Skip to main content
Log in

Building a Foundation for the Use of Historical Narratives

  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Many educators today advocate the use of historical narratives as one of a number of possible contexts for teaching science. However, several pedagogical and epistemological issues arise when implementing narratives in the classroom. In this paper, we are interested in expanding our view of narrative, specific to integrating the history of science and science teaching, and we extend our argument beyond simple anecdotal references to recognise the benefits of the historical narrative in a variety of ways. At the same time, we address pedagogical concerns by broadening perceptions of the manner and contexts in which narratives can be developed so as to include imaginative and manipulative elements that provide interactive experiences for students that are more conducive to implementation by science teachers. Several practical examples are presented as illustrations of historical narratives with imaginative and manipulative elements that by design facilitate a more meaningful implementation in the science classroom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick F., Lederman, N.G. (2000). Improving Science Teachers’ Conceptions of Nature of Science: A Critical Review of the Literature, International Journal of Science Education 22(7):665–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allchin D. (2003). Scientific Myth-Conceptions. Science Education 87(3):329–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansberry K., Morgan E. (2005). Picture-perfect science lessons: Using children’s books to guide inquiry. NSTA Press, Arlington, VI

    Google Scholar 

  • Arons A.B. (1988). Historical and philosophical perspectives attainable in introductory physics courses. Educational Philosophy and Theory 20(2):13–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew H., Osborne J., Ratcliffe M. (2004). Teaching Students “Ideas about-Science”: Five Dimensions of Effective Practice. Science Education 88(6):915–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battrick E. (1999). Beatrix Potter: The Unknown Years. Frederick Warne for the Armitt Library and Museum Centre, Ambleside. London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education (CSMEE), National Research Council: 2000, Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning, National Academy Press, Washington, DC

  • Clegg, J.: 1987, Lake District Natural History and Beatrix Potter. Beatrix Potter Series II, pp. 4–11

  • Clegg J. (1989). Beatrix Potter: Artist, Storyteller and Scientist. Torquay Natural History Society, Torquay, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough M.P. (1997). Strategies and Activities for Initiating and Maintaining Pressure on Students’ Naive Views Concerning the Nature of Science. Interchange 28(2–3):191–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough M.P. (2004). The Nature of Science: Understanding How the Game of Science is Played. In: Weld J. (eds) The Game of Science Education. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA, pp. 198–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough M.P. (2006). Learners Responses to the Demands of Conceptual Change: Considerations for Effective Nature of Science Instruction. Science & Education 15(5):463–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough M.P., Olson J.K. (2004). The Nature of Science: Always Part of the Science Story. The Science Teacher 71(9):28–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, L. & Griffith, D.: 1997, ‘Physics in Context: An IUPP Course’, in E.F. Redish & J.S. Rigden (eds.), The Changing Role of Physics Departments in Modern Universities: Proceedings of ICUPE, The American Institute of Physics

  • Conant J.B. (1957). Harvard Case Histories in Experimental Science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Corry A. (2005). Mentoring Students Towards Independent Scientific Inquiry. In: Alsop S., Bebcze L., Pedretti E. (eds), Analyzing Science Teaching. Maidenhead, UK, Open University Press, pp. 63–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford B. (2000). Embracing the Essence of Inquiry: New Roles for Science Teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(9):916–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duschl R.A. (1990). Restructuring Science Education: The Importance of Theories and Their Development. Teachers College Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan K. (1978). What is a Plot?. New Literary History 9:455–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan K. (1989). The Shape of the Science Text: A Function of Stories. In de Castell S., Luke A., Luke C. (eds), Language, Authority and Criticism: Readings on the School Textbook. The Falmer Press, New York, pp. 96–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay W.P.K. (1969). Wayside and Woodland Fungi. Frederick Warne & Co. Ltd, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Flagg A., Ory T. (2002). Teaching Science with Favorite Picture Books: Grades 1–3. Scholastic Incorporated, Toronto, ON

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford D. (2006). Representations of Science within Children’s Trade Books. Science Education 43(2):214–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost J. (1997). Creativity in Primary Science. Open Univeristy Press, Buckingham UK, pp. 65–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Glandon S. (2000). Caldecott Connections to Science. Libraries Unlimited, Westport, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman M., Robinson J.K. (1998). Using History to Teach Invention and Design: the Case of the Telephone. Science & Education 7(2):173–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen J., Allchin D., Singer F. (1996). Doing Biology. HarperCollins, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Heering, P.: 2003, Analysing Unsuccessful Experiments and Instruments with the Replication Method, Paper presented at the Itinerant Physicists of the 17th century Conference, Pognana, Italy, June 1–6, 2003

  • Henning, B. (Producer), & Phillips, P. (Director).: 1998, Tickling the Dragon’s Tail. [documentary]. Great North Productions

  • Herrenstein-Smith (1981). Narrative Versions, Narrative Theories. In: Mitchel W. (eds), On Narrative. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 209–232

  • Holbrow C.H., Amato J.C., Galvez E.J., Lloyd J.N. (1995). Modernizing Introductory Physics. American Journal of Physics 63:1078–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin A.R. (2000). Historical Case Studies: Teaching the Nature of Science in Context. Science Education 84(1):5–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, M.: 2001, Narratology: A Guide to the Theory of Narrative. Part III of Poems, Plays, and Prose: A Guide to the Theory of Literary Genres. University of Cologne, Cologne. [Available Online.] http://www.uni-koeln.de/∼ ∼ame02/ppm.htm

  • Kenealy, P., 1989, ‘Telling a Coherent “Story”: A Role for the History and Philosophy of Science in a Physical Science Course’, in D.E. Herget (ed.), HPSST, Proceedings of the First International Conference, pp. 209–220

  • Keys C., Bryan L. (2001). Co-constructing Inquiry-based Science with Teachers: Essential Research for Lasting Reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38(6):631–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis N. (1996). The “Historical-Investigative” Approach to Teaching Science. Science & Education 5(3):277–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, S. (2006, in press). A Theoretical Framework for Contextual Science Teaching. Interchange

  • Klopfer L.E., Cooley W.W. (1963). The History of Science Cases for High Schools in the Development of Student Understanding of Science and Scientists. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1(1):33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubli, F.: 1998, Narratives in Science Teaching – Some Results from an Investigation into Students’ Interests, Paper presented at the Second International Seminar for the Use of History in Science Education, Munich, Germany

  • Kubli F. (1999). Historical Aspects in Physics Teaching: Using Galileo’s work in a New Swiss Project. Science & Education 8(2):137–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubli F. (2005). Science Teaching as a Dialogue – Bakhtin, Vygotsky and some Applications in the Classroom. Science & Education 14(6):501–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linder L. (1989). The Journal of Beatrix Potter, 1881–1997. Frederick Warne, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews M. (1994). History and Philosophy in the Classroom: The case of Pendulum Motion. In: Matthews M. (eds), Science Teaching; The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. Routledge, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, D.: 2002, Understanding the Nature of Science through the Historical Development of Conceptual Models, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg

  • Metz, D.: 2003, Understanding the Nature of Science through the Historical Development of Conceptual Models, A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Education Conference, Philadelphia, PA, USA. March 23–26, 2003

  • Martin B., Brouwer W. (1991). The Sharing of Personal Science and the Narrative Element in Science Education75:707–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyling H. (1997). How to Change Students’ Conceptions of the Epistemology of Science. Science & Education 6(4):397–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar R., Osborne J. (eds.): (1998). Beyond 2000: Science Education for the Future, King’s College London, School of Education, London, UK

  • Milne C. (1996). Philosophically Correct Science Stories? Examining the Implications of Heroic Science Stories for School Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35(2):175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monk M., Osborne J. (1997). Placing the History and Philosophy of Science on the Curriculum: A Model for the Development of Pedagogy. Science Education 81(4):405–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. & Bintz, W.: 2002, From Galileo to Snowflake Bentley, Science Scope, September 2002, 10–14

