Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

From social class to self-efficacy: internalization of low social status pupils’ school performance

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research has largely documented that socioeconomic status (SES) is a strong and consistent predictor of pupils’ school performance in several countries. In this research, we argue that children internalize the SES achievement gap in the form of a lower/higher sense of school self-efficacy. In two studies, teenaged students’ (Study 1) and children’s (Study 2) self-efficacy was measured. Their parents’ occupations as well as the students’ anticipated grades (Study 1) and real grades (Study 2) in mathematics and French were recorded. The results indicated that SES affected both self-efficacy and school performances. Moreover, self-efficacy mediated the link between SES and mathematics performance. Thus, a seemingly psychological factor (i.e., self-efficacy) actually depends on social status and further contributes to explain low SES students’ poor performance in school.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Preliminary analysis indicated no main effect of gender on either self-efficacy, F < 1, or performance, (mathematics: F < 1, French: F(1,76) = 1.56, p = .22). Thus, this variable was not retained in the analyses.

  2. As in Study 1, there was no main effect of gender on either performance (mathematics or French) or self-efficacy (mathematics or French), all F < 1. Thus, gender was not entered in the analyses.

References

  • Alfassi, M. (2003). Promoting the will and skill of students at academic risk: An evaluation of an instructional design geared to foster achievement, self-efficacy and motivation. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30(1), 28–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S. (1997). The jigsaw classroom (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auwarter, A. E., & Aruguete, M. S. (2008). Counselor perceptions of students who are vary in gender and socioeconomic status. Social Psychology of Education, 11, 389–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67(3), 1206–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Reese, L., & Adams, N. E. (1982). Microanalysis of action and fear arousal as a function of differential levels of perceived self-efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauvois, J.-L., Bourjade, A., & Pansu, P. (1991). Norme d’internalité et évaluation professionnelle. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 4(1–2), 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauvois, J.-L., & Dubois, N. (1988). The norm of internality in the explanation of psychological events. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(4), 299–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berstein, B. (1988). Class, codes and control. London: Routedge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R., & Corwyn, R. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brauer, M. (2000). L’identification des processus médiateurs dans la recherche en psychologie. L’Année Psychologique, 100(4), 661–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bressoux, P., & Pansu, P. (2003). Quand les enseignants jugent leurs élèves. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks-Gunn, J., & Duncan, G. (1997). The effects of poverty on children. The Future of Children, 7(2), 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatard, A., Guimond, S., & Selimbegovic, L. (2007). “How good are you in math?” The effect of gender stereotypes on students’ recollection of their school marks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(6), 1017–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. H., Thompson, M. S., Kromrey, J. D., & Chang, G. H. (2014). Relations of student perceptions of teacher oral feedback with teacher expectancies and student self-concept. The Journal of Experimental Education, 79(4), 452–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croizet, J.-C., & Claire, T. (1998). Extending the concept of stereotype threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(6), 588–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnon, C., Buchs, C., & Desbar, D. (2012a). The jigsaw technique and self-efficacy of vocational training students: A practice report. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(3), 439–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnon, C., Dompnier, B., & Poortvliet, P. M. (2012b). Achievement goals in educational contexts: A social psychology perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(10), 760–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Désert, M., Préaux, M., & Jund, R. (2009). So young and already victims of stereotype threat: Socio-economic status and performance of 6 to 9 years old children on Raven’s progressive matrices. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(2), 207–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dompnier, B., Pansu, P., & Bressoux, P. (2006). An integrative model of scholastic judgments: Pupils’ characteristics, class context, halo effect and internal attributions. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21(2), 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubet, F. (2004). L’école des chances. Qu’est-ce qu’une école juste?. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, Y., Baron, A. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). From american city to Japanese village: A cross-cultural investigation of implicit race attitudes. Child Development, 77(5), 1268–1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duru-Bellat, M. (1996). Social inequalities in French secondary schools: From figures to theories. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 17(3), 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duru-Bellat, M., Meuret, D., & Bègue, L. (2009). Les sentiments de justice à et sur l’école. Bruxelles: De Boeck Université.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duru-Bellat, M., & Tenret, É. (2009). L’emprise de la méritocratie scolaire : Quelle légitimité ? Revue Française de Sociologie, 50, 229–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, J., & Kick, E. (2000). The interpretive repertoires of whites on race-targeted policies: Claims making of reverse discrimination. Sociological Perspectives, 43(1), 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gecas, V. (1989). The social psychology of self-efficacy. Annual Review of Psychology, 15, 291–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, L. A., Stevens, C. M., Monty, A. N., & Coakley, C. A. (2006). The consequences of stereotype threat on the academic performance of White and non-White lower income college students. Social Psychology of Education, 9(3), 341–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joët, G. (2009). Le sentiment d’auto-efficacité en primaire: de son élaboration à son impact sur la scolarité des élèves. Université Pierre Mendès France Grenoble 2.

