Skip to main content
Log in

Training letter and orthographic pattern recognition in children with slow naming speed

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although research has established that performance on a rapid automatized naming (RAN) task is related to reading, the nature of this relationship is unclear. Bowers (2001) proposed that processes underlying performance on the RAN task and orthographic knowledge make independent and additive contributions to reading performance. We examined the benefits of training orthographic pattern recognition and speeded letter recognition for children in Grades 1 and 2 with slow naming speed. Children first received training in either orthographic pattern recognition or speeded letter recognition, and then switched to the other type of training. Results indicated that speeded letter recognition can improve through training, but only when preceded by training in orthographic pattern recognition. Orthographic pattern recognition training improved the accuracy and speed of reading training words, whether training occurred alone or following letter training. Letter training prior to the orthographic training provided no additional benefit. Together, these results argue for the importance of orthographic training for children with slow naming speed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, E. W., & Blachman, B. A. (1991). Does phonemic awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, N. J., Lovett, M. W., & Kroeber, C. L. (1997). Training and transfer-of-learning effects in disabled and normal readers: Evidence of specific effects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64, 343–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berends, I. E., & Reitsma, P. (2006). Remediation of fluency: Word specific or generalized training. Reading and Writing, 19, 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A. (1978). Relationships between oral reading rates for letters, words, and simple text in the development of reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 223–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blachman, B. A. (1984). Relationship of rapid naming ability and language analysis skills to kindergarten and first-grade reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 610–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, P. G. (1993). Text reading and rereading: Determinants of fluency beyond word recognition. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 133–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, P. G. (1995). Re-examining selected reading research from the viewpoint of the “double deficit hypothesis”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the society for research in child development, Indianapolis, IN.

