Skip to main content
Log in

The power of people: social capital’s role in recovery from the 1995 Kobe earthquake

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the regularity of disasters, social science has only begun to generate replicable knowledge about the factors which facilitate post-crisis recovery. Building on the broad variation in recovery rates within disaster-affected cities, I investigate the ability of Kobe’s nine wards to repopulate after the 1995 Kobe earthquake in Japan. This article uses case studies of neighborhoods in Kobe alongside new time-series, cross-sectional data set to test five variables thought to influence recovery along with the relatively untested factor of social capital. Controlling for damage, population density, economic conditions, inequality and other variables thought important in past research, social capital proves to be the strongest and most robust predictor of population recovery after catastrophe. This has important implications both for public policies focused on reconstruction and for social science more generally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The data used in this study are available for replication on the author’s DataVerse Network homepage.

  2. The term NPO includes groups classified by the Japanese government as nonprofit public-interest entities (kōeki hōjin) along with school, religious, medical, and social welfare organizations. Pekkanen points out that in Japan, the borrowed term “NGO” typically refers to organizations involved in international work, while “NPO” involves domestically active groups (2000: 116 fn 12).

  3. Tierney and Goltz (1997: 6) suggested that the lack of an official request from the governor, devastation of communications networks, logistical problems, the size of the event, and ambivalent attitudes toward the role of military in society were responsible for the SDF’s sluggish reaction (see also Yasui 2007: 97).

  4. According to Tsuji (2001: 218, Figures 9–1 and 9–2) the Nagata district had 35% of its population in emergency housing after the earthquake, and it took a full year for them to return to permanent housing. In a similar-sized district of Fukushima, 70% of its population moved into emergency shelters but all had moved out within 100 days.

  5. As autoregressive distributed lag models often create high levels of multicollinearity, I tested the data for multicollinearity using the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) approach, and found relatively low levels of interaction among the variables (with a VIF of less than 7 for all models) (Rabe-Hesketh and Everitt 2007: 69). A second concern for ADLs is that variables within them remain strictly stationary. A multivariate augmented Dickey-Fuller test indicated that we can reject the null hypothesis that the processes for 1, 2, and 3 period lags are nonstationary (that is, lack equilibrium). Further, the Hausman specification test determines whether a fixed or random effects model is most appropriate when using time-series data, and it indicated in this case that a fixed effects model fit more closely (Chi square value of 0.0001).

References

  • Ahern J, Galea S (2006) Social context and depression after a disaster: the role of income inequality. J Epidemiol Community Health 60(9):766–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albala-Bertrand JM (1993) Political economy of large natural disasters: with special reference to developing countries. Oxford, Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich DP (2008) Site fights: divisive facilities and civil society in Japan and the west. Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich DP (2010) Fixing recovery: social capital in post-crisis resilience. J Homel Secur 7 (July)

  • Aldrich DP, Crook K (2008) Strong civil society as a double-edged sword: siting trailers in post-katrina New Orleans. Polit Res Q 61(3):378–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck N, Katz J (2004) Time-series cross-section issues: dynamics 2004. Working paper

  • Beck N, Katz J (2009) Modeling dynamics in time-series cross-section political economy data. Working paper

  • Beggs J, Haines V, Hurlbert J (1996) Situational contingencies surrounding the receipt of informal support. Soc Forces 75(1):201–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkland T (2006) Lessons of disaster: policy change after catastrophic events. Georgetown University Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Birner R, Wittmer H (2003) Using social capital to create political capital: how do local communities gain political influence? A theoretical approach and empirical evidence from Thailand. In: Dolsak N, Ostrom E (eds) The Commons in the New Millenium: challenges and adaptations. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 291–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland J, Rahman M (1999) Community based disaster management during the 1997 Red River Flood in Canada. Disasters 23(2):174–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobe City NPO Database http://www.kobenpomap.com/photo/hojin/120080129130902.xls

  • Cutter S, Emrich C (2006) Moral Hazard, Social catastrophe: the changing face of vulnerability along the hurricane coasts. Annal Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 604:102–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter S, Finch C (2008) Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. Proc Nat Acad Sci 105(7):2301–2306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dacy D, Kunreuther H (1969) The economics of natural disasters: implications for federal policy. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis DR, Weinstein DE (2002) Bones, bombs, and break points: the geography of economic activity. Am Econ Rev 92(5):1269–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dynes R (2005) Community social capital as the primary basis of resilience. University of Delaware Disaster Research Center Preliminary Paper #344

