Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating and comparing entrepreneurial ecosystems using SMAA and SMAA-S

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on the entrepreneurial ecosystem as a set of interdependent and coordinated factors in a territory enabling entrepreneurship. To date, academic research has failed to produce methodologies for evaluating and comparing entrepreneurial ecosystems from different perspectives that can highlight the underlying factors. Moreover, there is a lack of empirical analysis that discriminates between factors according to their importance. Taking into account these two gaps, the aim of the paper is twofold. First, it proposes the application of an accurate, robust and reliable measurement technique, namely stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA). It considers the variability of weights that can be assigned to the different factors, producing a probabilistic ranking to obtain a comparison among entrepreneurial ecosystems. This ranking is more reliable than a single ranking proposed by the usual composite indices that take into account a single vector of weights. Second, the paper presents a new methodology, SMAA for strategic management analytics and assessment, or SMAA squared (SMAA-S), which detects the relation between entrepreneurial ecosystem factors and growth-oriented start-ups in a territory. The results show that the most relevant entrepreneurial ecosystem factors enabling the birth and activity of high-growth start-ups, and so impacting on technology, economy and society, can be identified in cultural and social norms, government programs, and internal market dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.oecd.org/industry/business-stats.

  2. http://entrepreneurial-revolution.com.

  3. http://www.weforum.org.

References

  • Achrol, R. S., & Stern, L. W. (1988). Environmental determinants of decision-making uncertainty in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(1), 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., & Mueller, P. (2008). Employment effects of business dynamics: Mice, gazelles and elephants. Small Business Economics, 30, 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., Parsons, W., & Tracy, S. (2008). High impact firms: Gazelles revisited. Office of Advocacy Working Paper, US Small Business Administration.

  • Alvedalen, J., & Boschma, R. (2017). A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 887–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angilella, S., Bottero, M., Corrente, S., Ferretti, V., Greco, S., & Lami, I. (2016). Non additive robust ordinal regression for urban and territorial planning: An application for siting an urban waste landfill. Annals of Operations Research, 245(1), 427–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angilella, S., Corrente, S., & Greco, S. (2015). Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis for the Choquet integral preference model and the scale construction problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 240, 172–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. (1995). Innovation, growth and survival. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4), 441–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. J. (2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: Establishing the framework conditions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1030–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Fritsch, M. (1994). On the measurement of entry rates. Empirica, 21, 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Heger, D., & Veith, T. (2015). Infrastructure and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 44(2), 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2004). Does entrepreneurship capital matter? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(5), 419–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birch, D. L., Medoff, J., Solmon, L. C., & Levenson, A. R. (1994). Gazelles, labor markets, employment policy and job creation. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R. (2004). Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective. Regional Studies, 38, 1001–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brüderl, J., & Preisendörfer, P. (2000). Fast-growing businesses: Empirical evidence from a German study. International Journal of Sociology, 30(3), 45–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruyat, C., & Julien, P. A. (2000). Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., Provance, M., & Grigoroudis, E. J. (2016). Entrepreneurship ecosystems: An agent-based simulation approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(3), 631–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carree, M. A., & Thurik, A. R. (2008). The lag structure of the impact of business ownership on economic performance in OECD countries. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, H. K., Yee, R. W., Dai, J., & Lim, M. K. (2016). The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on green product innovation and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 181(2), 384–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, T. (2011). Building an entrepreneurial ecosystem: Lesson from Omaha. Omaha, NE: Amanda Styron Community Builder Editor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W., & Rhodes, E. (1987). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, R. Y., Roth, Y., & Lemoine, J. F. (2015). The impact of culture on creativity: How cultural tightness and cultural distance affect global innovation crowdsourcing work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60, 189–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. (2006). Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business Strategy Environment, 15, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, J., & O’Kane, C. (2017). Technology based nascent entrepreneurship. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P. (2004). Researching entrepreneurship. International Studies in Entrepreneurship. Boston, MA: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., & Henrekson, M. (2002). Determinants of the prevalence of start-ups and high-growth firms. Small Business Economics, 19(2), 81–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Mel, S., McKenzie, D., & Woodruff, C. (2009). Measuring microenterprise profits: Must we ask how the sausage is made? Journal of Development Economics, 88(1), 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dejardin, M. (2011). Linking net entry to regional economic growth. Small Business Economics, 36, 443–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Giudice, M., Nicotra, M., Romano, M., & Schillaci, C. E. (2017). Entrepreneurial performance of principal investigators and country culture: Relations and influences. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 320–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., & Gartner, W. B. (2003). Arriving at the high-growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, W. J., Jr. (1997). More than you think: An inclusive estimate of business entries. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 175–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, W. J., Jr. (1999). Business starts and stops. Wells Fargo/NFIB Series. Washington, DC: The NFIB Education Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2013). Research and Innovation performance in EU Member States and Associated countries. Innovation Union progress at country level.. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, B. (2012). Start-up communities: Building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley InterScience.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M. M., & Nijkamp, P. (1988). The role of small firms for regional revitalization. The Annals of Regional Science, 22(1), 28–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M. (2013). New business formation and regional development—A survey and assessment of the evidence. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 9, 249–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2008). The effect of new business formation on regional development over time. The case of Germany. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B. (1990). What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing, 5(1), 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B., & Shane, S. A. (1995). Measuring entrepreneurship over time. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(4), 283–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GEM. (2017). Global report 2016/2017. http://www.gemconsortium.org/report/49812. Accessed 3 Apr 2017.

