Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Social Class is Dead. Long Live Social Class! Stereotype Threat among Low Socioeconomic Status Individuals

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stereotype threat effects occur when members of a stigmatized group perform poorly on a task because they fear confirming a negative stereotype that is associated with their ingroup. The present study investigates whether the observed achievement gap in standardized testing between high- and low-socioeconomic status (SES) American students can be due, in part, to this phenomenon. Participants were placed in one of four conditions that varied in level of “threat” related to socioeconomic status. Results show that when socioeconomic identity is made salient before taking a test, or when the test is presented as diagnostic of intelligence, low-SES students perform significantly worse, and report much lower self-confidence, than low-SES participants in the non-threatening conditions. When threatening conditions converge, performance of low-SES students is at its worst level. These results help us better understand the role stereotyping plays in the academic performance of low-SES students, and may partly explain the disparity on standardized test scores between low- and high-SES students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. “The Simpsons” is a popular American animated television show.

  2. This study is based on a survey of 5,001 American adults, conducted between April 23 and May 31, 1998.

  3. Following Tabachnick and Fidell (2001) a log transformation was used, which resulted in a significant reduction in skewness and kurtosis and eliminated the deviation from normality (Shapiro-Wilk W = .96, p < .20).

  4. We are grateful to Vincent Yzerbyt for his suggestions regarding these analyses.

  5. This variable did not show significant skewness, so it was not transformed. Due to one missing value on this variable, the sample size for these analyses is 45.

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, M. E., & Marshall, C. A. (2005). Beyond the “triple whammy”: Considering social class as one factor in discrimination against persons with disabilities. In J. L. Chin (Ed.), The psychology of prejudice and discrimination: Disability, religion, physique, and other traits (Vol. 4, Race and ethnicity in psychology, pp. 95–110). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.

  • Beck, E. L., Whitley, D. M., & Wolk, J. L. (1999). Legislators’ perceptions about poverty: Views from the Georgia general assembly. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 26, 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosson, J. K., Haymovitz, E. L., & Pinel, E. C. (2004). When saying and doing diverge: The effects of stereotype threat on self-reported versus non-verbal anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2002). Distinction; A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantlinger, E. A. (2003). Dividing classes: How the middle class negotiates and rationalizes school advantage. New York: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brezina, T., & Winder, K. (2003). Economic disadvantage, status generalization, and negative racial stereotyping by white Americans. Social Psychology Quarterly. Special Issue: Race, Racism, and Discrimination, 66, 402–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadinu, M., Maass, A., Rosabianca, A., & Kiesner, J. (2005). Why do women underperform under stereotype threat? Evidence for the role of negative thinking. Psychological Science, 16, 572–578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • College Board (2005). 2005 College-bound seniors: Total group profile report. Retrieved September 25, 2005 from http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/about/news_info/cbsenior/yr2005/2005-college-bound-seniors.pdf.

  • Cortese, A. J. (1989). Subcultural differences in human sexuality: Race, ethnicity, and social class. In K. McKinney & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Human sexuality: The societal and interpersonal context (pp. 63–90). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozzarelli, C., Wilkinson, A. V., & Tagler, M. J. (2001). Attitudes toward the poor and attributions for poverty. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 207–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, J., Voelkl, K., Testa, M., & Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 218–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croizet, J. C., & Claire, T. (1998). Extending the concept of stereotype threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 588–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croizet, J. C., Despres, G., Gauzines, M. E., Huguet, P., Letens, J. P., & Meot, A. (2004). Stereotype threat undermines intellectual performance by triggering a disruptive mental load. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 721–731.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M., & Gross, P. H. (1983). A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 20–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S. D. (2005). Women’s realities: Defining violence against women by immigration, race, and class. In N. J. Sokoloff & C. Pratt (Eds.), Domestic violence at the margins: Readings on race, class, gender, and culture (pp. 56–70). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 276–287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (1981). The effects of race, status, and ability on helping behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 192–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, M. E. (2005). Is Bill Cosby right? Or has the Black middle class lost its mind? New York: Basic Civitas Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Educational Testing Service (2002). GRE: Practicing to take the general test (10th ed.). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Educational Testing Service (2003). Factors that can influence performance on the GRE general test, 2002–2003. Retrieved May 24, 2006 from http://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/GRE/pdf/gre_factors_02–03.pdf

  • Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 357–411). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A. C., & Glick, P. (1999). (Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, T. E., Ferguson, M. A., Brooks, J. L., & Hagadone, K. M. (2004). Coping sense of humor reduces effects of stereotype threat on women’s math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 643–653.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frable, D. E. S., Platt, L., & Hoey, S. (1998). Concealable stigmas and positive self-perceptions: Feeling better around similar others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 909–922.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L, Roberts, T., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup Poll Social Audit. (1998). Haves and have-nots: Perceptions of fairness and opportunity. Retrieved April 30, 2005 from http://www.gallup.com/poll/content/login.aspx?ci=9877

