Skip to main content
Log in

Risk of Sperm Competition Mediates Copulation Duration, but not Paternity, of Male Burying Beetles

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Males should increase their investment in ejaculates whenever they are faced with an increased risk of sperm competition. Burying beetles (Nicrophorus vespilloides), insects that breed on small vertebrate carcasses, offer an ideal model with which to examine sperm allocation tactics because females typically mate with many males prior to laying eggs. Males compete directly for control of carcasses, and males losing such contests often become satellites, lurking in the vicinity of the carcass and attempting surreptitious copulations with the resident female. We predicted that both the dominant resident male and the satellite male would increase their sperm allocation in the presence of the other, but that relative to dominant males, satellite males would allocate a greater number of sperm per ejaculate. We employed a repeated-measures design in which two full-sib rival males, differing only in their dominance status, were each mated a single time to a previously-inseminated female under two conditions, once in the absence of their rival and once in the presence of their rival. Satellite males exhibited longer copulation durations than dominant resident males when both males were present on a carcass. Copulation durations of dominant males did not differ in the presence or absence of satellite males. Contrary to expectation, the increased copulation durations of satellite males did not result in a greater share of paternity relative to dominant males. The absence of any discernible effect of increased copulation durations on paternity in satellite males could be due to post-copulatory preferences of females or, alternatively, satellite males may require longer durations of copulation to transfer the same amount of sperm as dominant males.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beeler AE, Rauter CM, Moore AJ (2002) Mate discrimination by females in the burying beetle Nicrophorus orbicollis: the influence of male size on attractiveness to females. Ecol Entomol 27:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne PG (2004) Male sperm expenditure under sperm competition risk and intensity in quacking frogs. Behav Ecol 15:857–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson JL (1986) Prolonged mating in the milkweed beetle Labidomera clivicollis clivicollis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): a test of the “ sperm-loading” hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:331–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (1996) Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson M, Canal D (2006) The effects of copulation duration in the bruchid beetle Callosobruchus maculates. Behav Ecol 17:430–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggert A-K (1992) Alternative male mate-finding tactics in burying beetles. Behav Ecol 3:243–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggert A-K, Müller JK (1989) Mating success of pheromone-emitting Necrophorus males: do attracted females discriminate against resource owners? Behaviour 110:248–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggert A-K, Müller JK (1992) Joint breeding in female burying beetles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:237–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggert A-K, Müller JK (1997) Biparental care and social evolution in burying beetles: lessons from the larder. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 216–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggert A-K, Reinking M, Müller JK (1998) Parental care improves offspring survival and growth in burying beetles. Anim Behav 55:97–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fu P, Neff BD, Gross MR (2001) Tactic-specific success in sperm competition. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1105–1112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gage MJG (1991) Risk of sperm competition directly affects ejaculate size in the Mediterranean fruit fly. Anim Behav 42:1036–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross MR (1996) Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. Trends Ecol Evol 11:92–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev 75:21–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski MW (2004) Reduction in last male sperm precedence caused by competitive assault on a mating male in Gastrophysa viridula, a highly polygamous leaf beetle. Ethol Ecol Evol 16:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller JK (1987) Replacement of a lost clutch: a strategy for optimal resource utilization in Necrophorus vespilloides (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Ethology 76:74–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller JK, Eggert A-K (1989) Paternity assurance by “ helpful” males: adaptations to sperm competition in burying beetles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:245–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panaitof SC, Scott MP, Borst DW (2004) Plasticity in juvenile hormone in male burying beetles during breeding: physiological consequences of the loss of a mate. J Insect Physiol 50:715–724

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1998) Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculates: towards a theory base. In: Birkhead TR, Møller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic, San Diego, pp 3–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Pound N, Gage MJG (2004) Prudent sperm allocation in Norway rats, Rattus norvegicus: a mammalian model of adaptive ejaculate adjustment. Anim Behav 68:819–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokop P, Václav R (2005) Males respond to the risk of sperm competition in the sexually cannibalistic praying mantis, Mantis religiosa. Ethology 111:836–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pukowski E (1933) Ökologische Untersuchungen an Necrophorus F. Z. Morph. Ökol Tiere 27:518–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolfsen G, Figenschou L, Folstad I, Tveiten H, Figenschou M (2006) Rapid adjustments of sperm characteristics in relation to social status. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:325–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakaluk SK, Eggert A-K, Müller JK (1998) The ‘widow effect’ and its consequences for reproduction in burying beetles, Nicrophorus vespilloides (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Ethology 104:553–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (2004) SAS OnlineDoc® 9.1.3. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaus JM, Sakaluk SK (2001) Ejaculate expenditures of male crickets in response to varying risk and intensity of sperm competition: not all species play games. Behav Ecol 12:740–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaus JM, Sakaluk SK (2002) Repeatability of sperm number across multiple matings in three cricket species, Gryllodes sigillatus, Gryllus veletis, and Gryllus texensis (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Can J Zool 80:582–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte-Hostedde AI, Burness G (2005) Fertilization dynamics of sperm from different male mating tactics in bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus). Can J Zool 83:1638–1642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins JL, Simmons LW (2000) Sperm competition games played by dimorphic male beetles: fertilization gains with equal mating access. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1547–1553

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell N, Gage MJG, Parker GA (2002) Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends Ecol Evol 17:313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenninger EJ, Averill AL (2006) Influence of body and genital morphology on relative male fertilization success in oriental beetle. Behav Ecol 17:656–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeh JA, Zeh DW (2003) Toward a new sexual selection paradigm: polyandry, conflict and incompatibility. Ethology 109:929–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Anne Eggert, Joseph Leman, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript. This project was supported by a research fellowship renewal from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and grants from the National Science Foundation (IBN-0126820) and Illinois State University to S. K. S., and a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to J. K. M. (Mu 1175/3–1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott K. Sakaluk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sakaluk, S.K., Müller, J.K. Risk of Sperm Competition Mediates Copulation Duration, but not Paternity, of Male Burying Beetles. J Insect Behav 21, 153–163 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-007-9115-y

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-007-9115-y

Keywords

Navigation