Abstract
This paper describes a detailed evaluation of the performance and characteristic behaviour of four equations for estimating reference evapotranspiration (ET0) at eight meteorological sites in a subtropical climate. The equations assessed were: Makkink (MK), Turc (TC), Priestley–Taylor (PT) and Hargreaves (HG). The sites were distributed throughout the north of Iran and represent an intermediate humidity regime. The Penman–Monteith (PM) method was chosen as the standard for comparison and calibration of the above—mentioned four equations. Good correlation was found between the ET0 values estimated by each of the four empirical equations and the PM method for all the locations; however MK and TC equations produced considerable underestimations. The performance of the PT and HG equations improved slightly after region-specific coefficients were developed for each equation, and the TC and MK equations were improved greatly. The modified PT equation turned out to be the most precise method, demonstrating superiority over the other methods evaluated (0.48 mm d−1 of root mean square error (RMSE)). Good performance from the modified HG equation (0.53 mm d−1 of RMSE) must be emphasized, given the simplicity of that method, which only requires maximum and minimum air temperature data.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen RG (1996) Assessing integrity of weather data for reference evapotranspiration estimation. J Irrig Drain Eng 122(2):97–106
Allen RG (2003) REF-ET user’s guide. University of Idaho Kimberly Research Stations, Kimberly
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. In: FAO irrigation and drainage paper, no 56. FAO, Roma, Italy
Amatya DM, Skaggs RW, Gregory JD (1995) Comparison of methods for estimating REF-ET. J Irrig Drain Eng 121(6):427–435
Di Stefano C, Ferro V (1997) Estimation of evapotranspiration by Hargreaves formula and remote sensed data in semi-arid Mediterranean areas. J Agric Eng Res 68(3):189–199
Douglas EM, Jacobs JM, Sumner DM, Ray RL (2009) A comparison of models for estimating potential evapotranspiration for Florida land cover types. J Hydrol 373:366–376
Droogers P, Allen RG (2002) Estimating reference evapotranspiration under inaccurate data conditions. Irrig Drain Syst 16:33–45
Hargreaves GH, Allen RG (2003) History and evaluation of Hargreaves evapotranspiration equation. J Irrig Drain Eng 129(1):53–62
Hargreaves GH, Samani ZA (1985) Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Appl Eng Agric 1(2):96–99
Hargreaves LG, Hargreaves GH, Riley JP (1985) Irrigation water requirements for Senegal river basin. J Irrig Drain Eng 111(3):265–275
Irmak S, Allen RG, Whitty EB (2003) Daily grass and alfalfa-reference evapotranspiration estimates and alfalfa-to-grass evapotranspiration ratios in Florida. J Irrig Drain Eng 129(5):360–370
Jensen ME, Burman RD, Allen RG (1990) Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements. In: ASCE manuals and reports on engineering practice, no 70. ASCE, New York
Kosarev AN, Yablonskaya EA (1994) The Caspian Sea. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague
Landeras G, Ortiz-Barredo A, López JJ (2008) Comparison of artificial neural network models and empirical and semi-empirical equations for daily reference evapotranspiration estimation in the Basque Country (Northern Spain). Agric Water Manag 95(5):553–565
Makkink GF (1957) Testing the Penman formula by means of lysimeters. J Inst Water Eng 11(3):277–288
Meyer SJ, Hubbard KG, Wilhite DA (1989) Estimating potential evapotranspiration: the effect of random and systematic errors. Agric For Meteorol 46:285–296
Penman HL (1948) Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proc R Soc Lond 193:120–145
Priestley CHB, Taylor RJ (1972) On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large scale parameters. Mon Weather Rev 100:81–92
Rivington M, Bellocchi G, Matthews KB, Buchan K (2005) Evaluation of three model estimations of solar radiation at 24 UK stations. Agric For Meteorol 132:228–243
Rodionov SN (1994) Global and regional climate interaction: the Caspian Sea experience. Water science and technology library. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht
Suleiman AA, Hoogenboom G (2007) Comparison of Priestley-Taylor and FAO-56 Penman–Monteith for daily reference evapotranspiration estimation in Georgia. J Irrig Drain Eng 133(2):175–182
Tabari H (2010) Evaluation of reference crop evapotranspiration equations in various climates. Water Resour Manag 24:2311–2337
Trajkovic S, Kolakovic S (2009) Evaluation of reference evapotranspiration equations under humid conditions. Water Resour Manag 23:3057–3067
Turc L (1961) Estimation of irrigation water requirements, potential evapotranspiration: a simple climatic formula evolved up to date. Ann Agron 12:13–49 (in French)
Utset A, Farre I, Martinez-Cob A, Cavero J (2004) Comparing Penman–Monteith and Priestley–Taylor approaches as referenceevapotranspiration inputs for modeling maize water-use under Mediterranean conditions. Agric Water Manag 66(3):205–219
Vanderlinden K, Giraldez JV, Van Meirvenne M (2004) Assessing reference evapotranspiration by the Hargreaves method in southern Spain. J Irrig Drain Eng 130(3):184–191
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions which improved the content of the article. This study was done in Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Aburaihan Campus, University of Tehran.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rahimikhoob, A., Behbahani, M.R. & Fakheri, J. An Evaluation of Four Reference Evapotranspiration Models in a Subtropical Climate. Water Resour Manage 26, 2867–2881 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0054-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0054-9