  • Joët, G., Usher, E. L., & Bressoux, P. (2011). Sources of self-efficacy: An investigation of elementary school students in France. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 649–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. E., Richeson, J. A., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). Middle class and marginal? Socioeconomic status, stigma, and self-regulation at an elite university. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 838–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. (2001). Outgroup favoritism and the theory of system justification: A paradigm for investigating the effects of socioeconomic success on stereotype content. In G. Moskovitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 89–102). Mahawah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J., & Burgess, D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 260–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judd, C. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Muller, D. (2013). Mediation and moderation. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handobook of research methods in social and personality psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Keltner, D. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kudrna, L., Furnham, A., & Swami, V. (2010). The influence of social class salience on self-assessed intelligence. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 38(6), 859–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuncel, N. R., Crédé, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2005). The reliability of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores. Review of Educational Research, 75, 63–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laar, C., & Sidanius, J. (2001). Social status and the academic achievement gap: A social dominance perspective. Social Psychology of Education, 4, 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahire, B. (1992). L’“Illetrisme” en questions. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledgerwood, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Jost, J., & Pohl, M. J. (2011). Working for the system: Motivated defense of meritocratic beliefs. Social Cognition, 29(3), 322–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, S. K., & Major, B. (2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 341–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(1), 30–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institut of Statistics and Economic Studies. (2008). Depuis 20 ans, une population de plus en plus dîplômée mais avec des disparités selon le milieu social encore importante [For twenty-five years, a population more graduated but with differences according to social environment still important]. France: INSEE références, portrait social.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, L., & Major, B. (2009). Group status and feelings of personal entitlement: The roles of social comparison and system-justifying beliefs. In J. T. Jost, A. C. Kay, & H. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 427–443). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, K. R., Dweck, C. S., Spelke, E. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2011). Children’s responses to group-based inequalities: Perpetuation and rectification. Social Cognition, 29(3), 270–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009). Overcoming social background:equity in learning opportunities and outcomes. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2009-results-overcoming-social-background_9789264091504-en.

  • Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self- concept, and school achievement. In R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds.), Perception (pp. 239–266). London: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pansu, P., Dubois, N., & Dompnier, B. (2008). Internality-norm theory in educational contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(4), 385–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Régner, I., Huguet, P., & Monteil, J. (2002). Effects of socioeconomic status (SES) information on cognitive ability inferences: When low-SES students make use of a self-threatening stereotype. Social Psychology of Education, 5(3), 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachtev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarr-Salapatek, S., & Williams, M. L. (1973). The effects of early stimulation on low-birth-weight infants. Child Development, 44(1), 94–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects on children’s achievement: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(1), 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1982). Progress self-monitoring: Effects on children’s self-efficacy and achievement. The Journal of Experimental Education, 51(2), 89–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2001). Development of Academic Self-Efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (Vol. 1446, pp. 1–27). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51(2), 663–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeding, A., Darnon, C., Souchal, C., Toczeck-Capelle, M. C., & Butera, F. (2013). Reducing the socio-economic status achievement gap at university by promoting mastery-oriented assessment. PLoS One, 8(8), e71678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. A., Kass, S. J., Rotunda, R. J., & Schneider, S. K. (2006). If at first you don’t succeed: Effects of failure on general and task-specific self-efficacy and performance. North American Journal of Psychology, 1(8), 171–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Son Hing, L. S., Bobocel, D. R., Zanna, M. P., Garcia, D. M., Gee, S. S., & Orazietti, K. (2011). The merit of meritocracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 433–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, B., & Castano, E. (2007). Social class is dead. Long live social class! stereotype threat among low socioeconomic status individuals. Social Justice Research, 20(4), 418–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, N. M., Fryberg, S. A., Markus, H. R., Johnson, C. S., & Covarrubias, R. (2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1178–1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suls, J. M., & Miller, R. L. (1977). Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Washigton D.C.: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanti, M., & Labone, E. (2011). Step up into teaching: Increasing the engagement and academic self-efficacy of school students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. The Journal of Catholic School, 83(1), 64–73.

  • Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2002). Self-esteem and socioeconomic status: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(1), 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Inviting confidence in school: Invitations as a critical source of the academic self-efficacy beliefs of entering middle school students. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, 12, 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche, the Swiss National Foundation, and the Région Auvergne. We wish to express our gratitude to Lyon Catholic University for its participation in Study 2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Céline Darnon.

Additional information

Address for correspondence of the author Céline Darnon is Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive, Clermont Université, Université Blaise Pascal, 34 Avenue Carnot, 63037 Clermont-Ferrand Cedex, France.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wiederkehr, V., Darnon, C., Chazal, S. et al. From social class to self-efficacy: internalization of low social status pupils’ school performance. Soc Psychol Educ 18, 769–784 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-015-9308-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-015-9308-8

Keywords

Navigation