Abstract
This study investigated the effects of participant sex, victim dress, and attitudes influencing the tendency to blame a marital rape victim. College undergraduates completed the Attitudes toward Marriage Scale, an intervening cognitive task, and a read fictitious scenario of a marital rape incident where the victim was dressed somberly or seductively. Participants then completed a brief questionnaire. As predicted, males rated the victim more deserving of the attack than females. As predicted, the suggestively dressed victim was rated more responsible and deserving than the somberly dressed victim. As predicted, participants holding more traditional attitudes toward marriage were more likely to assign more victim responsibility and deservingness than participants with more egalitarian attitudes. These findings are discussed within an attitudinal framework.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison, J. A., and Wrightsman, L. S. (1993). Rape: The Misunderstood crime, Sage, New York.
American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Am. Psychol. 47: 1597–1611.
Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 38: 217–230.
Campbell, J. C. (1989). Women’s responses to sexual abuse in intimate relationships. Health Care Women Int. 10: 335–346.
Check, J. V. P., and Malamuth, N. (1985). An empirical assessment of some feminist hypotheses about rape. Int. J. Women’s Studies 8: 414–423.
Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Academic, New York.
Deitz, S. R., and Byrnes, L. E. (1981). Attribution of responsibility for sexual assault: The influence of observer empathy and defendant occupation and attractiveness. J. Psychol. 108: 17–29.
Edmonds, E. M., and Cahoon, D. D. (1986). Attitudes concerning crimes related to clothing worn by female victims. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 24: 444–446.
Finkelhor, D., Gelles, R. J., Hotaling, G. T., and Straus, M. A. (1983). The Dark Side of Families: Current Family Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Finkelhor, D., and Yllo, K. (1985). License to Rape: Sexual Abuse of Wives, Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York.
Giacopassi, D. J., and Dull, R. T. (1986). Gender and racial differences in the acceptance of rape myths within a college population. Sex Roles 15: 63–75.
Jacobson, A. H. (1951). A study of conflict in attitudes toward the roles of the husband and the wife in marriage (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 1951). Dissertation Abstr. Int. [AAC0276710].
Jenkins, M. J., and Dambrot, F. H. (1987). The attribution of date rape: Observer’s attitudes and sexual experiences and the dating situation. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 17: 875–895.
Kanekar, S., and Kolsawalla, M. B. (1980). Responsibility of a rape victim in relation to her respectability, attractiveness, and provocativeness. J. Soc. Psychol. 112: 153–154.
Kanekar, S., and Nazareth, A. M. (1988). Attributed rape victim’s fault as a function of her attractiveness, physical hurt, and emotional disturbance. Soc. Behav. 3: 37–40.
Kirkwood, M. K., and Cecil, D. K. (2001). A student assessment of rape laws and marital exemption. Violence Women 7: 1234–1253.
Koss, M. P., Dinero, T. E., Seibel, C. A., and Cox, S. L. (1988). Stranger and acquaintance rape: Are there differences in the victim’s experience. Psychol. Women Q. 12: 1–24.
Krulewitz, J. E., and Nash, J. E. (1979). Effects of rape victim resistance, assault outcome, and sex of observer on attributions about rape. J. Pers. 47: 557–574.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., and Monson, C. M. (1998). Marital rape: Is the crime taken seriously without co-occurring physical abuse? J. Fam. Violence 13(4): 433–443.
Lerner, M. J. (1980). The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion, Plenum Press, New York.
Lipkus, I. (1991). The construction and preliminary validation of the a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just word scale. Pers. Individ. Differences 12: 1171–1178.
Mathias, B. (1986). Lifting the shade on family violence. Fam. Ther. Networker 10: 20–29.
Merrell, J. L. (1998). The effects of gender role attitudes, participant gender, and situational factors on attitudes toward marital rape and sexual obligation (Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, 1998). Dissertation Abstr. Int. 59: 1373.
Miller, W. R., Williams, A. M., and Bernstein, M. H. (1982). The effects of rape on marital and sexual adjustment. Am. J. Fam. Ther. 10: 51–58.
Monson, C. M., Byrd, G. R., and Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1996). To have and to hold: Perceptions of marital rape. J. Interpers. Violence 11: 410–424.
Monson, C. M., and Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1998). Sexual and nonsexual marital aggression: Legal considerations, epidemiology, and an integrated typology of perpetrators. Aggression Violent Behav. 3: 369–389.
Monson, C. M., Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., and Binderup, T. (2000). Does “no” really mean “no” after you say “yes”?: Attributions about date and marital rape. J. Interpers. Violence 15: 1156–1174.
Muehlenhard, C. (1988). Misinterpreted dating behavior and the risk of date rape. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 6: 20–37.
National Clearinghouse on Marital and Date Rape. (1985). Prosecution Statistics, Author, Berkeley, CA.
National Clearinghouse on Marital and Date Rape. (1991). State Law Chart, Author, Berkeley, CA.
Painter, K., and Farrington, D. P. (1998). Marital violence in Great Britain and its relationship to marital and non-marital rape. Int. Rev. Victimol. 5: 257–276.
Russell, D. H. (1990). Rape in Marriage, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.
Sanchez, D. M. (1997). The relationship between attitudes toward women, rape myth acceptance, and perceptions of marital versus stranger rape (Doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology, 1997). Dissertation Abstr. Int. 58: 1545.
Scroggs, J. R. (1976). Penalties for rape as a function of victim provocativeness, damage, and resistance. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 6: 360–368.
Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51: 515–530.
Shaver, K. G. (1985). The Attribution of Blame: Causality, Responsibility, and Blameworthiness, Springer, New York.
Shotland, R. L., and Goodstein, L. (1983). Just because she doesn’t want to doesn’t mean it’s rape: An experimentally based causal model of the perception of rape in a dating situation. Soc. Psychol. Q. 46: 220–232.
Simonson, K., and Subich, L. M. (1999). Rape perceptions as a function of gender-role traditionality and victim-perpetrator association. Sex Roles 40(7–8): 617–634.
Spence, J. T., and Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity & Femininity: Their Psychological Dimensions, Correlates, and Antecedents, The University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.
Sullivan, J. P., and Mosher, D. L. (1990). Acceptance of guided imagery of marital rape as a function of macho personality. Violence Victims 5: 275–286.
Tabachnick, B. G., and Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using Multivariate Statistics, 2nd edn., Harper and Row, New York.
Walster, E. (1966). Assignment of responsibility for an accident. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 3: 73–79.
Ward, C. (1988). The attitudes toward rape victims scale: Construction, validation, and cross-cultural applicability. Psychol. Women Q. 12: 127–146.
Westwell, C. A. (1998). Cognitive processing therapy in the treatment of marital rape. Psychother. Priv. Pract. 17: 63–77.
Whatley, M. A. (1993). For better or worse: The case of marital rape. Violence Vict. 8: 31–41.
Whatley, M. A. (1994, November). Factors Affecting Attributions of Blame for Date Rape. In Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Southeastern Social Psychologists, Winston-Salem, NC.
Whatley, M. A. (1996). Victim characteristics influencing attributions of responsibility to rape victims: A meta-analysis. Aggression Violent Behav. 1: 81–95.
Whatley, M. A., and Riggio, R. E. (1993). Gender differences in attributions of blame for male rape victims. J. Interpers. Violence 8: 502–511.
Willis, C. E. (1992). The effect of sex role stereotype, victim and defendant race, and prior relationship on rape culpability attributions. Sex Roles 26: 213–226.
X, L. (1999). Accomplishing the impossible: An advocate’s notes from the successful campaign to make marital and date rape a crime in all 50 U.S. states and other countries. Violence Women 5: 1064–1081.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whatley, M.A. The Effect of Participant Sex, Victim Dress, and Traditional Attitudes on Causal Judgments for Marital Rape Victims. J Fam Viol 20, 191–200 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-3655-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-3655-8