Abstract
Males should increase their investment in ejaculates whenever they are faced with an increased risk of sperm competition. Burying beetles (Nicrophorus vespilloides), insects that breed on small vertebrate carcasses, offer an ideal model with which to examine sperm allocation tactics because females typically mate with many males prior to laying eggs. Males compete directly for control of carcasses, and males losing such contests often become satellites, lurking in the vicinity of the carcass and attempting surreptitious copulations with the resident female. We predicted that both the dominant resident male and the satellite male would increase their sperm allocation in the presence of the other, but that relative to dominant males, satellite males would allocate a greater number of sperm per ejaculate. We employed a repeated-measures design in which two full-sib rival males, differing only in their dominance status, were each mated a single time to a previously-inseminated female under two conditions, once in the absence of their rival and once in the presence of their rival. Satellite males exhibited longer copulation durations than dominant resident males when both males were present on a carcass. Copulation durations of dominant males did not differ in the presence or absence of satellite males. Contrary to expectation, the increased copulation durations of satellite males did not result in a greater share of paternity relative to dominant males. The absence of any discernible effect of increased copulation durations on paternity in satellite males could be due to post-copulatory preferences of females or, alternatively, satellite males may require longer durations of copulation to transfer the same amount of sperm as dominant males.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beeler AE, Rauter CM, Moore AJ (2002) Mate discrimination by females in the burying beetle Nicrophorus orbicollis: the influence of male size on attractiveness to females. Ecol Entomol 27:1–6
Byrne PG (2004) Male sperm expenditure under sperm competition risk and intensity in quacking frogs. Behav Ecol 15:857–863
Dickinson JL (1986) Prolonged mating in the milkweed beetle Labidomera clivicollis clivicollis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): a test of the “ sperm-loading” hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:331–338
Eberhard WG (1996) Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Edvardsson M, Canal D (2006) The effects of copulation duration in the bruchid beetle Callosobruchus maculates. Behav Ecol 17:430–434
Eggert A-K (1992) Alternative male mate-finding tactics in burying beetles. Behav Ecol 3:243–254
Eggert A-K, Müller JK (1989) Mating success of pheromone-emitting Necrophorus males: do attracted females discriminate against resource owners? Behaviour 110:248–257
Eggert A-K, Müller JK (1992) Joint breeding in female burying beetles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:237–242
Eggert A-K, Müller JK (1997) Biparental care and social evolution in burying beetles: lessons from the larder. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 216–236
Eggert A-K, Reinking M, Müller JK (1998) Parental care improves offspring survival and growth in burying beetles. Anim Behav 55:97–107
Fu P, Neff BD, Gross MR (2001) Tactic-specific success in sperm competition. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1105–1112
Gage MJG (1991) Risk of sperm competition directly affects ejaculate size in the Mediterranean fruit fly. Anim Behav 42:1036–1037
Gross MR (1996) Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. Trends Ecol Evol 11:92–98
Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev 75:21–64
Kozlowski MW (2004) Reduction in last male sperm precedence caused by competitive assault on a mating male in Gastrophysa viridula, a highly polygamous leaf beetle. Ethol Ecol Evol 16:15–23
Müller JK (1987) Replacement of a lost clutch: a strategy for optimal resource utilization in Necrophorus vespilloides (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Ethology 76:74–80
Müller JK, Eggert A-K (1989) Paternity assurance by “ helpful” males: adaptations to sperm competition in burying beetles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:245–249
Panaitof SC, Scott MP, Borst DW (2004) Plasticity in juvenile hormone in male burying beetles during breeding: physiological consequences of the loss of a mate. J Insect Physiol 50:715–724
Parker GA (1998) Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculates: towards a theory base. In: Birkhead TR, Møller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic, San Diego, pp 3–54
Pound N, Gage MJG (2004) Prudent sperm allocation in Norway rats, Rattus norvegicus: a mammalian model of adaptive ejaculate adjustment. Anim Behav 68:819–823
Prokop P, Václav R (2005) Males respond to the risk of sperm competition in the sexually cannibalistic praying mantis, Mantis religiosa. Ethology 111:836–848
Pukowski E (1933) Ökologische Untersuchungen an Necrophorus F. Z. Morph. Ökol Tiere 27:518–586
Rudolfsen G, Figenschou L, Folstad I, Tveiten H, Figenschou M (2006) Rapid adjustments of sperm characteristics in relation to social status. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:325–332
Sakaluk SK, Eggert A-K, Müller JK (1998) The ‘widow effect’ and its consequences for reproduction in burying beetles, Nicrophorus vespilloides (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Ethology 104:553–564
SAS Institute Inc. (2004) SAS OnlineDoc® 9.1.3. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC
Schaus JM, Sakaluk SK (2001) Ejaculate expenditures of male crickets in response to varying risk and intensity of sperm competition: not all species play games. Behav Ecol 12:740–745
Schaus JM, Sakaluk SK (2002) Repeatability of sperm number across multiple matings in three cricket species, Gryllodes sigillatus, Gryllus veletis, and Gryllus texensis (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Can J Zool 80:582–585
Schulte-Hostedde AI, Burness G (2005) Fertilization dynamics of sperm from different male mating tactics in bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus). Can J Zool 83:1638–1642
Tomkins JL, Simmons LW (2000) Sperm competition games played by dimorphic male beetles: fertilization gains with equal mating access. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1547–1553
Wedell N, Gage MJG, Parker GA (2002) Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends Ecol Evol 17:313–320
Wenninger EJ, Averill AL (2006) Influence of body and genital morphology on relative male fertilization success in oriental beetle. Behav Ecol 17:656–663
Zeh JA, Zeh DW (2003) Toward a new sexual selection paradigm: polyandry, conflict and incompatibility. Ethology 109:929–950
Acknowledgements
We thank Anne Eggert, Joseph Leman, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript. This project was supported by a research fellowship renewal from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and grants from the National Science Foundation (IBN-0126820) and Illinois State University to S. K. S., and a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to J. K. M. (Mu 1175/3–1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sakaluk, S.K., Müller, J.K. Risk of Sperm Competition Mediates Copulation Duration, but not Paternity, of Male Burying Beetles. J Insect Behav 21, 153–163 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-007-9115-y
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-007-9115-y