  • Bowers, P. G. (2001). Exploration of the basis for rapid naming’s relationship to reading. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 41–63). Timonium, MA: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, P. G., Sunseth, K., & Golden, J. (1999). The route between rapid naming and reading progress. Scientific Studies in Reading, 3, 31–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, P. G., & Swanson, L. B. (1991). Naming speed deficits in reading disability: Multiple measures of a single process. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 195–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, P. G., & Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 5, 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1991). Phonological skills before and after learning to read. In S. A. Brady & D. P. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy (pp. 37–45). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, R. P., & David, A. H. (2001). Investigating reading achievement using a causal model. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 107–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, N. J. (2008). From reading to spelling and spelling to reading: Transfer goes both ways. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 869–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, N. J., & Levy, B. A. (2007). Letter processing and the formation of memory representations in children with naming speed deficits. Reading and Writing, 20, 201–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das-Smaal, E. A., Klapwijk, M. J. G., & van der Leij, A. (1996). Training of perceptual unit processing in children with a reading disability. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 221–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, P. F., & Vrielink, L. O. (2004). Rapid automatized naming: Easy to measure, hard to improve (quickly). Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 65–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In P. G. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (1997). Learning to read and learning to spell are one and the same, almost. In C. A. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory and practice across languages (pp. 237–269). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C., & Robbins, C. (1992). Beginners need some decoding skill to read words by analogy. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 12–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fugate, M. H. (1997). Letter training and its effect on the development of beginning reading skills. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 170–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. (1986). Children’s use of analogy in learning to read: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greaney, K. T., Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (1997). Effects of rime-based orthographic analogy training on the word recognition skills of children with reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 645–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, N., & Hanley, J. R. (2004). The role of orthographic analogies in reading for meaning: Evidence from readers with dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 265–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R. K., & Pfeiffer, S. L. (2003). Naming speed and phonological awareness as predictors of reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 453–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, B. A. (2001). Moving the bottom: Improving reading fluency. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency and the brain (pp. 357–379). Timonium, MA: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, B. A., Bourassa, D. C., & Horn, C. (1999). Fast and slow namers: Benefits of segmentation and whole word training. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 115–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, B. A., & Lysynchuk, L. (1997). Beginning word recognition: Benefits of training by segmentation and whole word methods. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 359–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, M. W., Steinbach, K. A., & Frijters, J. C. (2000). Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disability: A double-deficit perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 334–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manis, F. R., Doi, L. M., & Bhadha, B. (2000). Naming speed, phonological awareness, and orthographic knowledge in second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 325–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manis, F. R., & Freedman, L. (2001). The relationship of naming speed to multiple reading measures in disabled and normal readers. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 65–92). Timonium, MA: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S., & Doi, L. M. (1999). See Dick RAN: Rapid naming and the longitudinal prediction of reading subskills in first and second graders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 129–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride-Chang, C., & Manis, F. R. (1996). Structural invariance in the associations of naming speed, phonological awareness, and verbal reasoning in good and poor readers: A test of the double deficit hypothesis. Reading and Writing, 8, 323–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. S., Wood, F. B., Hart, L. A., & Felton, R. H. (1998). Selective predictive value of rapid automatized naming in poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 106–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R., Forsberg, H., Wise, B., & Rack, J. (1994). Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In G. R. Lyons (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 243–277). Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, D., Stainthorp, R., Stuart, M., Garwood, H., & Quinlan, P. (2007). An experimental comparison between rival theories of rapid automatized naming performance and its relationship to reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 98, 46–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitsma, P. (1983). Printed word learning in beginning readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 36, 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitsma, P. (1997). How to get friends in beginning word recognition. In C. K. Leong & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Cross-language studies of learning to read and spell (pp. 213–233). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, J. (1975). Helping children overcome learning difficulties: A step-by-step guide for parents and teachers. Oxford, England: Walker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, J. (1979). Test of auditory analysis skills. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, J. M. (1992). Assessment of Children’s intelligence: Revised and updated (3rd ed.). San Diego: Jerome M. Sattler Publisher Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, R., & Frederickson, N. (2005). Evidence of a highly specific relationship between rapid automatic naming of digits and text-reading speed. Brain and Language, 93, 152–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, R., & Stuart, M. (2001). Orthographic analogies and early reading: Explorations of performance and variation in two transfer tasks. Reading and Writing, 14, 571–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, H. S. (1998). Predicting the future achievement of second graders with reading disabilities: Contributions of phonemic awareness, verbal memory, rapid naming, and IQ. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L. S., Share, D., & Geva, E. (1995). Evidence for superior orthographic skills in dyslexics. Psychological Science, 6, 250–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., Feeman, D. J., & Cunningham, A. E. (1983). The development of the relation between letter-naming speed and reading ability. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 199–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, V., Ebner, E. M., Wimmer, H., & Landerl, K. (2004). Training reading fluency in dysfluent readers with high reading accuracy: Word specific effects but low transfer to untrained words. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 89–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 276–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Burgess, S., & Hecht, S. (1997). Contribution of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming ability to the growth of word-reading skills in second- to fifth-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 161–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Daal, V. H. P., Reitsma, P., & van der Leij, A. (1994). Processing units in word reading by disabled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 180–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Bos, K. P., Zijlstra, B. J. H., & Spelberg, H. C. L. (2002). Life-span data on continuous naming speeds of numbers, letters, colors, and pictured objects and word-reading speed. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 25–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vukovic, R. K., & Siegel, L. S. (2006). The double deficit hypothesis: A comprehensive analysis of the evidence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Hecht, S. A., Barker, T. A., Burgess, S. R., et al. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33, 68–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (2000). The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 668–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. (1997). A provisional, integrative account of phonological and naming speed deficits in dyslexia: Implications for diagnosis and intervention. In B. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 67–92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., Bally, H., & Morris, R. (1986). Automaticity, retrieval processes, and reading: A longitudinal study in average and impaired readers. Child Development, 57, 988–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., Bowers, P. G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., Goldberg-O’Rourke, A., Gidney, C., Lovett, M., Cirino, P., & Morris, R. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 43–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., Pfeil, C., Lotz, R., & Biddle, K. (1994). Towards a more universal understanding of the developmental dyslexias: The contribution of orthographic factors. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge, theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 137–171). New York, NY: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C. (2002). Orthographic analogies and phonological priming effects. Journal of Research in Reading, 25, 144–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the principals, teachers, parents, and especially the students who participated in and supported this work. We also thank Carolyn Breukelman, Samantha Minnet, and Bryan Lee for their assistance. This work was supported by an operating grant to the second author from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. This experiment is part of the Ph.D. dissertation research of the first author. Portions of this paper were presented at the 10th annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading (2003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole J. Conrad.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 5.

Table 5 Generalization words

Appendix 2

See Table 6.

Table 6 Training words

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conrad, N.J., Levy, B.A. Training letter and orthographic pattern recognition in children with slow naming speed. Read Writ 24, 91–115 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9202-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9202-x

Keywords

Navigation