Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Differences in Word Processing Skills of Deaf and Hearing Individuals Reading in Different Orthographies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study investigated differences in the word processing skills of prelingually deaf and hearing participants reading in five orthographies (Hebrew, Arabic, English, German and Turkish). We tested 256 readers (132 deaf and 124 hearing) from the mid level of education (sixth and seventh grades) using two computerized paradigms that assessed the perceptual and conceptual processing of word pairs. Based on the Orthographic Depth Hypothesis (ODH), we expected those reading in shallow orthographies to process the written words faster and more accurately than those reading in deep orthographies. Moreover, we anticipated a deficit in the word processing skills of deaf readers as compared to their hearing peers, regardless of orthography. Findings suggested that, in orthographies with demanding visuo-perceptual properties, prelingually deaf readers are at risk of developing processing deficits even at the word (lexical) level of text processing. However, such deficits do not seem to be directly related to hearing status or the shallowness of the orthography, but rather seem to reflect the joint contribution of augmented visuo-perceptual processing demands in visually complex orthographies and drastically impoverished reading experience that hampers the optimization of perceptual processes required to efficiently deal with such complexity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Rabia, S. (2007). The role of morphology and short vowelization in reading Arabic among normal and dyslexic readers in Grades 3, 6, 9, and 12. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36(2), 89–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alegria, J., Leybaert, J., Charlier, B., & Hage, C. (1992). On the origin of phonological representations in the deaf: Hearing lips and hands. In J. Alegria, D. Holender, J. Junça de Morais, & M. Radeau (Eds.), Analytic approaches to human cognition (pp. 107–132). Brussels: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • American National Standard Institute (ANSI). (1989). Specification for audiometers. (ANSI S3.6-1989). New York: ANSI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beech, J. R., & Harris, M. (1997). The prelingually deaf young reader: a case of reliance on direct lexical access? Journal of Research in Reading, 20, 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, C., & Mayberry, R. I. (2000). Theorizing about the relation between ASL and reading. In C. Chamberlain, J. P. Morford, & R. I. Mayberry (Eds.), Language acquisition by eye (pp. 221–259). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, R. (1979). The deaf school child. London: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossu, G., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I. Y., & Gugliotta, M. (1995). Visual and phonological determinants of misreadings in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing, 7, 237–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drieghe, D., & Brysbaert, M. (2002). Strategic effects in associative priming with words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 951–961.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durgunoglu, A., & Oney, B. (1999). A cross-linguistic comparison of phonological awareness and word recognition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durgunoglu, A., & Oney, B. (2002). Phonological awareness in literacy acquisition: it’s not only for children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6(3), 245–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, A., MacSweeney, M., Szczerbinski, M., Green, L., & Campbell, R. (2003). Predictors of reading delay in deaf adolescents: the relative contributions of rapid automatized naming speed and phonological awareness and decoding. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8, 215–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (1986). Sources of difficulty in learning to spell and read. Advances in Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 7, 121–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L., Nunes, R. S., Willows, D., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. W., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2000). Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflects loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1103–1123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (1985). A developmental framework for developmental dyslexia. Annuals of Dyslexia, 36, 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trials. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. (2006). Becoming literate in Hebrew: the grain size hypothesis and Semitic orthographic systems. Developmental Science, 9(5), 439–440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. (2009). Reading in Hebrew versus reading in English: Is there a qualitative difference? In K. Pugh & P. McCardle (Eds.), How children learn to read: Current issues and new directions in the integration of cognition, neurobiology and genetics of reading and dyslexia research and practice (pp. 235–254). New York: Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographic depth: a multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. (2008). Reading, complexity and the brain. Literacy, 42, 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, V. L. (1982). Short-term recall by deaf signers of American Sign Language: implications of encoding strategy for order recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 572–583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, V. L., & Fowler, C. A. (1987). Phonological coding in word reading: evidence from hearing and deaf readers. Memory & Cognition, 15(3), 199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, V. L., & Lichtenstein, E. H. (1990). Short term memory coding by deaf signers: the primary language coding hypothesis reconsidered. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 211–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, V. L., & McGarr, N. S. (1989). Rhyme generation by deaf adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 2–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, V. L., Liberman, I. Y., & Shankweiler, D. (1984). Linguistic coding by deaf children in relation to beginning reading success. