Abstract
Although nature of science (NOS) and nature of scientific inquiry (NOSI) are related to each other, they are differentiated as NOS is being more related to the product of scientific inquiry (SI) which is scientific knowledge whereas NOSI is more related to the process of SI (Schwartz et al. 2008). Lederman et al. (Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 65–8, 2014) determined eight NOSI aspects for K-16 context. In this study, a science camp was conducted to teach scientific inquiry (SI) and NOSI to 24 6th and 7th graders (16 girls and 8 boys). The core of the program was guided inquiry in nature. The children working in small groups under guidance of science advisors conducted four guided-inquiries in the nature in morning sessions on nearby plants, animals, water, and soil. NOSI aspects were made explicit during and at the end of each inquiry session. Views about scientific inquiry (VASI) (Lederman et al. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 65–8, 2014) questionnaire was applied as pre- and post-test. The results of the study showed that children developed in all eight NOSI aspects, but higher developments were observed in “scientific investigations all begin with a question” and “there is no single scientific method,” and “explanations are developed from data and what is already known” aspects. It was concluded that the science camp program was effective in teaching NOSI.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achieve (2013) Next generation science standards. Retrieved from https://www.achieve.org/nextgeneration-science-standards.
Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education., 95(3), 518–542.
Antink-Meyer, A., Bartos, A. S., Lederman, J., & Lederman, N. G. (2016). Using science camps to develop understandings about scientific inquiry-Taiwanese students in a U.S. summer science camp. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 29–53.
Atwater, M. M., Colson, J., & Simpson, R. D. (1999). Influences of a university summer residential program on high school students’ commitment to the sciences and higher education. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 5, 1555.173.
Aydeniz, M., Baksa, K., & Skinner, J. (2011). Understanding the impact of an apprenticeship-based scientific research program on high school students’ understanding of scientific inquiry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 403–421.
Barab, S. A., & Hay, K. E. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of experts: issues related to the science apprenticeship camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 70–102.
Bell, R., Blair, M., Crawford, B., & Lederman, N. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 487–509.
Bleicher, R. (1996). High school students learning science in university research laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 1115–1133.
Burgin, S. R., & Sadler, T. D. (2016). Learning nature of science concepts through a research apprenticeship program: a comparative study of three approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(1), 31–59.
Crawford, B. (2014). From inquiry to scientific practices in the science classroom. In N. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, vol. II (pp. 515–544). New York: Taylor and Francis Group.
Fields, D. A. (2009). What do students gain from a week at science camp? Youth perceptions and the design of an immersive research-oriented astronomy camp. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 151–171.
Gibson, H., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students’ attitudes toward science. Science Education, 86, 693–705.
Helm, E., Parker, J., & Russell, M. (1999). Education and career paths of LSU’s summer science program students from 1985 to 1997. Academic Medicine, 74, 336–337.
Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education. Science & Education, 20(7–8), 591–607.
Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). The influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551–578.
Kimbrough, D. (1995). Project design factors that affect student perceptions of success of a science research project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 157–175.
Knox, K. L., Moynihan, J. A., & Markowitz, D. G. (2003). Evaluation of short-term impact of a high school summer science program on students’ perceived knowledge and skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(4), 471–478.
Leblebicioglu, G., Abik, N. M., Capkinoglu, E., Metin, D., Eroglu Dogan, E., Cetin, P. S., & Schwartz, R. (2017). Science camps for introducing nature of scientific inquiry through student inquiries in nature: two applications with retention study. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9652-0.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers conception of the nature of science: a review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.
Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, vol. I (pp. 831–879). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lederman, N., & Lederman, J. (2014). Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. In N. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, vol II (pp. 600–620). New York: Taylor and Francis Group.
Lederman, J., Lederman, N., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014). Meaningful assessment of learners’ understandings about scientific inquiry- the views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65–83.
