Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Perils of perspective: Identifying adult confidence in the child’s capacity, autonomy, power and agency (CAPA) in readiness for voice-inclusive practice

  • Published:
Journal of Educational Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, children’s voice initiatives in education have gained increased recognition and application. However, while the concept of child and student ‘voice’ is not new, there remains a high level of inconsistency in how voice-focused initiatives are implemented across education sectors. Not all voice initiatives are successful, mainly because such initiatives are not always willingly adopted by the adults directly responsible for the education of children. If authentic voice-inclusive practice is to occur, greater recognition of the impact an adult’s conceptualisation of children has on their willingness and ability to embrace voice-inclusive practice needs to take place. Understanding the key informants that adults draw upon to conceptualise children and their capabilities can assist educational strategists in identifying adult readiness for authentic and effective Voice-Inclusive Practice. Voice-inclusive practice is defined as actions and processes that incorporate children’s perspectives and actively engage with children on matters that affect them. This paper presents a conceptual model CAPA (capacity, autonomy, power and agency) representing the subjective designations adults place on the child that informs the application of sustained voice-inclusive practice and offers a ‘pre-voice’ exploration of an individual’s likelihood of engaging in voice-inclusive practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Loris Malaguzzi is the founder of the Reggio Emilia approach from which an entire philosophy of education has evolved and further validates the significance of adult conceptualisations of children for practice.

  2. Both authors are (and have been) involved in initial teacher education for over 10 years (Gillett-Swan) and over 20 years (Author 2) at different institutions. They have also independently and collaboratively been involved in consultancy work to deliver workshops and professional development to adults in education and other fields about child voice and child rights.

  3. General topics addressed in this scoping study included adult conceptions of tween capacity, participation, protection, relationships, materialism, and gender.

  4. 79 female; 25 male; 20 unspecified.

  5. Countries included Australia, New Zealand, Sweden, Canada, Denmark, Japan, Lithuania, Turkey, United Kingdom, Bhutan, Ecuador, Ethiopia, Hungary, France, India, Kenya, Laos, Mongolia, Netherlands, South Africa, Tanzania, The Gambia, United Arab Emirates, and the United States of America. The most respondents resided in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Sweden, Denmark and the United Kingdom.

  6. Approximately 41% participants resided in Australia at the time of participating in the APTQ study.

  7. Approximately 41% were 34 years old and under; 47% between 35 and 54 years old; 11% were 55 years and older.

  8. Snowball sampling method beginning with distribution to existing researcher contacts involved with children in middle childhood in professional capacities (e.g. teacher, educator, researcher, academic etc).

  9. Commentary included in the remainder of the paper includes the following labelling based on respondent disclosure; Occupation, Age, Country (APTQ study)/Country when participating (workshop), response source (APTQ study or workshop). All commentary examples provided below are from different individuals.

References

  • Adams, K. (2014). What is a child? Children’s perceptions, the Cambridge primary review and implications for education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 44(2), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.860082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderson, P. (2007). Competent children? Minors’ consent to health care treatment and research. Social Science and Medicine, 65(11), 2272–2283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae, B. (2009). Children’s right to participate—Challenges in everyday interactions. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 17(3), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/13502930903101594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baroutsis, A., McGregor, G., & Mills, M. (2016). Pedagogic voice: Student voice in teaching and engagement pedagogies. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 24(1), 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, N. S. (1994). Taking relationships seriously: Children, autonomy, and the right to a relationship. New York University Law Review, 69, 1150–1175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bou-Habib, P., & Olsaretti, S. (2015). Autonomy and children’s well-being. In A. Bagattini & C. Macleod (Eds.), The nature of children’s well-being: Theory and practice (pp. 15–33). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, G., Lowe, P., & Olin Lauritzen, S. (2015). Connecting a sociology of childhood perspective with the study of child health, illness and wellbeing: Introduction. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37(2), 173–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bragg, S. (2007). ‘But I listen to children anyway!’ Teacher perspectives on pupil voice. Educational Action Research, 15(4), 505–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewin, C. R., & Andrews, B. (2017). Creating memories for false autobiographical events in childhood: A systematic review. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brighouse, H. (2002). What rights (if any) do children have? In D. Archard & C. M. Macleod (Eds.), The moral and political status of children (pp. 31–52). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E. (2008). Deconstructing developmental psychology. Sussex: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, K. L. (2017). The problem of choosing (for) our children. In J. Ahlberg & M. Chobli (Eds.), Procreation, parenthood, and educational rights: Ethical and philosophical issues (pp. 73–93). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, M. (2011). Debate: The case against the comprehensive enrolment of children. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 20(3), 353–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook-Sather, A. (2002). Authorizing students’ perspectives. Educational Researcher, 31(4), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corsaro, W. A. (2005). The sociology of childhood. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covell, K. (2010). School engagement and rights-respecting schools. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(1), 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsson, C., & Granstrom, K. (2002). Gender-biased interaction in the classroom: The influence of gender and age in the relationship between teacher and pupil. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830220142155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, J. (1994). The child’s right to an open future. In J. Feinberg (Ed.), Freedom and fulfilment (pp. 76–97). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, E. (2011). Conceptualizing indicators for children in diverse contexts and particular circumstances, challenges and constraints. Child Indicators Research, 4, 547–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-011-9124-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, M. (2004). ‘New wave’ student voice and the renewal of Civic Society. London Review of Education, 2(3), 197–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, M. (2011). Patterns of partnership: Student voice, intergenerational learning and democratic fellowship. In N. Mockler & J. Sachs (Eds.), Rethinking educational practice through reflexive inquiry (pp. 61–75). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0805-1_5.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, M., & Bragg, S. (2003). Students as researchers: Making a difference. Consulting pupils about teaching and learning. Cambridge: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischman, G. E., & Laren, P. (2005). Rethinking critical pedagogy and the Gramscian and Freirean legacies: From organic to committed intellectuals or critical pedagogy, commitment and praxis. Cultural Studies—Critical Methodologies, 5(4), 425–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708605279701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flutter, J. (2007). Teacher development and pupil voice. The Curriculum Journal, 18(3), 343–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flutter, J., & Rudduck, J. (2004). Consulting students: What’s in it for schools. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H. (2006). Taking ourselves seriously & getting it right. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frierson, P. R. (2016). Making room for children’s autonomy: Maria Montessori’s case for seeing children’s incapacity for autonomy as an external failing. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 50(3), 332–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillett-Swan, J. K. (2013). Time to tell: the complexity of wellbeing from the perspective of tweens. PhD dissertation, Australian Catholic University.