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 378–393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., & Beech, J. R. (1995). Reading development in prelingually deaf children. In K. E. Nelson & Z. Reger (Eds.), Children’s language (Vol. 8, pp. 181–202). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, J. A. (1993). Stanford Achievement Test—8th edition: reading comprehension subgroup results. American Annals of the Deaf, 138, 172–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, R., Eviatar, Z., & Aharon-Perez, J. (2002). Do the characteristics of Arabic orthography slow its cognitive processing? Neuropsychology, 16(3), 322–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Izzo, A. (2002). Phonemic awareness and reading ability: an investigation with young readers who are deaf. American Annals of the Deaf, 147, 18–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, N. E., & Coltheart, M. (2001). Routes to reading success and failure: Toward an integrated cognitive psychology of atypical reading. New York: Psychological.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning: An overview. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 1–8). Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kyle, F., & Harris, M. (2006). Concurrent correlates and predictors of reading and spelling achievement in deaf and hearing school children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11, 273–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. B., & Doorlag, D. H. (1983). Teaching special students in the mainstream. Columbus: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leybaert, J. (1993). Reading in the deaf: The roles of phonological codes. In M. Marschark & M. D. Clark (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on deafness. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leybaert, J. (2000). Phonology acquired through the eyes and spelling in deaf children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 75, 291–318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lukatela, K., Carello, C., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, I. (1995). Phonological awareness in illiterates. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 463–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C. M., & Masson, M. E. J. (2000). Repetition priming in speeded word reading: contributions of perceptual and conceptual processing episodes. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(2), 208–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, V. A., Tobin, P., & Wilson, R. (1987). Measuring phonological awareness through the invented spellings of kindergarten children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33(3), 365–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschark, M., & Harris, M. (1996). Success and failure in learning to read: The special case of deaf children. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 279–300). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F., Pratt, C., & Fraser, J. (2000). The use of orthographic and phonological strategies for the decoding of words in children with developmental dyslexia and average readers. Dyslexia, 6, 231–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McClean, M., Bryant, P., & Bradley, L. (1987). Rhymes, nursery rhymes and reading in early childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 255–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (1997). The effect of communication mode on the development of phonemic awareness in prelingually deaf students. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 40, 1151–1163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (2001). Communication mode and the information processing capacity of Hebrew readers with prelingually acquired deafness. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 13, 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (2002a). Another look at the STM capacity of prelingually deafened individuals and its relation to reading comprehension. American Annals of the Deaf, 147, 56–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (2002b). Communication mode and the processing of printed words: evidence from readers with prelingually acquired deafness. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7, 312–329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (2004a). The importance of vowel diacritics for reading in Hebrew: what can be learned from readers with prelingual deafness? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 593–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (2004b). Processing of written word and non-word visual information by individuals with prelingual deafness. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 990–1000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (2004c). Processing of written words by individuals with prelingual deafness. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 979–989.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (2005a). Reading comprehension and its relation to the quality of functional hearing: evidence from readers with different functional hearing abilities. American Annals of the Deaf, 150, 305–323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (2005b). What the word recognition skills of prelingually deafened readers tell about the roots of dyslexia. Journal of Development & Physical Disabilities, 17, 369–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (2006a). What the processing of real words and pseudo-homophones tell about the development of orthographic knowledge in prelingually deafened individuals. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11, 21–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (2006b). What the visual word recognition skills of prelingually deafened readers tell about their reading comprehension problems. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 18, 91–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (2010). Phonological, orthographic, and syntactic awareness and their relation to reading comprehension in prelingually deaf individuals: what can we learn from skilled readers? Journal of Development and Physical Disabilities, 22, 549–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth, S. (1992). The role of phonology and context in word recognition in hearing impaired readers. Unpublished master’s thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

  • Nielsen, D. C., & Luetke-Stahlman, B. (2002). Phonological awareness: one key to the reading proficiency of deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 147(3), 11–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, C. A., & Caramazza, A. (2004). Orthographic structure and deaf spelling errors: syllables, letter frequency, and speech. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 385–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oney, B., & Durgunoglu, A. Y. (1997). Beginning to read in Turkish: a phonologically transparent orthography. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oney, B., & Goldman, S. (1984). Decoding and comprehension skills in Turkish and English: effects of the regularity of grapheme-phoneme correspondences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 557–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padden, C., & Hanson, V. L. (2000). Search for the missing link: The development of skilled reading in deaf children. In K. Emmorey & H. Lane (Eds.), The signs of language revisited (pp. 435–447). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., & Sandak, R. (2000). Reading optimally builds on spoken language: implications for deaf readers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 32–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., Beck, I., Bell, C. L., & Hughes, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: a longitudinal study of first grade children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33(3), 283–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman, I. (2006). On the age-of-acquisition effects in word naming and orthographic transparency: mapping specific or universal? Visual Cognition, 13(7), 1044–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raman, I., & Baluch, B. (2001). Semantic effects as a function of reading skill in word naming of a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 599–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raman, I., & Weekes, B. S. (2005). Deep dysgraphia in Turkish. Behavioural Neurology, 16, 59–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raman, I., Baluch, B., & Sneddon, P. (1996). What is the cognitive system’s preferred route for deriving phonology from print? The European Psychologist, 1, 221–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raman, I., Baluch, B., & Besner, D. (2004). On the control of visual word recognition: changing routes versus changing deadlines. Memory & Cognition, 32(3), 489–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Report of the National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington: GPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. O. (1976). Psychological aspects of learning disabilities and reading disorders. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2005). Dyslexia (specific reading disability). Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1301–1309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, L. H., & Hanley, J. R. (2003). The effects of orthographic consistency on reading development and phonological awareness: evidence from children learning to read in Wales. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 1–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterne, A., & Goswami, U. (2000). Phonological awareness of syllables, rhymes and phonemes in deaf children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(5), 609–625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Morgan, S. T., & Davis, C. (1992). Effects of two types of phonological awareness training on word learning in kindergarten children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 364–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transler, C., Gombert, J. E., & Leybaert, J. (2001). Phonological decoding in severely and profoundly deaf children: similarity judgment between written pseudowords. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 61–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troia, G. (2004). Phonological processing and its influence on literacy learning. In C. Stone, E. Silliman, B. Ehren, & K. Appel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders (pp. 271–301). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Orden, G. C., Johnston, J. C., & Hale, B. L. (1988). Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 371–386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Trezek, B. J., Luckner, J., & Paul, P. V. (2008). The role of phonology and phonologically related skills in reading instruction for students who are deaf or hard of hearing. American Annals of the Deaf, 153(4), 396–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, G. S., & Doehring, D. B. (1990). Reading acquisition in congenitally deaf children who communicate orally: insights from an analysis of component reading, language, and memory skills. In T. H. Carr & B. A. Levy (Eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills approaches (pp. 323–373). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wauters, L. N., Van Bon, W. H. J., & Tellings, A. J. M. (2006). Reading comprehension of Dutch deaf children. Reading and Writing, 19, 49–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, M. S. (1993). The time course of perceptual and conceptual contributions to word fragment completion priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1010–1023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., & Hummer, P. (1990). How German-speaking first graders read and spell: doubts on the importance of the logographic stage. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 349–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This manuscript was prepared with the support of SLC on Visual Language and Visual Learning (VL2), NSF Grant # SBE-0541953.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Special Education, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

    Tevhide Kargin & Birkan Guldenoglu

  2. Department of Special Education, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

    Paul Miller

  3. National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA

    Peter Hauser

  4. Institut für Deutsche Gebärdensprache, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Christian Rathman & Okan Kubus

  5. San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA

    Erin Spurgeon

  6. Faculty of Educational Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

    Tevhide Kargin

Authors
  1. Tevhide Kargin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Birkan Guldenoglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter Hauser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christian Rathman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Okan Kubus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Erin Spurgeon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tevhide Kargin.

Additional information

This participant sample does not include individuals that were found to be outliers on two baseline measures, one assessing their fine-motor speed and another assessing their ability to sustain attention.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kargin, T., Guldenoglu, B., Miller, P. et al. Differences in Word Processing Skills of Deaf and Hearing Individuals Reading in Different Orthographies. J Dev Phys Disabil 24, 65–83 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-011-9255-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-011-9255-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation