Skip to main content

Aristotle on Citizenship and Civic Education: The Central Role of Political Participation

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Citizenship and Education

Abstract

This chapter examines and summarizes Aristotle’s views about citizenship and education. Aristotle defines citizenship functionally, rather than by birth or status, and he understood participation and political authority to be essential to citizenship. Aristotle’s definition of citizenship is tied tightly to his theory of the good human life and to his ethics of virtue. A good citizen in the ideal state is identical to the fully ethically virtuous person. For Aristotle, the virtues of living a good human life are the same as those needed to rule and be ruled in turn. Because of the link between ethics and politics of the person, Aristotle’s (admittedly incomplete) program for civic education is connected to his program for ethical training. This makes the civic educational process intensive and somewhat foreign to modern conceptions of civic preparation. Despite this somewhat foreign idea of education, a number of influential thinkers today have drawn on Aristotelian ideas of citizenship to develop their own theories of governance for modern states today. Social democrats, communitarians, and others looking to revive the link between civic education and participatory communities have all looked explicitly (and sometimes implicitly) to Aristotle for guidance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adkins, A. W. H. (1991). The connexion between Aristotle’s ethics and politics. In D. Keyt & F. Miller (Eds.), A companion to Aristotle’s politics (pp. 75–93). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biondi, C. A. (2007). Aristotle on the mixed constitution and its relevance for American political thought. Social Philosophy and Policy, 24(2), 176–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostock, D. (2000). Aristotle’s ethics (pp. 214–235). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartledge, P. (2000). The historical context. In M. Schofield & C. Rowe (Eds.), The Cambridge history of Greek and Roman political thought (pp. 11–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, J. (1992). Does Aristotle’s political theory rest on a ‘blunder’? History of Political Thought, 13, 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S. D. (2006). Aristotle and the rediscovery of citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. M. (1985). Aristotle on the goods of fortune. The Philosophical Review, 94(2), 173–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. M. (2010). Political community and the highest good. In J. Lennox & R. Bolton (Eds.), Being, nature, and life: Essays in honor of Allan Gotthelf (pp. 212–264). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Curren, R. R. (2000). Aristotle on the necessity of public education. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curren, R. (2013). Aristotle’s educational politics and the Aristotelian renaissance in philosophy of education. In C. Brooke & E. Frazer (Eds.), Ideas of education (pp. 33–49). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curzer, H. J. (2012). Aristotle and the virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Depew, D. J. (1991). Politics, music, and contemplation in Aristotle’s ideal state. In D. Keyt & F. Miller (Eds.), A companion to Aristotle’s politics (pp. 346–380). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deslauriers, M. (2009). Sexual difference in Aristotle’s Politics and his biology. The Classical World, 102, 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Destrée, P. (2013). Education, leisure, and politics. In M. Deslauriers & P. Destrée (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Aristotle’s politics (pp. 301–323). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Drefcinski, S. (2011). What kind of cause is music’s influence on moral character? American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 85, 287–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J. (2005). A democracy of distinction: Aristotle and the work of politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frede, D. (2005). Citizenship in Aristotle’s politics. In R. Kraut & S. Kultety (Eds.), Aristotle’s politics: Critical essays (pp. 167–184). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garver, E. (2005). Factions and the paradox of Aristotelian practical science. Polis: The Journal of the Society for Greek Political Thought, 22(2), 181–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. E. (2012). Aristotle’s politics today. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. H. (1991). The Athenian democracy in the age of Demosthenes: Structure, principles, and ideology. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitz, Z. (2012). Aristotle on law and moral education. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 42, 263–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (1984). Who is Aristotle’s citizen? Phronesis, 29, 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyt, D. (1991). Three basic theorems in Aristotle’s politics. In D. Keyt & F. Miller (Eds.), A companion to Aristotle’s politics (pp. 118–141). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyt, D. (2007). The good man and the upright citizen in Aristotle’s Ethics and Politics. Social Philosophy and Policy, 24, 153–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, C.-A. B. (2005). Aristotle, citizenship, and the common advantage. Polis, 22, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koeplin, A. (2009). The telos of citizen life: Music and philosophy in Aristotle’s ideal polis. Polis, 26, 116–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. (2007). Nature in Aristotle’s ethics and politics. Social Philosophy and Policy, 24, 153–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. (2012). Aristotle on becoming good: Habituation, reflection, and perception. In The Oxford handbook of Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. (2018, Summer). Aristotle’s ethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-ethics/