  • Norris S., Guilbert M., Smith M., Shahram H., Phillips L. (2005). A Theoretical Framework for Narrative Explanation in Science. Science Education 89(4):535–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips L.M., Norris S. (1999). Interpreting Popular Reports of Science: What Happens when the Reader’s World meets the World on Paper?. International Journal of Science Education 21(3):317–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince G. (1973). A Grammar of Stories: An Introduction. Mouton, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieß, F.: 1995, ‘Teaching Science and the History of Science by Redoing Historical Experiments’, in F. Finley et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Third International History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching Conference, Vol. 2, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, pp. 958–966

  • Roach L.E., Wandersee J.H. (1993). Short Story Science. Science Teacher 60(6):18–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Royce C., Wiley D. (2005). The Common Ground: A Rationale for Integrating Science and Reading. Science & Children 12(5):40–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Schillereff M. (2001). Using inquiry-based science to help gifted students become more self-directed. Primary Voices 10(1):28–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid R. (1999). Bamboozled by Botany, Beatrix Potter Bypasses Bigoted Biology, Begins Babying Bountiful Bunnies: Or Beatrix Potter [1866–1943] as a Mycologist: The Period before Peter Rabbit and Friends. Taxon 48:438–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seatter C. (2003). Constructivist Science Teaching: Intellectual and Strategic Teaching Acts. Interchange 34(1):63–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seker, H. & Welsh, L.: 2003, ‘The Differentiation of Contexts Provided by History of Science’, in D. Metz (ed.), Proceedings of the 7th International History, Philosophy of Science and Science Teaching Conference Proceedings, Winnipeg

  • Shrigley R.L., Koballa T.R. (1989). Anecdotes: What Research Suggests about Their Use in the Science Classroom. School Science and Mathematics 89(4):293–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon J. (2002). Science Stories and Science Texts: What can They Do for Our Students?. Studies in Science Education 37:85–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scot, L., & McCarthy, S.: 1992, ‘Teaching About the Nature of Science Through History: Action Research in the Classroom’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 409–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinner, A. (1985). Understanding Scientific Literacy: From Method to Large Context, Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Toronto

  • Stinner A. (1990). Philosophy, Thought Experiments and Large context Problems in the Secondary School Physics course. International Journal of Science Education 12(3):244–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinner A. (1995). Contextual Settings, Science Stories, and Large Context Problems: Toward a More Humanistic Science Education. Science Education 79(5):555–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinner A., McMillan B.A., Metz D., Jilek J.M., Klassen S. (2003). The Renewal of Case Studies in Science Education. Science & Education 12(7):617–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinner A. & Williams, H.: 1998. History and Philosophy of Science in the Science Curriculum, in Tobin K.G., Fraser B.J. (eds), International Handbook of Science Education, Boston, MA, Kluwer, pp. 1027–1045

  • Stout B. (2001). Tools for scientific inquiry in a fifth-grade classroom. Primary Voices 10(1):23–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao P.K. (2003). Eliciting and Developing Junior Secondary Students’ Understanding of the Nature of Science Through a Peer Collaboration Instruction in Science Stories. International Journal of Science Education 25(2):147–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor J. (1989). Beatrix Potter’s Letters. Frederick Warne, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor J. (1992). Letters to Children from Beatirx Potter. Frederick Warne, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Walting R. (2001). Mischevious Mushrooms: Beatrix Potter’s Affair with Fungi – Facts and Understandings. Beatrix Potter Studies IX:69–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandersee J.H. (1992). The Historicality of Cognition: Implications for Science Education Research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29(4):423–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J.D.: 1968, ‘The Double Helix’, in G.S. Stent (1980) (ed.), The Double Helix, Norton Critical Edition, Norton, New York

  • Whitehead A. (1929). The Aims of Education and Other Essays. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager R.E. (1992). Viewpoint: What We Did Not Learn from the 60s about Science Curriculum Reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29(8):905–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Don Metz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Metz, D., Klassen, S., McMillan, B. et al. Building a Foundation for the Use of Historical Narratives. Sci Educ 16, 313–334 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9024-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9024-z

Keywords

Navigation