Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ill-conditioned dynamic hysteresis compensation for a low-frequency magnetostrictive vibration shaker

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report an adaptive feedforward controller to address the ill-conditioned dynamic hysteresis on a custom-developed magnetostrictive vibration shaker. The vibration shaker works within low-frequency bandwidth. Magnetostrictive-induced hysteresis is a main issue that affects excitation waveform replication. Generally, the shape of dynamic hysteresis loop depends on the amplitude and frequency of input current. Many studies, e.g., Prandtl–Ishlinskii (PI)-based feedforward control approach, are conducted to address nonlinear dynamics in the hysteresis. Particularly, the dynamic hysteresis loop characterizes non-positive gradient (i.e., ill condition) when the frequency of input current is increasing. Under the ill condition, traditional PI-based feedforward control is ineffective. In this paper, we investigate this phenomenon according to a few experiments. Then, a novel static hysteresis and dynamics hybrid compensator is presented to deal with the ill-conditioned dynamic hysteresis issue. The dynamic compensator is a finite-impulse-response-based model whose coefficients are updated by the modified filtered-x normalized least mean square (MFxNLMS) algorithm. The static hysteresis compensator is constructed with the polynomial-modified PI (PMPI) model. The parameters of PMPI model are acquired by particle swarm optimization. Two simulations are conducted to show (1) the convergence of the MFxNLMS algorithm; (2) the efficacy of proposed model to describe the ill-conditioned dynamic hysteresis. Furthermore, the experimental device is constructed and a couple of experiments are implemented. The experimental results show that, with the proposed controller, the magnetostrictive vibration shaker can replicate both narrowband and wideband waveforms accurately. Moreover, it is robust to load variation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen, T.H., Liaw, C.M.: Vibration acceleration control of an inverter-fed electrodynamic shaker. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mech. 4(1), 60 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hu, Q.: Robust adaptive sliding mode attitude maneuvering and vibration damping of three-axis-stabilized flexible spacecraft with actuator saturation limits. Nonlinear Dyn. 55(4), 301 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Noormohammadi, : Hybrid control of human-induced vibration. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 7(2), 307 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, Y.W., Yuan, B., Fang, B., Chen, L.Q.: Reducing thermal shock-induced vibration of an axially moving beam via a nonlinear energy sink. Nonlinear Dyn. 87(2), 1159 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sabatini, M., Gasbarri, P., Monti, R., Palmerini, G.B.: Vibration control of a flexible space manipulator during on orbit operations. Acta Astronaut. 73, 109 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang, J., Li, D.: Optimal placement and decentralized robust vibration control for spacecraft smart solar panel structures. Smart Mater. Struct. 19(8), 085020 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kamesh, D., Pandiyan, R., Ghosal, A.: Passive vibration isolation of reaction wheel disturbances using a low frequency flexible space platform. J. Sound Vib. 331(6), 1310 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang, K., Zhang, Y.W., Ding, H., Yang, T.Z., Li, Y., Chen, L.Q.: Nonlinear energy sink for whole-spacecraft vibration reduction. J. Vib. Acoust. 139(2), 021011 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jung, H.J., Kim, I.H., Min, D.Y., Sim, S.H., Koo, J.H.: “A hybrid electromagnetic energy harvesting device for low frequency vibration.” Active and Passive Smart Structures and Integrated Systems 2013. vol. 8688, International Society for Optics and Photonics (2013)

  10. Zhang, T., Jiang, C., Zhang, H., Xu, H.: Giant magnetostrictive actuators for active vibration control. Smart Mater Struct 13(3), 473 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao, X., Liu, Y.: Research of giant magnetostrictive actuator’s nonlinear dynamic behaviours. Nonlinear Dyn 92, 793–802 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Niu, M., Yang, B., Yang, Y., Meng, G.: Modeling and optimization of magnetostrictive actuator amplified by compliant mechanism. Smart Mater. Struct. 26(9), 095029 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Meng, A., Yang, J., Li, M., Jiang, S.: Research on hysteresis compensation control of gmm. Nonlinear Dyn. 83(1), 161 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Li, C.X., Gu, G.Y., Yang, M.J., Zhu, L.M.: High-speed tracking of a nanopositioning stage using modified repetitive control. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 14(3), 1467 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, F., Liu, Z., Zhang, Y., Chen, C.L.P.: Adaptive robust image-based visual servoing control of robot with unknown actuator hysteresis. Nonlinear Dyn. 85(1), 547 (2016)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Hedegärd, M.N., Wik, T., Wallin, C.: Adaptive hysteresis compensation using reduced memory sequences. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mech. 22(5), 2296 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dapino, M., Smith, R., Faidley, L., Flatau, A.: Coupled structural-magnetic strain and stress model for magnetostrictive transducers. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 11(2), 135 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vaiana, N., Sessa, S.: A class of uniaxial phenomenological models for simulating hysteretic phenomena in rate-independent mechanical systems and materials. Nonlinear Dyn. 93, 1647–1669 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tan, X., Baras, J.: Modeling and control of hysteresis in magentostrictive actuators. Automatica 40, 1469 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Rakotondrabe, M.: Multivariable classical prandtl-ishlinskii hysteresis modeling and compensation and sensorless control of a nonlinear 2-dof piezoactuator. Nonlinear Dyn. 89(1), 481 (2017)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Li, Z., Shan, J., Gabbert, U.: Inverse compensation of hysteresis using Krasnoselskii–Pokrovskii model. IEEE/ASME Transa. Mech. 23(2), 966–971 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gu, G.Y., Zhu, L.M., Su, C.Y., Ding, H., Fatikow, S.: Modeling and control of piezo-actuated nanopositioning stages: a survey. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 13(1), 313 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kuhnen, K.: Modeling, identification and compensation of complex hysteretic nonlinearities: a modified Prandtl–Ishlinskii approach. Eur. J. Control 9(4), 407 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Qin, Y., Tian, Y., Zhang, D., Shirinzadeh, B., Fatikow, S.: A novel direct inverse modeling approach for hysteresis compensation of piezoelectric actuator in feedforward applications. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mech. 18(3), 981 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Al Janaideh, M., Aljanaideh, O.: Further results on open-loop compensation of rate-dependent hysteresis in a magnetostrictive actuator with the Prandtl-Ishlinskii model. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 104, 835–850 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Qi, C., Gao, F., Li, H.X., Li, S., Zhao, X., Dong, Y.: An incremental hammerstein-like modeling approach for the decoupled creep, vibration and hysteresis dynamics of piezoelectric actuator. Nonlinear Dyn. 82(4), 2097 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Tan, U.X., Win, T., Shee, C.Y., Ang, W.T.: Rate-dependent hysteresis model of piezoelectric using singularity free Prandtl–Ishlinskii model. In: International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation. CIRA 2007, pp. 356–361. IEEE, New York (2007)

  28. Tan, U.X., Latt, W.T., Shee, C.Y., Riviere, C.N., Ang, W.T.: Feedforward controller of ill-conditioned hysteresis using singularity-free prandtl-ishlinskii model. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mech. 14(5), 598 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jiang, Y., Zhu, Y., Yang, K., Hu, C., Yu, D.: A data-driven iterative decoupling feedforward control strategy with application to an ultraprecision motion stage. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 62(1), 620 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sarban, R., Jones, R., Mace, B., Rustighi, E.: A tubular dielectric elastomer actuator: fabrication, characterization and active vibration isolation. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 25(8), 2879 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang, Y., Yang, B., Niu, M.: Adaptive trajectory tracking of magnetostrictive actuator based on preliminary hysteresis compensation and further adaptive filter controller. Nonlinear Dyn. 92(3), 1109 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu, J., Zou, Q.: A decomposition-based learning approach to hysteresis-dynamics system control: Piezoelectric actuator example. In: American Control Conference (ACC), pp. 2649–2654. IEEE, New York (2015)

  33. Liu, J., Zou, Q.: An almost superposition of hammerstein systems for simultaneous hysteresis-dynamics compensation. In: American Control Conference (ACC), pp. 679–684. IEEE, New York (2016)

  34. De Oliveira, L.P., Stallaert, B., Janssens, K., Van der Auweraer, H., Sas, P., Desmet, W.: Nex-lms: a novel adaptive control scheme for harmonic sound quality control. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 24(6), 1727 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Widrow, B., Stearns, S.: Adaptive Signal Processing. Prentice-Hall, New York (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Widrow, B., Walach, E.: Adaptive Inverse Control, Reissue Edition: A Signal Processing Approach. IEEE Press Series on Power Engineering Adaptive Inverse Control. Wiley, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hassibi, B.: On the robustness of LMS filters. Least-Mean-Sq. Adapt. Filters 4, 105–144 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bolzern, P., Colaneri, P., De Nicolao, G.: Robustness and performance in adaptive filtering. In: Robustness in Identification and Control, pp. 174–189 (1999)

  39. Poli, R., Kennedy, J., Blackwell, T.: Particle swarm optimization. Swarm Intell 1(1), 33 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kachitvichyanukul, V.: Comparison of three evolutionary algorithms: Ga, pso, and de. Ind. Eng. Manag. Syst. 11(3), 215 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chu, Z., Ma, Y., Cui, J.: Adaptive reactionless control strategy via the pso-elm algorithm for free-floating space robots during manipulation of unknown objects. Nonlinear Dyn. 91(2), 1321 (2018)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Bao, C., Sas, P., Van Brussel, H.: A novel filtered x-algorithm for active noise control. J. A 34(1), 89 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work is supported by NSFC Fund (5177349), the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFF0108000) and SJTU-CASC Advanced Space Technology Fund (USCAST2015-05, USCAST2016-13), for which the authors are most grateful.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

    Sicheng Yi, Bintang Yang & Guang Meng

Authors
  1. Sicheng Yi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bintang Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guang Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bintang Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that we have no conflict of interest and comply with ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yi, S., Yang, B. & Meng, G. Ill-conditioned dynamic hysteresis compensation for a low-frequency magnetostrictive vibration shaker. Nonlinear Dyn 96, 535–551 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-019-04804-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-019-04804-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation