Abstract
This paper presents the results of an investigation into the relationship between urban form and the performance of a water distribution system. The effect of new development or redevelopment on the performance of an expanded rehabilitation of the well-known Anytown water distribution system is examined to provide an insight into their interaction, which can be considered along with other aspects of renewal to achieve more sustainable urban areas. A range of urban growth rates, urban form and water efficiency strategies are studied in relation to the system’s key performance indicators of total cost, resilience and water quality. The urban forms considered in this work are compact/uniform, monocentric, polycentric and edge developments. These development patterns are representative of common development approaches widely applied in urban planning. They also correspond to future settlement patterns, based on adopting four future (socio-economic) scenarios so called Policy Reform (PR), Fortress World (FW), New Sustainability Paradigm (NSP), and Market Forces (MF) respectively. Three growth rates and two water demand efficiency levels are considered. It is concluded the rate and type of urban development has major implications for the redesign and operation of existing water infrastructure in terms of total cost, water quality and system resilience, with uniform expansion (PR) resulting in the most cost-effective system upgrade by a considerable margin. Polycentric expansion as a representative urban form for New Sustainability Paradigm is the least cost-effective if it relies on centralised water distribution system to provide service to customers. Edge expansion (MF) has both the cheapest and the most expensive expansion costs depending on location of the expansion. Monocentric urban development (FW) does not result in the most cost-effective system contrary to what has been reported in the literature. Water efficiency measures had relatively little impact on overall performance as it was balanced out with demand increase due to new growth.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altshuler AA, Gomez-Ibanez JA (1993) Regulation for revenue: the political economy of land use exactions. Brookings Institution Press; Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Washington, DC
Bano R, Reca J, Martinez J, Gil C (2011) Resilience indexes for water distribution network design: a performance analysis under demand uncertainty. Water Resour Manag 25:2351–2366
Blais P (1996) The economics of urban form, report prepared for the GTA Task force. Mimeographed, Toronto
Carter N, Kreutzwiser RD, de Loe RC (2005) Closing the circle: linking land use planning and water management at the local level. Land Use Policy 22:115–127
Chandapillai J, Sudheer KP, Saseendran S (2012) Design of water distribution network for equitable supply. Water Resour Manag 26:391–406
CLG (2009) The water efficiency calculator for new dwellings, Communities and Local Government, September 2009, 25 pp, http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/uploads/br/water_efficiency_calculator.pdf, accessed September 2012
CSH (2006) The Code for sustainable homes, a step-change in sustainable home building practice, Department for communities and local government. December 2006, 31 pp. http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/uploads/code_for_sust_homes.pdf, accessed September 2012
CWS (2004) Centre for Water Systems, benchmark networks for design and optimisation of water distribution networks, http://www.exeter.ac.uk/cws/benchmarks, accessed September 2012
Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197
Defra (2008) Future water: the government’s water strategy for England, Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), http://archive.defra.gov.uk/environment/quality/water/strategy/pdf/future-water.pdf, accessed September 2012
EA (2007) Hidden infrastructure: the pressures on environmental infrastructure, Environment Agency report. Bristol, UK. http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/pdf/GEHO0307BMCD-E-E.pdf, accessed September 2011
EA (2009) Demand for water in the 2050’s: briefing note. Environment Agency. Bristol, UK. http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/pdf/GEHO1208BPBY-E-E.pdf, accessed September 2012
Echenique M, Barton H, Hargreaves T, Mitchell G (2010) Sustainability of land use and transport in outer neighbourhoods, Solutions final report, https://www.suburbansolutions.ac.uk/Findings.aspx
EPA (2006) Growing toward more efficient water use: linking development, infrastructure, and drinking water policies. United States Environmental Protection Agency. USA, EPA-230-R-06-001. www.epa.gov/smartgrowth
Farmani R, Savic DA, Walters GA (2005a) Evolutionary multi-objective optimization in water distribution network design. J Eng Optim 37(2):167–185
Farmani R, Walters GA, Savic DA (2005b) Trade-off between total cost and reliability for Anytown water distribution network. ASCE J Water Resour Plan Manag 131(3):161–171
Farmani R, Walters GA, Savic DA (2006) Evolutionary multi-objective optimization of the design and operation of water distribution network: total cost vs. reliability vs. water quality. J Hydroinf 8(3):165–179
Filion YR (2008) Impact of urban form on energy use in water distribution systems. J Infrastruct Syst 14(4):337–346
Frank JE (1989) The costs of alternative development patterns: a review of the literature. Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC
Guy S, Marvin S (2000) Models and pathways: the diversity of sustainable urban futures. In: Williams K, Jenks M, Burton E (Eds) Achieving sustainable urban form, 9–18
IBI Group (1990) Greater Toronto area urban structure concepts study: summary report. Prepared for the Greater Toronto Coordinating Committee. Toronto
Marchand C, Charland J (1992) The rural urban fringe: a review of patterns and development costs. Intergovernmental Committee on Urban and Regional Research, Toronto
Moss T (2003) Utilities, land-use change, and urban development: brownfield sites as ‘cold-spots’ of infrastructure networks in Berlin. Environ Plan A 35:511–529
Newton P (2000) Urban form and environmental performance. In: Williams K, Jenks M, Burton E (Eds) Achieving sustainable urban form, 46–63
Raskin P, Banuri T, Gallopín G et al (2002) Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead, Polestar Series Report no. 10. Boston: Stockholm Environmental Institute. 111pp
Rossman LA (2000) EPANET users manual. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati
Skipworth P, Engelhardt M, Cashman A, Savic D, Saul A, Walters G (2002) Whole life costing for water distribution network management. Thomas Telford Publishing
Slater S, Marvin S, Newson M (1994) Land use planning and the water sector: a review of development plans and catchment management plans. Town Plan Rev 65(4):375–397
Todini E (2000) Looped water distribution networks design using a resilience index based heuristic approach. Urban Water 2(2):115–122
Walski TM et al (1987) Battle of networks models: epilogue. J Water Resour Plan Manag 113(2):191–203
Williams K, Jenks M, Burton E (2000) Achieving sustainable urban form: an introduction. Spon Press, London, pp 1–5
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the UK Engineering and Physical Science Research Council as part of the ReVISIONS and Urban Futures consortia under the Sustainable Urban Environment programme (grants EP/F007566/1 and EP/F007426/1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Farmani, R., Butler, D. Implications of Urban Form on Water Distribution Systems Performance. Water Resour Manage 28, 83–97 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0472-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0472-3