  • Greco, S., Figueira, J. R., & Ehrgott, M. (2016). Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Matarazzo, B., & Torrisi, G. (2017). Stochastic multiattribute acceptability analysis: An application to the ranking of Italian regions. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1347612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., & Torrisi, G. (2018). On the methodological framework of composite indices: A review of the issues of weighting, aggregation, and robustness. Social Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1832-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., & Słowiński, R. (2001). Rough set theory for multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 129(1), 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halabisky, D., Dreessen, E., & Parsley, C. (2006). Growth in firms in Canada 1985–1999. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 19(3), 255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, K. (2016). Is your entrepreneurial ecosystem scaling? An approach to inventorying and measuring a region’s innovation momentum. Innovations, 11(1), 126–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hébert, R. F., & Link, A. N. (1989). In search of the meaning of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 1(1), 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isenberg, D. J. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isenberg, D. J. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economy policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project. Babson Park, MA: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jap, S. D. (1999). Pie-expansion efforts: Collaboration processes in buyer–supplier relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(4), 461–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, S. (2008). Trade, institutions and religious tolerance: Evidence from India. Stanford University Research Paper, no. 2004. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=948734. Accessed 10 July 2017.

  • Kamasak, R., Yavuz, M., & Altuntas, G. (2016). Is the relationship between innovation performance and knowledge management contingent on environmental dynamism and learning capabilities? Evidence from a turbulent market. Business Research, 9(2), 229–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karatas-Ozkan, M., Anderson, A. R., Fayolle, A., Howells, J., & Condor, R. (2014). Understanding entrepreneurship: Challenging dominant perspectives and theorizing entrepreneurship through new postpositivist epistemologies. Journal of Small Business Management, 52, 589–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M. (1938). A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika, 30(1–2), 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klapper, L., Lewin, A., & Delgado, J. M. Q. (2009). The impact of the business environment on the business creation process. World Bank, Development Research Group, Finance and Private Sector Team, Policy Research Working Paper, no. 4937. World Bank.