Lederman, N., Lederman J., Akubo, M., Barlow, B. J., Bartels, S., Blanquet, E., Blonder, R. EL-Deghaidy, H., Dogan, O. K., Gomez, D. S. Gyllenpalm, J., Al-Lal, S. H., Han-Tosunoglu, C., Huang, X., Kremer, K., Lavonen, J., Liu, C., Liu, E., Liu, S. Y., Mamlok, R., McDonald, C. V., Neumann, I., Pan, Y. Pavez, J. J., Schwartz, R. (2017) Admin symposium: International collaborative investigation of beginning seventh grade students’ understandings of scientific inquiry, presented at National Association of Research Science Teaching (NARST), April, 22-25, 2017, San Antonio, TX, U.S.
Lindner, N., & Kubat, C. (2014). Science camps in Europe – collaboration with companies and school. Implications and Results on Scientific Literacy Science Education International, 25(1), 79–85.
Liu, S. Y., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). Taiwanese gifted students’ views of nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 102(3), 114–123.
Markowitz, D. G. (2003). Evaluation of the long-term impact of a university high school summer science program on students’ interest and perceived abilities in science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13, 3,395–3,407.
McComas, W. F. (Ed.). (1998). The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.
Mesci, G., & Schwartz, R. (2016). Changing preservice teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: why some conceptions may be more easily altered. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 329–351.
Ministry of National Education (MNE). (2004). Elementary and secondary science and technology curriculum. Ankara: Ministry of National Education.
Ministry of National Education (MNE). (2014). Elementary and secondary science curriculum. Ankara: Ministry of National Education.
Moss, D. M., Abrams, E. D., & Kull, J. A. (1998). Can we be scientists, too? Secondary students’ perceptions of scientific research from a project-based classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7, 149–161.
Moss, D. M., Abrams, E. D., & Robb, J. (2001). Examining student conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 8, 771–790.
National Research Council (NRC) (1996). National science education standards. Washington: National Academy Press.
National Research Council (NRC) (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: a guide for teaching and learning. Washington: National Academy Press.
Neumann, I., Neumann, K., & Nehm, R. (2011). Evaluating instrument quality in science education: Rasch-based analyses of a nature of science test. International journal of science education., 33(10), 1373–1405.
Osborne, J. (2014). Scientific practices and inquiry in the science classroom. In N. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), The handbook of research on science education, vol. II (pp. 579–599). New York: Taylor and Frances Group.
Richmond, G., & Kurth, L. (1999). Moving from outside to inside: high school students’ use of apprenticeships as vehicles for entering the culture and practice of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 677–697.
Sadeh, I., & Zion, M. (2009). The development of dynamic inquiry performances within an open inquiry setting: a comparison to guided inquiry setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(10), 1137–1160.
Sadler, T. D., Burgin, S., McKinney, L., & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: a critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 47(3), 235–256.
Schwartz, R. (2004). Scientists’ epistemological views of science: a cross-discipline comparison of scientists’ views of nature of science and scientific inquriy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Oregon State Univeristy.
Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2008). What scientists say: scientists’ views of nature of science and relation to science context. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 727–771.
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing view of nature of science in an authentic context: an explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(4), 610–645.
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2008). An instrument to assess views of scientific inquiry: the VOSI questionnaire, National Association for Research in Science Teaching, March 30–April 2, 2008. Baltimore, U.S.
Schwartz, R., Lederman, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). A series of misrepresentations: a response to Allchin’s whole approach to assessing nature of science understandings. Science Education, 96(4), 685–692.
Senler, B. (2015). Middle school students’ views of scientific inquiry: an international comparative study. Science Education International, 26(2), 166–179.
Settlage, J., & Southerland, S. A. (2007). Teaching science to every child: using culture as a starting point. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Acknowledgments
The science camp project presented in this paper was supported by Science and Society Department of Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest in this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leblebicioglu, G., Metin, D., Capkinoglu, E. et al. Changes in Students’ Views about Nature of Scientific Inquiry at a Science Camp. Sci & Educ 26, 889–917 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9941-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9941-z