Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the Effect of Missing Weather Data on Estimating Daily Reference Evapotranspiration Under Different Climatic Conditions

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous equations exist for estimating reference evapotranspiration (ETo). Relationships were often subject to rigorous local calibration, hence having limited global validity. The Penman–Monteith (P − M) equation is widely perceived as the best equation for estimating daily and monthly ETo in all climates. The main shortcoming of the P − M equation is that it requires numerous weather data that may not always be available. This study evaluates the methods to estimate missing data in the context of their influence on the performance of the ETo equations. The performance of other ETo equations under missing data are also compared. ETo equations are ranked individually in semi − humid and semi − arid climates based on their accuracy. Results indicate that the P − M equation is more sensitive in semi − arid climate than semi − humid climate under missing data conditions. The accuracy of the P − M equation under these conditions increases remarkably if any available relationships between dew point and minimum temperatures and also long–term average wind speed for each station are exploited. Finally, the minimum data requirements necessary for adequate performance of the P − M equation are air temperature for semi − humid climates, air temperature and wind speed for semi − arid climates, and the availability of a relationship between dew point and minimum temperature, especially for semi − arid climate. In absence of the satisfaction of such minimum requirements, the Hargreaves–Samani equation is preferable for semi − humid climates and the Hargreaves equation modified by Droogers and Allen (2002) for semi − arid climates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ababaei B (2014) Are weather generators robust tools to study daily reference evapotranspiration and irrigation requirement? Water Resour Manag 28:915–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abghari H, Ahmadi H, Besharat S, Rezaverdinejad V (2012) Prediction of daily pan evaporation using wavelet neural networks. Water Resour Manag 26:3639–3652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG (1996) Assessing integrity of weather data for reference evapotranspiration estimation. J Irrig Drain Eng 122(2):97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranpiration: guildlines for computing crop water requirements, fao irrigation and drainage paper no 56. Food and Agriculture Organisation, Land and Water, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai J, Liu Y, Lei T, Pereira LS (2007) Estimating reference evapotranspiration with the FAO Penman–Monteith equation using daily weather forecast messages. Agric For Meteorol 145(1):22–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan S, Shrivastava RK (2009) Performance evaluation of reference evapotranspiration estimation using climate based methods and artificial neural networks. Water Resour Manag 23:825–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiew FHS, Kamaladassa NN, Malano HM, McMahon TA (1995) Penman–Monteith, FAO–24 reference crop evapotranspiration and class–a pan data in Austrelia. Agric Water Manag 28(1):9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Citakoglu H, Cobaner M, Haktanir T, Kisi O (2014) Estimation of monthly mean reference evapotranspiration in Turkey. Water Resour Manag 28:99–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doorenbos J, Kassam AH (1979) Yield response to water. FAO irrigation and drainage paper No. 33. Rome, FAO

  • Doorenbos J, Pruitt WO (1975) Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements, irrigation and drainage paper no. 24, FAO–ONU, Rome, Italy. 168pp

  • Droogers P, Allen RG (2002) Estimating reference evapotranspiration under inaccurate data conditions. Irrig Drain Syst 16(1):33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmaeili A, Vazirzadeh S (2009) Water pricing for agricultural production in the South of Iran. Water Resour Manag 23:957–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer G, Tubiello H, Velthuizen V, Wiberg D (2006) Climate change impacts on irrigation water requirements: global and regional effects of mitigation. Technol Forecast Soc 74:1990–2080

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia M, Raes D, Allen RG, Herbas C (2006) Dynamics of reference evapotranspiration in the Bolivian highlands (Altiplano). Agric Forest Meteorol 125:67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavilán P, Lorite IJ, Tornero S, Berenjena J (2006) Regional calibration of Hargreaves equation for estimating reference ET in a semiarid environment. Agric Water Manag 81:257–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavilán P, Berengena J, Allen RG (2007) Measuring versus estimating net radiation and soil heat flux: impact on penman–Monteith reference ET estimates in semiarid regions. Agric Water Manag 89(3):275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George BA, Reddy BRS, Raghuwanshi NS, Wallender WW (2002) Decision support system for estimating reference evapotranspiration. J Irrig Drain Eng 128(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves GH, Samani ZA (1985) Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Trans ASAE 28(1):96–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves LG, Hargreaves GH, Riley JP (1985) Irrigation water requirements for Senegal river basin. J Irrig Drain Eng 111(3):265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess TM (1998) Trends in reference evapo–transpiration in the North East arid zone of Nigeria. J Arid Environ 38:99–115

