Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Factors Affecting Water Utility Companies’ Decision to Promote the Reduction of Household Water Consumption

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper investigates the factors affecting water utility companies’ decision to implement public information campaigns aimed at promoting sustainable water use and reducing household water consumption. We have analyzed 114 Italian water utility companies. For each we hand-collected data regarding their suggestions for reducing household water consumption and sustainable reporting information, published on the corporate websites. We then classified each utility on the basis of their ownership, diversification, location, sales, population served, tariff and annual rainfall. Using M-quantile regression for count data we have constructed a performance measure of Italian water utility companies and have ranked them by the identification of a unique M-quantile coefficient associated with each datum observed. The paper provides some interesting insights into the type of companies most sensitive to water sustainability issues, providing potential guidance to policy makers in defining a water management framework and selecting firms to manage water services. Larger firms located in the center of Italy, in drought regions and the driest areas, seem to be more sensitive to promoting the reduction of household water consumption. Moreover, companies operating only in the water business that are publicly owned and apply lower tariffs embody the type of institutions that make greater use of web information campaigns to reduce consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreasen A (1994) Social marketing: its definition and domain. J Public Policy Mark 13(1):108–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen A (1995) Marketing social change: changing behavior to promote health, social development, and the environment. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett G (2004) Water conservation: the role of price and regulation in residential water consumption. Econ Pap: A J Appl Econ Pol 23(3):271–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett G, Wallace M (2011) An institutional economics perspective: the impact of water provider privatisation on water conservation in England and Australia. Water Resour Manag 25(5):1325–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bithas K (2008) The sustainable residential water use: sustainability, efficiency and social equity. The European experience. Ecol Econ 68(1–2):221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breckling J, Chambers R (1988) M-quantile. Biometrika 75(4):761–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantoni E, Ronchetti E (2001) Robust inference for generalized linear models. J Am Stat Assoc 96(455):1022–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho P, Marques RC (2011) The influence of the operational environment on the efficiency of water utilities. J Environ Manag 92(10):2698–2707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R, Tzavidis N (2006) M-quantile models for small area estimation. Biometrika 93(2):255–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R, Salvati N, Tzavidis N (2012) Semi-parametric small area estimation for binary out- comes with applications in estimating unemployment and poverty. Paper submitted for publication and available from the author upon request.

  • Co.n.vi.ri. (2009, 2011) Rapporto sullo Stato dei Servizi Idrici. Roma

  • Dalhuisen JM, Nijkamp P (2002) Critical factors for achieving multiple goals with water tariff systems: combining limited data sources and expert testimony. Water Resour Res 38(7):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Witte K, Marques RC (2009) Capturing the environment, a metafrontier approach to the drinking water sector. Int T Oper Res 16:257–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delorme DE, Hagen SC, Stout IJ (2003) Consumers’ perspectives on water issues: directions for educational campaigns. J Environ Educ 34(2):28–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworak T, Berglund M, Strosser P, Roussard J, Kossida M, Berbel J, Kolberg S (2007) Final report EU Water saving potential (Part 1 –Report). Ecologic - Institute for International and European Environmental Policy

  • Espey M, Espey J, Shaw WD (1997) Price elasticity of residential demand for water: a meta-analysis. Water Resour Res 33(6):1369–1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding KS, Spinks A, Russell S, McCrea R, Stewart R, Gardner J (2013) An experimental test of voluntary strategies to promote urban water demand management. J Environ Manag 114:343–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick PH (1998) Water in crisis: paths to sustainable water use. Ecol Appl 8(3):571–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick PH, Loh P, Gomez S, Morrison J (1995) California water 2020: a sustainable vision. Pacific Institute Report. Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Gómez F, García‐Rubio MA, Alcalá-Olid F, Ortega-Díaz MI (2013) Outsourcing and efficiency in the management of rural water services. Water Resour Manag 27(3):731–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrini A, Romano G, Campedelli B (2011) Factors affecting the performance of water utility companies. Int J Public Sect Manag 24(6):543–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrini A, Romano G, Campedelli B (2013) Economies of scale, scope, and density in the Italian water sector: a two-stage data envelopment analysis approach. Water Resour Manag 27(13):4559–4578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth D (1999) Privatization. A help or hindrance in managing water demand? Water Resour Updat 114:18–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Istat N(2013) http://noiitalia2013.istat.it/index.php?id=7&user_100ind_pi1[id_pagina]=412&cHash=8dc3d92233e3e5ab302062403

