Abstract
We examine the effect of participation in neighborhood association (NHA) activities on volunteering using the 2010 Japanese General Social Survey data. We find that controlling for established predictors of formal volunteering such as demographic and socioeconomic variables, NHA association participation, either operationalized as a dichotomous or interval variable, positively predicts volunteering. Moreover, some of the established predictors of volunteering (e.g., marital status and associational membership) are useful in predicting NHA participation. Our results indicate a complementary relationship between volunteering and NHA participation. We discuss implications of our study for future research on community volunteering in Japan and elsewhere.
Résumé
Nous étudions l’effet de la participation aux activités de bénévolat des associations de quartier en utilisant des données de l’enquête sociale générale japonaise de 2010. Nous constatons que le contrôle des facteurs prédictifs établis du bénévolat formel, tels que les variables démographiques et socioéconomiques, de la participation des associations de quartier, qu’elle soit mise en œuvre comme variable dichotomique ou d’intervalle, prédit positivement le bénévolat. En outre, certains des indicateurs bien établis du bénévolat (par exemple, la situation familiale et l’adhésion à une association) sont utiles pour prédire la participation à une association de quartier. Nos résultats indiquent une relation complémentaire entre le bénévolat et la participation à une association de quartier. Nous discutons des répercussions de notre étude pour les recherches futures sur la communauté des bénévoles au Japon et ailleurs.
Zusammenfassung
Wir untersuchen die Auswirkung einer Beteiligung an Aktivitäten einer Nachbarschaftsvereinigung auf die ehrenamtliche Arbeit und stützen uns dabei auf die 2010 durchgeführte allgemeine Bevölkerungsumfrage (General Social Survey) in Japan. Wir kommen zu dem Ergebnis, dass die Kontrolle der bewährten Prädiktoren für formelle ehrenamtliche Tätigkeiten, wie demographische und sozioökonomische Variablen, die Beteiligung an einer Nachbarschaftsvereinigung, entweder als dichotome oder Intervallvariable operationalisiert, eine positive Prognose für eine ehrenamtliche Arbeit aufstellen. Darüber hinaus sind einige der bewährten Prädiktoren für die ehrenamtliche Arbeit (z. B. Familienstand und Vereinsmitgliedschaft) für die Prognose einer Beteiligung an der Nachbarschaftsvereinigung nützlich. Unsere Ergebnisse weisen auf eine komplementäre Beziehung zwischen ehrenamtlicher Arbeit und der Beteiligung an einer Nachbarschaftsvereinigung hin. Wir diskutieren die Implikationen unserer Studie für zukünftige Forschungen zu ehrenamtlichen Gemeindetätigkeiten in Japan und anderswo.
Resumen
Examinamos el efecto de la participación en actividades de asociaciones vecinales (NHA, del inglés neighborhood association) sobre el voluntariado utilizando los datos de la Encuesta Social General Japonesa 2010. Encontramos que controlando los indicadores establecidos del voluntariado formal, tales como las variables demográficas y socioeconómicas, la participación en asociaciones vecinales (NHA), ya sea puesta en marcha como una variable de intervalo o como una variable dicotómica, predice el voluntariado de manera positiva. Asimismo, algunos de los indicadores establecidos del voluntariado (p.ej. el estado civil y la pertenencia a una asociación) son útiles para predecir la participación en asociaciones vecinales. Nuestros resultados indican una relación complementaria entre el voluntariado y la participación en asociaciones vecinales. Tratamos de las implicaciones de nuestro estudio para investigaciones futuras sobre el voluntariado comunitario en Japón y en otras partes.
摘要
通过2010年日本综合社会调查数据,我们检查了参与邻里协会 (NHA) 活动对志愿活动的影响。我们发现,控制人口统计和社会经济变量、NHA协会参与(作为叉状分支或间隔变量运营)等既定的正式志愿指标都在积极预测志愿。此外,一些既定志愿指标(如婚姻状态和协会成员)对于预测NHA参与非常有用。我们的结果表明,志愿和NHA参与之间存在互补关系。我们讨论了研究对于日本和其他地方的未来社区志愿活动的含义。
ملخص
نحن ندرس تأثير المشاركة في أنشطة جمعية المقاطعة (NHA) على التطوع بإستخدام بيانات إستطلاع الرأي الإجتماعي العام الياباني عام 2010. نجد أن السيطرة للذين يقومون بالتنبؤ للعمل التطوعي الرسمي ومعترف بهم مثل المتغيرات الديموجرافية والإجتماعية والاقتصادية، مشاركة جمعية المقاطعة (NHA)٬ إما تفعيل كمتغير بين شيئين أو فترات، يتوقع التطوع بشكل إيجابي.علاوة على ذلك، فإن بعض الذين يقومون بالتنبؤ للعمل التطوعي و معترف بهم (على سبيل المثال، الحالة الاجتماعية وعضوية الترابطية) مفيدين في التنبؤ على مشاركة أنشطة جمعية المقاطعة (NHA). نتائجنا تشير إلى وجود علاقة تكاملية بين العمل التطوعي ومشاركة جمعية المقاطعة (NHA). نناقش الآثار المترتبة على دراستنا للبحث في المستقبل على تطوع المجتمع في اليابان وأماكن أخرى.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This rate is calculated based on microdata of individuals not households.
