Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Crystallization behavior of phosphate glasses and its impact on the glasses’ bioactivity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The crystallization behavior of phosphate glasses of the composition 50P2O5–(40−x)CaO−xSrO–10Na2O with x = 0, 20, and 40 was investigated using non-isothermal differential thermal analysis. The study was performed on three different size fractions (fine powder (<45 μm), intermediate (300–500 μm), and coarse particles (>500 μm)). The DTA thermograms recorded for all glasses exhibited a single and symmetrical crystallization peak. The position and shape of the crystallization varies with the particles size. The activation energy for crystallization, E c, was calculated using equations proposed by Kissinger and Friedman. The calculated E c values were similar for both techniques. E c decreased with increasing the particle size for all glass compositions. The Johnson–Mehl–Avrami exponent n expressing the crystal growth dimensionality was quantified using the methods proposed by Augis–Bennett (AB) and Ozawa. In general, the AB method gave higher value than the Ozawa technique. For all glass composition the n value for the coarse powder suggested bulk crystallization whereas with decreasing particle size, the value of n indicated a complex surface crystallization. Glass monoliths were heat treated in electric oven at several temperatures for various times. XRD suggested crystallization of two phases: Ca(PO3)2 and NaCa(PO3)3 for the glass with x = 0, Sr(PO3)2 and NaSr(PO3)3 for the glass with x = 40, and a solid solution of (Ca,Sr)(PO3)2 and Na(Ca,Sr)(PO3)3 for the glass with x = 20. All crystals were found to preferentially nucleate and grow from the surface. Partially to fully crystallized glass particles were immersed in simulated body fluid for 24, 48, and 72 h. SEM/EDS of the particles and changes in the pH and ion concentrations of the solution (ICP-OES) suggested that crystallization prevents the CaP layer formation for all partially crystallized glasses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stookey SD (1959) Catalyzed crystallization of glass in theory and practice. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:805–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoeland W, Beal GH (eds) (2010) Glass-ceramic technology, 2nd edn. The American Ceramic Society, Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nakamura T, Yamamuro T, Higashi S, Kakutani Y, Kokubo T (1985) A new glass-ceramic for bone replacement: evaluation of its bonding to bone tissue. J Biomed Mater Res 19:685–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zanotto ED, Fokin VM (2003) Recent studies of internal and surface nucleation in silicate glasses. Philos Trans Math Phys Eng Sci 361:591–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Davis MJ, Mitra I (2003) Crystallization measurements using DTA methods: applications to Zerodur®. J Am Ceram Soc 86:1540–1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Massera J, Remond J, Musgraves J, Davis MJ, Misture ST, Petit L, Richardson K (2010) “Nucleation and growth behavior of glasses in the TeO2–Bi2O3–ZnO glass system”. J Non Cryst Solids 356:2947–2955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ziani N, Belhadji M, Heireche L, Bouchaour Z, Belbachir M (2005) Crystallization kinetics of Ge20Te80Ge20Te80 chalcogenide glasses doped with Sb. Phys B 358:132–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Joraid AA (2005) Limitation of the Johnson–Mehl–Avrami (JMA) formula for kinetic analysis of the crystallization of a chalcogenide glass. Thermochim Acta 436:78–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Christian JW (1965) The theory of metals and alloys. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kissinger HE (1957) Reaction kinetics in differential thermal analysis. Anal Chem 29:1702–1706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedman HL (1963) Kinetics of thermal degradation of char-forming plastics from thermogravimetry. Application to a phenolic plastic. Polym Sci 6C:183–195

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ozawa T (1971) Kinetics of non-isothermal crystallization. Polymer 12:150–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Augis JA, Bennett JE (1978) Calculation of the Avrami parameters for heterogeneous solid state reactions using a modification of the Kissinger method. J Therm Anal Calorim 13:283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marotta A, Buri A, Branda F (1980) Surface and bulk crystallization in non-isothermal devitrification of glasses. Thermochim Acta 40:397–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ray CS, Day DE (1980) Identifying internal and surface crystallization by differential thermal analysis for the glass-to-crystal transformations. Thermochim Acta 280/281:163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Malek J, Mitsuhashi T (2000) Testing method for the Johnson–Mehl–Avrami equation in kinetic analysis of crystallization processes. J Am Ceram Soc 83:2103–2105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Massera J, Fagerlund S, Hupa L, Hupa M (2012) Crystallization behavior of the commercial bioactive glasses 45S5 and S53P4. J Am Ceram Soc 95:607–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Clement J, Manero JM, Planell JA (1999) Analysis of the structural changes of a phosphate glass during its dissolution in simulated body fluid. J Mater Sci Mater Med 10:729–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Massera J, Petit L, Cardinal T, Videau JJ, Hupa M, Hupa L (2013) Thermal properties and surface reactivity in simulated body fluid of new strontium ion-containing phosphate glasses. J Mater Sci Mater Med 24:1407–1416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Starink MJ (2003) The determination of activation energy from linear heating rate experiments: a comparison of the accuracy of isoconversion methods. Thermochim Acta 404:163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gotor FJ, Criado JM (2001) Limitations of the Augis and Bennett method for kinetic analysis of the crystallization of glasses and conditions for correct use. J Am Ceram Soc 84:1797–1802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kokubo T, Kushitani H, Sakka S, Kitsugi T, Yamamuro T (1990) Solutions able to reproduce in vivo surface-structure changes in bioactive glass-ceramic A–W3. J Biomed Mater Res 24:721–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yinnon H, Uhlmann DR (1983) Applications of thermoanalytical techniques to the study of crystallization kinetics in glass-forming liquids, part I: theory. J Non Cryst Solids 54:253–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pacurariu C, Lazau RI, Lazau I, Tita D (2007) Kinetics of non-isothermal crystallization of some glass-ceramics based on basalt. J Therm Anal Calorim 88:647–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Burnett DG, Douglas RW (1970) Liquid–liquid phase separation in the soda–lime–silica system. Phys Chem Glas 11:125–127

    Google Scholar 

  26. Massera J, Kokkari A, Närhi T, Hupa L SrO substituted CaO in bioactive phosphate-and silicate-based glasses: enhancement of gingival fibroblasts proliferation. J Mater Sci Mater Med (submitted)

  27. Fagerlund S, Massera J, Moritz N, Hupa L, Hupa M (2012) Phase composition and in vitro bioactivity of porous implants made of bioactive glass S53P4. Acta Biomater 8:2331–2339

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The Academy of Finland is gratefully acknowledged for the financial support of J. Massera.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Massera.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 152 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Massera, J., Mayran, M., Rocherullé, J. et al. Crystallization behavior of phosphate glasses and its impact on the glasses’ bioactivity. J Mater Sci 50, 3091–3102 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-8869-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-8869-4

Keywords

Navigation