Abstract
An analytical model was developed to predict the pressure-dependent gaseous thermal conductivity in aerogels based on the spherical porous secondary particle aggregate structure. The model includes the effects of particle size, pore and particle microstructures, and solid–gas coupling including the quasi lattice vibrations for solid-like vibrating gas molecules in the gaps between adjacent secondary particles that are not included in previous models. The results show that the pressure-dependent effective gaseous thermal conductivities of RF and silica aerogels predicted by the present model agree well with experimental results. The solid–gas coupling significantly increases the effective gaseous thermal conductivity in the aerogels as the quasi lattice vibrating gas molecules in the gaps more effectively bridge adjacent particles. The effects of solid–gas coupling and pore and particle microstructures are significant for particle aggregate structures with mean pore and particle diameters in the range of 100 nm–10 μm while the Knudsen formula and the Zeng’s model have limited applicability in this size range. Micron and millimeter-scale pores that can occur in nanoporous silica aerogel samples due to the mechanical fragility of these nanostructures can be well represented by the present three pore size model.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- a :
-
Equivalent solid cubic element length (m)
- a 1 :
-
Crystal lattice constant (m)
- A :
- A i :
-
Ring area of the ith hollow cylinder (m2)
- B :
-
Parameter in Eq. 37
- C 1, C 2, C 3, C 4, C 5, C 6, C 7 :
-
Parameters
- c v :
-
Specific heat at constant volume (J kg−1 K−1)
- d :
-
Diameter (m)
- D :
-
Pore diameter (m)
- k :
-
Thermal conductivity (W m−1 K−1)
- k B :
-
Boltzmann’s constant (1.38 × 10−23 J K−1)
- l :
-
Mean free path (m)
- l contact :
-
Contact length between adjacent particles (m)
- M :
-
Gas molecular weight (kg mol−1)
- N :
-
Number of partitions
- p :
-
Pressure (Pa)
- Pr :
-
Prandtl number
- R m :
-
Universal gas constant (8.314 J mol−1 K−1)
- S :
-
Specific surface area (m2 kg−1)
- T :
-
Temperature (K)
- T m :
-
Melting point (K)
- v :
-
Group velocity (m s−1)
- x, y, z :
-
Coordinates (m)
- α:
-
Energy accommodation coefficient
- μ:
-
Dynamic viscosity (N s m−2)
- γ:
-
Adiabatic coefficient
- γ1 :
-
Gruneisen constant
- Π:
-
Aerogel porosity
- ρ:
-
Density (kg m−3)
- φ:
-
Porosity or volume fraction
- ϕ:
-
Volume fraction
- 0:
-
Free space or ambient conditions
- a:
-
Aerogel
- Ar:
-
Argon
- b:
-
Bulk
- ce:
-
Coupling effect
- CM:
-
Continuum regime
- exp:
-
Experiment
- FM:
-
Free molecular regime
- g:
-
Gas
- He:
-
Helium
- p:
-
Pore
- part:
-
Aerogel particle
- r:
-
Radiation
- s:
-
Solid
- total:
-
Total or effective
- TR:
-
Transition regime
References
Baetens R, Jelle BP, Thue JV, Tenpierik MJ, Grynning S, Uvslokk S, Gustavsen A (2010) Vacuum insulation panels for building applications: a review and beyond. Energy Build 42:147–172
Deng ZS, Wang J, Wu AM, Shen J, Zhou B (1998) High strength SiO2 aerogel insulation. J Non-Cryst Solids 225:101–104
Denpoh K (1998) Modeling of rarefied gas heat conduction between wafer and susceptor. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 11(1):25–29
Fricke J, Tillotson T (1997) Aerogel: production, characterization, and application. Thin Solid Films 297:212–223
Heinemann U (2008) Influence of water on the total heat transfer in ‘evacuated’ insulations. Int J Thermophys 29:735–749
Heinemann U, Caps R, Fricke J (1996) Radiation–conduction interaction: an investigation on silica aerogels. Int J Heat Mass Transf 39(10):2115–2130
Hemberger F, Weis S, Reichenauer G, Ebert HP (2009) Thermal transport properties of functionally graded carbon aerogels. Int J Thermophys 30:1357–1371
Kaganer MG (1969) Thermal insulation in cryogenic engineering. IPST Press, Jerusalem
Kennard EH (1938) Kinetic theory of gases. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 290–318