The US rate of volunteering based on the 2013 Current Population Survey is 25.4 %. It should be noted that unlike the GSS that considers adults as those aged 18 and older, the CPS defines them as those aged 16 and older. The age group 16–24 has the lowest rate of volunteering (BLS 2014). The low rate may be also because the CPS is a household survey and not all of the CPS data on volunteering are based on self-reports (BLS 2014).
In our preliminary analysis, we ran OLS models of NHA participation. Regression diagnostics indicated violations of the assumptions (e.g., normal and homoscedastic distributions of errors). The ordered logistic model was also run. Specification tests suggested that for some predictors, the parallel-slope assumption is violated. We decided to measure NHA participation as well as volunteering at the nominal level.
Comparing coefficients across nested nonlinear models is not straightforward. We adopted the method recommended by Kohler et al. (2011). To compare Models 1 and 2 (for men) and Models 4 and 5 (for women), we found that marital status increases the log odds of volunteering by 0.80 (for men) and 0.62 (for women). Controlling for a binary variable on NHA participation, the direct effect of marital status goes down to 0.46 (for men) and 0.22 (for women), rendering its indirect effect of 0.34 (for men) and 0.40). To compare Models 1 and 3 (for men) and Models 4 and 6 (for women), we found that marital status increases the log odds of volunteering by 0.84 (for men) and 0.61 (for women). Controlling for a binary variable on NHA participation, the direct effect of marital status goes down to 0.28 (for men) and 0.25 (for women), rendering its indirect effect of 0.56 (for men) and 0.36 (for women).
References
Aarseth, H. (2009). From modernized masculinity to degendered lifestyle projects changes in men’s narratives on domestic participation 1990-2005. Men and Masculinities, 11(4), 424–440.
Aldrich, D. P. (2011). The power of people: Social capital’s role in recovery from the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Natural Hazards, 56(3), 595–611.
Anheier, H. K., & Salamon, L. M. (1999). Volunteering in cross-national perspective: Initial comparisons. Law and Contemporary Problems, 62(4), 43–65.
Bekkers, R. (2012). Trust and volunteering: Selection or causation? Evidence from a four year panel study. Political Behavior, 34(2), 225–247.
Bekkers, R., & Schuyt, T. N. M. (2008). And who is your neighbor? Explaining the effect of religion on charitable giving and volunteering. Review of Religious Research, 50(1), 74–96.
Blair, S. L. (1993). Employment, family, and perceptions of marital quality among husbands and wives. Journal of Family Issues, 14(2), 189–212.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. London: Routledge.
Braibanti, R. J. D. (1948). Neighborhood associations in Japan and their democratic potentialities. The Far Eastern Quarterly (currently The Journal of Asian Studies), 7(2), 136–164.
Brown, E., & Ferris, J. M. (2007). Social capital and philanthropy: An analysis of the impact of social capital on individual giving and volunteering. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(1), 85–99.
Bruhn, J. G. (2005). The Sociology of Community Connections. New York: Springer Science + Business Media Inc.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor. (2014). Volunteering in the United States, 2013. [News release USDL-14-0314]. Retrieved June 11, 2014, from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/volun.nr0.htm.
Caputo, R. K. (1997). Women as volunteers and activists. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26(2), 156–174.
Cnaan, R. A., & Amrofell, L. M. (1994). Mapping volunteer activity. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23, 335–351.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Bellknap Press.
Cwiertka, K. (2013). Beyond the black market: Neighborhood associations and food rationing in postwar Japan. In C. Gerteis & T. S. George (Eds.), Japan since 1945: From postwar to post-bubble (pp. 89–106). New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Edwards, W. D. (1989). Modern Japan through its weddings: Gender, person, and society in ritual portrayal. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Einolf, C. J. (2009). Will the Boomers volunteer during retirement? Comparing the Baby Boom, silent, and long civic cohorts. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(2), 181–199.
Emrich, C. G., Denmark, F. L., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2004). Cross-cultural differences in gender egalitarianism: Implications for societies, organizations, and leaders. Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study, 62, 343–394.
Freedman, D. A., & Sekhon, J. S. (2010). Endogeneity in probit response models. Political Analysis, 18(2), 138–150.
Freeman, R. (1997). Working for nothing: The supply of volunteer labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 15(1), S140–S166.
Georgeou, N. (2010). From Hoshi to Borantia: Transformations of volunteering in Japan and implications for foreign policy. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary & Nonprofit Organizations, 21(4), 467–480.
Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Hasegawa, K. (2010). Collaborative environmentalism in Japan. In H. Vinken, Y. Nishimura, B. L. J. White, & M. Deguchi (Eds.), Civic engagement in contemporary Japan: Established and emerging repertoires (pp. 85–99). Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies. New York: Springer.
Hastings, S. A. (1995). Neighborhood and nation in Tokyo, 1905–1937. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Honma, M., & Deguchi, M. (1996). Borantia kakumei (volunteer revolution). Tokyo: Tokyo Keizai Shinpo-sha. (in Japanese).
ICPSR. (2013). Japanese General Social Survey, 2010 (#34623). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
Imada, M. (2010). Civil Society in Japan: Democracy, voluntary action, and philanthropy. In H. Vinken, Y. Nishimura, B. L. J. White, & M. Deguchi (Eds.), Civic engagement in contemporary Japan: Established and emerging repertoires (pp. 21–40). Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies. New York: Springer.
Jackson, E., Bachmeier, M., Wood, J. R., & Craft, C. (1995). Volunteering and charitable giving: Do religious and associational ties promote helping behavior? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 24(1), 59–78.
Jones, K. S. (2006). Giving and volunteering as distinct forms of civic engagement: The role of community integration and personal resources in formal helping. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(2), 249–266.
Kang, N., & Kwak, N. (2003). A multilevel approach to civic participation: Individual length of residence, neighborhood residential stability, and their interactive effects with media use. Communication Research, 30(1), 80–106.
Kaufman, G. (2000). Do gender role attitudes matter? Family formation and dissolution among traditional and egalitarian men and women. Journal of Family Issues, 21(1), 128–144.
Kohler, U., Karlson, K. B., & Anders Holm, A. (2011). Comparing coefficients of nested nonlinear probability models. The Stata Journal, 11, 1–19.
Kwak, N., Shah, D. V., & Holbert, R. L. (2004). Connecting, trusting, and participating: The direct and interactive effects of social associations. Political Research Quarterly, 57(4), 643–652.
Lebra, T. S. (1984). Japanese women: Constraint and fulfillment. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Lee, Y. J., & Brudney, J. L. (2012). Participation in formal and informal volunteering: Implications for volunteer recruitment. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 23(2), 159–180.
Lee, Y. J., & Moon, S. G. (2011). Mainstream and ethnic volunteering by Korean immigrants in the United States. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(4), 811–830.
Lueptow, L. B., Guss, M. B., & Hyden, C. (1989). Sex role ideology, marital status, and happiness. Journal of Family Issues, 10(3), 383–400.
Lunsing, W. M. (2001). Beyond common sense: Sexuality and gender in contemporary Japan. Kegan Paul: London & New York.
Lye, D. N., & Biblarz, T. J. (1993). The effects of attitudes toward family life and gender roles on marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues, 14(2), 157–188.
Matsunaga, Y. (2007). To give, or not to give; to volunteer, or not to volunteer, that is the question: Evidence on Japanese philanthropic behavior revealed by the JGSS-2005 data set Nihon-ban General Social Surveys Kenkyu Ronbunshu (Japanese General Social Surveys monographs) (Vol. 6, pp. 69–82). Osaka: Osaka University of Commerce.
McPherson, J. M., Popielarz, P. A., & Drobnic, S. (1992). Social networks and organizational dynamics. American Sociological Review, 57(2), 153–170.
Nakano, L. Y. (2000). Volunteering as a lifestyle choice: Negotiating self-identities in Japan. Ethnology, 39(2), 93–107.
Nakano, L. Y. (2005). Community volunteers in Japan: Everyday stories of social change. New York: Routledge Curzon.
Ogawa, A. (2009). The failure of civil society? The third sector and the state in contemporary Japan. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Park, R. E. (1915). The city: Suggestions for the investigation of human behavior in the city environment. The American Journal of Sociology, 20(5), 577–612.
