Abstract
This article reports a study of the learning environments in computer networked classrooms. The study is unique in that it involved an evaluation of both the physical and psychosocial classroom environments in these computerised settings through the use of a combination of questionnaires and ergonomic evaluations. The study involved administering a student questionnaire designed to assess aspects of the psychosocial learning environment in these settings, and relating these factors to students’ satisfaction and to important aspects of the physical learning environment. The sample consisted of 1404 students in 81 classes in Australia and Canada. A questionnaire assessing five aspects of psychosocial environment exhibited good factorial validity and internal consistency reliability. When satisfaction was used as a dependent variable, classroom psychosocial environment (especially autonomy/independence and task orientation) was significantly and directly associated with students’ satisfaction with their learning. In contrast, no direct associations were found between student satisfaction and measures of the physical classroom environment, such as the workspace and visual environments. However statistically significant associations emerged between physical and psychosocial learning environment variables in classrooms using new information technologies. These associations suggest a model of educational productivity for learning environments in technology-rich classrooms. Qualitative case studies provided more detailed information about selected classrooms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, D., Carlson, H., & Hamm, M. (1990). Cooperative learning and educational media: Collaborating with technology and each other. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Englewood Technology Publications.
Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). A cross-cultural study of classroom learning environments in Australia and Taiwan. Learning Environments Research, 3, 101–134.
Chapanis, A. (1996). Human factors in systems engineering. New York: Wiley.
Dorman, J. P. (2003). Cross-national validation of the What Is Happening In this Class? (WIHIC) questionnaire using confirmatory factor analysis. Learning Environment Research, 6, 231–245.
Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 170–198). New York: Simon & Shuster Macmillan.
Fraser, B. J. (1981). Test of science related attitudes. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Fraser, B. J. (1991). Two decades of classroom environment research. In B. J. Fraser & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents and consequences (pp. 3–27). London: Pergamon.
Fraser, B. J. (1994). Research on classroom and school climate. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 493–541). New York: Macmillan.
Fraser, B. J. (1998a). Science learning environments: Assessment, effects and determinants. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 527–564). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Fraser, B. J. (1998b). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7–33.
Fraser, B. J. (2002). Learning environments research: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. In S. C. Goh & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Studies in educational learning environments: An international perspective (pp. 1–25). Singapore: World Scientific Publishers.
Fraser, B. J., & Chionh, Y.-H. (2000, April). Classroom environment, self-esteem, achievement, and attitudes in geography and mathematics in Singapore. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Fraser, B. J., Fisher, D. L., & McRobbie, C. J. (1996, April). Development, validation and use of personal and class forms of a new classroom environment instrument. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
Gardiner, W. L. (1989). Forecasting, planning, and the future of the information society. In P. Goumain (Ed.), High technology workplaces: Integrating technology, management, and design for productive work environments (pp. 27–39). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Goh, S. C., & Khine, M. S. (Eds.). (2002). Studies in educational learning environments: An international perspective. Singapore: World Scientific Publishers.
Grandjean, E. (1987). Ergonomics in computerized offices. London: Taylor and Francis.
Grandjean, E. (1988). Fitting the task to the man: A textbook of occupational ergonomics (4th ed.). London: Taylor and Francis.
Jonasson, D. H. (1994). Thinking technology: Towards a constructivist design model. Educational Technology, 34, 34–37.
Khine, M. S., & Fisher, D. L. (2001, December). Classroom environment and teachers’ cultural background in secondary science classes in an Asian context. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Perth, Australia.
Kroemer, K., & Grandjean, E. (1997). Fitting the task to the human: A textbook of occupational ergonomics (5th ed.). London: Taylor and Francis.
Margianti, E. S., Fraser, B., & Aldridge, J. (2001, December). Investigating the learning environment and students’ outcomes in university level computing courses in Indonesia. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Fremantle, Australia.
McRobbie, C., & Fraser, B. (1993). Associations between student outcomes and psychosocial science environment. The Journal of Educational Research, 87, 78–85.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). (1987). Information technologies and basic learning. Paris: OECD Publications.
Raaflaub, C., & Fraser, B. (2003, March). The learning environment associated with the use of laptop computers in Canadian science classes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA.
Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. J. (1998). Qualitative and quantitative landscapes of classroom learning environments. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 623–640). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Trickett, E. J., & Moos, R. H. (1973). Social environment of junior high and high school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 93–102.
Walberg, H. J. (1991). Educational productivity and talent development. In B. J. Fraser & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents and consequences (pp. 93–109). London: Pergamon.
Walberg, H. J., & Anderson, G. J. (1968). Classroom climate and individual learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 414–419.
Zandvliet, D. B., & Straker, L. (2001). Physical and psychosocial ergonomic aspects of the learning environment in information technology rich classrooms. Ergonomics, 449, 838–857.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zandvliet, D.B., Fraser, B.J. Physical and Psychosocial Environments Associated with Networked Classrooms. Learning Environ Res 8, 1–17 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-005-7951-2
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-005-7951-2