Abstract
Previous studies about the orthographic neighborhood size (NS) in Chinese have overlooked the morphological processing, and the co-variation between the character frequency and the the NS. The present study manipulated the word frequency and the NS simultaneously, with the leading character frequency controlled, to explore their influences on word lexical decision (Experiment 1) and naming (Experiment 2). The results showed a robust effect that words with a larger NS produced shorter reaction time than those with a smaller NS, irrespective of the word frequency and the tasks. This facilitative effect may occur due to a semantic network formed by neighbor words, resulting in the semantic activation to accelerate the word recognition. Moreover, the comparison of the effect sizes of word frequency between the two tasks showed that lexical decision responses demonstrated a larger word frequency effect, indicating that the sub-word processing was involved in the multi-character word recognition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(5), 802–814. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.802.
Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(2), 234–254. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.2.234.
Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(4), 439–461. doi:10.3758/BF03214334.
Baayen, R. H. (1994). Productivity in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(3), 447–469. doi:10.1080/01690969408402127.
Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(1), 94–117. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2509.
Bertram, R., Baayen, R. H., & Schreuder, R. (2000). Effects of family size for complex words. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(3), 390–405. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2681.
Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10(5), 425–455. doi:10.1080/01690969508407111.
Carreiras, M., Perea, M., & Grainger, J. (1997). Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(4), 857–871. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.4.857.
Chinese Knowledge Information Processing Group. (2001). Word list with accumulated word frequency in Sinica Corpus 3.1. Taipei: Institute of Information Science, Academic Sinica
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Domic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). New York: Academic Press.
De Jong, N. H., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000). The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4–5), 329–365. doi:10.1080/01690960050119625.
del Prado, M., Martín, F., Kostić, A., & Baayen, R. H. (2004). Putting the bits together: An information theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cognition, 94(1), 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.015.
del Prado, M., Martín, F., Kostić, A., & Baayen, R. H. (2004). Putting the bits together: An information theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cognition, 94(1), 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.015.
Dijkstra, T., del Prado, Moscoso, Martín, F., Schulpen, B., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). A roommate in cream: Morphological family size effects on interlingual homograph recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(1–2), 7–41. doi:10.1080/01690960444000124.
Forster, K. I., & Shen, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(3), 696–713. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.3.696.
Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13(1), 104–115. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.13.1.104.
Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(2), 228–244. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(90)90074-A.
Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effect of mask homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 218–233. doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1011.
Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103(3), 518–565. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.518.
Grainger, J., & Segui, J. (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Perception and Psychophysics, 47(2), 191–198. doi:10.3758/BF03205983.
Grainger, J., O’Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., & Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception and Psychophysics, 45(3), 189–195. doi:10.3758/BF03210696.
Grainger, J., O’Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., & Segui, J. (1992). Neighborhood frequency effect and letter visibility in visual word recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 51(1), 49–56. doi:10.3758/BF03205073.
Huang, H. W., Lee, C. Y., Tsai, J. L., Lee, C. L., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (2006). Orthographic neighborhood effects in reading Chinese two-character words: Reaction time and ERP measurements. Neuroreport, 17(10), 1061–1065. doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000224761.77206.1d.
Jalbert, A., Neath, I., Bireta, T. J., & Surprenant, A. M. (2011). When does length cause the word length effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 37(2), 338–353. doi:10.1037/a0021804.
Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (De)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 920–933. doi:10.1038/nrn2532.
Lavidor, M., & Ellis, A. W. (2002). Word length and orthographic neighborhood size effects in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Brain and Language, 80(1), 45–62. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2583.
Li, Q. L., Bi, H. Y., Wei, T. Q., & Chen, B. G. (2011). Orthographic neighborhood size effect in Chinese character naming: Orthographic and phonological activations. Acta Psychologica, 136(1), 35–41. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.09.012.
Liu, I. M., Chuang, C. J., & Wang, S. C. (1975). Frequency count of 40,000 Chinese words. Taipei: Lucky Books.
Liu, I. M., Wu, J. T., & Chou, T. L. (1996). Encoding operation and transcoding as the major loci of the frequency effect. Cognition, 59(2), 149–168. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00688-5.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–407. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375.
Monsell, s, Doyle, M. C., & Haggard, P. N. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(1), 43–71. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.118.1.43.
National Language Committee. (2000). Report of frequently used characters and words. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
Peereman, R., & Content, A. (1995). Neighborhood size effect in naming: Lexical activation or sublexical correspondences? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21(2), 409–421. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.409.
Pollatsek, A., Perea, M., & Binder, K. S. (1999). The effects of “neighborhood size” in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(4), 1142–1158. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.1142.
Sandra, D. (1994). The morphology of the mental lexicon: Internal word structure viewed from a psycholinguistic perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(3), 227–269. doi:10.1080/01690969408402119.
Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(1), 118–139. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2510.
Sears, C. R., Campbell, C. R., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Is there a neighborhood frequency effect in English? Evidence from reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(4), 1040–1062. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.1040.
Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (1995). Neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(4), 876–900. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.4.876.
Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 65–76. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.65.
Tsai, J. L., Lee, C. Y., Lin, Y. C., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Hung, D. L. (2006). Neighborhood size effects of Chinese words in lexical decision and reading. Language and Linguistics, 7(3), 659–675. Retrieved from http://www.ling.sinica.edu.tw/publ_j_en.asp-aid=23.htm
Wang, Q. H., & Zhang, J. W. (2011). N400 solution effect of Chinese character fragments: An orthographic neighborhood size effect. Brain Research Bulletin, 86(3–4), 179–188. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2011.07.006.
Wu, J. T. (1995). A PC software system of lab automation for Chinese psychological experiments. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 37(1), 1–21. Retrieved from http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/246246/137216
Wu, J. T., & Liu, I. M. (1988). A data base system about the Psychological features of Chinese characters and words. In I. M. Liu, H. C. Chen, & M. J. Chen (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of the Chinese language (pp. 171–186). Hong Kong: Asian Research Service.
Wu, J. T., Chou, T. L., & Liu, I. M. (1994). The locus of the character/word frequency effect. In H. W. Chang, J. T. Huang, C. W. Hue, & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Advances in the study of Chinese language processing (pp. 31–58). Taipei: National Taiwan University.
Wu, J. T., Yang, F. L., & Lin, W. C. (2013). Beyond phonology matters in character recognition. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 55(3), 289–318. doi:10.6129/CJP.20130608.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by grants from the National Science Council of Taiwan (NSC 98-2410-H-002-027) to Jei-Tun Wu and (NSC 101-2410-H-002-093-MY2) to Tai-Li Chou. Our special gratitude goes to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. Besides, thank Xin-Yu Gao for her precious support in our cooperation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: High-Frequency Words Used in Experiments 1 and 2
Over 90 % of the above high-frequency words with larger and smaller NS had higher frequency neighbor words.
Appendix 2: Low-Frequency Words Used in Experiment 1 and 2
100 % of the above low-frequency words with larger and smaller NS had higher frequency neighbor words.
Appendix 3: Non-words Used in Experiment 1
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, MF., Lin, WC., Chou, TL. et al. The Role of Orthographic Neighborhood Size Effects in Chinese Word Recognition. J Psycholinguist Res 44, 219–236 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9340-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9340-4