  • Evans N (2001) Community planning in Japan: the case of Mano, and its experience in the Hanshin earthquake. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation for School of East Asian Studies, University of Sheffield

  • Haas P (2004) When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process. J Eur Public Policy 11(4):569–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas J, Eugene K, Robert W, Bowden MJ (eds) (1977) Reconstruction following disaster. MIT University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagiwara T, Jinushi T (2005) Hanshin Awaji Daishinsai no Higai to Fukkō–Chiikiteki Bunseki–[Damage and reconstruction of the Hanshin–Awaji earthquake: a spatial analysis]. Paper prepared for the 10th anniversary of Hanshin-Awaji earthquake memorial academic symposium, Kobe University

  • Haque CE (2003) Perspectives of natural disasters in East and South Asia, and the Pacific States. Nat Hazards 49:465–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattori K (2003) Reconstruction of disaster and recreation of local heritage. From international symposium on Asian heritage, 22 August to 10 September, Malaysia

  • Hirschman A (1970) Exit, voice, and loyalty: responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne J (2005) Carving a better city. New Orleans Times-Picayune, 13 Nov

  • Horwich G (2000) Economic lessons of the Kobe earthquake. Econ Dev Cult Change 48(3):521–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyois P, Below R, Scheuren J-M, Guha-Sapir D (2007) Annual disaster review: numbers and trends. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters

  • Ikeda H (2004) Comparative study of housing recovery measures taken after the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake and the 1995 Hanshin-Awaji earthquakes. In: Nakabayshi I (ed) A comparative study of urban reconstruction processes after earthquakes in Turkey, Taiwan, and Japan. Graduate School of Urban Science, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, pp 33–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Inui K (1998) Sanka ni okeru Goui/kettei to wa nanika [What is an agreement/decision in participation?], in Hanshin-Awaji Daishinsai Fukkō ni kansuru Tokubetu Chōsa Kenkyū Purojekuto (The Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake Reconstruction Reseach Project) (ed) Hanshin-Awaji Daishinsai Sōgo Kenkyū Ronbunshu [the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake Comprehensive Study Report]. Kyoto, Japan, Ritsumeikan University, pp 243–249

  • Kamel N, Loukaitou-Sideris A (2004) Residential assistance and recovery following the Northridge earthquake. Urban Stud 41(3):533–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keele L, Kelly N (2005) Dynamic models for dynamic theories: the ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. Polit Anal 14(2):186–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kōbe shi Sōmukyoku Tōkeika [Kobe City General Affairs Bureau, Statistics Department] (various years). Kōbe shi Tōkeisho 1990–2005 [Kobe City Statistics]. Kobe, Kobe shi

  • Kōbe shi Senkyo Kanri Iinkai [Kobe City Election Committee]. Kakushu Senkyo no Tōhyō Ritsu: Kekka Nado [The Rates and Results of Various Elections]. Available online at http://www.city.kobe.jp/cityoffice/60/06.html

  • Krishna A (2007) How does social capital grow? A seven-year study of villages in India. J Polit 69(4):941–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin N (2008) A network theory of social capital. In: Castiglione D, Van Deth JW, Wolleb G (eds) The handbook of social capital. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 50–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu A, Fellowes M, Mabanta M (2006) A one-year review of key indicators of recovery in post-storm New Orleans. Brookings Institution

  • Murosaki Y (2007) The great Hanshin earthquake and fire. J Disaster Res 2(4):298–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakabayashi I, Ichiko T (2004) A comparative study of built up reconstruction measures and strategy among earthquake disasters of Hanshin Awaji, East Marmar, and 921 Chi-chi. In: Itsuki N (ed) A comparative study of urban reconstruction processes after earthquakes in Turkey, Taiwan, and Japan. Graduate School of Urban Science, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, pp 5–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa Y, Shaw R (2004) Social capital: a missing link to disaster recovery. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 22(1):5–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Nossiter A, Eaton L (2007) Violent protest over housing in New Orleans, New York Times 21 Dec

  • Olshansky R (Forthcoming) Reconstruction after the Kobe earthquake. In Olshansky, Johnson, Topping (eds) Reconstruction in comparative perspective. University of Illinois

  • Olson M (1965) The logic of collective action; public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pais J, Elliott JR (2008) Places as recovery machines: vulnerability and neighborhood change after major hurricanes. Soc Forces 86(4):1415–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekkanen R (2000) Japan’s new politics: The case of the NPO law. J Japanese Stud 26(1):111–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam R (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabe-Hesketh S, Everitt B (2007) A handbook of statistical analyses using stata, 4th edn. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovai E (1994) The social geography of disaster recovery: differential community responses to the north coast earthquakes. Assoc Pac Coast Geogr Yearbook 56:49–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawada Y, Shimizutani S (2008) How do people cope with natural disasters? Evidence from the Great Hanshin-Awaji (Kobe) earthquake in 1995. J Money Credit Bank 40(2–3):463–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekikawa C, Sakurai M, Song M (2006) Kōreisha Shūgō Jutaku ni kansuru Kenkyū–Korekuteibu Haujingu no jirei wo Tōshite [Collective Housing for Seniors: An analysis of examples of such housing]. Kyōto Kyōiku Daigaku Kiyō [Bulletin of Kyoto University of Education], no. 109, pp 85–98

  • Shaw R, Goda K (2004) From disaster to sustainable civil society: the Kobe experience. Disasters 28(1):16–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair B, Hall T, Alvarez RM (2008) Flooding the vote: Hurricane Katrina and voter participation in New Orleans. Voting technology project of caltech working paper #70

  • Sorensen A (2007) Changing governance of shared spaces: Machizukuri as institutional innovation. In: Sorensen A, Funck C (eds) Living cities in Japan: citizens’ movements, Machizukuri and local environments. Routledge, London, pp 56–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings R, Quarantelli EL (1985) Emergent citizen groups and emergency management. Public Adm Rev 45:93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suga M (2007) Atarashii komyuniti no keisei to tenkai [Forming and developing a new community] in Masaki Urano, Jun Oyane, and Tadahiro Yoshikawa eds., Fukkō komyuniti ron Nyūmon [Introduction to Theories on the Reconstruction of Communities]. Kōbundō Publishers, Tokyo, pp 98–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajika E (2000) Public support for livelihood rebuilding. In: Committee for global assessment of earthquake countermeasures, Hyogo Prefectural Government (ed) Assessment reports of the global assessment of earthquake countermeasures, vol 4, Support of disaster victims. Hyogo Prefecture, Hyogo Prefectural Government, pp 119–168

  • Tandon R, Mohanty R (2000) Civil society and governance: a research study in India. Society for Participatory Research in Asia, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuki S (2008) The role of civil society for long-term life recovery from a Megadisaster. Paper prepared for the 2008 annual meeting of the American political science association, 28–31 Aug

  • Tatsuki S, Hayashi H (2002) Seven critical element model of life recovery: general linear model analyses of the 2001 Kobe Panel Survey Data. Paper prepared for the proceedings of 2nd workshop for comparative study on urban earthquake disaster management, 14–15 Feb

  • Tierney K, Goltz J (1997) Emergency response: lessons learned from the Kobe earthquake. University of Delaware Disaster Research Center Preliminary Paper #260

  • Tobin G, Montz B (1997) Natural hazards: explanation and integration. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuji K (2001) Saigai Katei to Saisei Katei: Hanshin-Awaji Daishinsai no Shōjojishi [the course of disaster and recovery: a short epic about the Hanshin Awaji earthquake]. Kōyō Shobō Publishers, Kyoto

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Small Business Administration [US SBA] (2006) Entrepreneurship: the foundation for economic renewal in the Gulf coast region. In: Proceedings of the 11 April conference, New Orleans, LA

  • Van Deth JW (2008) Measuring social capital. In: Castiglione D, Jan van Deth W, Guglielmo W (eds) The handbook of social capital. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 150–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner C (2006) Census tallies Katrina changes, nut the changing New Orleans area is a moving target. Times-Picayune Wednesday, 7 June

  • West M (2005) Law in everyday Japan: sex, sumo, suicide, and statutes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasui E (2007) Community vulnerability and capacity in post disaster recover: the cases of Mano and Mikura neighborhoods in the Wake of the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation for the University of British Columbia

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to acknowledge Takahiro Yamamoto for his excellent research assistance. The archival and theoretic work for this paper was carried out while the author was on an Abe Fellowship sponsored by the Center for Global Partnership and administered by the Social Science Research Council. Pat Boling, Erik Cleven, Paul Danyi, Jay McCann, Leigh Raymond, Mark Tilton, and Laurel Weldon provided helpful feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel P. Aldrich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aldrich, D.P. The power of people: social capital’s role in recovery from the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Nat Hazards 56, 595–611 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9577-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9577-7

Keywords

Navigation