Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Novel woodland patches in a small historical Mediterranean city: Padova, Northern Italy

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Woodland fragments, in small historical cities, are commonly regarded as temporary voids in an urban matrix, yet to be allocated a land-use, under city planning regulations. However, they could display relevant plant diversity, and contribute to urban ecosystem services. This study combined surveys at 100 m2, and at patch level, with the aim to investigate how patch size, stand and urbanization, affected the structure of plant communities in thirty woodland fragments (0.1–2 ha), spontaneously developing in the small, historical city of Padova (Northern Italy). Trees, shrubs and other perennial species dominated the plant communities in these patches. Alien species were common, in both the understory (freq. = 97 %, mean richness = 4.33) and tree layer (freq. = 90 %, mean richness = 1.50). Species typical of native communities also occurred. Understory communities were associated with ancient forest, nitrophilous, and ruderal species; highlighting an overall heterogeneity. Road and railway density was moderately correlated with total species richness in the understory, whereas, urbanity (i.e. the concentration of built environment excluding road and railway density), and tree density were not. Furthermore, alien tree dominance negatively influenced total and native tree layer species richness and, moderately positively, native understory species richness. These results highlight that spontaneous novel woodland patches, even if they are minor fragments in small historical cities, maintain diverse green infrastructures that may supply an array of urban ecosystem services, when adequately recognised by city plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acosta A, Carranza LM, Giancola M (2005) Landscape change and ecosystem classification in a Municipal district of small city (Isernia, Central Italy). Environ Monit Assess 108:323–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alvey AA (2006) Promoting and preserving biodiversity in the urban forest. Urban For Urban Green 5:195–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ARPAV (2013) Pollini e spore fungine allergenici nel Veneto—Rapporto anno 2012. http://www.arpa.veneto.it/temi-ambientali/pollini/file-e-allegati/rapporto-2012/RAPPORTO_Pollini_2012.pdf. Accessed 30 January 2014

  • Atkinson MD, Atkinson E (2002) Sambucus nigra L. J Ecol 90:895–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbati A, Corona P, Salvati L, Gasparella L (2013) Natural forest expansion into suburban countryside: gained ground for a green infrastructure? Urban For Urban Green 12:36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier S, Gosselin F, Balandier P (2008) Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved – a critical review for temperate and boreal forests. For Ecol Manag 254:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE (1980) Regression diagnostics. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bossard M, Feranec J, Otahel J (2000) CORINE land cover technical guide—Addendum 2000. European Environmental Agency, Technical Report No. 40, Copenhagen, Denmark. http://www.eea.eu.int. Accessed 12 Dicember 2013

  • Braun-Blanquet J, Pavillard J (1928) Vocabulaire de sociologie végétale. Imprimerie Roumégous & Déhan, Montpellier

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuste J, Haase D, Elmqvist T (2013) Urban landscapes and ecosystem services. In: Wratten S, Sandhu H, Cullen R, Costanza R (eds) Ecosystem services in agricultural and urban landscapes. Wiley, Chichester, pp 83–104

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Celesti-Grapow L, Blasi C (1998) A comparison of the urban flora of different phytoclimatic regions in Italy. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 7:367–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Celesti-Grapow L, Blasi C (2003) Archaeological sites as areas for biodiversity conservation in cities: the spontaneous vascular flora of the Caracalla Baths in Rome. Webbia 58:77–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celesti-Grapow L, Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Blasi C (2006) Determinants of native and alien species richness in the urban flora of Rome. Divers Distrib 12:490–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celesti-Grapow L, Alessandrini A, Arrigoni PV, Banfi E, Bernardo L, Bovio M, Brundu G, Cagiotti MR, Camarda I, Carli E, Conti F, Fascetti S, Galasso G, Gubellini L, La Valva V, Lucchese F, Marchiori S, Mazzola P, Peccenini S, Poldini L, Pretto F, Prosser F, Siniscalco C, Villani MC, Viegi L, Wilhalm T, Blasi C (2009) Inventory of the non‐native flora of Italy. Plant Biosyst 143:386–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chocholoušková Z, Pyšek P (2003) Changes in composition and structure of urban flora over 120 years: a case study of the city of Plzeň. Flora 198:366–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croci S, Butet A, Georges A, Aguejdad R, Clergeau P (2008) Small urban woodlands as biodiversity conservation hot-spot: a multi-taxon approach. Landsc Ecol 23:1171–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Caceres M, Legendre P, Moretti M (2010) Improving indicator species analysis by combining groups of sites. Oikos 119:1674–1684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Sanctis M, Alfò M, Attore F, Francesconi F, Bruno F (2010) Effect of habitat configuration and quality on species richness and distribution in fragmented forest patches near Rome. J Veg Sci 21:55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Tredici PD (2010) Spontaneous urban vegetation: reflections of change in a globalized world. Nat Cult 5:299–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Development Core Team R (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Comune di Padova (2012) Annuario statistico comunale 2012. www.padovanet.it. Accessed 12 December 2013

  • Doody BJ, Sullivan JJ, Meurk CD, Stewart GH, Perkins HC (2010) Urban realities: the contribution of residential gardens to the conservation of urban forest remnants. Biodivers Conserv 19:1385–1400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufrêne M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for flexible assymetrical approach. Ecol Monog 67:345–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobedo FJ, Kroeger T, Wagner JE (2011) Urban forests and pollution mitigation: analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. Environ Pollut 159:2078–2087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam FS (2007) The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems. Bioscience 57:845–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godefroid S, Koedam S (2003) How important are large vs. small forest remnants for the conservation of the woodland flora in an urban context? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:287–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez M, Ladet S, Deconchat M, Cabanettes A, Alard D, Balent G (2010) Relative contribution of edge and interior zones to patch size effect on species richness: an example for woody plants. For Ecol Manag 259:266–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Moreno P, Pino J, Gassó N, Vilá M (2013) Landscape context modulates alien plant invasion in Mediterranean forest edges. Biol Inv 15:547–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg M, Lowrie K, Mayer H, Miller KT, Solitare L (2001) Brownfield redevelopment as a smart growth option in the United States. Environmentalist 21:129–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guntenspergen GR, Levenson JB (1997) Understory plant species composition in remnant stands along an urban-to-rural lan-use gradient. Urban Ecosyst 1:155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamberg L, Fedrowitz K, Lehvävirta S, Kotze DJ (2010) Vegetation changes at sub-xeric urban forest edges in Finland—the effects of edge aspect and trampling. Urban Ecosyst 13:583–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding DJ, Hilton GM (1992) Functional ecology of woodlands and forests. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermy M, Honnay O, Firbank L, Grashof-Bokdam C, Lawesson JE (1999) An ecological comparison between ancient and other forest plant species of Europe, and the implications for forest conservation. Biol Conserv 91:9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs ER (1988) Species richness in urban forest patches and implications for urban landscape diversity. Landsc Ecol 1:141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Arico S, Aronson J, Baron JS, Bridgewater P, Cramer VA, Epstein PR, Ewel JJ, Klink CA, Lugo AE, Norton D, Ojima D, Richardson DM, Sanderson EW, Valladares F, Vilà M, Zamora R, Zobel M (2006) Novel ecosystems:theoreticla and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ignatieva M, Stewart GH, Meurk C (2010) Planning and design of ecological networks in urban areas. Landsc Ecol Eng 7:17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iida S, Nakashizuka T (1995) Forest fragmentation and its effect on species diversity in suburban coppice forests in Japan. For Ecol Manag 73:197–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jim CY, Chen WY (2009) Ecosystem services and valuation of urban forests in China. Cities 26:187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kattwinkel M, Bierdermann R, Kleyer M (2011) Temporary conservation for urban biodiversity. Biol Conserv 144:2335–2343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp S, Kühn I, Bakker JP, Kleyer M, Klotz S, Ozinga WA, Poschlod P, Thompson K, Thuiller W, Römermann C (2009) How species traits and affinity to urban land use control large-scale species frequency. Divers Distrib 15:533–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konijnendijk CC (2008) The forest and the city: the cultural landscape of urban woodland. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen L, Korhonen KT, Rautiainen M, Stenberg P (2006) Estimation of forest canopy cover: a comparison of field measurement techniques. Silva Fenn 40:577–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik I (2005) Wild urban woodlands: towards a conceptual framework. In: Kowarik I, Körner S (eds) Wild urban woodlands. new perspectives for urban forestry. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik I (2011) Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environ Pollut 159:1974–1983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik I, Langer A (2005) Natur-park Südgelände: linking conservation and recreating in an abandoned rail yard in Berlin. In: Kowarik I, Körner S (eds) Wild urban woodlands. new perspectives for urban forestry. Springer, Berlin, pp 287–299

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik I, von der Lippe M, Cierjacks A (2013) Prevalence of alien versus native species of woody plants in Berlin differs between habitats and at different scales. Preslia 85:113–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühn N (2006) Intentions for the unintentional: spontaneous vegetation as the basis for innovative planting design in urban areas. J Landsc Archit 1:46–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kühn I, Klotz S (2006) Urbanization and homogenization—comparing the floras of urban and rural areas in Germany. Biol Conserv 127:292–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafortezza R, Corry RC, Sanesi G, Brown RD (2008) Visual preference and ecological assessments for designed alternative brownfield rehabilitations. J Environ Manag 89:257–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaPaix R, Harper K, Freedman B (2012) Patterns of exotic plants in relation to anthropogenic edges within urban forest remnants. Appl Veg Sci 15:525–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehvävirta S, Rita H (2002) Natural regeneration of trees in urban woodlands. J Veg Sci 13:57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lososová Z, Chytrý M, Tichý L, Danihelka J, Fajmon K, Hájek O, Kintrová K, Láníková D, Otýpková Z, Řehořek V (2012) Biotic homogenization of Central European urban floras depends on residence time of alien species and habitat types. Biol Conserv 145:179–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mabey R (1973) The unofficial countryside. William Collins Sons and Co, Glasgow

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmivaara-Lämäs M, Löfström HL, Vanha-Majamaa I, Niemelä J (2008) Trampling tolerance of understorey vegetation in different hemiboreal urban forest site types in Finland. Urban Ecosyst 11:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masin Rizzieri R, Scortegagna S (2012) Flora alloctona del Veneto centro-meridionale (Province di Padova, Rovigo, Venezia e Vicenza—Veneto - NE Italia). Nat Vicentina 15:5–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathey J, Rink D (2010) Urban Wastelands—a change for biodiversity in cities? Ecological aspects, social perceptions and acceptance of wilderness by residents. In: Müller N, Werner P, Kelcey JG (eds) Urban biodiversity and design. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey, pp 406–424

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Matlack GR (1994) Vegetation dynamics of forest edge—trends in space and successional time. J Ecol 82:113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald RI (2015) The effectiveness of conservation interventions to overcome the urban-environmental paradox. Ann N Y Acad Sci. doi:10.1111/nyas.12752

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell M, Hahs A (2008) The use of gradient analysis studies in advancing our understanding of the ecology of urbanizing landscapes: current status and future directions. Landsc Ecol 23:1143–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2008) Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst 11:161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe DJ (2005) Hedera helix L. J Ecol 93:632–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millard A (2000) The potential role of natural colonisation as a design tool for urban forestry—a pilot study. Landsc Urban Plan 52:173–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millard A (2004) Indigenous and spontaneous vegetation: their relationship to urban development in the city of Leeds, UK. Urban For Urban Green 3:39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JE, Popovich SJ (1997) Effectiveness of basal area for estimating canopy cover of ponderosa pine. For Ecol Manag 95:45–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordh H, Østby K (2013) Pocket parks for people—a study of park design and use. Urban For Urban Green 12:12–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformation 20:289–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Penone C, Machon N, Julliard R, Le Viol I (2012) Do railway edges provide functional connectivity for plant communities in an urban context? Biol Conserv 148:126–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pignatti S (1982) Flora d’Italia. Edagricole, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • Prach K, Pyšek P (2001) Using spontaneous succession for restoration of human-disturbed habitats: experience from Central Europe. Ecol Eng 17:55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P (1998) Alien and native species in Central European urban floras: a quantitative comparison. J Biogeogr 25:155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quantum GIS Development Team (2012) Quantum GIS geographic information systen. open source geospatial foundation project. http://qgis.osgeo.org