  • Jensen ME, Haise HR (1963) Estimating evapotranspiration from solar radiation. J Irrig Drain Div Proc Am Soc Civ Eng 89:15–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen ME, Burman RD, Allen RG (1990) Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements. ASCE manuals and reports on engineering practice No. 70, ASCE, New York

  • Kimball JS, Running SW, Nemani R (1997) An improved method for estimating surface humidity from daily minimum temperature. Agric Forest Meteorol 85(1–2):87–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisi O, Cengiz TM (2013) Fuzzy genetic approach for estimating reference evapotranspiration of Turkey: Mediterranean region. Water Resour Manag 27:3541–3553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llasat MC, Snyder RL (1998) Data error effects on net radiation and evapotranspiration estimation. Agric Forest Meteorol 91(3–4):209–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez–Urrea R, De Santa Olalla FM, Fabeiro C, Moratalla A (2006) An evaluation of two hourly reference evapotranspiration equations for semiarid conditions. Agric Water Manag 86(3):277–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez–Cob A, Tejero–Juste M (2004) A wind–based qualitative calibration of the Hargreaves ETo estimation equation in semiarid regions. Agric Water Manag 64:251–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandagiri L, Kovoor GM (2006) Performance evaluation of reference evapotranspiration equations across a range of Indian climates. J Irrig Drain Eng 132(3):238–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models: 1. A discussion on principles. J Hydrol 10:45–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira LS (2005) Water and agriculture: facing water scarcity and environmental challenges. Agric Eng Int CIGR E J 7:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira AR, Pruitt WO (2004) Adaptation of the thornthwaite scheme for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration. Agric Water Manag 66(3):251–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perugu M, Singam AJ, Kamasani CSR (2013) Multiple linear correlation analysis of daily reference evapotranspiration. Water Resour Manag 27:1489–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahimikhoob A (2014) Comparison between M5 model tree and neural networks for estimating reference evapotranspiration in an arid environment. Water Resour Manag 28:657–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahimikhoob A, Behbahani MR, Fakheri J (2012) An evaluation of four reference evapotranspiration models in a subtropical climate. Water Resour Manag 26:2867–2881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahimikhoob A, Asadi M, Mashal M (2013) A comparison between conventional and M5 model tree methods for converting pan evaporation to reference evapotranspiration for semi-arid region. Water Resour Manag 27:4815–4826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravelli F, Rota P (1999) monthly frequency maps of reference crop evapotranspiration and crop water deficits in southern italy. irrigation experimentation office of the former Southern Italy development agency, Rome, Italy

  • Todorovic M (1999) Single–layer evapotranspiration model with variable canopy resistance. J Irrig Drain Eng 125(5):235–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trachkovich S, Kolakovich S (2009a) Evaluation of reference evapotranspiration equations under humid conditions. Water Resour Manag 23:3057–3067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trachkovich S, Kolakovich S (2009b) Wind–adjusted Turc equation for estimating reference evapotranspiration at humid European locations. Hydrol Res 40(1):45–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Trachkovich S, Kolakovich S (2009c) Estimating reference evapotranspiration using limited weather data. J Irrig Drain Eng 135(4):443–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trajkovic S (2007) Hargreaves versus Penman–Monteith under humid conditions. J Irrig Drain Eng 133(1):38–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turc L (1961) Estimation des besoins en eau d’irrigation, evapotranspiration potentielle, formule climatique simplifiee et mise a jour. Ann Agron 12(1):13–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderlinden K, Giraldez JV, Van Meirvenne M (2004) Assessing reference evapotranspiration by the Hargreaves method in Southern Spain. J Irrig Drain Eng 130(3):184–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventura F, Spano D, Duce P, Snyder RL (1999) An evaluation of common evapotranspiration equations. Nuovo Cimento della Soc Ital di Fis Nucl Part Fields 18(4):163–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu C–Y, Singh VP (2002) Cross comparison of empirical equations for calculating potential evapotranspiration with data from Switzerland. Water Resour Manag 16:197–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao C, Nan Z, Cheng G (2005) Evaluating methods of estimating and modelling spartial distribution of evapotranspiration in the Middle Heihe River Basin, China. Am J Environ Sci 1(4):278–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their precious and insightful comments and suggestions that greatly improved the quality of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Majidi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Majidi, M., Alizadeh, A., Vazifedoust, M. et al. Analysis of the Effect of Missing Weather Data on Estimating Daily Reference Evapotranspiration Under Different Climatic Conditions. Water Resour Manage 29, 2107–2124 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0782-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0782-0

Keywords

Navigation