Abstract
Value-oriented instructional programs, such as anti-racism, may often face societal barriers. A case in point are peace education programs in conflictual contexts. Close analysis of peace education programs in regions of conflict and tension suggest that they face formidable barriers that would appear to prevent the attainment of their goals of mutual legitimization, changed attitudes and empathy. However, positive research findings suggest otherwise. A possible solution of this contradiction is the distinction between strongly held and not easily changeable attitudes and beliefs, called “convictions” (Abelson, American Psychologist 43: 267–275 1988) and more regular attitudes. Possibly, the barriers facing peace education may pertain to convictions while the positive impact of peace education may pertain to less strongly held attitudes and beliefs. The present study examined the possible differential changes in more or less central beliefs when Israeli Jewish and Israeli Palestinian youth participated in a year long, school-based peace education program. This study also examined the durability of the program’s effects on the 956 adolescent study participants divided into program and no-program controls. Findings showed that such a peace education program can effectively influence adolescents’ more peripheral beliefs but not the core beliefs that stand in the center of the groups’ collective narratives. However, peripheral beliefs that are more easily affected can as easily change back, apparently by the context of adverse social and political forces.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abelson R. P. (1988) Conviction. American Psychologist 43: 267–275
Abu-Nimer M. (2004) Education for coexistence and Arab-Jewish encounters in. Israel: Potential and challenges. Journal of Social Issues 60(2): 405–422
Asmal K., Asmal L., Roberts R. S. (1997) Reconciliation through truth: A reckoning of apartheid’s criminal governance. David Phillips Publishers, Capetown
Bar-Natan, I. (2006). Aspects of friendship between adversaries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Education, University of Haifa (Hebrew).
Bar-Tal D. (2000a) Shared beliefs in a society: Social psychological analysis. Sage, Thousands Oaks, CA
Bar-Tal D. (2000b) From intractable conflict through conflict resolution to reconciliation: Psychological analysis. Political Psychology 21: 351–365
Bar-Tal D., Raviv A., Freund T. (1994) An anatomy of political beliefs: A study of their centrality, confidence, contents, and epistemic authority. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 24: 849–872
Bar-Tal D., Rosen Y. (2009) Direct and indirect models of peace education. Review of Educational Research 79(2): 557–575
Bar-Tal D., Salomon G. (2006) Israeli-Jewish narratives of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: Evolvement, contents, functions and consequences. In: Rotberg R. (eds) History’s double helix: The intertwined narratives of Israel/Palestine. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp 19–46
Biton Y., Salomon G. (2006) Peace in the eyes of Israeli and Palestinian youth: Effects of collective narratives and peace education. Journal of Peace Research 43(2): 167–180
Bourdieu P., Passeron J.-C. (2000) Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sage, London
Byrne S. (2001) Consociational and civic society approaches to peacebuilding in Northern Ireland. Journal of Peace Research 38(3): 327–352
Coleman P. (2003) Characteristics of protracted intractable conflict. Peace and Conflict: Journal of peace psychology 9: 1–37
Dakof G. A., Quille T. J., Tejeda M. J., Aalberga L. R., Bandstra E., Szapocznik J. (2003) Enrolling and retaining mothers of substance-exposed infants in drug abuse treatment. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology 71: 764–772
Danesh H. B. (2009) Unity-based peace education. In: Salomon G., Cairns E. (eds) Handbook of peace education. Taylor and Francis, New York
Devine P. G. (1989) Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56: 5–18
Eidelson R., Eidelson J. (2003) Dangerous ideas: Five beliefs that propel groups toward conflict. American Psychologist 58: 182–192
Fazio R. H., Olson M. A. (2003) Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology 54: 297–327
Groves F. H., Pugh F. (2002) Cognitive illusions as hindrances to learning complex environmental issues. Journal of Science Education and Technology 11: 381–390
Hammack P. L. (2008) Narrative and the cultural psychology of identity. Personality and Social Psychology Review 12(3): 222–247
Hollins E. R. (2008) School learning: Revealing the deep meaning, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York
Husseisi, R. (2009). The relationship between legitimizing the adversary’s collective narrative and adherence to one’s own narrative as a function of participation in a peace education program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Education, University of Haifa (Hebrew).
IPCRI (2004). Pathways for Peace. Israel/Palestine Center for Research and Information (IPCRI).
King N., Home B. (2000) Memory, narrative identity. Edinbourgh University Press, Edinbourgh, UK
Kriesberg L. (1998) Coexistence and the reconciliation of communal conflicts. In: Weiner E. (eds) The handbook of interethnic coexistence. The Continuum Publishing Company, New York, pp 182–198
Krosnick J., Petty R. (1995) Attitude strength: An overview. In: Petty R., Krosnick J. A. (eds) Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 1–24
Krosnick J. A., Schuman H. (1988) Attitude intensity, importance, and certainty and susceptibility to response effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54: 940–952
Kupermintz H., Salomon G. (2005) Lessons to be learned from research on peace education in the context of intractable conflict. Theory into Practice 44(4): 293–302
Nosek B. A. (2005) Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 134: 565–584
Polkinghorne D. (1988) Narrative knowing and the human sciences. State University of New York Press, NY
Priester J., Wegener D., Petty R., Fabrigar L. (1999) Examination the psychological process underlying the sleeper effect: The elaboration likelihood model explanation. Media Psychology 1(1): 27–48
Rosen Y. (2009) Transformation of central and peripheral beliefs: Challenges for peace education. Journal of Transformative Education 7: 1–12
Rosenthal R., Jacobson L. (1992) Pygmalion in the classroom: Teachers expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. Irvington, New York
Salomon G. (2002) The nature of peace education: Not all programs are created equal. In: Salomon G., Nevo B. (eds) Peace education: The concept, principles and practices around the world. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 3–25
Salomon G. (2004) A narrative-based view of coexistence education. Journal of Social Issues 60(2): 273–287
Salomon G. (2006) Does peace education really make a difference?. Peace and Conflict: The Journal of Peace Psychology 12(1): 37–48
Salomon G. (2008) Peace education: Its nature, nurture and the challenges it faces. In: de Rivera J. (eds) Handbook on building cultures of peace. Springer, New York
Thomsen C., Borgida E., Lavine H. (1995) The causes and consequences of personal involvement. In: Petty R., Krosnick J. (eds) Attitude strength. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 191–214
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosen, Y., Salomon, G. Durability of peace education effects in the shadow of conflict. Soc Psychol Educ 14, 135–147 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-010-9134-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-010-9134-y