Skip to main content
Log in

Tissue response and biodegradation of composite scaffolds prepared from Thai silk fibroin, gelatin and hydroxyapatite

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work aimed to investigate tissue responses and biodegradation, both in vitro and in vivo, of four types of Bombyx mori Thai silk fibroin based-scaffolds. Thai silk fibroin (SF), conjugated gelatin/Thai silk fibroin (CGSF), hydroxyapatite/Thai silk fibroin (SF4), and hydroxyapatite/conjugated gelatin/Thai silk fibroin (CGSF4) scaffolds were fabricated using salt-porogen leaching, dehydrothermal/chemical crosslinking and an alternate soaking technique for mineralization. In vitro biodegradation in collagenase showed that CGSF scaffolds had the slowest biodegradability, due to the double crosslinking by dehydrothermal and chemical treatments. The hydroxyapatite deposited from alternate soaking separated from the surface of the protein scaffolds when immersed in collagenase. From in vivo biodegradation studies, all scaffolds could still be observed after 12 weeks of implantation in subcutaneous tissue of Wistar rats and also following ISO10993-6: Biological evaluation of medical devices. At 2 and 4 weeks of implantation the four types of Thai silk fibroin based-scaffolds were classified as “non-irritant” to “slight-irritant”, compared to Gelfoam® (control samples). These natural Thai silk fibroin-based scaffolds may provide suitable biomaterials for clinical applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meinel L, Fajardo R, Hofmann S, Langer R, Chen J, Snyder B, Novakovic GV, Kaplan DL. Silk implants for the healing of critical size bone defects. Bone. 2005;37:688–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang Y, Kim HJ, Novakovic GV, Kaplan DL. Stem cell-based tissue engineering with silk biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2006;37:6064–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Meinel L, Hofmann S, Karageorgiou V, Heade CK, McCool J, Gronowicz G, Zichner L, Langer R, Novakovic GV, Kaplan DL. The inflammatory responses to silk films in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials. 2005;26:147–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vepari C, Kaplan DL. Silk as a biomaterial. Prog Polym Sci. 2007;32:991–1007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim HJ, Kima UJ, Novakovic GV, Min BH, Kaplan DL. Influence of macroporous protein scaffolds on bone tissue engineering from bone marrow stem cells. Biomaterials. 2005;26:4442–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chamchongkaset J, Kanokpanont S, Kaplan DL, Damrongsakkul S. Modification of Thai silk fibroin scaffolds by gelatin conjugation for tissue engineering. Adv Mater Res. 2008;55–57:685–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vachiraroj N, Ratanavaraporn J, Damrongsakkul S, Pichyangkura R, Banaprasert T, Kanokpanont S. A comparison of Thai silk fibroin-based and chitosan-based materials on in vitro biocompatibility for bone substitutes. Int J Biol Macromol. 2009;45(5):470–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. ISO10993-6. Biological evaluation of medical devices—part 6: tests for local effects after implantation.

  9. Kim UJ, Park J, Kim HJ, Wada M, Kaplan DL. Three-dimensional aqueous-derived biomaterial scaffolds from silk fibroin. Biomaterials. 2005;26:2775–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tagchi T, Kishida A, Akashi M. Hydroxyapatite formation on/in poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel matrices using a novel alternate soaking process. Chem Lett. 1998;711–712.

  11. Li M, Ogiso M, Minoura N. Enzymatic degradation behavior of porous silk fibroin sheets. Biomaterials. 2003;24:357–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Petrini P, Parolari C, Tanzi MC. Silk fibroin-polyurethane scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2001;12:849–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lehle K, Lohn S, Reinerth GU, Schubert T, Preuner GJ, Birnbaum DE. Cytological evaluation of the tissue-implant reaction associated with subcutaneous implantation of polymers coated with titaniumcarboxonitride in vivo. Biomaterials. 2004;25:5457–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dykstra JM. A manual of applied techniques for biological electron microscopy. Drying samples with hexamethyldisilazane. New York: Plenum; 1993. p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ozeki M, Tabata Y. In vivo degradability of hydrogels prepared from different gelatins by various cross-linking methods. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2005;16:549–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Everaerts F, Torrianni M, Hendriks M, Feijen J. Biomechanical properties of carbodiimide crosslinked collagen: influence of the formation of ester crosslinks. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008;85(2):547–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim HJ, Kim JU, Kim SH, Li C, Wada M, Leisk GG, Kaplan DL. Bone tissue engineering with premineralized silk scaffolds. Bone. 2008;42:1226–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chunling D, Jun J, Yucheng L, Xiangdong K, Kemin W, Juming Y. Novel silk fibroin/hydroxyapatite composite films: structure and properties. Mater Sci Eng. 2009;C29:62–8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang L, Nemoto R, Senna M. Microstructure and chemical states of hydroxyapatite/silk fibroin nanocomposites synthesized via a wet-mechanochemical route. J Nanopart Res. 2002;4:535–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Furuzono T, Taguchi T, Kishida A, Akashi M, Tamada Y. Preparation and characterization of apatite deposited on silk fabric using an alternate soaking process. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;50:344–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhuang H, Zheng JP, Gao H. In vitro biodegradation and biocompatibility of gelatin/montmorillonite-chitosan intercalated nanocomposite. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007;18:951–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pek YS, Spector M, Yannas IV, Gibson LJ. Degradation of a collagen-chondroitin-6-sulfate matrix by collagenase and by chondroitinase. Biomaterials. 2004;25:473–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barbani N, Lazzeri L, Lelli L, Bonaretti A, Seggiani M, Narducci P, Pizzirani G, Giusti P. Physical and biological stability of dehydro-thermally crosslinked collagen-poly(vinyl alcohol) blends. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1994;5:882–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The financial supports from the 90th Anniversary of Chulalongkorn University Fund (Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund), Chulalongkorn University Centenary Academic Development Project and National Research Council of Thailand are highly acknowledged. H.T. also thanks Polymer Engineering Laboratory, Biomedical Engineering Laboratory (Faculty of Engineering), and i-Tissue Laboratory (Faculty of Medicine), Chulalongkorn University for the support of laboratory facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siriporn Damrongsakkul.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tungtasana, H., Shuangshoti, S., Shuangshoti, S. et al. Tissue response and biodegradation of composite scaffolds prepared from Thai silk fibroin, gelatin and hydroxyapatite. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 21, 3151–3162 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-010-4159-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-010-4159-5

Keywords

Navigation