  • Klepper, S. (2009). Spinoffs: A review and synthesis. European Management Review, 6, 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F., & Menter, M. (2017). The role of public policy in fostering technology-based nascent entrepreneurship. In J. Cunningham & C. O’Kane (Eds.), Technology based nascent entrepreneurship (pp. 19–52). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lahdelma, R., Hokkanen, J., & Salminen, P. (1998). SMAA—Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 106(1), 137–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahdelma, R., Salminent, P., & Hokkanen, J. (2002). Locating a waste treatment facility by using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis with ordinal criteria. European Journal of Operational Research, 142(2), 345–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leskinen, P., Viitaned, J., Kangas, A., & Kangas, J. (2006). Alternatives to incorporate uncertainty and risk attitude in multicriteria evaluation of forest plans. Forest Science, 52(3), 304–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littunen, H., & Tohmo, T. (2003). The high growth in new metal-based manufacturing and business service firms in Finland. Small Business Economics, 21(2), 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malecki, E. J. (2011). Connecting local entrepreneurial ecosystems to global innovation networks: Open innovation, double networks, and knowledge integration. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 14, 36–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKernan, S. M. (2002). The impact of microcredit programs on self-employment profit: Do non-credit program aspects matter? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Friesen, P. (1983). Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management Journal, 4(3), 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napier, G., & Hansen, C. (2011). Ecosystems for young scaleable firms. Copenhagen: FORA Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neck, H. M., Meyer, G. D., Cohen, B., & Corbett, A. C. (2004). An entrepreneurial system view of new venture creation. Journal of Small Business Management, 42, 190–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicotra, M., Romano, M., Del Giudice, M., & Schillaci, C. E. (2017). The causal relation between entrepreneurial ecosystem and productive entrepreneurship. Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10961-017-9628-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1998). Fostering entrepreneurship, the OECD jobs strategy. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016). Entrepreneurship at a glance 2016. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paelinck, J. H. P. (1974). Qualitative multiple-criteria analysis, environmental protection and multiregional development. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 36, 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, T., & Ryu, D. (2015). Drivers of technology commercialization and performance in SMEs: The moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Management Decision, 53(2), 338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulson, A. L., & Townsend, R. (2004). Entrepreneurship and financial constraints in Thailand. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10, 229–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piergiovanni, R., Carree, M. A., & Santarelli, E. (2012). Creative industries, new business formation, and regional economic growth. Small Business Economics, 39, 539–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition (pp. 77–89). Boston: Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roundy, P. T., Brockman, B. K., & Bradshaw, M. (2017). The resilience of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 8, 99–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. (1996). Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saviotti, P. P., & Pyka, A. (2004). Economic development, variety and employment. Revue Economique, 55, 1023–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilke, O. (2014). On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strategic Management Journal, 35(2), 179–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schillaci, C. E., & Nicotra, M. (2010). Rowing against the tide: The struggle to enhance entrepreneurship in a hostile region. In G. Dossena (Ed.), Entrepreneurship today (pp. 143–162). Milano: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. S., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2003). Science parks and the performance of new technology-based firms: A review of recent UK evidence and an agenda for future research. Small Business Economics, 20(2), 177–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystems. In R. Blackburn, D. De Clercq, J. Heinonen, & Z. Wang (Eds.), Handbook for entrepreneurship and small business (pp. 1–15). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (2012). Do EU regional policies favour regional entrepreneurship? Empirical evidence from Spain and Germany. European Planning Studies, 20(4), 583–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tervonen, T., & Figueira, J. R. (2008). A survey on stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis methods. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 15, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tervonen, T., Linkov, I., Figueira, J. R., Steevens, J., Chappell, M., & Merad, M. (2009). Risk-based classification system of nanomaterials. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 11(4), 757–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H. (1993). The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag, M. C. (1999). Some classic views on entrepreneurship. The Economist, 147(3), 311–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verheul, I., Wennekers, S., Audretsch, D., & Thurik, R. (2002). An eclectic theory of entrepreneurship: Policies, institutions and culture. In D. Audretsch, R. Thurik, I. Verheul, & S. Wennekers (Eds.), Entrepreneurship: Determinants and policy in a European-US comparison. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Bargen, P., Freedman, D., & Pages, E. R. (2003). The rise of the entrepreneurial society. Economic Development Quarterly, 17(4), 315–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyrwich, M. (2012). Regional entrepreneurial heritage in a socialist and a post-socialist economy. Economic Geography, 88, 423–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacharakis, A., Shepard, D., & Coombs, J. (2003). The development of venture-capital-backed internet companies: An ecosystem perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department “Economia e Impresa”, University of Catania, Corso Italia, 55, 95129, Catania, Italy

    Salvatore Corrente, Salvatore Greco, Melita Nicotra, Marco Romano & Carmela Elita Schillaci

  2. Portsmouth Business School, University of Portsmouth, Portland Street, Portsmouth, PO1 3DE, UK

    Salvatore Greco

Authors
  1. Salvatore Corrente
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Salvatore Greco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Melita Nicotra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marco Romano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Carmela Elita Schillaci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melita Nicotra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corrente, S., Greco, S., Nicotra, M. et al. Evaluating and comparing entrepreneurial ecosystems using SMAA and SMAA-S. J Technol Transf 44, 485–519 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9684-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9684-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation