Abstract
This study examines the knowledge of language components in 44 teachers of English as a foreign language (EFL). These components include phonology, orthography, and morphology, for reading and spelling instruction. The study also examines teacher attitudes towards and perceptions of these language components in the context of their self-reported practice. Mixed methods analyses showed that teacher knowledge was not at ceiling level but was greater than reported comparative studies in the Israeli EFL context. Similar to previous studies, this study found that teacher knowledge of phonological awareness was weak. The teachers in this study were keen to learn more; however, their self-reported practice demonstrated a discrepancy between their perceptions of the importance of language components such as orthography and their implementation in the field, with the least number of teachers reporting teaching the orthographic conventions. The teachers’ responses provide some insights into their thinking about the relevance of language components to their teaching in an EFL context where they are often the only guiding source in the path towards literacy. For EFL teachers to impact their students’ progress in literacy, there is a need for them to acquire a more in-depth understanding of language components such as phonology, orthography, and morphology to become professionally adept.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
12 August 2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10189-8
References
Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. MIT Press.
Applegate, A. J., & Applegate, D. M. (2004). The Peter effect: Reading habits and attitudes of pre-service teachers. The Reading Teacher, 57, 554–563.
Binks-Cantrell, E., Washburn, E. K., Joshi, R. M., & Hougen, M. (2012). Peter effect in the preparation of reading teachers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 526–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.601434
Birch, B. (2011). Out of my orthographic depth: Second language reading. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 488–506). Routledge.
Bos, C., Mather, N., Dickson, S., Podhajski, B., & Chard, D. (2001). Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice educators about early reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 197–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-001-0007-0
Bowers, J. S., & Bowers, P. N. (2017). Beyond phonics: The case for teaching children the logic of the English spelling system. Educational Psychologist, 52, 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1288571
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Burt, J. S. (2006). Spelling in adults: The combined influences of language skills and reading experience. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 447–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9024-9
Calfee, R., & Sperling, M. (2010). Mixed methods: Approaches to language and literacy research. Teachers College Press.
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Ehri, L. C., & Rosenthal, J. (2007). Spelling of word: a neglected facilitator of vocabulary learning. Journal of Literacy Research, 39, 389–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960701675341
Fowler, D., & Shankweiler, A. E. (2004). Questions people ask about the role of phonological processes in learning to read. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 483–515. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000044598.81628.e6
Frost, R. (2005). Orthographic systems and skilled word recognition. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 272–295). USA: Blackwell.
Fuchs, S. (2017). Relationships between theory and practice in EFL literacy instruction in Israel: Teachers’ and experts’ perceptions about classroom practices [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Haifa.
Fuchs, S., Kahn-Horwitz, J., & Katzir, T. (2019). Theory and reported practice in EFL literacy instruction: EFL teachers’ perceptions about classroom practices. Annals of Dyslexia, 69, 114–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-018-00172-4
Goldfus, C. (2012). Knowledge foundations for beginning reading teachers in EFL. Annals of Dyslexia, 62, 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-012-0073-5
Graham, S., & Santangelo, T. (2014). Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writers? A meta-analytic review. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27, 1703–1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-01409517-0
Henry, M. (2003). Unlocking literacy: Effective decoding and spelling instruction. Brookes.
Henry, M. (2005). Spelling instruction in the upper grades: The etymology/morphology connection. Perspectives, 31, 30–32.
Israeli Ministry of Education (n. d.). Building Blocks Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/view/buildingblocksisrael/home?authuser=0
Joshi, R. M., Treiman, R., Carreker, S., & Moats, L. C. (2008). How words cast their spell. American Educator, 32, 6–16. Retrieved from: aft.org/sites/default/files/periodicals/joshi.pdf
Joshi, R. M., Washburn, E. K., & Kahn-Horwitz, J. (2016). Introduction to the special issue on teacher knowledge from an international perspective. Annals of Dyslexia, 66, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-015-0119-6
Kahn-Horwitz, J. (2015). Organizing the mess in my mind: EFL teachers’ perceptions and knowledge of English orthography. Reading and Writing, 28(5), 611–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9541-8
Kahn-Horwitz, J. (2016). Providing English foreign language teachers with content knowledge to facilitate decoding and spelling acquisition: a longitudinal perspective. Annals of Dyslexia, 66(1), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-015-0120-0
Kahn-Horwitz, J. (2020). I didn’t even know one of the conventions before: Explicit EFL spelling instruction and individual differences. Cognitive Development, 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100880
Kahn-Horwitz, J., Roffman, N., & Teitelbaum, T. G. (1998). Facing the challenges of learning English as a foreign language in Israel: In response to Ganschow, Sparks and Schneider. Dyslexia, 4(3), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0909(199809)4:3<169::AID-DYS108>3.0.CO;2-N
Kahn-Horwitz, J., & Saba, M. (2018). Weak English foreign language readers: The cross-linguistic impact of morphological awareness. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 31, 1843–1868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9810-9
Kahn-Horwitz, J., Shimron, J., & Sparks, R. L. (2005). Predicting foreign language reading achievement in elementary school students. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18 (6), 527–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3179-x
Kahn-Horwitz, J., Sparks, R. L., & Goldstein, Z. (2012). English as a foreign language spelling development: A longitudinal study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(2), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000397
Kemp, N. (2009). The acquisition of spelling patterns: early, late or never? In C. Wood & V. Connelly (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on reading and spelling (pp. 76–91). Routledge.
Mamluk-Naaman, R., Katchevich, D., & Hofstein, A. (2018). Professional development of science high school teachers in Israel. In M.-H. Chiu (Ed.), Science education research and practice in Asia (pp. 491–516). Springer.
McCutchen, D., Abbott, R. D., Green, L. B., Beretvas, S. N., Cox, S., Potter, N. S., & Gray, A. L. (2002). Beginning literacy links among teacher knowledge, teacher practice, and student learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940203500106
Moats, L. C. (1994). The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 81–102.
Moats, L. C. (1999). The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 81–102.
Moats, L. C. (2005). How spelling supports reading. American Educator, 29(4), 12–43.
Moats, L. (2014). What teachers don’t know and why they aren’t learning it: Addressing the need for content and pedagogy in teacher education. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 19, 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2014.941093
Moats, L. C. (2020). Teaching reading is rocket science: What expert teachers of reading should know and be able to do. American Educator, 44(2), 4.
Murphy, K. A., & Diehm, E. A. (2020). Collecting words: A clinical example of a morphology-focused orthographic intervention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 51, 544–560. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_LSHSS-19-00050.
Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhouven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–213). John Benjamins.
Piasta, S. B., Connor, C. M., Fishman, B. J., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Teachers’ knowledge of literacy concepts, classroom practices, and student reading growth. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 224–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430902851364.
Piasta, S. B., Park, S., Farley, K. S., Justice, L. M., & O’Connell, A. A. (2019). Early childhood educators’ knowledge about language and literacy: Associations with practice and children’s learning. Dyslexia, 26, 137–152.
Roffman, N. (2012). The impact of an explicit, multi-sensory, phonics intervention programme on the professional development of English as a foreign language teacher [Doctoral dissertation, Anglia Ruskin University]. http://angliaruskin.openrepository.com/arro/bitstream/10540/273132/1/Naomi%20Roffman%20thesis.pdf.
Russak, S., & Kahn-Horwitz, J. (2015). English foreign language spelling: Comparisons between good and poor spellers. Journal of Research in Reading, 38, 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrir.12009
Scarborough, H. S., Ehri, L. C., Olson, R. K., & Fowler, A. E. (1998). The fate of phonemic awareness beyond the elementary school years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0202_2.
Seymour, P. H., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 142–174.
Treiman, R. (1998). Why spelling? The benefits of incorporating spelling into beginning reading instruction. In J. Metsala & L. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 289–313). Erlbaum.
Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2014). How children learn to write words. Oxford University Press.
Vaisman, E. E., & Kahn-Horwitz, J. (2020). English foreign language teachers’ linguistic knowledge, beliefs and reported practices regarding reading and spelling instruction. Dyslexia, 26, 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1608
Venezky, R. L. (1999). The American way of spelling: The structure and origins of American orthography. The Guilford Press.
Acknowledgements
The data for this study was collected by the first author in the framework of the M.Ed. Language Teaching Program, Oranim College of Education. We have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised: In the original publication of the article the citations to “Author, date” and “Author & Colleagues, date” were not changed to relevant citations and also, the references were not alphabetized in the publication process.
Appendices
Appendix
Questionnaire
-
(1)
Which word contains a long vowel sound? orthographic convention
a) story b) send c) hall d) cream
-
(2)
Which word contains a short vowel sound? orthographic convention
a) great b) cart c) clip d) saw
-
(3)
Count the number of speech sounds that you perceive in each of the following words. Remember, the speech sounds may not be equivalent to the letters. For example, the word “spoke” has four speech sounds: /s/, /p/, /o-e/, /k/. phonemic awareness
a) drill __ b) sing__ c) says __ d) shook e) shrimp __ f) know __ g) quack h) sawed i) mix __ j) eight __
-
(4)
A soft c is in the word: orthographic convention
a) cone b) cape c) chide d) center
-
(5)
Which word is an example of the spelling rule: double the last letter consonant after CVC in a stressed syllable when adding the suffix –ing. grammatical/morphemic related convention
a) visit b) begin c) reach d) walk
-
(6)
Which word is an example of the spelling rule: drop the letter y and replace it with the letters ie when adding the letter s. grammatical/morphemic related convention
a) play b) buy c) cry d) enjoy e) make
-
(7)
A nonsense word that does not follow the English spelling pattern is: orthographic convention
a) shease b) toyn c) squive d) clow
-
(8)
Which letters are never doubled in English spelling (give 2 examples)? orthographic convention
-
(9)
Which letters are always doubled at the end of a stressed syllable with a short vowel (give 2 examples)? orthographic convention
-
(10)
How many syllables are in the following words? For example, the word higher has two syllables, the word threat has 1, and the word physician has three syllables: syllabic awareness
a) lighten b) international c) talked d) banana
-
(11)
The smallest unit of sound that changes the meaning of a word is called a: linguistic terminology
a) grapheme b) phoneme c) morpheme d) schwa
-
(12)
A voiced consonant digraph is in: linguistic terminology
a) these b) ship c) boy d) think
-
(13)
The name for an unstressed vowel sound is: linguistic terminology
a) morpheme b) phoneme c) schwa d) blend
-
(14)
The name for two vowel sounds that glide into each other is: linguistic terminology
a) vowel pair b) diphthong c) blend d) apostrophe
-
(15)
The name for a part of a word that contains at least one vowel and can have a consonant on either side is: linguistic terminology
a) morpheme b) syllable c) affix d) schwa
-
(16)
The name for sounds created in speech when the vocal tract is open: linguistic terminology
a) consonant b) blend c) vowel d) digraph
-
(17)
The smallest unit of print for a single speech sound is called a: linguistic terminology
a) grapheme b) phoneme c) morpheme d) syllable
-
(18)
The name describing a minimal unit of meaning in a word: linguistic terminology
a) consonant b) grapheme c) phoneme d) morpheme
-
(19)
How many years have you been teaching EFL? ___ background information
-
(20)
What grades do you teach? ___ background information
-
(21)
How many years do you think it takes English L1 learners to read accurately? perceptions
-
(22)
How many years do you think it takes English L1 learners to read texts for comprehension purposes? perceptions
-
(23)
How many years do you think it takes to acquire English L1 learners to acquire accurate spelling? perceptions
-
(24)
How many years do you think it takes EFL learners to read accurately? perceptions
-
(25)
How many years do you think it takes EFL learners to read texts for comprehension purposes? perceptions
-
(26)
How many years do you think it takes EFL learners to acquire spelling? perceptions
-
(27)
How often do you teach spelling? practice
a) every lesson b) once when teaching grammar c) when you notice a common error d) once a month e) other ___________________________
-
(28)
How do you teach spelling? Please explain in as much detail as possible – pretending that I am not an English teacher! practice
-
(29)
In what way do you think English spelling contributes to learning English? attitudes
-
(30)
What is personally challenging for you regarding EFL spelling? perceptions
-
(31)
What successful experiences have you had regarding teaching EFL spelling? practice
-
(32)
How do you overcome the challenges you face regarding teaching EFL spelling? practice
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saban, M., Kahn-Horwitz, J. “It’s difficult since there is no rhyme or reason”: Spelling relevance in an EFL context. Read Writ 35, 245–272 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10178-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10178-x