Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Seismic risk assessment of buildings in urban areas: a case study for Denizli, Turkey

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to carry out a seismic risk assessment for a typical mid-size city based on building inventory from a field study. Contributions were made to existing loss estimation methods for buildings. In particular, a procedure was introduced to estimate the seismic quality of buildings using a scoring scheme for the effective parameters in seismic behavior. Denizli, a typical mid-size city in Turkey, was used as a case study. The building inventory was conducted by trained observers in a selected region of Denizli that had the potential to be damaged from expected future earthquakes according to geological and geotechnical studies. Parameters that are known to have some effect on the seismic performance of the buildings during past earthquakes were collected during the inventory studies. The inventory includes data of about 3,466 buildings on 4,226 parcels. The evaluation of inventory data provided information about the distribution of building stock according to structural system, construction year, and vertical and plan irregularities. The inventory data and the proposed procedure were used to assess the building damage, and to determine casualty and shelter needs during the M6.3 and 7.0 scenario earthquakes, representing the most probable and maximum earthquakes in Denizli, respectively. The damage assessment and loss studies showed that significant casualties and economic losses can be expected in future earthquakes. Seismic risk assessment of reinforced concrete buildings also revealed the priorities among building groups. The vulnerability in decreasing order is: (1) buildings with 6 or more stories, (2) pre-1975 constructed buildings, and (3) buildings with 3–5 stories. The future studies for evaluating and reducing seismic risk for buildings should follow this priority order. All data of inventory, damage, and loss estimates were assembled in a Geographical Information System (GIS) database.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altunel E (2000) Historical earthquake activity in and around Hierapolis. In: D’Andria F, Silvestrelli F (eds) Ricerche Archeologiche Turche Nella Valle Del Lykos, Lykos Vadisi Turk Arkeoloji Arastirmalari. Congedo Editore, 2000, pp 299–325 (in Italian and Turkish)

  • ATC-40 (1996) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California

  • Aydan O, Kumsar H, Ulusay R, Tano H (2001) Is there a relation between the temperature changes of thermal waters in Denizli region and the earth crust at the Denizli fault zone? In: JEOTEKNIKIII, 3rd Earthquake and Geotechnical Conference on Izmir and its Surroundings, 12–14 November, Izmir, Turkey (in Turkish)

  • Aydan O, Kumsar H, Ulusay R (2002) How to infer the possible mechanism and characteristics of earthquakes from the striations and ground surface traces of existing faults. Structural Eng/Earthquake Eng 19:199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2003) Updated near-source ground-motion (attenuation) relations for the horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration and acceleration response spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93(1):314–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KW (1997) Empirical near-source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectra. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):154–179

    Google Scholar 

  • ERAIM (Earthquake Risk Assessment for the Istanbul Metropolitan Area) (2003) A report prepared by Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute, Istanbul, Turkey

  • FEMA-154 (1988) Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazard: a handbook. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

  • FEMA-440 (2005) Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

  • FEMA-368 (2000) NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations of new buildings and other structures, Part 1: Provisions. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

  • Hancock PL, Altunel E (1997) Faulted archaeological relics at Hierapolis (Pamukkale), Turkey. J Geodyn 24(1–4):21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAZUS (1999) Earthquake loss estimation methodology technical manual, prepared by the National Institute of Building Sciences for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Washington, DC

  • Inel M, Senel SM, Toprak S, Kayhan AH, Yilmaz S (2004) Building damage assessment of urban areas: a case study for Denizli, Turkey. 6th international congress on advances in civil engineering, Istanbul, Turkey

  • Inel M, Ozmen HB (2006) Effect of initial-phase seismic assessment parameters of existing buildings on structural behaviour. 1st European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, September 3–8 (Paper Reference 173), Geneva, Switzerland

  • IEDMP (2000) Izmir earthquake disaster master plan for the City of Izmir, prepared by Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute, Istanbul, Turkey (in Turkish); available at http://www.koeri.boun.edu.tr

  • Kaplan H, Yilmaz S, Akyol E, Sen G, Dayanir N (2007) Preliminary seismic risk assessment of urban building stocks: a case study for Denizli-Turkey. J Sci Technol 1(1):106–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Kircher CA, Nassar AA, Kustu O, Holmes WT (1997) Development of building damage functions for earthquake loss estimation. Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 13, No. 4, Earthquake Engineering Reseach Institute (EERI), Oakland, California

  • METU (2004) Development of seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies, prepared by Structural Engineering Research Unit, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, January

  • Ozmen HB (2005) Investigation of effects of the parameters used in rapid seismic evaluation methods on the building performance, Master Thesis, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey (in Turkish)

  • PAU (2002) Geological, geotechnical, and hydrogeological properties of Denizli Municipality lands. Geology, Engineering Department, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey (in Turkish)

  • Sucuoglu H, Yazgan U (2003) Simple survey procedures for seismic risk assessment in urban building stocks, Seismic Assessment and Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, NATO Science Series, Vol. IV/29, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, Nov. (2003), pp 97–118

  • Sucuoglu H, Yazgan U, Yakut A (2007) A screening procedure for seismic risk assessment in urban building stocks. Earthq Spectra 23(2):441–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun S (1990) Geology and coal resources between Denizli and Usak, General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration Report No 9985, Ankara, Turkey

  • Toprak S, Koc AC, Taskin F (2004) Seismic vulnerability assessment of Denizli city, Turkey water supply system. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 1–6, paper No. 0812

  • Toprak S, Taskin F (2007) Estimation of earthquake damage to buried pipelines caused by ground shaking. Nat Hazards 40:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkish Earthquake Code (1998) Specifications for structures to be built in disaster areas, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara, Turkey; available in English at http://www.koeri.boun.edu.tr

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research reported in this article was supported by Pamukkale University Research Fund under Project No. 2003MHF006. The authors wish to express their deep gratitude to Assoc. Prof. Halil Kumsar for providing base maps for Denizli area and for his valuable comments and discussions. Thanks are also extended to Research Assts. H. Kayhan and S. Yilmaz who contributed to initial stages of the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Inel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Inel, M., Senel, S.M., Toprak, S. et al. Seismic risk assessment of buildings in urban areas: a case study for Denizli, Turkey. Nat Hazards 46, 265–285 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9187-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9187-1

Keywords

Navigation