Skip to main content
Log in

Socially-Optimal and Nash Pareto-Based Alternatives for Water Allocation under Uncertainty: an Approach and Application

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study has proposed a methodology by enhancing an interactive algorithm to multi-objective optimization problems with interval parameters, in an attempt to reach the tradeoff between quality and reliability of the resultant optimum solutions. The earlier algorithm could turn into a prolonged procedure that deals with several players with different aspirations at different reliability, or risk, levels under non-deterministic conditions. Hence, it is not a pertinent approach to solve problems of water allocation between competing parties. The enhanced methodology aims to alleviate the burdens of the procedure and generate a unique set of solutions (i.e., near-Pareto-optimal alternatives), instead of a myriad of compromise solution sets. We have investigated a real-world hydro-environmental problem, the allocation of water between Dorudzan-Korbal irrigation networks and Bakhtegan Lake in Fars Province, Iran to assess feasibility of this methodology. In order to reach a consensus concerning the stakeholders’ individual preferences, we identified the compromise alternatives from the obtained sets of non-dominated solutions by taking advantage of various social choice rules and the Nash bargaining model. The results demonstrated that the developed methodology could incorporate the risk of system constraints violations (i.e., planning reliability under uncertainty) into the process of approximating the optimal tradeoff set of solutions. It also gave policymakers a chance to acquire perception into the potentially best compromise for land and water allocation schemes regarding the preference profiles of the involved interest groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alizadeh MR, Nikoo MR, Rakhshandehroo GR (2017a) Developing a multi-objective conflict-resolution model for optimal groundwater management based on fallback bargaining models and social choice rules: a case study. Water Resour Manag 31:1457–1472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alizadeh MR, Nikoo MR, Rakhshandehroo GR (2017b) Hydro-environmental management of groundwater resources: A fuzzy-based multi-objective compromise approach. J Hydrol 551:540–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arsanjani TJ, Javidan R, Nazemosadat MJ, Arsanjani JJ, Vaz E (2015) Spatiotemporal monitoring of Bakhtegan Lake's areal fluctuations and an exploration of its future status by applying a cellular automata model. Comput Geosci 78:37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colapinto C, Jayaraman R, Marsiglio S (2017) Multi-criteria decision analysis with goal programming in engineering, management and social sciences: a state-of-the art review. Ann Oper Res 251(1–2):7–40

  • Connor R (2015) The United Nations world water development report 2015: water for a sustainable world vol 1. UNESCO Publishing

  • Das B, Singh A, Panda SN, Yasuda H (2015) Optimal land and water resources allocation policies for sustainable irrigated agriculture. Land Use Policy 42:527–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davijani MH, Banihabib M, Anvar AN, Hashemi S (2016) Optimization model for the allocation of water resources based on the maximization of employment in the agriculture and industry sectors. J Hydrol 533:430–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6:182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farhadi S, Nikoo MR, Rakhshandehroo GR, Akhbari M, Alizadeh MR (2016) An agent-based-nash modeling framework for sustainable groundwater management: A case study. Agric Water Manag 177:348–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazlali A, Shourian M (2018) A Demand Management Based Crop and Irrigation Planning Using the Simulation-Optimization Approach. Water Resour Manage 32(1):67–81

  • Fooladmand HR, Ahmadi SH (2009) Monthly spatial calibration of Blaney–Criddle equation for calculating monthly ETo in south of Iran. Irrig Drain 58:234–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemi MM, Karamouz M, Shui LT (2016) Farm-based cropping pattern optimization and conjunctive use planning using piece-wise genetic algorithm (PWGA): a case study. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment 2:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman NB (1999) Accepting the standardized precipitation index: a calculation algorithm. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35:311–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han Y, Huang Y-F, Wang G-Q, Maqsood I (2011) A multi-objective linear programming model with interval parameters for water resources allocation in Dalian city. Water Resour Manag 25:449–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiani T, Ramesht MH, Maleki A, Safakish F (2017) Analyzing the impacts of climate change on water level fluctuations of Tashk and Bakhtegan Lakes and its role in environmental sustainability. Open Journal of Ecology 7:158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis A, Randall M (2017) Solving multi-objective water management problems using evolutionary computation. J Environ Manag 204:179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Guo P, Singh VP, Yang G (2016) An uncertainty-based framework for agricultural water-land resources allocation and risk evaluation. Agric Water Manag 177:10–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madani K (2014) Water management in Iran: what is causing the looming crisis? J Environ Stud Sci 4:315–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madani K, Read L, Shalikarian L (2014) Voting under uncertainty: a stochastic framework for analyzing group decision making problems. Water Resour Manag 28:1839–1856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madani K, AghaKouchak A, Mirchi A (2016) Iran’s socio-economic drought: challenges of a water-bankrupt nation. Iran Stud 49:997–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin WE, Shields DJ, Tolwinski B, Kent B (1996) An application of social choice theory to USDA Forest Service decision making. J Policy Model 18:603–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nafarzadegan AR, Rezaeian Zadeh M, Kherad M, Ahani H, Gharehkhani A, Karampoor M, Kousari M (2012) Drought area monitoring during the past three decades in Fars province, Iran. Quat Int 250:27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash J (1953) Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica 21:128–140

  • Nicklow J et al (2009) State of the art for genetic algorithms and beyond in water resources planning and management. J Water Resour Plan Manag 136:412–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu G, Li Y, Huang G, Liu J, Fan Y (2016) Crop planning and water resource allocation for sustainable development of an irrigation region in China under multiple uncertainties. Agric Water Manag 166:53–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla S, Wood AW (2008) Use of a standardized runoff index for characterizing hydrologic drought. Geophys Res Lett 35:L02405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A (2017) Optimal allocation of water and land resources for maximizing the farm income and minimizing the irrigation-induced environmental problems. Stoch Env Res Risk A 31:1147–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torabi Haghighi A, Kløve B (2017) Design of environmental flow regimes to maintain lakes and wetlands in regions with high seasonal irrigation demand. Ecol Eng 100:120–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urli B, Nadeau R (1992) An interactive method to multiobjective linear programming problems with interval coefficients. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research 30:127–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Huang G (2014) An integrated approach for water resources decision making under interactive and compound uncertainties. Omega 44:32–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zekavat SM (1997) The state of the environment in Iran. J Dev Soc 13:49–72

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hassan Vagharfard.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Highlights

• An interval-parameter model for water allocation between contesting parties is developed.

• A previously proposed algorithm to solve interval multi-objective problems is enhanced.

• An optimal trade-off between system objectives and failure risks is acquired.

• The compromise policies are selected from the Pareto-approximate set of alternatives.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(PDF 362 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nafarzadegan, A.R., Vagharfard, H., Nikoo, M.R. et al. Socially-Optimal and Nash Pareto-Based Alternatives for Water Allocation under Uncertainty: an Approach and Application. Water Resour Manage 32, 2985–3000 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1969-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1969-6

Keywords

Navigation