Kistler SS (1935) The relation between heat conductivity and structure in silica aerogel. J Phys Chem 39:79–87
Lee SC, Cunnington GR (2000) Conduction and radiation heat transfer in high-porosity fiber thermal insulation. J Thermophys Heat Transf 14(2):121–136
Lee D, Stevens PC, Zeng SQ, Hunt AJ (1995) Thermal characterization of carbon-opacified silica aerogels. J Non-Cryst Solids 186:285–290
Lee OJ, Lee KH, Yim TJ, Kim SY, Yoo KP (2002) Determination of mesopore size of aerogels from thermal conductivity measurements. J Non-Cryst Solids 298:287–292
Lu X, Arduini-Schuster MC, Kuhn J, Nilsson O, Fricke J, Pekala RW (1992) Thermal conductivity of monolithic organic aerogels. Science 255:971–972
Lu X, Caps R, Fricke J, Alviso CT, Pekala RW (1995) Correlation between structure and thermal conductivity of organic aerogels. J Non-Cryst Solids 188:226–234
Lu G, Wang XD, Duan YY, Li XW (2011) Effects of non-ideal structures and high temperatures on the insulation properties of aerogel-based composite materials. J Non-Cryst Solids 357:3822–3829
Ozerinc S, Kakac S, Yazicioglu AG (2010) Enhanced thermal conductivity of nanofluids: a state-of-the-art review. Microfluid Nanofluid 8:145–170
Raed K, Gross U (2009) Modeling of influence of gas atmosphere and pore-size distribution on the effective thermal conductivity of Knudsen and non-Knudsen porous materials. Int J Thermophys 30:1343–1356
Reichenauer G, Heinemann U, Ebert HP (2007) Relationship between pore size and the gas pressure dependence of the gaseous thermal conductivity. Colloids Surf A 300:204–210
Spagnol S, Lartigue B, Trombe A, Despetis F (2009) Experimental investigations on the thermal conductivity of silica aerogels by a guarded thin-film-heater method. ASME J Heat Transf 131:074501
Swimm K, Reichenauer G, Vidi S, Ebert HP (2009) Gas pressure dependence of the heat transport in porous solids with pores smaller than 10 μm. Int J Thermophys 30:1329–1342
Wang J, Kuhn J, Lu X (1995) Monolithic silica aerogel insulation doped with TiO2 powder and ceramic fibers. J Non-Cryst Solids 186:296–300
Wang BX, Zhou LP, Peng XF (2003) A fractal model for predicting the effective thermal conductivity of liquid with suspension of nanoparticles. Int J Heat Mass Transf 46:2665–2672
Warrier P, Yuan YH, Beck MP, Teja AS (2010) Heat transfer in nanoparticle suspensions: modeling the thermal conductivity of nanofluids. AIChE J 56(12):3243–3256
Wei GS, Liu YS, Zhang XX, Yu F, Du XZ (2011) Thermal conductivities study on silica aerogel and its composite insulation materials. Int J Heat Mass Transf 54:2355–2366
Woignier T, Phalippou J, Prassas M (1990) Glasses from aerogels. J Mater Sci 25:3118–3126
Zeng SQ, Hunt A, Greif R (1995a) Transport properties of gas in silica aerogel. J Non-Cryst Solids 186:264–270
Zeng SQ, Hunt A, Greif R (1995b) Geometric structure and thermal conductivity of porous medium silica aerogel. ASME J Heat Transf 117(4):1055–1058
Zhao SY, Zhang BM, He XD (2009) Temperature and pressure dependent effective thermal conductivity of fibrous insulation. Int J Therm Sci 48:440–448
Zhao JJ, Duan YY, Wang XD, Wang BX (2011) Effect of nanofluids on thin film evaporation in microchannels. J Nanopart Res 13:5033–5047
Zhao JJ, Duan YY, Wang XD, Wang BX (2012a) An analytical model for combined radiative and conductive heat transfer in fiber-loaded silica aerogels. J Non-Cryst Solids 358:1303–1312
Zhao JJ, Duan YY, Wang XD, Wang BX (2012b) A 3-D numerical heat transfer model for silica aerogels based on the porous secondary nanoparticle aggregate structure. J Non-Cryst Solids 358:1287–1297
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge financial support from NSFC (No. 21176133) and SRFDP (No. 20100002110045).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, JJ., Duan, YY., Wang, XD. et al. Effects of solid–gas coupling and pore and particle microstructures on the effective gaseous thermal conductivity in aerogels. J Nanopart Res 14, 1024 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-1024-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-1024-0