Skip to main content
Log in

Resilience Indexes for Water Distribution Network Design: A Performance Analysis Under Demand Uncertainty

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditionally, the optimal design of water distrubution networks has been dealt with using single-objective constrained approaches, where the aim is to minimize the network investment cost while maintaining minimum pressure head constraints at all nodes. However, in the last decade some authors have proposed multi-objective approaches which optimize other objectives than network investment cost. In most cases, these objectives have been formulated using the concept of resilience index, which mimics the design aim of providing excess head above the minimum allowable head at the nodes and of designing reliable loops with practicable pipe diameters. Although several authors have proposed different resilience indexes for this pupose, to date there is no empirical study that analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of these proposals. This paper evaluates the performance of a well-known multi-objective evolutionary algorithm, the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm 2, using three different resilience indexes. The results obtained in two water supply networks under a large number of simulated over-demand scenarios show the advantages and disadvantages of these measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alperovits A, Shamir U (1977) Design of optimal water distribution systems. Water Resour Res 13(6):885–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baños R, Gil C, Reca J, Martinez J (2009) Implementation of scatter search for multi-objective optimization: a comparative study. Comput Optim Appl J 42(3):421–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cisty M (2010) Hybrid genetic algorithm and linear programming method for least-cost design of water distribution systems. Water Resour Manag 24(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmani R, Walters GA, Savic DA (2005a) Trade-off between total cost and reliability for anytown water distribution network. J Water Resour Plan Manage 131(3):161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmani R, Savic DA, Walters GA (2005b) Evolutionary multi-objective optimization in water distribution network design. Eng Optim 37(2):167–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujiwara O, Khang DB (1990) A two-phase decomposition method for optimal design of looped water distribution networks. Water Resour Res 26(4):539–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison Wesley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta I, Bassin JK, Gupta A, Khanna P (1993) Optimization of water distribution systems. Environ Softw 8(4):101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaram N, Srinivasan K (2008) Performance-based optimal design and rehabilitation of water distribution networks using life cycle costing. Water Resour Res 44:W01417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montesinos P, Garcia-Guzman A, Ayuso JL (1999) Water distribution network optimisation using modified genetic algorithm. Water Resour Res 35(11):3467–3473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad DT, Park N (2004) Multi-objective genetic algorithms for the design of pipe networks. J Water Resour Plan Manage 130(1):73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raad DN, Sinske AN, Vuuren JH (2010) Comparison of four reliability surrogate measures for water distribution systems design. Water Resour Res 46:W05524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reca J, Martínez J (2006) Genetic algorithms for the design of looped irrigation water distribution networks. Water Resour Res 42:W05416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reca J, Martínez J, Gil C, Baños R (2008a) Application of several meta-heuristic techniquess to the optimization of real looped water distribution networks. Water Resour Manag 22(10):1367–1379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reca J, Martinez J, Baños R, Gil C (2008b) Optimal design of gravity-fed looped water distribution networks considering the resilience index. J Water Resour Plan Manage 134(3):234–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossman LA (2000) EPANET 2 user’s manual, EPA/600/R-00/057. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/wswrd/dw/epanet.html. Accessed 9 Jan 2011 (Online)

  • Todini E (2000) Looped water distribution networks design using a resilience index based heuristic approach. Urban Water 2(3):115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zitzler E, Thiele L (1999) Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength pareto approach. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 3(4):257–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zitzler E, Laumanns M, Thiele L (2001) SPEA2: improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization. Evolutionary Methods for Design, Optimisation, and Control, Barcelona, Spain, pp 95–10

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raúl Baños.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baños, R., Reca, J., Martínez, J. et al. Resilience Indexes for Water Distribution Network Design: A Performance Analysis Under Demand Uncertainty. Water Resour Manage 25, 2351–2366 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9812-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9812-3

Keywords

Navigation