  • Kristjánsson, K. (2016). Aristotle, emotions, and education. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leunissen, M. (2012). Aristotle on natural character and its implications for moral development. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 50(4), 507–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leunissen, M. (2013). ‘Becoming good starts with nature’: Aristotle on the moral advantages and the heritability of good natural character. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 44, 99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, T. (2007). Is natural slavery beneficial? Journal of the History of Philosophy, 45, 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, T. (2013a, August). Aristotle’s politics. Oxford Bibliographies. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780195389661/obo-9780195389661-0159.xml

  • Lockwood, T. (2013b, November). Aristotle’s Ethics. Oxford Bibliographies. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780195389661/obo-9780195389661-0079.xml

  • Lord, C. (1981). The character and composition of Aristotle’s politics. Political Theory, 9, 459–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C. (2013). Aristotle’s politics (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, F. (2017, Winter). Aristotle’s political theory. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-politics/

  • Morrison, D. (1999). Aristotle’s definition of citizenship: A problem and some solutions. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 16, 143–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (1988). Nature, function and capability: Aristotle on political distribution. In J. Annas, & R. H. Grimm (Eds.), Oxford studies in ancient philosophy: Supplementary volume 1988 (pp. 145–184). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (1990). Aristotelian social democracy. In R. Bruce Douglass, G. M. Mara, & H. S. Richardson (Eds.), Liberalism and the good (pp. 203–252). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (1992). Human functioning and social justice: In defense of Aristotelian essentialism. Political Theory, 20, 202–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (1995). Aristotle on human nature and the foundations of ethics. In J. Altham & R. Harrison (Eds.), World, mind, and ethics: Essays on the ethical philosophy of Bernard Williams (pp. 83–131). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Aristotle, Politics, and human capabilities: A response to Antony, Arneson, Charlesworth, and Mulgan. Ethics, 111, 102–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, C. D. C. (1998). Aristotle: Politics. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesbeck, D. J. (2016). Aristotle on political community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roochnik, D. (2008). Aristotle’s defense of the theoretical life: Comments on Politics 7. Review of Metaphysics, 61, 711–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. (1998). Liberalism and the limits of justice (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, M. (2000). Aristotle: An introduction. In M. Schofield & C. Rowe (Eds.), The Cambridge history of Greek and Roman political thought (pp. 310–320). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, C. (2016, Winter). Aristotle. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle/

  • Smith, N. (1991). Aristotle’s theory of natural slavery. In D. Keyt & F. Miller Jr. (Eds.), A companion to Aristotle’s politics (pp. 142–155). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelman, E. (1994). Who’s who in the polis. In B.-A. B. On (Ed.), Engendering origins: Critical feminist readings in Plato and Aristotle (pp. 99–125). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1985). Philosophy and the human sciences: Philosophical papers (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. C. W. (1995). Politics. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Aristotle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yack, B. (1993). The problems of a political animal: Community, justice, and conflict in Aristotelian political thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckert, C. H. (2014). Aristotelian virtue ethics and modern liberal democracy. The Review of Metaphysics, 68, 61–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Miller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Miller, B. (2019). Aristotle on Citizenship and Civic Education: The Central Role of Political Participation. In: Peterson, A., Stahl, G., Soong, H. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Citizenship and Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67905-1_34-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67905-1_34-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67905-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67905-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics