition and evolution of homoeologous genomes in hexaploid wheat through BAC-end sequencing on chromosome 3B. Plant J 48:463–474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal J, Das S, Khurana DK, Srivastava PS, Lakshmikumaran M (1999) Molecular characterization and distribution of a 145-bp tandem repeat family in the genus Populus. Genome 42:909–918

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ralph S, Oddy C, Cooper D, Yueh H, Jancsik S, Kolosova N, Philippe RN, Aeschliman D, White R, Huber D, Ritland CE, Benoit F, Rigby T, Nantel A, Butterfield YSN, Kirkpatrick R, Chun E, Liu J, Palmquist D, Wynhoven B, Stott J, Yang G, Barber S, Holt RA, Siddiqui A, Jones SJM, Marra MA, Ellis BE, Douglas CJ, Ritland K, Bohlmann J (2006) Genomics of hybrid poplar (Populus trichocarpa × deltoides) interacting with forest tent caterpillars (Malacosoma disstria): normalized and full-length cDNA libraries, expressed sequence tags, and a cDNA microarray for the study of insect-induced defences in poplar. Mol Ecol 15:1275–1297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rozas J, Rozas R (1999) DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis. Bioinformatics 15:174–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sabot F, Schulman AH (2006) Parasitism and the retrotransposon life cycle in plants: a hitchhiker’s guide to the genome. Heredity 97:381–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SanMiguel P, Tikhonov A, Springer PS, Edwards KJ, Zakharov D, Melake-Berhan A, Springer PS, Edwards KJ, Lee M, Avramova Z, Bennetzen JL (1996) Nested retrotransposons in the intergenic regions of the maize genome. Science 274:765–768

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SanMiguel P, Gaut BS, Tikhonov A, Nakajima Y, Bennetzen JL (1998) The paleontology of intergene retrotransposons of maize. Nature Genet 20:43–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santini S, Cavallini A, Natali L, Minelli S, Maggini F, Cionini PG (2002) Ty1/Copia- and Ty3/Gypsy-like DNA sequences in Helianthus species. Chromosoma 111:192–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS, Stein JC, Wei F, Pasternak S, Liang C, Zhang J, Fulton L, Graves TA, Minx P, Reily AD, Courtney L, Kruchowski SS, Tomlinson C, Strong C, Delehaunty K, Fronick C, Courtney B, Rock SM, Belter E, Du F, Kim K, Abbott RM, Cotton M, Levy A, Marchetto P, Ochoa K, Jackson SM, Gillam B, Chen W, Yan L, Higginbotham J, Cardenas M, Waligorski J, Applebaum E, Phelps L, Falcone J, Kanchi K, Thane T, Scimone A, Thane N, Henke J, Wang T, Ruppert J, Shah N, Rotter K, Hodges J, Ingenthron E, Cordes M et al (2009) The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 326:1112–1115. doi:1126/science.1178534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seberg O, Petersen G (2009) A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements should reflect their phylogeny. Nature Rev Genet 10:276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sterck L, Rombauts S, Jansson S, Sterky F, Rouzé P, Van de Peer Y (2005) EST data suggest that poplar is an ancient polyploid. New Phytol 167:165–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sterky F, Bhalerao RR, Unneberg P, Segerman B, Nilsson P, Brunner AM, Charbonnel-Campaa L, Lindvall JJ, Tandre K, Strauss SH, Sundberg B, Gustafsson P, Uhlen M, Bhalerao RP, Nilsson O, Sandberg G, Karlsson J, Lundeberg J, Jansson S (2004) A Populus EST resource for plant functional genomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:13951–13956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sugimoto K, Takeda S, Hirochika H (2000) MYB-related transcription factor NtMYB2 induced by wounding and elicitors is a regulator of the tobacco retrotransposon tto1 and defense-related genes. Plant Cell 12:2511–2528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • The French-Italian Public Consortium for Grape Genome Characterization (2007) The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature 449:463–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The International Rice Genome Sequencing Project (2005) The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature 436:793–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JD, Desmond G, Gibson H, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucl Acids Res 22:4673–4680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Z, Rizzon C, Du JC, Zhu L, Bennetzen JL, Jackson SA, Gaut BS, Ma J (2009) Do genetic recombination and gene density shape the pattern of DNA elimination in rice long terminal repeat retrotransposons? Genome Res 19:2221–2230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tuskan GA, DiFazio S, Jansson S, Bohlmann J, Grigoriev I, Hellsten U, Putnam N, Ralph S, Rombauts S, Salamov A, Schein J, Sterck L, Aerts A, Bhalerao RR, Bhalerao RP, Blaudez D, Boerjan W, Brun A, Brunner A, Busov V, Campbell M, Carlson J, Chalot M, Chapman J, Chen GL, Cooper D, Coutinho PM, Couturier J, Covert S, Cronk Q, Cunningham R, Davis J, Degroeve S, Déjardin A, dePamphilis C, Detter J, Dirks B, Dubchak I, Duplessis S, Ehlting J, Ellis B, Gendler K, Goodstein D, Gribskov M, Grimwood J, Groover A, Gunter L, Hamberger B, Heinze B, Helariutta Y et al (2006) The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 313:1596–1604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Venner S, Feschotte C, Biemont C (2009) Dynamics of transposable elements: towards a community ecology of the genome. Trends Genet 25:317–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vicient CM, Kalendar R, Schulman AH (2005) Variability, recombination, and mosaic evolution of the barley BARE-1 retrotransposon. J Mol Evol 61:275–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vitte C, Bennetzen JL (2006) Analysis of retrotransposon structural diversity uncovers properties and propensities in angiosperm genome evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:17638–17643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wawrzynski A, Ashfield T, Chen NWG, Mammadov J, Nguyen A, Podicheti R, Cannon SB, Thareau V, Ameline-Torregrosa C, Cannon E, Chacko B, Couloux A, Dalwani A, Denny R, Deshpande S, Egan AN, Glover N, Howell S, Ilut D, Lai H, Martin del Campo S, Metcalf M, O’Bleness M, Pfeil BE, Ratnaparkhe MB, Samain S, Sanders I, Ségurens B, Sévignac M, Sherman-Broyles S, Tucker DM, Yi J, Doyle JJ, Geffroy V, Roe BA, Saghai Maroof MA, Young NA, Innes RW (2008) Replication of nonautonomous retroelements in soybean appears to be both recent and common. Plant Physiol 148:1760–1771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wicker T, Sabot F, Hua-Van A, Bennetzen JL, Capy P, Chalhoub B, Flavell A, Leroy P, Morgante M, Panaud O, Paux E, SanMiguel P, Schulman AH (2007) A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements. Nature Rev Genet 8:973–982

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Witte CP, Le QH, Bureau T, Kumar A (2001) Terminal-repeat retrotransposons in miniature (TRIM) are involved in restructuring plant genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:13778–13783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Wang H (2007) LTR_FINDER: an efficient tool for the prediction of full-length LTR retrotransposons. Nucl Acids Res 35:W265–W268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki M, Tsugawa H, Miyao A, Yano M, Wu J, Yamamoto S, Matsumoto T, Sasaki T, Hirochika H (2001) The rice retrotransposon Tos17 prefers low-copy-number sequences as integration targets. Mol Genet Genomics 265:336–344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou F, Xu Y (2009) RepPop: a database for repetitive elements in Populus trichocarpa. BMC Genomics 10:14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zuccolo A, Sebastian A, Yu Y, Jackson S, Rounsley S, Billheimer D, Wing RA (2010) Assessing the extent of substitution rate variation of retrotransposon long terminal repeat sequences in Oryza sativa and Oryza glaberrima. Rice 3:242–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research work supported by PRIN-MIUR, Italy, Project “Verso la delucidazione delle basi molecolari dell’eterosi nelle piante coltivate: variazione cis-regolatoria ed espressione genica in ibridi di pioppo.” Thanks are due to Dr. Andrea Zuccolo (Arizona Genomics Institute, USA) and Dr. John A. Walsh (Warwick University, UK) for their critical reading of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Biologia delle Piante Agrarie, Università di Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124, Pisa, Italy

    Rosa Maria Cossu, Matteo Buti, Tommaso Giordani, Lucia Natali & Andrea Cavallini

Authors
  1. Rosa Maria Cossu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matteo Buti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tommaso Giordani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lucia Natali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Andrea Cavallini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Cavallini.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Wegrzyn

Electronic supplemental materials

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 2028 kb)

ESM 2

(JPEG 147 kb)

High resolution image file (TIFF 128 kb)

ESM 3

(JPEG 105 kb)

High resolution image file (TIFF 81 kb)

ESM 4

(TXT 0 kb)

ESM 5

(JPEG 264 kb)

High resolution image file (TIFF 152 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cossu, R.M., Buti, M., Giordani, T. et al. A computational study of the dynamics of LTR retrotransposons in the Populus trichocarpa genome. Tree Genetics & Genomes 8, 61–75 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-011-0421-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-011-0421-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation