Abstract
This paper analyzes the extent to which individual characteristics, the workplace situation, and regional policies influence the use and duration of parental leave in Spain. The research is based on a sample of 125,165 individuals, and 6,959 parental leaves covered in the “Muestra Continua de Vidas Laborales” (MCVL-2006). The MCVL consists of administrative register data, which include information from three different sources: The social security system, municipal and income tax Registers. We adopt a simultaneous equations approach to analyze the determinants of the use (logistic regression) and duration (event history analysis) of parental leave, which allows us to control for endogeneity and censored observations. Our results suggest that the Spanish parental leave scheme increases gender and social inequalities, insofar as it reinforces gender role specialization, and only encourages the reconciliation of work and family life among workers with a good position in the labor market (educated employees with a high and stable work status).
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The social security system only provides information about the number of individuals who were not at work due to parental leave in December of each year. Therefore, this estimate should not be interpreted as a rate, but the percentage of mothers and fathers that were in parental leave during the specified month. Other researches also confirm the small use of parental leave in Spain (Escobedo, 2008).
Spain is administratively divided into 17 autonomous communities or regions which hold broad legislative and executive autonomy in specific areas of social policy that allow them, for instance, to design additional measures of social protection to national labor law.
The average monthly gross wage in Spain was 1,353 Euros for women and 1,837 Euros for men in 2006, according to the “Encuesta de Estructura Salarial” (“Spanish Wage Structure Survey”).
According to Durán (2007), 95% of Spanish workers contribute to the social security system. Only a small proportion of workers (mostly liberal professionals and civil servants) choose others systems of social protection. As a consequence, our dataset is representative of the great majority of parents eligible for parental leave.
6,140 individuals made up this number of career breaks. 85% of them took only one parental leave, 12.5% took two and 1.6% took three or more. As a result, there are individuals who have contributed more than one career break to the sample.
In Model 3, which deals with men, we have fixed the value of the standard deviation at the same value as that estimated in the model for both sexes (Model 2), due to the fact that the reduced number of available observations does not allow its estimation.
The MCVL underestimates educational attainment (García-Pérez 2008, p. 9) since individuals provide this information directly to the municipal registers, and they usually update it when there is a change in their home address. Consequently, the effect of educational attainment could be even larger.
Similar results are shown if we omit the variable “level of education” from the model, which presumably is very much related to income level (these results are not shown).
References
Adam, P. (1996). Mothers in an insider-outsider economy: The puzzle of Spain. Journal of Population Economics, 9(3), 301–323.
Alwin, D. F. (1991). Changes in family roles and gender differences in parental socialization values. In N. Cahill (Ed.), Sociological studies of childhood (Vol. 4). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Baizán, P. (2009). Regional child care availability and fertility decisions in Spain. Demographic Research, 21(27), 803–842.
Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Blau, F. D., Ferber, M. A., & Winker, A. E. (2001). The economics of women, men and work. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Blossfeldt, H. P., & Rohwer, G. (2002). Techniques of event history modeling: New approaches to causal analysis (2nd ed.). London and Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Bygren, M., & Duvander, A. (2006). Parents’ workplace situation and fathers’ parental leave use. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(2), 363–372.
Crompton, R. (2006). Employment and the family. The reconfiguration of work and family life in contemporary societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Del Boca, D., & Pascua, S. (2005). ‘Social policies and employment of married women in Europe’. ChilD’s working paper 19. Torino: Centre for Household, Income, Labor and Demographic Economics.
Duncan, S., & Edwards, R. (1999). Lone mothers, paid work and gendered moral rationalities. London: Macmillan.
Durán, A. (2007). La Muestra Continua de Vidas Laborales de la Seguridad Social. Revista del Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales, 67(E), 231–240. http://www.mtas.es/es/publica/revista/numeros/ExtraSS07/default.htm. Cited September 22, 2009.
Ermisch, J. F. (2003). An economic analysis of the family. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Escobedo, A. (2008). Spain. In P. Moss & M. Korintus (Eds.), International review of leave policies and related research 2008, (Employment relations research series no 100, pp. 316–332). London: Department of Trade and Industry.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Esping-Andersen, G. (2007). Family formation and family dilemmas in contemporary Europe. Bilbao: Fundación BBVA.
European Council (2002) Barcelona European cuncil, 15–16 March 2002. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/71025.pdf. Cited October 7, 2008.
Ferrara, M. (1996). The southern model in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17–37.
Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household in 22 countries. American Sociological Review, 69(6), 751–767.
Fuwa, M., & Cohen, P. N. (2007). Housework and social policies. Social Science Research, 36(2), 512–530.
García-Pérez, I. (2008). La Muestra Continua de Vidas Laborales: una guía de uso para el análisis de transiciones. Revista de Economía Aplicada, 1(E), 5–28.
García-Segovia, F., & Durán, A. (2008). ‘Nuevos Avances en la información laboral: la Muestra Continua de Vidas Laborales”. Economistas, 116(1), 228–231.
