Abstract
This study of middle-school students in California focused on the effectiveness of using innovative teaching strategies for enhancing the classroom environment, students’ attitudes and conceptual development. A sample of 661 students from 22 classrooms in four inner city schools completed modified forms of the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey (CLES), What Is Happening In this Class? (WIHIC) questionnaire and Test of Mathematics Related Attitudes (TOMRA). Data analyses supported the factor structure, internal consistency reliability, discriminant validity and the ability to distinguish between different classes for these questionnaires when used with middle-school mathematics students in California. The effectiveness of the innovative instructional strategy was evaluated in terms of classroom environment and attitudes to mathematics for the whole sample, as well as for mathematics achievement for a subgroup of 101 students. A comparison of an experimental group which experienced the innovative strategy with a control group supported the efficacy of the innovative teaching methods in terms of learning environment, attitudes and mathematics concept development. Also associations were found between perceptions of classroom learning environment and students’ attitudes to mathematics and conceptual development.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Huang, T. C. I. (1999). Investigating classroom environments in Taiwan and Australia with multiple research methods. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 48–62.
Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Sebela, M. P. (2004). Using teacher action research to promote constructivist learning environments in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 24, 245–253.
Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., Taylor, P. C., & Chen, C. C. (2000). Constructivist learning environments in a cross-national study in Taiwan and Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 37–55.
California Department of Education. (2000). Mathematics framework for California public schools, kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento, CA: Department of Education.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–335.
Dorman, J. P. (2001). Associations between classroom environment and academic efficacy. Learning Environments Research, 4, 243–257.
Dorman, J. (2003). Cross-national validation of the What is Happening In This Class? (WIHIC) questionnaire using confirmatory factor analysis. Learning Environments Research, 6, 231–245.
Fraser, B. J. (1981). Using environment assessments to make better classrooms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 13, 131–144.
Fraser, B. J. (1998a). Science learning environments: Assessment, effects, and determinants. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 527–564). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Fraser, B. J. (1998b). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity, and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7–33.
Fraser, B. J., & Chionh, Y.-H. (2000, April). Classroom environment, self-esteem, achievement, and attitudes in geography and mathematics in Singapore. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. (1982). Predicting students’ outcomes from their perceptions of classroom psychosocial environment. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 498–518.
Harwell, S. H., Gunter, S., Montgomery, C. S., Shelton, C., & West, D. (2001). Technology integration and the classroom learning environment: Research for action. Learning Environments Research, 4, 259–286.
Kennedy, L., & Tipps, S. (2000). Guiding children’s learning of mathematics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
Kim, H. B., Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1999). Assessment and investigation of constructivist science learning environments in Korea. Research in Science & Technological Education, 17, 239–249.
Kim, H. B., Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). Classroom environment and teacher interpersonal behavior in secondary science classes in Korea. Evaluation and Research in Education, 14, 3–22.
Mansfield, H. M., & Happs, J. C. (1996). Using grade eight students’ existing knowledge to teach about parallel lines. School Science and Mathematics, 92, 450–454.
Maor, D., & Fraser, B. J. (1996). Use of classroom environment perceptions in evaluating inquiry-based computer assisted learning. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 401–421.
Margianti, E. S. (2002). Learning environment research in Indonesia. In S. C. Goh & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Studies in educational learning environments: An international perspective (pp. 153–168). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
McRobbie, C. J., & Fraser, B. J. (1993). Associations between student outcomes and psychosocial science environment. The Journal of Educational Research, 87, 78–85.
Mink, D. V., & Fraser, B. J. (2005). Evaluation of a K–5 mathematics program which integrates children’s literature: Classroom environment and attitudes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 59–85.
Nix, R. K., Fraser, B. J., & Ledbetter, C. E. (2005). Evaluating an integrated science environment using the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey. Learning Environments Research, 8, 109–133.
Ogbuehi, P. I., & Fraser, B. J. (2005, April). Evaluation of innovative strategy for teaching and learning systems of linear equations in terms of classroom environment, attitudes and conceptual development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
Spinner, H., & Fraser, B. J. (2005). Evaluation of an innovative mathematics program in terms of classroom environment, student attitudes, and conceptual development. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 267–293.
Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 293–302.
Teh, G., & Fraser, B. J. (1994). An evaluation of computer-assisted learning in terms of achievement, attitudes and classroom environment. Evaluation and Research in Education, 8, 147–161.
Thompson, B. (1998a). Review of ‘what if there were no significance tests?’ Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 334–346.
Thompson, B. (1998b, April). Five methodology errors in educational research: The pantheon of statistical significance and other faux pas. Invited address presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. J. (1998). Qualitative and quantitative landscapes of classroom learning environments. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 623–640). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Trickett, E. J., & Moos, R. H. (1973). Social environment of junior high and high school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 93–102.
United States Department of Education. (2001). No Child Left Behind act. Retrieved February 5, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/methods/math/math.pdf.
Walberg, H. J., & Anderson, G. J. (1968). Classroom climate and individual learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 414–419.
Wong, A. F. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1996). Environment-attitude associations in the chemistry laboratory classroom. Research in Science & Technology Education, 14, 91–102.
Zandvliet, D. B., & Fraser, B. J. (2005). Physical and psychosocial environments associated with networked classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 8, 1–17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ogbuehi, P.I., Fraser, B.J. Learning environment, attitudes and conceptual development associated with innovative strategies in middle-school mathematics. Learning Environ Res 10, 101–114 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-007-9026-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-007-9026-z