Abstract
DFT/BP86 calculations have been carried out on a series of hypothetical binuclear compounds of general formula (L3M)2(C12N2H8) (M = Sc–Ni, L3 = (CO)3, (PH3)3 and Cp−, and C12N2H8 = phenazine ligand-denoted Phn). The various structures with syn and anti configurations have been investigated, in order to determine the phenazine’s coordination to first-row transition metals of various spin states with syn and anti conformations. The lowest energy structures depend on the nature of the metal, the spin state, and the molecular symmetry. This study has shown that the electronic communication between the metal centers depends on their oxidation state and the attached ligands. The tricarbonyl and the triphosphine ligands gave rise to comparable results in terms of stability order of isomers, metal-metal bond distances, and the coordination modes. Metal-metal multiple bonding has been evidenced for Sc, Ti, and V complexes to compensate the electronic deficiency. The Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, and Ni-rich metals prefer the anti conformation due to the enhancement of the metal valence electron count. The spin density values calculated for the triplet and quintet spin structures point out that the unpaired electrons are localized generally on the metal centers. The Wiberg bond indices are used to evaluate the metal-metal bonding. Furthermore, calculations using the BP86-D functional which take into account the attractive part of the van der Waals type interaction potential between atoms and molecules that are not directly connected to each other gave comparable results to those obtained by BP86 functional in terms of coordination modes, HOMO-LUMO gaps, metal-metal bond orders, and the stability order between isomers, but with slight deviation of M–C, M–N, and M–M bond distances not exceeding 3%.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kallir AJ, Suter GW, Wild UP (1985). J Phys Chem 89:1996
Aaron JJ, Maafi M, Parkanyi C, Boniface C (1995). Spectrochim Acta 51A:603
Hirata Y, Tanaka I (1976). Chem Phys Lett 43:568
Pavlopoulos TG (1987). Spectrochim Acta 43A:715
Del Barrio JI, Rebato JR, Tablas FMG (1989). J Phys Chem 93:6836
Kuzmin VA, Levin PP (1988). Bull Acad Sci USSR Div Chem Sci 37:1098
Casey CP, Audett JD (1986). Chem Rev 86:339
Schwab PFH, Levin MD, Michl J (1999). Chem Rev 99:1863
Holton J, Lappert MF, Pearce R, Yarrow PI (1983). Chem Rev 83:135
Moss JR, Scott LG (1984). Coord Chem Rev 60:171
Chowdhury MDAH, Rahman MDS, Islam MDR, Rajbangshi S, Ghosh S, Hogarth G, Tocher DA, Yang L, Richmond MG, Kabir SE (2016). J Organomet Chem 805:34
Shuster V, Gambarotta S, Nikiforov GB, Budzelaar P (2013). Organometallics 32:2329
Zhu G, Tanski JM, Churchill DG, Janak KE, Parkin G (2002). J Am Chem Soc 124:13658
Zhu G, Tanski JM, Parkin G (2003). Polyhedron 22:199
Zhu G, Pang K, Parkin G (2008). J Am Chem Soc 130:1564
Zhu G, Pang K, Parkin G (2008). Inorg Chim Acta 361:3221
Zendaoui MS, Zouchoune B (2013). Polyhedron 51:123
Merzoug M, Zouchoune B (2014). J Organometal Chem 770:69
Zouchoune F, Zendaoui S-M, Bouchakri N, Djedouani A, Zouchoune B (2010). J Mol Struct 945:78
Farah S, Korichi H, Zendaoui SM, Saillard JY, Zouchoune B (2009). Inorg Chim Acta 362:3541
Bensalem N, Zouchoune B (2016). Struct Chem 27:1781
Fadli S, Zouchoune B (2016). Struct Chem 28:985
Zendaoui SM, Saillard JY, Zouchoune B (2016). Chem Select 5:940
Saiad A, Zouchoune B (2015). Can J Chem 93:1096
Zendaoui MS, Zouchoune B (2016). New J Chem 40:2554
Benhamada N, Bouchene R, Bouacida S, Zouchoune B (2015). Polyhedron 91:59
Chekkal F, Zendaoui SM, Saillard JY, Zouchoune B (2013). New J Chem 37:2293
Stone AJ (1997) The theory of intermolecular forces. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kaplan IG (2006) Intermolecular interactions. Wiley, Chichester
Grimme S (2006). J Comput Chem 27:1787
SCM ADF2014.01, theoretical chemistry. Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Baerends EJ, Ellis DE, Ros P (1973). Chem Phys 2:41
te Velde G, Baerends EJ (1992). J Comput Phys 99:84
Fonseca Guerra C, Snijders JG, te Velde G, Baerends EJ (1998). Theo Chim Acc 99:391
Bickelhaupt FM, Baerends EJ (2000). Rev Comput Chem 15:1
te Velde G, Bickelhaupt FM, Fonseca Guerra C, van Gisbergen SJA, Baerends EJ, Snijders JG, Ziegler T (2001). J Comput Chem 22:931
Vosko SD, Wilk L, Nusair M (1990). Can J Chem 58:1200
Becke AD (1986). J Chem Phys 84:4524
Becke AD (1988). Phys Rev A 38:3098
Perdew JP (1986). Phys Rev B 33:8822
Perdew JP (1986). Phys Rev B 34:7406
Versluis L, Ziegler T (1988). J Chem Phys 88:322
Fan L, Ziegler T (1992). J Chem Phys 96:9005
Fan L, Ziegler T (1992). J Phys Chem 96:6937
P. Flükiger, H. P. Lüthi, S. Portmann, J. Weber, MOLEKEL, Version 4.3.win32 Swiss Center for Scientific Computing (CSCS), Switzerland, 2000–2001. http://www.cscs.ch/molekel/
Wiberg KB (1968). Tetrahedron 24:1083
Weinhold F, Landis CR (2005) Valency and bonding: a natural bond order donor acceptor perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Glendening ED, Badenhoop JK, Reed AE, Carpenter JE, Bohmann JA, Morales CM, Landis CR, Weinhold F (2013) NBO 6.0.; Theoretical chemistry institute. University of Wisconsin, Madison Available at: www.chem.wisc.edu/_nbo6. Accessed 1 Feb 2013
Sattler A, Zhu G, Parkin G (2008). J Am Chem Soc 131:3221
Wang H, Sun Z, Xie Y, King RB, Schaefer HF III (2010) Eur J Inorg Chem: 5161
Sun Z, Wang H, Xie Y, King RB, Schaefer III HF (2010). Dalton Trans 39:10702
Wang H, Sun Z, Xie Y, King RB, Schaefer III HF (2010). Organometallics 29:630
Korichi H, Zouchoune F, Zendaoui SM, Zouchoune B, Saillard JY (2010). Organometallics 29:1693
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Algerian MESRS (Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique) and DGRSDT (Direction Générale de la Recherche Scientifique et du Développement Technologique) for the Financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
Selected geometrical and energetic parameters calculated for [(PH3)3M]2(Phz) (M = Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, and Co) models obtained by BP86 method of singlet (S = 0) and triplet (S = 1) spin states and various symmetries (Tables S1–S3) and optimized-BP86 [(PH3)3M]2(Phz) (M = Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, and Co) structures of of singlet (S = 0) and triplet (S = 1) spin states for syn and anti conformations (Figs. S1–S3) (DOCX 1698 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Naili, N., Zouchoune, B. Structural diversity of homobinuclear transition metal complexes of the phenazine ligand: theoretical investigation. Struct Chem 29, 725–739 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-017-1064-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-017-1064-2