  • Gard, M. C. E., & Freeman, C. P. (1996). The dismantling of a myth: A review of eating disorders and socioeconomic status. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 20, 1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, P. M., Blanton, H., & Williams, K. J. (2002). The effects of stereotype threat and double-minority status on the test performance of Latino women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 659–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 645–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A., & Banaji, M. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartz, L. (1955). The liberal tradition in America. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haycock, K. (2001). Closing the achievement gap. Educational Leadership, 58, 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, T. M., Auman, C., Colcombe, S. J., & Rahhal, T. A. (2003). The impact of stereotype threat on age differences in memory performance. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58B, 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, V. L., & Valentino, N. A. (2004). The centrality of race in American politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 383–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, M. R., & Muha, M. J. (1984). Education and intergroup attitudes: Moral enlightenment, superficial democratic commitment, or ideological refinement? American Sociological Review, 49, 751–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns, M., Schmader, T., & Martens, A. (2005). Knowing is half the battle: Teaching stereotype threat as a means of improving women’s math performance. Psychological Science, 16, 175–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T. (2001). Outgroup favoritism and the theory of system justification: A paradigm for investigating the effects of socioeconomic success on stereotype content. In G. B. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 89–102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jussim, L., & Eccles, J. (1995). Are teacher expectations biased by students’ gender, social class, or ethnicity? In Y. T. Lee, L. J. Jussim, & C. R. McCauley (Eds.), Stereotype accuracy: Toward appreciating group differences (pp. 245–271). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jussim, L., Eccles, J., & Madon, S. (1996). Social perception, social stereotypes, and teacher expectations: Accuracy and the quest for the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 281–388). San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., & Young, S. (2005). Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternate routes to system justification. Psychological Science, 16, 240–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landrine, H. (1999). Race x class stereotypes of women. In L. A. Peplau, S. C. DeBro, R. C. Veniegass, & P. L. Taylor (Eds.), Gender, culture, and ethnicity: Current research about women and men (pp. 38–61). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyens, J. P., Desert, M., Croizet, J. C., & Darcis, C. (2000). Stereotype threat: Are lower status and history of stigmatization preconditions of stereotype threat? Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1189–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. (1996). American exceptionalism: A double-edged sword. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, B. (2002). Cognitive and behavioral distancing from the poor. American Psychologist, 57, 100–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lott, B., & Saxon, S. (2002). The influence of ethnicity, social class and context on judgments about U.S. women. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 481–499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maass, A., & Cadinu, M. (2003). Stereotype threat: When minority members underperform. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 243–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madon, S., Jussim, L., Keiper, S., Eccles, J., Smith, A., & Palumbo, P. (1998). The accuracy and power of sex, social class, and ethnic stereotypes: A naturalistic study in person perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1304–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., & O’Brien, L. T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 393–421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, G. W. (2004). Closing the achievement Gap: Lessons from Illinois’ golden spike high-poverty high-performing schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 9, 97–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. M., McLaughlin, J. A., Haddon, J., & Chansky, N. M. (1968). Socioeconomic class and teacher bias. Psychological Reports, 23, 806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. B. (1996). Estimating achievement performance: A confirmation bias. Journal of Black Psychology, 22, 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemann, Y. F., O’Connor, E., & McClorie, R. (1998). Intergroup stereotypes of working class Blacks and Whites: Implications for stereotype threat. Western Journal of Black Studies, 22, 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, D. M., Kahng, S. K., & Crocker, J. (2004). Discreditable: Stigma effects of revealing a mental illness history on test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 803–815.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothsten, R. (2004). Class and the classroom. American School Board Journal, 191, 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks P. (2003). Class rules: The fiction of egalitarian higher education. Chronicle of Higher Education, 49, 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks P. (2004). The geography of privilege. ENCOUNTER: Education for Meaning and Social Justice, 17, 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmader T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440–452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shih M., Pittinsky T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson J. O., & Schnitzer, D. K. (2005). Accountability for all. American School Board Journal, 192, 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer S. J., Steele C. M., & Quinn, D. (1999). Under suspicion of inability: Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stone J., Lynch C. I., Sjomeling M., & Darley, J. M. (1999). Stereotype threat effects on Black and White athletic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1213–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C., & Triandis, L. M. (1987). Race, social class, religion, and nationality as determinants of social distance. In W. Bergmann (Ed.), Error without trial: Psychological research on antisemitism. Current research on antisemitism (Vol. 2, pp. 501–516). Oxford, England: Walter De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, M., & Lupfer, M. B. (2004). Complicating race: The relationship between prejudice, race, and social class categorizations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 972–984.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, F. N., & Carlson, R. A. (1993). Singles ads: Gender, social class, and time. Sex Roles, 29, 387–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yzerbyt, V. Y., Muller, D., & Judd, C. M. (2004). Adjusting researchers’ approach to adjustment: On the use of covariates when testing interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 424–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Bill Hirst and Ernesto Verdeja for comments on earlier drafts of this article, as well as John Nikkah and Tava Auslan for help with data collection and coding. We are also grateful for a Clara Mayo Grant from the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, which funded portions of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bettina Spencer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spencer, B., Castano, E. Social Class is Dead. Long Live Social Class! Stereotype Threat among Low Socioeconomic Status Individuals. Soc Just Res 20, 418–432 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0047-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0047-7

Keywords

Navigation