  • Kaïka M (2003) The water framework directive: a new directive for a changing social, political and economic European framework. Eur Plan Stud 11(3):303–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallis G, Ray I, Fulton J, McMahon JE (2010) Public versus private: does it matter for water conservation? Insights from California. Environ Manag 45:177–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker R, Bassett G (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46:33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokic P, Chambers R, Breckling J, Beare S (1997) A measure of production performance. J Bus Econ Stat 15(4):445–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P, Andreasen A (1996) Strategic marketing for non-profit organizations. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee M, Tansel B, Balbin M (2011) Influence of residential water use efficiency measures on household water demand: a four year longitudinal study. Resour Conserv Recycl 56(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Espiñeira R (2002) Residential water demand in the Northwest of Spain. Environ Resour Econ 21:161–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Espiñeira R, Nauges C (2004) Is all domestic water consumption sensitive to price control? Appl Econ 36(15):1697–1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzanti M, Montini A (2006) The determinants of residential water demand: empirical evidence for a panel of Italian municipalities. Appl Econ Lett 13:107–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musolesi A, Nosvelli M (2007) Dynamics of residential water consumption in a panel of Italian municipalities. Appl Econ Lett 14:441–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newey W, Powell J (1987) Asymmetric least squares estimation and testing. Econometrica 55(4):819–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieswiadomy ML (1992) Estimating urban residential water demand: effects of price structure, conservation, and education. Water Resour Res 28(3):609–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2010) Pricing water resources and water and sanitation services, ed. OECD, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead SM (2010) The economics of managing scarce water resources. Rev Environ Econ Policy 4(2):179–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead SM, Stavins RN (2009) Comparing price and nonprice approaches to urban water conservation. Water Resour Res. 45(4)

  • Renwick ME, Green RD (2000) Do residential water demand side management policies measure up? An analysis of eight California water agencies. J Environ Econ Manag 40(1):37–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers P, deSilva R, Bhatia R (2002) Water is an economic good: how to use prices to promote equity, efficiency, and sustainability. Water Policy 4:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano G, Guerrini A (2011) Measuring and comparing the efficiency of water utility companies: a data envelopment analysis approach. Util. Policy 19:202–209

  • Romano G, Guerrini A, Vernizzi S (2013) Ownership, investment policies and funding choices of Italian water utilities: an empirical analysis. Water Resour Manag 27(9):3409–3419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano G, Salvati N, Guerrini A (2014) Estimating the determinants of residential water demand in Italy. Water 6(10):2929–2945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvati N, Tzavidis N, Pratesi M, Chambers R (2012) Small area estimation via M-quantile geographically weighted regression. TEST 21(1):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleich J, Hillenbrand T (2009) Determinants of residential water demand in Germany. Ecol Econ 68:1756–1769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statzu V, Strazzera E (2009) Water demand for residential uses in a mediterranean region: econometric analysis and policy implications. Available via http://www.cide.info/conf/2009/iceee2009_submission_88.pdf

  • Stead M, Gordon R, Angus K, McDermott L (2007a) A systematic review of social marketing effectiveness. Health Educ 107(2):126–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stead M, Hastings G, McDermott L (2007b) The meaning, effectiveness and future of social marketing. Obes Rev 8:189–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzavidis N, Ranalli MG, Salvati N, Dreassi E, Chambers R (2014) Robust small area prediction for counts. Stat Methods Med Res. doi:10.1177/0962280214520731

  • United Nations (2009) Water in a Changing World: The United Nations World Water Development Report

  • Veleva VR (2010) Managing corporate citizenship: a new tool for companies. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 17(1):40–51

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics and Management, University of Pisa, Via C. Ridolfi, 10, 56124, Pisa, Italy

    Giulia Romano & Nicola Salvati

  2. Department of Management, University of Verona, Via dell’Artigliere, 19, 37129, Verona, Italy

    Andrea Guerrini

Authors
  1. Giulia Romano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicola Salvati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrea Guerrini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giulia Romano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Romano, G., Salvati, N. & Guerrini, A. Factors Affecting Water Utility Companies’ Decision to Promote the Reduction of Household Water Consumption. Water Resour Manage 28, 5491–5505 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0818-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0818-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation