Abstract
In recent years, there has been an increase of research investigating the neighborhood effect in Chinese character recognition. As for whether orthographic neighborhood size (NS) effect reveals facilitative or inhibitory results in Chinese character recognition, opinions vary and the question is still under debate. To clarify this topic, the present study implemented two experiments, the materials of which respectively were irregular-inconsistent phonograms in Experiment 1 (1A and 1B), and regular-consistent phonograms in Experiment 2 (2A and 2B). The researchers manipulated the orthographic NS and the number of higher frequency neighbors (HFNs) of the target characters, with the character frequency controlled. Results indicated that, regardless of the regularity and consistency of the stimuli, an inhibitory NS effect was observed. Moreover, in conditions of targets both with and without HFN, inhibitory NS effects were also stably displayed. This study revealed a possible underlying mechanism of the orthographic NS effect in the lexical decision task and naming task with Chinese characters, and exploited a global theoretical framework involving the neighborhood effect of characters in Chinese.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,15, 802–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.802.
Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,18, 234–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.18.2.234.
Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 439–461. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214334.
Bi, H. Y., Hu, W., & Weng, X. C. (2006). 汉语形声字声旁家族大小对整字发音的影响 (Orthographic neighborhood effects in the pronunciation of Chinese words). Acta Psychologica Sinica 38, 791–797. http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2006/V38/I06/791
Bi, H. Y., & Weng, X. C. (2008). Effects of orthographic neighborhood on reading in Chinese: An fMRI study. Neural Regeneration Research, 3, 128–132. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295616951_Effects_of_orthographic_neighborhood_on_reading_in_Chinese_An_fMRI_study
Brysbaert, M., & Stevens, M. (2018). Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: A tutorial. Journal of Cognition,1, 9. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.10.
Carrasco-Ortiz, H., Midgley, K., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2017). Interactions in the neighborhood: Effects of orthographic and phonological neighbors on N400 amplitude. Journal of Neurolinguistics,41, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.06.007.
Carreiras, M., Perea, M., & Grainger, J. (1997). Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,23, 857–871. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.23.4.857.
Chen, H. C., & Shu, H. (2001). Lexical activation during the recognition of Chinese characters: Evidence against early phonological activation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 511–518. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196186.
Chen, B. G., Wang, L. X., & Peng, D. L. (2003). 汉字识别中形音义激活时间进程的研究(II) [The time course of graphic, phonological and semantic information processing in Chinese character recognition (II)]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 35, 576–581. http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2003/V35/I05/576
Chinese Knowledge Information Processing Group. (1997). 中央研究院平衡语料库词集及词频统计 (Word list with accumulated word frequency in Sinica Corpus). Taipei: Academic Sinica.
Chou, Y. G. (1978). 现代汉字中声旁的表音功能问题 (To what degree are the “phonetics” of present-day Chinese characters still phonetic). Chinese Linguistics, 146, 172–177. http://www.zgyw.org.cn/CN/volumn/home.shtml
Colombo, L. (1986). Activation and inhibition with orthographically similar words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,12, 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.12.2.226.
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Domic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,32, 668–687. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.668.
Feldman, L. B., & Siok, W. W. T. (1999). Semantic radicals contribute to the visual identification of Chinese characters. Journal of Memory and Language,40, 559–576. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2629.
Ferguson, G. A., & Takane, Y. (1989). Statistical analysis psychology and education (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited.
Flores d’Arcais, G. B. (1992). Graphemic, phonological, and semantic activation processes during the recognition of Chinese characters. In H. C. Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 37–66). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Flores d’Arcais, G. B., Saito, H., & Kawakami, M. (1995). Phonological and semantic activation in reading Kanji characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,21, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.34.
Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,12, 627–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80042-8.
Forster, K. I., & Shen, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,22, 696–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.3.696.
Gao, X. Y., Li, M. F., Chou, T. L., & Wu, J. T. (2016). Comparing the frequency effect between the lexical decision and naming tasks in Chinese. Journal of Visualized Experiments,110, e53815. https://doi.org/10.3791/53815(2016).
Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,5, 674–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.5.4.674.
Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language,29, 228–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(90)90074-A.
Grainger, J. (2008). Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes,23, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701578013.
Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effect of mask homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language,33, 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1011.
Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review,103, 518–565. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.518.
Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1999). Temporal integration of information in orthographic priming. Visual Cognition,6, 461–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/135062899395064.
Grainger, J., Muneaux, M., Farioli, F., & Ziegler, J. C. (2005). Effects of phonological and orthographic neighborhood density interact in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 981–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000386.
Grainger, J., O’Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., & Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception and Psychophysics,45, 189–195. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210696.
Grainger, J., O’Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., & Segui, J. (1992). Neighborhood frequency effect and letter visibility in visual word recognition. Perception and Psychophysics,51, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205073.
Grainger, J., & Segui, J. (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Perception and Psychophysics,47, 191–198. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205983.
Huang, H. S. (2001). 中文年級認字量表 Chinese character recognition test. Taipei: Psychology Press.
Jared, D., McRae, K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language,29, 687–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(90)90044-Z.
Jiang, M. M., Zhang, J. J., & Li, H. (2011). 声旁家族大小和高频同声旁字对汉字命名的影响 (The effects of the phonetic radical family size and high frequency phonetic radical family member on naming). Psychological Exploration, 31, 434–439. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/8e4dcb9351e79b8968022640.html
Ko, H. W. (1986). 由兒童會錯意字的分析探討兒童認字方法 (To Explore Chinese character recognition from analyzing the misconceptions of characters for Children). The World of Chinese Language, 39, 25–32. http://readopac3.ncl.edu.tw/nclJournal/GetPDF?tid=A86001444&jid=79005560&eid=1e6a6b9338b1c5281841283d2bbd36ff
Lewellen, M. J., Goldinger, S. D., Pisoni, D. B., & Greene, B. G. (1993). Lexical familiarity and processing efficiency: Individual differences in naming, lexical decision, and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.316.
Li, Q. L., Bi, H. Y., Wei, T. Q., & Chen, B. G. (2011). Orthographic neighborhood size effect in Chinese character naming: Orthographic and phonological activations. Acta Psychologica,136, 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.09.012.
Li, Q. L., Bi, H. Y., & Zhang, J. X. (2010). Neural correlates of the orthographic neighborhood size effect in Chinese. European Journal of Neuroscience,32, 866–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07327.x.
Li, M. F., Gao, X. Y., Chou, T. L., & Wu, J. T. (2017). Neighborhood frequency effect in Chinese word recognition: Evidence from naming and lexical decision. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 227–245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9431-5
Li, M. F., Lin, W. C., Chou, T. L., Yang, F. L., & Wu, J. T. (2015). The role of orthographic neighborhood size effects in Chinese word recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,44, 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9340-4.
Li, M. F., & Su, Y. F. (2018). 臺灣國民小學國語課本生字於心理語言學特性之研究 (Psycholinguistic properties of Chinese characters in primary school corpora of Taiwan). Bulletin of Educational Psychology,49, 637–662. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.201806_49(4).0006.
Liu, I. M. (2003). 「漢字詞處理」序言 (Introduction to Chinese character/word processing). Chinese Journal of Psychology,45, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.2003.4501.01.
Liu, I. M., Chen, S. C., & Sue, I. R. (2003). Regularity and consistency effects in Chinese character naming. Chinese Journal of Psychology,45, 29–46. https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.2003.4501.03.
Liu, I. M., Chuang, C. J., & Wang, S. C. (1975). 常用中文詞的出現次數 (Frequency count of 40,000 Chinese words). Taipei: Lucky Books.
Liu, I. M., Sue, I. R., & Chen, S. C. (2001). 漢字聲旁的表音功能 (The phonetic function of Chinese phonetic radicals). Kaohsiung: Fu-Weng.
Liu, I. M., Wu, J. T., & Chou, T. L. (1996). Encoding operation and transcoding as the major loci of the frequency effect. Cognition,59, 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00688-5.
Lupker, S. J., & Colombo, L. (1994). Inhibitory effects in form priming: Evaluating a phonological competition explanation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,20, 437–451. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.20.2.437.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review,88, 375–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375.
Meade, G., Grainger, J., Midgley, K. J., Emmorey, K., & Holcomb, P. J. (2018). From sublexical facilitation to lexical competition: ERP effects of masked neighbor priming. Brain Research,1685, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2018.01.029.
National Language Committee. (2000). 常用字詞調查報告書 (Report of frequently used characters and words). Taipei: Ministry of Education.
Peereman, R., & Content, A. (1995). Neighborhood size effect in naming: Lexical activation or sub-lexical correspondences? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,21, 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.409.
Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (1998). The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,24, 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.24.1.101.
Perfetti, C. A., & Zhang, S. (1991). Phonological processes in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,17, 633–643. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.17.4.633.
Perfetti, C. A., & Zhang, S. (1995). Very early phonological activation in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,21, 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.24.
Pollatsek, A., Perea, M., & Binder, K. S. (1999). The effects of “neighborhood size” in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,25, 1142–1158. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.1142.