Park, J. Z., & Smith, C. (2000). To whom much has been given…: Religious capital and community voluntarism among churchgoing Protestants. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 39(3), 272–286.
Pekkanen, R. (2006). Japan’s dual civil society: Members without advocates. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Pekkanen, R., & Tsujinaka, Y. (2008). Neighbourhood associations and the demographic challenge. In F. Coulmas, H. Conrad, A. Schad-Seifert, & G. Vogt (Eds.), The demographic challenge: A handbook about Japan (pp. 707–720). Leiden: BRILL.
Pindyck, R. S., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1998). Econometric models and economic forecasts (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Portney, K. E., & Berry, J. M. (2007). Neighborhoods, neighborhood associations, and social capital. In S. A. Ostrander & K. E. Portney (Eds.), Acting civically: From local neighborhoods to higher education (pp. 21–43). Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. (2004). GLLAMM Manual. U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series, Paper 160.
Retherford, R. D., Ogawa, N., & Matsukura, R. (2001). Late marriage and less marriage in Japan. Population and Development Review, 27, 65–102.
Rossi, A. S. (2001). Domains and dimensions of social responsibility: A sociodemographic profile. In A. S. Rossi (Ed.), Caring and doing for others: Social responsibility in the domains of family, work, and community (pp. 97–134). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Ruiter, S., & De Graaf, N. D. (2006). National context, religiosity, and volunteering: Results from 53 Countries. American Sociological Review, 71(2), 191–210.
Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Sato, T. (1991). Tokugawa villages and agriculture. In C. Nakane, S. Ooishi, & C. Totman (Eds.), Tokugawa Japan: The social and economic antecedents of modern Japan (pp. 37–80). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
Schmid, H. (2001). Neighborhood self-management: Experiments in civil society. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Shaw, R., & Goda, K. (2004). From disaster to sustainable civil society: The Kobe experience. Disasters, 28(1), 16–40.
Smith, L. M. (1975). Women as volunteers: The double subsidy. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 4(3), 119–136.
Smith, H. D. (1983). The nonliberal roots of Taisho democracy. In H. Wray & H. Conroy (Eds.), Japan Examined: Perspectives on Modern Japanese History (pp. 191–199). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Taniguchi, H. (2006). Men’s and women’s volunteering: Gender differences in the effects of employment and family characteristics. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(1), 83–101.
Taniguchi, H. (2010). Who are volunteers in Japan? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(1), 161–179.
Taniguchi, H. (2012). The determinants of formal and informal volunteering: Evidence from the American Time Use Survey. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 920–939.
Thranhardt, A. M. (1990). Traditional neighborhood associations in industrial society: The case of Japan. In H. K. Anheier & W. Seibel (Eds.), The third sector: Comparative studies of nonprofit organizations (pp. 347–360). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Tsuya, N. O., & Mason, K. O. (1995). Changing gender roles and below-replacement fertility in Japan. In K. O. Mason & A. Jensen (Eds.), Gender and family change in industrialized countries (pp. 139–167). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. New York: Cambridge University Press.
van Houwelingen, P. (2012). Neighborhood associations and social capital in Japan. Urban Affairs Review, 48(4), 467–497.
Von Hoffman, A. (1994). Local attachments: The making of an American urban neighborhood, 1850 to 1920. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Wang, L., & Graddy, E. (2008). Social capital, volunteering, and charitable giving. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 19(1), 23–42.
Williams, R. (2006). Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. The Stata Journal, 6(1), 58–82.
Wilson, J. (2012). Volunteerism research: A review essay. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(2), 176–212.
Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 215–240.
Wilson, J., & Musick, M. A. (1997). Work and volunteering: The long arm of the job. Social Forces, 76(1), 251–272.
Wollebæk, D., & Strømsnes, K. (2008). Voluntary associations, trust, and civic engagement: A multilevel approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(2), 249–263.
Wuthnow, R. (2002). The United States: Bridging the privileged and the marginalized? In R. D. Putnam (Ed.), Democracies in flux (pp. 59–102). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yamazaki, Y. (2012). Recent History of Citizen Co-operatives in Japan and JCCU’s “2020 Vision”. Cadernos Gestão Social, 3(2), 293–304.
Acknowledgments
The Japanese General Social Surveys (JGSS) are designed and carried out by the JGSS Research Center at Osaka University of Commerce (Joint Usage/Research Center for Japanese General Social Surveys accredited by Minister of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology), in collaboration with the Institute of Social Science at the University of Tokyo.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taniguchi, H., Aldikacti Marshall, G. Neighborhood Association Participation and Formal Volunteering in Japan. Voluntas 27, 695–723 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9551-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9551-9