Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Changes in carabid beetle assemblages along an urbanisation gradient in the city of Debrecen, Hungary

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Responses of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) to urbanisation were studied along an urban-suburban-rural gradient representing decreasing intensities of humandisturbance. Carabids were collected by pitfall trapping during their activity period in lowland oak forest patches in the city of Debrecen, Eastern Hungary. The average number of carabid species was significantly higher in the rural and urban areas compared to the suburban one. The high overall species richness in the urban area was due to the presence of species preferring open habitats. The species richness of forest specialist carabids significantly increased along the urban-rural gradient. The overall carabid abundance was significantly higher in the rural than the other two areas. The results did not support the hypothesis that overall diversity should decrease in response to habitat disturbance. They also contradicted the intermediate disturbance hypothesis: species richness was not the highest in the moderately disturbed suburban area. In the urban area, opportunistic species dominated. The average carabid body size was significantly larger in the rural and suburban areas than in the more disturbed urban area. Multivariate methods detected changes in species composition and abundance structure along the urban-rural gradient. Significant proportion of the variation in abundance and species richness was explained by the heterogeneity of environmental variables (ground temperature, surface temperature, humidity, cover of decaying wood material, herbs, canopy layer, and by the amount of prey).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alaruikka D.M., Kotze D.J., Matveinen K. and Niemelä J. 2003. Carabid and spider assemblages along an urban to rural gradient in Southern Finland. Journal of Insect Conservation 6: 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake S., Foster G.N., Eyre M.D. and Luff M.L. 1994. Effects of habitat type and grassland management practices on the body size distribution of carabid beetles. Pedobiologia 38: 502–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan K.M. and Wratten S.D. 1984. The responses of polyphagous predators to spatial heterogeneity: aggregation by carabid and staphylinid beetles to their cereal aphid prey. Ecological Entomology 9: 251–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke D. and Goulet H. 1998. Landscape and area effects on beetle assemblages in Ontario. Ecography 21: 472–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield J. 1997. Carabid community succession during forestry cycle in conifer plantations. Ecography 20: 614–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell J.H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199: 1302–1310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies K.F. and Margules C.R. 1998. Effects of habitat fragmentation on carabid beetles: experimental evidence. Journal of Animal Ecology 67: 460–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis B.N.K. 1978. Urbanisation and the diversity of insects.. In: Mound L.A. and Waloff N. (eds), Diversity of Insect Faunas. Blackwell, London, UK, pp. 126–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Boer P.J. 1985. Fluctuations of density and survival of carabid populations. Oecologia 67: 322–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desender K., Ervynck A. and Tack G. 1999. Beetle diversity and historical ecology of woodlands in Flanders. Belgian Journal of Zoology 129: 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Didham R.K., Ghazoul J., Stork N.E., Davis A.J. 1996. Insects in fragmented forests: a functional approach. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 255–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dofferêne M. and Legendre P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67: 345–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elek Z., Magura T. and Tóthmérész B. 2001. Impacts of non-native Norway spruce plantation on abundance and species richness of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Web Ecology 2: 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre M.D. and Luff M.L. 2002. The use of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in conservation assessments of exposed riverine sediment habitats in Scotland and northern England. Journal of Insect Conservation 6: 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier E. and Loreau M. 1999. Effects of newly planted hedges on ground-beetle diversity (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in an agricultural landscape. Ecography 22: 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier E. and Loreau M. 2001. Respective roles of recent hedges and forest patch remnants in the maintenance of ground-beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) diversity in an agricultural landscape. Landscape Ecology 16: 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert O.L. 1989. The Ecology of Urban Habitats. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godefroid S. and Koedam N. 2003. Distribution pattern of the flora in a peri-urban forest: an effect of the city-forest ecotone. Landscape and Urban Planning 54: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray J.S. 1987 Species-abundance patterns. In: Gee J.H.R. and Giller P.S. (eds), Organization of Communities, Past and Present. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK, pp. 53–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray J.S. 1989. Effects of environmental stress on species rich assemblages. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 37: 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillemain M., Loreau M. and Daufresne T. 1997. Relationships between the regional distribution of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and the abundance of their potential prey. Acta Oecologica 18: 465–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliday N.J. 1991. Species responses of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) during postfire regeneration of boreal forest. The Canadian Entomologist 123: 1369–1389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hůrka K. 1996. Carabidae of the Czech and Slovak Republics. Kabourek, Zlin, Czech Republic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivula M. 2002. Alternative harvesting methods and boreal carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Forest Ecology and Management 167: 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koivula M., Punttila P. and Niemelä J. 1999. Leaf litter and the small-scale distribution of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in the boreal forest. Ecography 22: 424–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivula M., Kukkonen J. and Niemelä J. 2002. Boreal carabidbeetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages along the clear-cut originated succession gradient. Biodiversity and Conservation 11: 1269–1288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutner M., Nachtschiem C., Wasserman W. and Neter J. 1996. Applied Linear Statistical Models. McGraw-Hill, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P. and Legendre L. 1998. Numerical Ecology. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lövei G.L. 1984. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in two types of maize fields in Hungary. Pedobiologia 26: 571–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lövei G.L. and Sunderland K.D. 1996. Ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Annual Review of Entomology 41: 231–256.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mader H.J. 1984. Animal habitat isolation by roads and agricultural fields. Biological Conservation 29: 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mader H.J., Schell C. and Kornacker P. 1990. Linear barriers to arthropod movements in the landscape. Biological Conservation 54: 209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magura T. 2002. Carabids and forest edge: spatial pattern and edge effect. Forest Ecology and Management 157: 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magura T., Elek Z. and Tóthmérész B. 2002. Impacts of non-native spruce reforestation on ground beetles. European Journal of Soil Biology 38: 291–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magura T., Ködöböcz V. and Tóthmérész B. 2001a. Effects of habitat fragmentation on carabids in forest patches. Journal of Biogeography 28: 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magura T., Tóthmérész B. and Bordán Zs. 1997. Comparison of the carabid communities of a zonal oak-hornbeam forest and pine plantations. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 43: 173–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magura T., Tóthmérész B. and Bordán Zs. 2000a. Effects of nature management practice on carabid assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a non-native plantation. Biological Conservation 93: 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magura T., Tóthmérész B. and Elek Z. 2003. Diversity and composition of carabids during a forestry cycle. Biodiversity and Conservation 12: 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magura T., Tóthmérész B. and Molnár T. 2000b. Spatial distribution of carabids along grass-forest transects. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 46: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magura T., Tóthmérész B. and Molnár T. 2001b. Forest edge and diversity: carabids along forest-grassland transects. Biodiversity and Conservation 10: 287–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell M.J. and Pickett S.T.A. 1990. Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71: 1232–1237.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell M.J., Pickett S.T.A., Groffman P., Bohlen P., Pouyat R.V., Zipperer W.C., Parmelee R.W., Carreiro M.M. and Medley K. 1997. Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems 1: 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre N.E., Rango J., Fagan W.F., and Faeth S.H. 2001. Ground arthropod community structure in a heterogeneous urban environment. Landscape and Urban Planning 52: 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S., Thompson L.J., Lawler S.P., Lawton J.H. and Woodfin R.M. 1994. Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems. Nature 368: 734–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J. 1999. Ecology and urban planning. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J. and Spence J.R. 1994. Distribution of forest dwelling carabids (Coleoptera): spatial scale and the concept of communities. Ecography 17: 166–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J., Kotze J., Ashworth A., Brandmayr P., Desender K., New T., Penev L., Samways M. and Spence J. 2000. The search for common anthropogenic impacts on biodiversity: a global network. Journal of Insect Conservation 4: 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J., Kotze J.D., Venn S. Penev L., Stoyanov I., Spence J., Hartley D. and Montes de Oca E. 2002. Carabid beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) across urban-rural gradients: an international comparison. Landscape Ecology 17: 387–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemalä J., Haila Y., Halme E., Pajunen T. and Punttila P. 1992. Small-scale heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of carabid beetles in the southern Finnish taiga. Journal of Biogeography 19: 173–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J., Spence J.R., Langor D., Haila Y. and Tukia H. 1994. Logging and boreal ground-beetle assemblages on two continents: implications for conservation.. In: Gaston K., Samways M. and New T (eds), Perspectives in Insect Conservation. Intercept Publications, Andover, UK, pp. 29–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J., Haila Y. and Punttila P. 1996. The importance of small-scale heterogeneity in boreal forests: variation in diversity in forest-floor invertebrates across the succession gradient. Ecography 19: 352–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pócs T. and Tóthmérész B. 1997. Foliicolous bryophyte diversity in tropical rainforests. Abstracta Botanica 21: 135–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouyat R.V., McDonnell M.J. and Pickett S.T.A. 1997. Litter decomposition and nitrogen mineralization in oak stands along an urban-rural land use gradient. Urban Ecosystems 1: 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Probst J.R. and Crow T.R. 1991. Integrating biological diversity and resource management. Journal of Forestry 89: 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainio J. and Niemelä J. 2003. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators. Biodiversity and Conservation 12: 489–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott W.A. and Anderson R. 2002. Temporal and spatial variation in carabid assemblages from the United Kingdom Environmental Change Network. Biological Conservation 110: 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergeeva T.K. 1994. Seasonal dynamics of interspecific trophic relations in a carabid beetle assemblage.. In: Desender K., Dufrêne M., Loreau M., Luff M.L. and Maelfait J.- P. (eds), Carabid Beetles: Ecology and Evolution. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 367–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal R.R. and Rohlf F.J. 1995. Biometry. Freeman, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence J.R. and Niemelä J. 1994. Sampling carabid assemblages with pitfall traps: the madness and the method. The Canadian Entomologist 126: 881–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence J.R. and Spence D.H. 1988. Of ground beetles and men: introduced species and the synanthropic fauna of western Canada. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 144: 151–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence J.R., Langor D.W., Niemelä J., Cárcamo H.A. and Currie C.R. 1996. Northern forestry and carabids: the case for concern about old-growth species. Annales Zoologici Fennici 33: 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stork N. 1990. The Role of Ground Beetles in Ecological and Environmental Studies. Intercept, Andover, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šustek Z. 1987. Changes in body size structure of carabid communities (Coleoptera, Carabidae) along an urbanisation gradient. Biológia (Bratislava) 42: 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiele H.U. 1977. Carabid Beetles in Their Environments. Springer, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonteri T. and Haila Y. 1990. Plants in a boreal city: ecological characteristics of vegetation in Helsinki and its surroundings, southern Finland. Annales Botanici Fennici 27: 337–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vida G. 1978. Genetic diversity and environmental future. Environmental Conservation 5: 127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wootton J.T. 1998. Effects of disturbance on species diversity: a multitrophic perspective. The American Naturalist 152: 803–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hortobágy National Park Directorate, POB. 216, H-4002, Debrecen, Hungary

    T. Magura

  2. Ecological Institute, University of Debrecen, POB. 71, H-4010, Debrecen, Hungary

    B. Tóthmérész

  3. Department of Zoology, University of Debrecen, POB. 3, H-4010, Debrecen, Hungary

    T. Molnár

Authors
  1. T. Magura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Tóthmérész
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. Molnár
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Magura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magura, T., Tóthmérész, B. & Molnár, T. Changes in carabid beetle assemblages along an urbanisation gradient in the city of Debrecen, Hungary. Landscape Ecol 19, 747–759 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-1128-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-1128-4

Key words

Search

Navigation