  • Rebele F (1994) Urban ecology and special features of urban ecosystems. Glob Ecol Biogeogr Lett 4:173–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, MacDonald IAW, Forsyth GG (1989) Reduction in plant species richness under stands of alien trees and shrubs in the Fynbos Biome. South Afr For J 149:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson S, Lundholm J (2012) Ecosystem services provided by urban spontaneous vegetation. Urban Ecosyst 15:545–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Säumel I, Kowarik I (2010) Urban rivers as dispersal corridors for primarily wind-dispersed invasive tree species. Landsc Urban Plan 94:244–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitzia T, Semenzato P, Trentanovi G (2010) Natural reforestation is changing spatial patterns of rural mountain and hill landscapes: a global overview. For Ecol Manag 259:1354–1362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitzia T, Campagnaro T, Dainese M, Cierjacks A (2012) Plant species diversity in alien black locust forests: a paired comparison with native stands across a north-Mediterranean range expansion. For Ecol Manag 285:85–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitzia T, Rizzi A, Cattaneo D, Semenzato P (2014) Designing recreational trails in a forest dune habitat using least-cost path analysis at the resolution of visitor sight distance. Urban For Urban Green 13:861–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solla A, Bohnens J, Collin E, Diamandis S, Franke A, Gil L, Burón M, Santini A, Mittempergher L, Pinon J, Broeck AV (2005) Screening European elms for resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. For Sci 51:134–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukopp H, Numata M, Huber A (1995) Urban ecology as the basis of urban planning. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Trentanovi G, von der Lippe M, Sitzia T, Ziechmann U, Kowarik I, Cierjacks A (2013) Biotic homogenization at the community scale: disentangling the roles of urbanization and plant invasion. Divers Distrib 19:738–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tüxen R, Ellenberg H (1937) Der systematische und ökologische gruppenwert. ein beitrag zur begriffsbildung und methodik der pflanzensoziologie. Mitt Florist-Soziol Arbgem 3:171–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallet J, Daniel H, Beaujouan V, Rozé F, Pavoine S (2010) Using biological traits to assess how urbanization filters plant species of small woodlands. Appl Veg Sci 13:412–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von der Lippe M, Kowarik I (2008) Do cities export biodiversity? traffic as dispersal vector across urban-rural gradients. Divers Distrib 14:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber F, Kowarik I, Säumel I (2014) A walk on the wild side: Perceptions of roadside vegetation beyond trees. Urban For Urban Green 13:205–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner P (2011) The ecology of urban areas and their functions for species diversity. Landsc Ecol Eng 7:231–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westermann JR, vor der Lippe M, Kowarik I (2011) Seed traits, landscape and environmental parameters as predictors of species occurrence in fragmented urban railway habitats. Basic Appl Ecol 12:29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittig R (2004) The origin and development of the urban flora of Central Europe. Urban Ecosyst 7:323–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe S, Maurer U, Schmitz S, Sukopp H (2003) Biodiversity in Berlin and its potential for nature conservation. Landsc Urban Plan 62:139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Ingo Kowarik for his helpful review of an earlier version of this manuscript. This work was conducted as part of a M.S. thesis by R. Weir and of a PhD thesis by T. Campagnaro, at the University of Padova, Italy, under the supervision of T. Sitzia. The work has been supported by the University of Padova (ex 60 % research project 60A08-1078/13 to T. Sitzia and PhD scholarship to T. Campagnaro).

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tommaso Sitzia.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 51 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sitzia, T., Campagnaro, T. & Weir, R.G. Novel woodland patches in a small historical Mediterranean city: Padova, Northern Italy. Urban Ecosyst 19, 475–487 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-015-0475-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-015-0475-3

Keywords

Navigation