Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Variation in Chemical Defense Among Natural Populations of Common Toad, Bufo bufo, Tadpoles: the Role of Environmental Factors

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Defensive toxins are widespread in nature, yet we know little about how various environmental factors shape the evolution of chemical defense, especially in vertebrates. In this study we investigated the natural variation in the amount and composition of bufadienolide toxins, and the relative importance of ecological factors in predicting that variation, in larvae of the common toad, Bufo bufo, an amphibian that produces toxins de novo. We found that tadpoles’ toxin content varied markedly among populations, and the number of compounds per tadpole also differed between two geographical regions. The most consistent predictor of toxicity was the strength of competition, indicating that tadpoles produced more compounds and larger amounts of toxins when coexisting with more competitors. Additionally, tadpoles tended to contain larger concentrations of bufadienolides in ponds that were less prone to desiccation, suggesting that the costs of toxin production can only be afforded by tadpoles that do not need to drastically speed up their development. Interestingly, this trade-off was not alleviated by higher food abundance, as periphyton biomass had negligible effect on chemical defense. Even more surprisingly, we found no evidence that higher predation risk enhances chemical defenses, suggesting that low predictability of predation risk and high mortality cost of low toxicity might select for constitutive expression of chemical defense irrespective of the actual level of predation risk. Our findings highlight that the variation in chemical defense may be influenced by environmental heterogeneity in both the need for, and constraints on, toxicity as predicted by optimal defense theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbuckle K, Brockhurst M, Speed MP (2013) Does chemical defence increase niche space? A phylogenetic comparative analysis of the Musteloidea. Evol Ecol 27:863–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow A, Pook CE, Harrison RA, Wüster W (2009) Coevolution of diet and prey-specific venom activity supports the role of selection in snake venom evolution. Proc R Soc B 276:2443–2449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Benard MF, Fordyce JA (2003) Are induced defenses costly? Consequences of predator-induced defenses in western toads, Bufo boreas. Ecology 84:68–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie ED (2009) Toxins and venoms. Curr Biol 19:R931–R935

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brossman KH, Carlson BE, Stokes AN, Langkilde T (2014) Eastern newt (Notophthalmus viridescens) larvae alter morphological but not chemical defenses in response to predator cues. Can J Zool 92:279–283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crossland MR, Alford RA (1998) Evaluation of the toxicity of eggs, hatchlings and tadpoles of the introduced toad Bufo marinus (Anura: Bufonidae) to native Australian aquatic predators. Aust J Ecol 23:129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossland MR, Shine R (2012) Embryonic exposure to conspecific chemicals suppresses cane toad growth and survival. Biol Lett 8:226–229

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cunha Filhoa GA, Schwartz CA, Resck IS, Murta MM, Lemos SS, Castro MS, Kyaw C, Pires OR Jr, Leite JRS (2005) Antimicrobial activity of the bufadienolides marinobufagin and telocinobufagin isolated as major components from skin secretion of the toad Bufo rubescens. Toxicon 45:777–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly JW (1995) The chemistry of poisons in amphibian skin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:9–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Darst CR, Menéndez-Guerrero PA, Coloma LA, Cannatella DC (2005) Evolution of dietary specialization and chemical defense in poison frogs (Dendrobatidae): a comparative analysis. Am Nat 165:56–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fordyce JA, Nice CC, Shapiro AM (2006) A novel trade-off of insect diapause affecting a sequestered chemical defense. Oecologia 149:101–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz RS, Simms EL (1992) Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens: ecology, evolution, and genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Groner ML, Rollins-Smith LA, Reinert LK, Hempel J, Bier ME, Relyea RA (2014) Interactive effects of competition and predator cues on immune responses of leopard frogs at metamorphosis. J Exp Biol 217:351–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gunzburger MS, Travis J (2005) Critical literature review of the evidence for unpalatability of amphibian eggs and larvae. J Herpetol 39:547–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagman M, Hayes RA, Capon RJ, Shine R (2009) Alarm cues experienced by cane toad tadpoles affect post-metamorphic morphology and chemical defences. Funct Ecol 23:126–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanifin CT, Brodie ED III, Brodie ED Jr (2003) Tetrodotoxin levels in eggs of the rough-skin newt, Taricha granulosa, are correlated with female toxicity. J Chem Ecol 29:1729–1739

