Skip to main content
Log in

Phonological awareness in Hebrew (L1) and English (L2) in normal and disabled readers

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study examined cross-linguistic relationships between phonological awareness in L1 (Hebrew) and L2 (English) among normal (N = 30) and reading disabled (N = 30) Hebrew native speaking college students. Further, it tested the effect of two factors: the lexical status of the stimulus word (real word vs. pseudoword) and the linguistic affiliation of the target phoneme (whether it is within L1 or L2) on phonological awareness. Three parallel experimental phonological awareness tasks were developed in both languages: phoneme isolation, full segmentation, and phoneme deletion. As expected, the results revealed lower levels of phonological awareness in the L2 than in the L1, and in the reading disabled than in the normal reader group. The lexical status of the target word was a reliable factor predicting individual differences in phonological awareness in L2. It was also found that the linguistic affiliation of the target phoneme was a reliable factor in predicting L2 phonological awareness performance in both reader groups. The results are discussed within the framework of phonological representation and language-specific linguistic constraints on phonological awareness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aro, M., & Wimmer, H. (2003). Learning to read: English in comparison to six more regular orthographies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 621–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BenDror, I., Bentin, S., & Frost, R. (1995). Semantic, phonological and morphologic skills in reading disabled and normal children: Evidence from perception and production of spoken Hebrew. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 876–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. D. A., & Deavers, R. P. (1999). Units of analysis in nonword reading: Evidence from children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 208–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1990). Acquiring the alphabetic principle: A case for teaching recognition of phoneme identity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 805–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2003). Developmental changes in the manifestation of a phonological deficit in dyslexic children learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 22–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWeirdt, W. (1988). Speech perception and frequency discrimination in good and poor readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 163–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durgunoglu, A. Y., Nagy, W. E., & Hancin-Bhatt, B. J. (1993). Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 453–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durgunoglu, A. Y. (2002). Cross-linguistic transfer in literacy development and implications for language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbro, C. (1996). Early linguistic abilities and reading development: A review and a hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 453–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbro, C. (1998). When reading is ‘readn’ or somthn. Distinctness of phonological representations of lexical items in normal and disabled readers. Scandanavian Journal of Psychology, 39, 149–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, A. (1991). How early phonological development might set the stage for phoneme awareness. In S. Brady & D. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy (pp. 97–117). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, A., & Swainson, B. (2004). Relationships of naming skills to reading, memory and receptive vocabulary: Evidence for imprecise phonological representations of words by poor readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 247–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. (1995). Is non-word repetition a test of phonological memory or long-term knowledge? It all depends on the non-words. Memory & Cognition, 23, 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 513–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S., & Baddeley, A. (1990). The role of phonological memory in vocabulary acquisition: A study of young children learning new names. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 439–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geva, E., & Siegel, L. (2000). Orthographic and cognitive factors in the concurrent development of basic reading skills in two languages. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geva, E., & Wang, M. (2001). The development of basic reading skills in children: A cross-language perspective. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 182–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geva, E., Wade-Woolley, L., & Shany, M. (1997). Development of reading efficiency in first and second language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 119–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. (2000). Phonological representations, reading development and dyslexia: Towards a cross-linguistic theoretical framework. Dyslexia, 6, 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. (2002). Phonology, reading development and dyslexia: A cross-linguistic perspective. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koda, K. (2008). Impacts of prior literacy learning experience on second language learning to read. In K. Koda & A. M. Zehler (Eds.), Learning to read across languages: Cross-linguistic relationships in first- and second-language literacy development (pp. 68–96). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, G. R. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masoura, E. V., & Gathercole, S. (2005). Contrasting contributions of phonological short term memory and long term knowledge to vocabulary learning in a foreign language. Memory, 13, 422–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride-Chang, C. (1995). What is phonological awareness? Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 179–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metsala, J. L. (1997). An examination of word frequency and neighborhood density in the development of spoken word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25, 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metsala, J. L., & Walley, A. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In J. Metsala & L. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 65–87). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the national reading panel teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaza, M., & Cohen, H. (2007). The contribution of phonological awareness and visual attention in early reading and spelling. Dyslexia, 13, 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramus, F. (2001). Outstanding questions about phonological processing in dyslexia. Dyslexia, 7, 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M. A. (1989). Speech perception and the discrimination of brief auditory cues in reading disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 270–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2003). Linguistic distance and initial reading acquisition: The case of Arabic diglossia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 431–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2004). The impact of phonemic and lexical distance on the phonological analysis of words and pseudowords in a diglossic context. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 495–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2007a). Epilinguistic and metalinguistic phonological awareness may be subject to different constraints: Evidence from Hebrew. First Language, 27, 385–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2007b). Linguistic constraints on children’s ability to isolate phonemes in Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 605–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, E. (2008). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English-Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 481–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, E. (2010). Acquiring reading in two languages: An introduction to the special issue. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 263–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E., Kogan, N., & Walters, J. (2010). Universal and language-specific constraints on phonemic awareness: Evidence from Russian-Hebrew bilingual children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 359–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E., Levin, I., Hende, N., & Ziv, M. (2009). The linguistic affiliation constraint and phoneme recognition in diglossic Arabic. Journal of Child Language, in press.

  • Schrueder, R., & van Bon, W. H. J. (1989). Phonemic analysis: Effects of word properties. Journal of Research in Reading, 12, 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Service, E. (1998). The effect of word length on immediate serial recall depends on phonological complexity, not articulatory duration. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A–2, 283–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalem, T., & Lachman, D. (1998). Diagnostic battery of reading processes in Hebrew. Israel: Nitzan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Share, D., & Blum, P. (2005). Syllable splitting in literate and preliterate Hebrew speakers: Onsets and rimes or bodies and codas? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 182–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimron, J. (2006). Reading Hebrew: The language and the psychology of reading it. Hillsdale, NJ.: L. Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimron, J., & Sivan, T. (1994). Reading proficiency and orthography: Evidence from Hebrew and English. Language Learning, 44, 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M. (2000). Dyslexia. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, S. A., & Murray, B. A. (1994). Defining phonological awareness and its relationship to early reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. (1998). Refining the phonological core deficit model. Child Psychology & Psychiatry Review, 3, 17–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, D., & Goswami, U. (1997). Phonological awareness deficits in developmental dyslexia and the phonological representations hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 18–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L., & Siegel, L. (2001). Learning disabilities as a working memory deficit. Issues in Education, 7, 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., & Weatherson, S. (1992). Effects of linguistic structure on children’s ability to isolate initial consonants. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 174–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade-Woolley, L., & Geva, E. (2000). Processing novel phonemic contrasts in the acquisition of L2 word reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4, 295–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walley, A., Metsala, J., & Garlock, V. (2003). Spoken vocabulary growth: Its role in the development of phoneme awareness and early reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1987). Speech perception in severely disabled and average reading children. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 48–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, G., & van den Broek, W. (2004). Influence of bigrapheme frequency and consonantal sonority on first grade reading performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Scientific Studies of Reading (SSSR), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

  • Yopp, H. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 159–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susie Russak.

Additional information

This research is part of a doctoral dissertation conducted by the first author under the supervision of Dr. Elinor Saiegh-Haddad at Bar Ilan University, Israel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russak, S., Saiegh-Haddad, E. Phonological awareness in Hebrew (L1) and English (L2) in normal and disabled readers. Read Writ 24, 427–442 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9235-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9235-1

Keywords

Navigation