Abstract
We propose a computational procedure for inferring the cost functions that, according to the Principle of Optimality, underlie experimentally observed motor strategies. In the current use of optimization-based mathematical models of neuro-musculoskeletal systems, the cost functions are not known a-priori, since they can not be directly observed or measured on the real bio-system. Consequently, cost functions need to be hypothesized for any given motor task of interest, based on insight into the physical processes that govern the problem.
This work tries to overcome the need to hypothesize the cost functions, extracting this non-directly observable information from experimental data. Optimality criteria of observed motor tasks are here indirectly derived using: (a) a mathematical model of the bio-system; and (b) a parametric mathematical model of the possible cost functions, i.e. a search space constructed in such a way as to presumably contain the unknown function that was used by the bio-system in the given motor task of interest. The cost function that best matches the experimental data is identified within the search space by solving a nested optimization problem. This problem can be recast as a non-linear programming problem and therefore solved using standard techniques.
The methodology is here formulated for both static and dynamic problems, and then tested on representative examples.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
An, K.-N., Kwak, B.M., Chao, E.Y., Morrey, B.F.: Determination of muscle and joint forces: a new technique to solve the indeterminate problem. Transactions of the ASME 106, 364–367 (1984)
Anderson,F.G., Pandy, M.G.: Static and dynamic optimization solutions for gait are practically equivalent. Journal of Biomechanics 34, 153–161 (2001)
Betts, J.T.: Practical Methods for Optimal Control Using Non-Linear Programming, SIAM, Philadelphia, (2001)
Barclay, A., Gill, P.E., Rosen, J.B.: SQP methods and their application to numerical optimal control, Report NA 97–3, Department of Mathematics, University of California, San Diego, CA, (1997)
Bottasso, C.L., Croce, A., Leonello, D., Riviello, L.: Optimization of critical trajectories for rotorcraft vehicles. Journal of the American Helicopter Society 50, 165–177 (2005)
Bottasso, C.L., Croce, A.: Optimal control of multibody systems using an energy preserving direct transcription method. Multibody System Dynamics 12, 17–45 (2004)
Bryson, A.E., Ho, Y.C.: Applied Optimal Control, Wiley, New York, (1975)
Buchanan, T.S., Shreeve, D.A.: An evaluation of optimization techniques for the prediction of muscle activation patterns during isometric tasks. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 118, 565–574 (1996)
Crowninshield, R.D., Brand, R.A.: A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. Journal of Biomechanics 14, 793–801 (1981)
Dul, J., Johnson, G.E., Shiavi, R., Townsend, M.A.: Muscular synergism — II. A minimum-fatigue criterion for load sharing between synergistic muscles. Journal of Biomechanics 17, 675–684 (1984)
Flash, T., Mussa-Ivaldi, F.: Human arm stiffness characteristics during the maintenance of posture. Experimental Brain Research 82, 315–326 (1990)
Hatze, H.: Myocybernetic Control Model of Skeletal Muscle, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa, (1981)
Hatze, H.: Biomechanics of sports — Selected examples of successful applications and future perspectives, Proc. 16th Symposium of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports, University of Konstanz, Germany (1998)
Hatze, H.: The fundamental problem of myoskeletal inverse dynamics and its implications. Journal of Biomechanics 35, 109–115 (2002)
Hull, D.G.: Conversion of optimal control problems into parameter optimization problems. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics 20, 57–60 (1997)
Kaufman, K.R., An, K.-N., Litchy, W.J., Chao, E.Y.: Physiological prediction of muscle forces — II. Application to isokinetic exercise. Neuroscience 40, 793–804 (1991)
Nubar, Y., Contini, R.: A minimal principal in biomechanics. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 23, 377–391 (1961)
Seireg, A., Arvikar, R.: Biomechanical Analysis of the Musculoskeletal Structure for Medicine and Sports, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York (1989)
Prilutsky, B.I.: Coordination of two- and one-joint muscles: functional consequences and implications for motor control. Motor Control 4, 1–44 (2000)
Prilutsky, B.I., Zatsiorsky, V.M.: Optimization-based models of muscle coordination. Exercise and Sport Science Reviews 30, 32–38 (2002)
Raikova, R.T., Prilutsky, B.I.: Sensitivity of predicted muscle forces to parameters of the optimization-based human leg model revealed by analytical and numerical analyses. Journal of Biomechanics 34, 1243–1255 (2001)
Renegar, J.: A Mathematical View of Interior Point Methods in Convex Optimization, SIAM, Philadelphia (2001)
Wells, R., Evans, N.: Functions and recruitment patterns of one- and two-joint muscles under isometric and walking conditions. Human Movement Science 6, 349–372 (1987)
Wood, J.E., Meek, S.G., Jacobsen, S.C.: Quantification of human shoulder anatomy for prosthetic arm control — II Anatomy matrices. Journal of Biomechanics 22, 309–325 (1989)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bottasso, C.L., Prilutsky, B.I., Croce, A. et al. A numerical procedure for inferring from experimental data the optimization cost functions using a multibody model of the neuro-musculoskeletal system. Multibody Syst Dyn 16, 123–154 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-006-9019-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-006-9019-1