Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Changing the Gender Balance in Caring: Fatherhood and the Division of Parental Leave in Norway

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we study fathers’ use of parental leave in Norway, using register data from 1993 to 1997. In 1993, a special father’s quota (1 month) was introduced in the parental leave program. The father’s quota is a success in the sense that 85% of fathers entitled to the leave use it, but few take more than their quota (1 month). One policy intention was to make a real change in the gender balance in care. The analyses show that gender balance in breadwinning has a strong effect on fathers’ use of parental leave: controlling for parents’ educational level, labor market attachment and father’s income, we find that the more mothers contribute to the family economy and the more equalized their earnings are, the more parental leave fathers take.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldous, J., Mulligan, G. M., & Bjarnason, T. (1998). Fathering over time: What makes the difference? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 809–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society—towards a new modernity. London, England: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Malden, England: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1981,1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Bernhardt, E. (2000). Familj och karriär. Välfärds Bulletinen, 4, 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandth, B., & Kvande, E. (2001). Flexible work and flexible fathers. Work, Family and Society, 15, 251–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltraine, S., & Ishii-Kuntz, M. (1992). Men’s housework: A life course perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, F. M., Lussier, J. B., & Servis, L. J. (1993). Husbands at home: Predictors of paternal participation in childcare and housework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(6), 1154–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. N. (1995). Kjønnssegregering i det norske arbeidsmarkedet. Kan forskjeller i lønnsstruktur bidra til at kvinner og menn velger ulike yrker? Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning, 2, 147–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, S. C. (1995). Changing patterns of sex segregated occupations throughout the life-course. European Sociological Review, 11(2), 157–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitterød, R. H. (2002a). Utdanning og ulikhet? En diskusjon av utdanningsnivåets betydning for deling av husarbeid blant småbarnsforeldre. Sosiologisk tidsskrift, 3, 179–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitterød, R. H. (2002b). Store endringer i småbarnsforeldres dagligliv. Samfunnsspeilet, 4/5, 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitterød, R. H., & Kjeldstad, R. (2003). A new father’s role? Employment pattern among Norwegian fathers 1991–2001. Economic Survey, 1, 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitterød, R. H., & Kjeldstad, R. (2004). Foreldres arbeidstid 1991–2001 belyst ved SSBs arbeidskraftsundersøkelser, tidsbruksundersøkelser og levekårsundersøkelser. Oslo/Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjeldstad, R., & Nymoen, E. (2004). Kvinner og menn i deltidsarbeid - Fordeling og forklaringer. Oslo/Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leira, A. (1998). Caring as social right: Cash for childcare and daddy leave. Social Politics, 5, Fall, 362–378.

  • Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Insurance Association. (2002). Basisrapport 2001 - Mellomlangsiktig budsjettering og rapportering (Vol. 01). Oslo, Norway.

  • Pettersen, S. V. (2003). Halvparten av fedrene vil ha lengre kvote. Samfunnsspeilet, 5, 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polachek, S. W. (1987). Occupational segregation and the gender wage gap. Population Research and Policy Review, 6, 47–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C. E. (1987). The division of labor at home. Social Forces, 65, 816–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Norway. (1994). Standard Industrial Classification. Official Statistics of Norway, C467.

  • Statistics Norway. (2001a). Labor Force Survey. Official Statistics of Norway, C748.

  • Statistics Norway. (2001b). Stable number of cohabitants. Cohabitants 2001. Retrieved from http://www.ssb.no/subjects/02/01/20/Samboer_en/arkiv.

  • Statistics Norway. (2002). Barn og unges familier - Færre ektepar med barn under 18 år. SSB magasin. Retrieved from http://www.ssb.no/emner/02/barn_og_unge/2002/famili.

  • Sundström, M., & Duvander, A. -Z. E. (2002). Gender division of childcare and the sharing of parental leave among new parents in Sweden. European Sociological Review, 18(4), 433–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Texmon, I. (1999). Vedlegg 3: Samliv i Norge mot slutten av 1900-tallet. En beskrivelse av endringer og mangfold. In Norges offentlige utredninger (NOU) (Ed.), Samboere og samfunnet, 25(pp. 251–285). Barne-og familiedepartementet.

  • Volling, B. L., & Belsky, J. (1991). Multiple determinants of father involvement during infancy in dual-earner and single-earner families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 461–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trude Lappegard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lappegard, T. Changing the Gender Balance in Caring: Fatherhood and the Division of Parental Leave in Norway. Popul Res Policy Rev 27, 139–159 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-007-9057-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-007-9057-2

Keywords

Navigation