Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimating population characteristics of two saproxylic beetles: a mark-recapture approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a mark-release-recapture technique we describe adult sex ratios, recapture rates and other sample characteristics of two saproxylic species: the nationally threatened longhorn beetle Leptura (Rutpela) maculata (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and the common L. quadrifasciata in southeastern Finland over two summers. Over 350 individuals of L. maculata and 150 individuals of L. quadrifasciata were captured on floral resource or in flight, and marked each summer. For L. maculata, the sex ratio was male-biased (2:1), whereas for L. quadrifasciata the bias was less clear. For both species, the male-bias may reflect behavioral differences between sexes, rather than true population differences. The proportion of recaptured individuals was low and varied between 7 and 33% depending on the species and year, which allowed us to estimate population parameters only for L. maculata in 2006. A model which assumed constant survival, but time-dependent catchability and entrance probability from a larger superpopulation, fit the data best. The precision of the total population size estimates were reasonable for all the models tested (coefficient of variation = 7–14%). Based on the estimated local adult population size (mean ± 95% confidence interval = 865 ± 131), and the current distribution area of L. maculata, we infer that the species is not in immediate risk of extinction in Finland. Our analysis shows that mark-recapture technique can provide precise estimates of adult population size of saproxylic beetles which have different adult and larval habitats, and thus be useful in assessing extinction risk and monitoring population trends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamski P (2004) Sex ratio of apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)—facts and artifacts. Eur J Entomol 101:341–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Amstrup SC, McDonald TR, Manly BFJ (eds) (2005) Handbook of capture-recapture analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (2009) Finnish statistical yearbook of forestry. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa

    Google Scholar 

  • Bense U (1995) Longhorn beetles. Illustrated key to the Cerambycidae and Vesperidae of Europe. Margraf Verlag, Weikersheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce MS (1992) Population viability analysis. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:481–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buse J, Ranius T, Assmann T (2008) An endangered longhorn beetle associated with old oaks and its possible role as an ecosystem engineer. Conserv Biol 22:329–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanks LM (1999) Influence of the larval host plant on reproductive strategies of cerambycid beetles. Annu Rev Entomol 44:483–505

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanks LM, Millar JG, Paine TD (1998) Dispersal of the eucalyptus longhorned borer (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in urban landscapes. Environ Entomol 27:1418–1424

    Google Scholar 

  • Harker RJ, Shreeve TG (2008) How accurate are single site transect data for monitoring butterfly trends? Spatial and temporal issues identified in monitoring Lasiommata megera. J Insect Conserv 12:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heliövaara K, Mannerkoski I, Siitonen J (2004) Longhorn beetles of Finland. Tremex Press, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes AL, Hughes MK (1982) Male size, mating success, and breeding habitat partitioning in the whitespotted sawyer Monochamus scutellatus (Say) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Oecologia 55:258–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2001) IUCN red list categories and criteria. Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland and Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Koji S, Nakamura K (2006) Seasonal fluctuation, age structure, and annual changes in a population of Cassida rubiginosa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in a natural habitat. Ann Entomol Soc Am 99:292–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komonen A (2007) Are we conserving peripheral populations? An analysis of range structure of longhorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in Finland. J Insect Conserv 11:281–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komonen A, Jonsell M, Ranius T (2008) Red-listing saproxylic beetles in Fennoscandia: current status and future perspectives. Endang Species Res 6:149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuussaari M, Nieminen M, Hanski I (1996) An experimental study of migration in the Glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia. J Anim Ecol 65:791–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martikainen P (2002) Ecology and conservation status of Acanthocinus griseus (Fabricius, 1792) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in Finland. Entomol Fenn 13:41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson T (1997a) Spatial population dynamics of the black tinder fungus beetle, Bolitophagus reticulatus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). PhD thesis. Department of Zoology, Uppsala University

  • Nilsson T (1997b) Survival and habitat preferences of adult Bolitophagus reticulatus. Ecol Entomol 22:82–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock KH, Nichols JD, Brownie C, Hines JE (1990) Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments. Wildlife Monographs 107:1–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranius T (2001) Constancy and asynchrony of Osmoderma eremita populations in tree hollows. Oecologia 126:208–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranius T (2002) Population ecology and conservation of beetles and pseudoscorpions living in hollow oaks in Sweden. Anim Biodivers Conserv 25:53–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranius T (2006) Measuring the dispersal of saproxylic insects: a key characteristic for their survival. Popul Ecol 48:177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranius T (2007) Extinction risks in metapopulations of a beetle inhabiting hollow trees predicted from time series. Ecography 30:716–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rassi P, Alanen A, Kanerva T, Mannerkoski I (2001) The 2000 red list of Finnish species. Edita, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Roslin T, Avomaa T, Leonard M, Luoto M, Ovaskainen O (2009) Some like it hot: microclimatic variation affects the abundance and movements of a critically endangered dung beetle. Insect Conserv Diver 2:232–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shibata E (1981) Seasonal fluctuation and spatial pattern of the adult population of the Japanese pine sawyer, Monochamus alternatus Hope (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), in young pine forests. Appl Entomol Zool 16:306–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibata E (1986) Adult populations of the sugi bark borer, Semanotus japonicus Lacordaire (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), in Japanese cedar stands: population parameters, dispersal, and spatial distribution. Res Popul Ecol 28:253–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shibata E (1994) Population studies of Callidiellum rufipenne (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) on Japanese cedar logs. Ann Entomol Soc Am 87:836–841

    Google Scholar 

  • Siitonen J, Saaristo L (2000) Habitat requirements and conservation of Pytho kolwensis, a beetle species of old-growth boreal forest. Biol Conserv 94:211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MT, Tobin PC, Bancroft J, Li GH, Gao RT (2004) Dispersal and spatiotemporal dynamics of Asian longhorned beetle (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in China. Environ Entomol 33:435–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starzomski BM, Bondrup-Nielsen S (2002) Analysis of movement and the consequence for metapopulation structure of the forked fungus beetle, Bolitotherus cornutus Panzer (Tenebrionidae). Écoscience 9:20–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoks R (2001) Male-biased sex ratios in mature damselfly populations: real or artefact? Ecol Entomol 26:181–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weslien J, Lindelöw Å (1989) Trapping a local population of spruce bark beetles Ips typographus (L.): population size and origin of trapped beetles. Holarct Ecol 12:511–514

    Google Scholar 

  • White GC (2009) Program MARK. Version 5:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock MC (1992) Nonequilibrium population structure in forked fungus beetles: extinction, colonization, and the genetic variance among populations. Am Nat 139:952–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikars L-O (2004) Habitat requirements of the pine wood-living beetle Tragosoma depsarium (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) at log, stand, and landscape scale. Ecol Bull 51:287–294

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Suomen Hyönteistieteellinen Seura, Suomen Biologian Seura Vanamo and Finnish Environment Institute for financial support. Thomas Ranius and Tomas Roslin gave valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atte Komonen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tikkamäki, T., Komonen, A. Estimating population characteristics of two saproxylic beetles: a mark-recapture approach. J Insect Conserv 15, 401–408 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-010-9313-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-010-9313-3

Keywords

Navigation