Pollatsek, A., Tan, L. H., & Rayner, K. (2000). The role of phonological codes in integrating information across saccadic eye movements in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,26, 607–633. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.26.2.607.
Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (1995). Neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,21, 876–900. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.4.876.
Sears, C. R., Siakaluk, P. D., Chow, V. C., & Buchanan, L. (2008). Is there an effect of print exposure on the word frequency effect and the neighborhood size effect? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,37, 269–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-008-9071-5.
Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,16, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.65.
Shen, D., & Forster, K. I. (1999). Masked phonological priming in reading Chinese words depends on the task. Language and Cognitive Processes,14, 429–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909699386149.
Shu, H., Chen, X., Anderson, R. C., Wu, N., & Xuan, Y. (2003). Properties of school Chinese: Implications for learning to read. Child Development,74, 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00519.
Snell, J., Bertrand, D., Meeter, M., & Grainger, J. (2018). Integrating orthographic information across time and space: Masked priming and flanker effects with orthographic neighbors. Experimental Psychology,65, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000386.
Tan, L. H., Hoosain, R., & Peng, D. L. (1995). Role of early presemantic phonological code in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,21, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.43.
Tan, L. H., & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Visual Chinese character recognition: Does phonological information mediate access to meaning? Journal of Memory and Language,37, 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2508.
Triola, M. F. (2017). Elementary statistics (13th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Addison Wesley.
Weekes, B. S., Chen, M. J., & Lin, Y. B. (1998). Differential effects of phonological priming on Chinese character recognition. Reading and Writing,10, 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008087715413.
Whaley, C. P. (1978). Word-nonword classification time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,17, 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90110-X.
Wu, J. T. (1995). 多目的心理學實驗及測量程序控制組合式電腦程式系統 (A PC software system of lab automation for Chinese psychological experiments). Chinese Journal of Psychology, 37, 1–21. http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/246246/137216
Wu, J. T., & Chen, H. C. (2000). 中文辨識與唸字作業中的字音字義促發效果比較分析 (Evaluating semantic priming and homophonic priming in recognition and naming of Chinese characters). Chinese Journal of Psychology, 42, 65–86. http://140.112.114.62/handle/246246/172771
Wu, J. T., & Chen, H. C. (2003). Chinese orthographic priming in lexical decision and naming. Chinese Journal of Psychology,45, 75–95. https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.2003.4501.05.
Wu, J. T., & Chou, T. L. (2000). The comparison of relative effects of semantic, homophonic, and graphic priming on Chinese character recognition and naming. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 32, 34–41. http://140.112.114.62/handle/246246/172772
Wu, J. T., Chou, T. L., & Liu, I. M. (1994). 中文字詞處理過程裡的頻率效果分析(The locus of the character/word frequency effect). In H. W. Chang, J. T. Huang, C. W. Hue, & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Advances in the study of Chinese language processing (pp. 31–58). Taipei: National Taiwan University.
Wu, J. T., & Liu, I. M. (1988). A data base system about the psychological features of Chinese characters and words. In I. M. Liu, H. C. Chen, & M. J. Chen (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of the Chinese language (pp. 171–186). Hong Kong: Asian Research Service.
Wu, J. T., Yang, F. L., & Lin, W. C. (2013). 跨越單字辨識歷程研究裡的語音處理議題 (Beyond phonology matters in character recognition). Chinese Journal of Psychology,55, 289–318. https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.20130608.
Yang, F. L., & Wu, J. T. (2014). 漢字辨識作業中部首相同促發字的形似抑制效果(Orthographic inhibition between characters with identical semantic radicals in primed character decision tasks). Chinese Journal of Psychology,56, 49–63. https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.20131028.
Zhang, J. J., & Jiang, M. M. (2008). 形旁家族、声旁家族和高频同声旁字对形声字识别的影响 (The effects of the radical family size and high frequency phonetic radical family member on phonogram recognition). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 40, 947–960. https://wenku.baidu.com/view/c73b0a19b9f3f90f77c61b02.html
Ziegler, J. C., Muneaux, M., & Grainger, J. (2003). Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. Journal of Memory and Language,48, 779–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00006-8.
Ziegler, J. C., Tan, L. H., Perry, C., & Montant, M. (2000). Phonology matters: The phonological frequency effect in written Chinese. Psychological Science,11, 234–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00247.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (MOST 104-2410-H-002-058). We thank anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, MF., Gao, XY. & Wu, JT. Neighborhood effects in Chinese character recognition: Going beyond phonological perspectives to explain a possible underlying mechanism. Read Writ 33, 547–570 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09973-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09973-4