González, M. J. (2002). Partnership formation in the context of women’s growing educational attainment. In H. P. Blossfeld (Ed.), The educational system as a marriage market. A longitudinal analysis of marriage decisions in the life course. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gustafson, S. S., Dex, S., Wetzels, C., & Vlasblom, J. D. (1996). Women`s labor force transitions in connection with childbirth: A panel data comparison between Germany, Sweden and Great Britain. Journal of Population Economics, 9(3), 223–246.
Gutiérrez-Domènech, M. (2002). Employment penalty after motherhood in Spain. (CEP Working Paper no 1177). London: London School of Economics. http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/DP0546.pdf. Cited May 14, 2008.
Gutiérrez-Domènech, M. (2005). Employment after motherhood: A European comparision. Labour Economics, 12(1), 99–123.
Hakim, C. (2000). Work-lifestyle choices in the 21st century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hakim, C. (2003). Models of the family in modern societies: Ideals and realities. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Joshi, H. (1998). The opportunity costs of childbearing: More than mothers’ business. Journal of Population Economics, 11(2), 161–183.
Kroska, A. (2004). Division of domestic works: revising and expanding the theoretical explanations. Journal of Family Issues, 25(7), 900–932.
Kuhlenkasper, T., & Kauermann, G. (2008). Duration of maternity leave in Germany: A case study of nonparametric hazard models and penalized splines. (SOEP papers no 213). Berlin: German Institute for Economic Research. http://www.diw-berlin.de/sixcms/detail.php?id=diw_02.c.221182.en. Cited September 22, 2009.
Lappegard, T. (2008). Changing the gender balance in caring: Fatherhood and the division of parental leave in Norway. Population Resarch and Policy Rewiev, 27(2), 139–159.
Lapuerta, I., Baizán, P., & González, M. J. (2009). Tiempo para cuidar, tiempo para trabajar: análisis del uso y la duración de la licencia parental en España. In V. Navarro (Eds.), La situación Social en España (Vol. III, pp. 425–459). Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
Lillard, L. A., & Panis, C. W. A. (2000). aML multilevel multiprocess statistical software, release 1.0. Los Angeles: EconWare.
Lundberg, S., & Pollack, R. A. (1993). Separate spheres bargaining and the marriage market. Journal of Political Economy, 101(6), 988–1010.
McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 26(3), 427–439.
MEC. (2007). Datos Avance del curso 2006–2007: Estadística de las Enseñanzas no universitarias. Madrid: Ministry of Education and Culture. http://www.mepsyd.es/mecd/estadisticas/index.html. Cited May 14, 2008.
Moreno-Mínguez, A. (2008). El reducido empleo femenino en los Estados del bienestar del sur de Europa. Un análisis comparado. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 66(50), 129–162.
Moss, P., & Korintus, M. (Eds.). (2008). International review of leave policies and related research 2008. (Employment relations research series no 100). London: Department of Trade and Industry.
Pfau-Effinger, B. (1998). Gender cultures and the gender arrangements–a theoretical framework for cross national gender research. Innovation, 11(2), 147–166.
Pronzato, C. D. (2007). Return to work after childbirth: Does parental leave matters in Europe? (Institute for social and economic research working paper series no 30). Colchester: Economic & Social Research Council. http://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/pubs/workpaps/pdf/2007-30.pdf. Cited January 7, 2008.
Pylkkämen, E. & Smith, N. (2004). The impact of family-friendly policies in Denmark and Sweden on mothers, career interruptions due to childbirth. (IZA discussion paper series no 1050). Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor.
Rindfuss, R., & Brewster, K. (1996). Childrearing and fertility. Population and Development Review, 22(suppl), 258–289.
Rubery, J., Smith, M., & Fagan, C. (1999). Women’s employment in Europe: Trends and prospects. London: Routledge.
Ruhm, C. (2004). Parental employment and child cognitive development. Journal of Human Resources, 39(1), 155–192.
Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299–322.
Spiess, K., & Wrohlich, K. (2008). The parental leave benefit reform in Germany: Cost and labour market outcomes of moving towards the Scandinavian model. Population Research and Policy Review, 27(5), 575–591.
Sundström, M., & Duvander, A. (2002). Gender division of childcare and the sharing of parental leave among new parents in Sweden. European Sociological Review, 18(4), 433–447.
Tanaka, S. (2005). Parental leave and child health across OECD countries. Economic Journal, 115(February), F7–F28.
Waldfogel, J. (2002). Child’s care, women employment and child outcomes. Journal of Population Economics, 15(3), 527–548.
Whitehouse, G., Diamond, C., & Baird, M. (2007). Fathers’ use of leave in Australia. Community Work and Family, 10(4), 387–407.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Work and Immigration of the Spanish Government (project FIPROS 2009/20) and the Catalan Women’s Institute (project U-84/08) for financing this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lapuerta, I., Baizán, P. & González, M.J. Individual and Institutional Constraints: An Analysis of Parental Leave Use and Duration in Spain. Popul Res Policy Rev 30, 185–210 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-010-9185-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-010-9185-y