Skip to main content
Log in

An Institutional Economics Perspective: The Impact of Water Provider Privatisation on Water Conservation in England and Australia

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the context of the world-wide trend towards the privatisation of water supplies, this article uses institutional economics to examine the incentives for English and Australian water providers to implement strategies to reduce household water consumption. The authors hypothesise that the effective marketing of reduced domestic water consumption is likely to be strengthened by the extent of government control over water providers. This hypothesis is examined using a case study of ten English water companies (all privately owned and subject to identical government regulation) and ten Australian water utilities (with varying degrees of government ownership and regulation), focusing on their promotion of home retrofitting with water-efficient technology. The examination supports the hypothesis, leading to the conclusion that significant government control of water utilities is necessary to curb domestic water consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agboola JI, Braimoh AK (2009) Strategic partnership for sustainable management of aquatic resources. Water Resour Manag 23(13):2761–2775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2004) Water Account Australia 2000–01, Canberra: ABS, Catalogue Number 4610.0

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2005) Australian Social Trends, Other areas of social concern, household water use and conservation, Canberra: ABS, Catalogue Number 4102.0

  • Bakker K (2003) An uncooperative commodity: privatising water in England and Wales. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Barberán R, Arbués R (2009) Equity in domestic water rates design. Water Resour Manag 23:2101–2118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett G (2004) Water conservation: the role of price and regulation in residential water consumption. Econ Pap 23(3):271–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron C (2005) London in the later middle ages, government and people 1200–1500. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Butlin NG, Pincus JJ, Barnard A (1982) Government and capitalism: public and private choice in twentieth century Australia. George Allen & Unwin, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Centner T (2010) Discerning public participation requirements under the US Clean Water Act. Water Resour Manag 24:2113–2127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consumer Council for Water (2006) Using water wisely: report of Consumer Research Findings and Recommendations for Action. http://www.nao.org.uk and http://www.ccwater.org.uk. Accessed 16 March 2009

  • Coward DH (1988) Out of sight: environmental history, 1851–1981. Dissertation, Australian National University

  • Critchley R, Phipps D (2007) Water and energy efficient showers: project report. United Utilities and Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool

    Google Scholar 

  • Defra (2007) Water Savings Group Action Plan 2007/08. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London

  • Defra (2008) Future water: the government’s water strategy for England. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London

  • Environment Agency (2008) Water resources planning guideline. Environment Agency, Rotherham

  • Fadlelmawla A (2009) Towards sustainable water policy in Kuwait: reforms of the current practices and the required investments, institutional and legislative measures. Water Resour Manag 23:1969–1987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold Coast City Council (2005) Agenda for water sustainability committee meeting April 7. Gold Coast City Council, Gold Coast

  • Hall D (2001) Water privatisation and quality of service. Public Services International Research Unit, University of Greenwich, London

  • Hall D, Lobina E (2005) The relative efficiency of public and private sector water. Public Services International Research Unit, University of Greenwich, London

  • Hartley KJ (1997) Independent audit of the Bolivar wastewater treatment plant to determine the causes of a major odour Event. Uniquest, St Lucia

  • Howarth D (1999) Privatisation: a help or hindrance in managing water demand? J Contemp Water Res Edu 114:18–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallis G, Ray I, Fulton J, McMahon J (2010) Public versus private: does it matter for water conservation? Insights from California. Environmental Management 45:177–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P, Zaltman G (1971) Social marketing: an approach to planned social change. J Mark 35(3):3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P, Andreasen A (1996) Strategic marketing for non-profit organisations. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons S, O’Doherty J, Tol R (2010) Determinants of water connection type and ownership of water-using appliances in Ireland. Water Resour Manag 24:2853–2867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacFadyen L, Stead M, Hastings G (1999) A synopsis of social marketing. Stirling University Institute of Social Marketing, Stirling

  • McClellan P (1998) Sydney water inquiry (6 vols). Sydney Water Inquiry Secretariat, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie-Mohr D (2005) Community–based social marketing. Water 32(2):18–23

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan S (2000) The microscope and the moving target: the challenge of applying content analysis to the world wide web. Journal Mass Commun Q 77(1):80–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofwat (2002) Information note no 27. Ofwat, Birmingham

  • Ofwat (2005) Security of supply, leakage and efficient use of water 2004–05 report. Ofwat, Birmingham

  • Ofwat (2007a) Water efficiency initiatives- good practice register. Ofwat, Birmingham

  • Ofwat (2007b) June return reporting requirements and definitions manual. Ofwat, Birmingham

  • Ofwat (2008a) Fact sheet- regulating the companies: Ofwat’s role. Ofwat, Birmingham

  • Ofwat (2008b) Water efficiency targets 2010–11 to 2014–15. Ofwat, Birmingham

  • Phumpiu P, Gustafsson JE (2009) When are partnerships a viable tool for development? Institutions and Partnerships for Water Sanitation Service in Latin America

  • Sharp L (2006) Water demand management in England and Wales: constructions of the domestic water user. J Environ Plan Manag 49(6):869–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shove E (2003) Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: the Social Organisation of Normality. Berg, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe K, Wildman K, Wilshire M (2005) Showerhead retrofit schemes: a Social Marketing Perspective. Water 32(2):74–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang V (2004) The meaning of water. Berg, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace M, Barrett G (2005) Reducing domestic water use: lessons from marketing and economics. Water 32(2):68–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace M, Barrett G (2007) Social marketing of water conservation: the impact of privatisation and government regulation on Australian water utilities. Public Policy 2(2):141–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Services Association of Australia (2008) Water restrictions and storages. http://www.wsaa.asn.au/Media/Facts/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 31 January 2008

  • Weare C, Lin W (2000) Content analysis on the world wide web. Soc Sci Comput Rev 18(3):272–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Grant A, Sharma A, Chen D, Chen L (2010) Alternative water resources for rural residential development in Western Australia. Water Resour Manag 24:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greg Barrett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barrett, G., Wallace, M. An Institutional Economics Perspective: The Impact of Water Provider Privatisation on Water Conservation in England and Australia. Water Resour Manage 25, 1325–1340 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9747-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9747-0

Keywords

Navigation