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes RA, Crossland MR, Hagman M, Capon RJ, Shine R (2009a) Ontogenetic variation in the chemical defences of cane toads (Bufo marinus): toxin profiles and effects on predators. J Chem Ecol 35:391–399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes RA, Piggott AM, Dalle K, Capon RJ (2009b) Microbial biotransformation as a source of chemical diversity in cane toad steroid toxins. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 19:1790–1792

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henrikson B-I (1990) Predation on amphibian eggs and tadpoles by common predators in acidified lakes. Holarct Ecol 13:201–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettyey A, Vincze K, Zsarnóczai S, Hoi H, Laurila A (2011) Costs and benefits of defences induced by predators differing in dangerousness. J Evol Biol 24:1007–1019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hettyey A, Tóth Z, Van Buskirk J (2014) Inducible chemical defences in animals. Oikos 123:1025–1028

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1999) Ecological methodology, 2nd ed. Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers, Inc

  • Licht LE (1967) Growth inhibition in crowded tadpoles: intraspecific and interspecific effects. Ecology 48:736–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligabue-Braun R, Carlini CR (2015) Poisonous birds: a timely review. Toxicon 99:102–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis O, Saglio P, Neveu A (2004) Effects of predators and conspecific chemical cues on the swimming activity of Rana temporaria and Bufo bufo tadpoles. Arch Hydrobiol 160:153–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall AC, Fordyce JA (2010) Can optimal defence theory be used to predict the distribution of plant chemical defences? J Ecol 98:985–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClintock JB, Baker BJ (2001) Marine chemical ecology. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/

  • Reading CJ, Loman J, Madsen T (1991) Breeding pond fidelity in the common toad, Bufo bufo. J Zool (Lond) 225:201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA (2002) Local population differences in phenotypic plasticity: predator-induced changes in wood frog tadpoles. Ecol Monogr 72:77–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter-Boix A, Llorente GA, Montori A (2007) A comparative study of predator-induced phenotype in tadpoles across a pond permanency gradient. Hydrobiologia 583:43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter-Boix A, Tejedo M, Rezende EL (2011) Evolution and plasticity of anuran larval development in response to desiccation. A comparative analysis. Ecol Evol 1:15–25

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sultan SE, Spencer HG (2002) Metapopulation structure favors plasticity over local adaptation. Am Nat 160:271–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tempone AG, Carvalho PD, Lebrun I, Sartorelli P, Taniwaki NN, de Andrade HF Jr, Antoniazzi MM, Jared C (2008) Antileishmanial and antitrypanosomal activity of bufadienolides isolated from the toad Rhinella jimi parotoid macrogland secretion. Toxicon 52:13–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Buskirk J (2002) A comparative test of the adaptive plasticity hypothesis: relationships between habitat and phenotype in anuran larvae. Am Nat 160:87–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Buskirk J, Arioli M (2005) Habitat specialization and adaptive phenotypic divergence of anuran populations. J Evol Biol 18:596–608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Buskirk J, Schmidt BR (2000) Predator-induced phenotypic plasticity in larval newts: trade-offs, selection, and variation in nature. Ecology 81:3009–3028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells KD (2007) The ecology and behavior of amphibians. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhams DC, Rollins-Smith LA, Carey C, Reinert L, Tyler MJ, Alford RA (2006) Population trends associated with skin peptide defenses against chytridiomycosis in Australian frogs. Oecologia 146:531–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Kutyó L. Jókai and Gábor Fera for help in the field, the Pilisi Parkerdő Zrt. for allowing us to use their forestry roads, and Edina Simon for help with the lab measurements of periphyton biomass. The Közép-Duna-Völgyi KTVF issued the permission to conduct the present study (KTF:603–3/2014). Financial support was provided by the ‘Lendület’ programme of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA, LP2012-24/2012), an FP7 Marie Curie Career Integration Grant (PCIG13-GA-2013–631722), and a Sparkling Science Project of the Federal Ministry of Science and Research, Austria (BMWF, SPA 04/171). During the study, Z. T. was supported by the MTA postdoctoral research programme (SZ-029/2013) and the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA, PD108938). During write-up, V.B. was supported by the Bolyai Fellowship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veronika Bókony.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary 1

(KML 13 kb)

Supplementary 2

(XLSX 53 kb)

Supplementary 3

(DOCX 472 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bókony, V., Móricz, Á.M., Tóth, Z. et al. Variation in Chemical Defense Among Natural Populations of Common Toad, Bufo bufo, Tadpoles: the Role of Environmental Factors. J Chem Ecol 42, 329–338 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-016-0690-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-016-0690-2

Keywords

Navigation