  • Gillett-Swan, J. K. (2014). Investigating tween children's capacity to conceptualise the complex issue of wellbeing. Global Studies of Childhood, 4(2), 64–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillett-Swan, J. K., & Coppock, V. (2016). The future of children’s rights, educational research and the UNCRC in a digital world: Possibilities and prospects. In J. K. Gillett-Swan & V. Coppock (Eds.), Children's Rights, Educational Research and the UNCRC: past, present and future (pp. 131–159). UK: Symposium Books.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gillett-Swan, J. K., & Sargeant, J. (2018a). Voice-Inclusive Practice, Digital Literacy and Children's Participatory Rights. Children and Society, 32(2), 38–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillett-Swan, J. K., & Sargeant, J. (2018b). Assuring children's human right to freedom of opinion and expression in education. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20(1), 120–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillett-Swan, J. K., & Sargeant, J. (2018c). Unintentional power plays: Interpersonal contextual impacts in child-centred participatory research. Educational Research, 60(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, J., & Rutter, M. (2004). Validity of adult retrospective reports of adverse childhood experiences: Review of the evidence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(2), 260–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00218.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R. A. (2008). Stepping back from “the ladder”: Reflections on a model of participatory work with children. In A. Reid, B. B. Jensen, J. Nikel, & V. Simovska (Eds.), Participation and learning (pp. 19–31). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heng, T. T. (2011). Children’s lives, children’s futures: A study of children starting secondary school. Teacher Development, 15(2), 267–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2011.577987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, B. (2009). Moral literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, S., Renold, E., Ross, N. J., & Hillman, A. (2010). Power, agency and participatory agendas: A critical exploration of young people’s engagement in participative qualitative research. Childhood, 17(3), 360–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568210369310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, D., Green, L., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Zero to eight. Young children and their internet use. London: LSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, D., Forde, C., Martin, S., & Parkes, A. (2017). Children’s participation: Moving from the performative to the social. Children’s Geographies, 15(3), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2016.1219022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunleth, J. (2011). Beyond on or with: Questioning power dynamics and knowledge production in ‘child-oriented’ research methodology. Childhood, 18(1), 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, R. G., & Chimwayange, C. (2014). Teacher action research and student voice: Making sense of learning in secondary school. Action Research, 12(1), 52–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750313515282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keddie, A. (2015). Student voice and teacher accountability: Possibilities and problematics. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 23(2), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2014.977806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, B. L., & Datnow, A. (2011). Student involvement and data-driven decision making: Developing a new typology. Youth and Society, 43(4), 1246–1271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X10388219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komulainen, S. (2007). The ambiguity of the child’s “voice” in social research. Childhood, 14(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568207068561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., & Choi, I. (2008). Learning classroom management through web-based case instruction: Implications for early childhood teacher education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(6), 495–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children. Full findings. London: LSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundy, L. (2007). “Voice” is not enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations convention on the rights of the child. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 927–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundy, L. (2018). In defence of tokenism? Implementing children’s right to participate in collective decision-making. Childhood, 25(3), 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568218777292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malaguzzi, L. (1994). Your image of the child: Where teaching begins. Child Care Information Exchange, 3(94), 52–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannion, G. (2007). Going spatial, going relational: Why “listening to children” and children’s participation needs reframing. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28, 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/015696300701458970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayall, B. (2002). Towards a sociology for childhood. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, D., Pedder, D., & Rudduck, J. (2005). Pupil voice: Comfortable and uncomfortable learnings for teachers. Research Papers in Education, 20(2), 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehan, C. (2016). Every child mattered in England: But what matters to children? Early Child Development and Care, 186(3), 382–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, B. (2005). Is “participation” as it is described by the United Nations convention on the rights of the child (UNCRC) the key to children’s citizenship? Journal of Social Sciences, 9, 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, D. L. (2014). Student voice in school reform: Building youth-adult partnerships that strengthen schools and empower youth. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, D. (2018). Student voice in secondary schools: the possibility for deeper change. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(5), 473–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mockler, N., & Groundwater-Smith, S. (2015). Engaging with student voice in research, education and community: Beyond legitimation and guardianship. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morabito, C., & Vandenbroeck, M. (2015). Equality of opportunities, divergent conceptualisations and their implications for early childhood care and education policies. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 49(3), 456–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullin, A. (2007). Children, autonomy, and care. Journal of Social Philosophy, 38, 536–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, R., Kumpulainen, K., & Lipponen, L. (2015). Pupils as active participants: Diamond ranking as a tool to investigate pupils’ experiences of classroom practices. European Educational Research Journal, 14(2), 138–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswell, D. (2013). The agency of children: From family to global human rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, T. C., & Wood, B. E. (2016). Education for transformation: An evaluative framework to guide student voice work in schools. Critical Studies in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1219959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prout, A. (2000). Childhood bodies: Construction, agency and hybridity. In A. Prout (Ed.), The body, childhood and society (pp. 1–18). Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Punch, S. (2002). Research with children: The same or different from research with adults. Childhood, 9(3), 321–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purdy, L. (1992). In their best interest? The case against equal rights for children. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, S., & Owen, S. (2016). Digging deeper: Understanding the power of ‘student voice’. Australian Journal of Education, 60(1), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944115626402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyneke, M. (2013). Children’s right to participate: Implications for school discipline. De Jure, 46, 206–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M., Leslie, S.-J., & Tworek, C. M. (2012). Cultural transmission of social essentialism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(34), 13526–13531. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1208951109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richman, K. D. (2005). (When) are rights wrong? Rights discourses and indeterminacy in gay and lesbian parents’ custody cases. Law & Social Inquiry, 30(1), 137–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2005.tb00348.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi, C. (2006). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. (2008). Changing education paradigms: Sir Ken Robinson. (2008). [video]. London: RSA: The Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, C., & Taylor, C. (2013). Student voice as a contested practice: Power and participation in two student voice projects. Improving Schools, 16(1), 32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronen, Y. (2002). The child’s right to identify as a right to belong. Tel Aviv University Law Review, 26, 935–984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudduck, J. (2007). Student voice, student engagement, and school reform. In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 587–610). Amsterdam: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rudduck, J., & Fielding, M. (2006). Student voice and the perils of popularity. Educational Review, 58(2), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910600584207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudduck, J., & Flutter, J. (2004). How to improve your school. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant, J. (2014). Adults’ Perspectives on Tweens’ Capacities: Participation or Protection? Children Australia, 39(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/cha.2013.36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant, J. (2018). Towards Voice-Inclusive Practice: Finding the Sustainability of Participation in Realising the Child’s Rights in Education. Children & Society, 32(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant, J., & Gillett-Swan, J. K. (2015). Empowering the disempowered through voice-inclusive practice: Children's views on adult-centric educational provision. European Educational Research Journal, 14(2), 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant, J., & Gillett-Swan, J. K. (2019). Voice-Inclusive Practice (VIP): A charter for authentic student engagement. International Journal of Children's Rights, 27(1), 122–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant, J., & Harcourt, D. (2012). Doing ethical research with children. UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schapiro, T. (1999). What is a child? Ethics, 109, 715–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schapiro, T. (2003). Childhood and personhood. Arizona Law Review, 45, 575–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (2001). Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, S. R. (Ed.). (2011). Kinderculture: The corporate construction of childhood. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, P. (2010). Involving children and young people in educational change: Possibilities and challenges. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 809–824). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tisdall, E. K. M. (2015). Children and young people’s participation: A critical consideration of article 12. In W. Vandenhole, E. Desmet, D. Reynaert, & S. Lambrechts (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of children’s rights studies (pp. 185–200). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todres, J., & Higinbotham, S. (2013). A person’s a person: Children’s rights in children’s literature. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 45, 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). (2016). General comment No. 4 (2016), Article 24: Right to inclusive education, 2 September 2016, CRPD/C/GC/4.

  • UNICEF UK. (2018). Rights respecting schools award https://www.unicef.org.uk/rights-respecting-schools/.

  • United Nations. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2005). General comment 7—Implementing child rights in early childhood. Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2009). General comment 12—The right of the child to be heard. Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, P. (2008). The development of apt citizenship education through listening to young people’s voices. Educational Action Research, 16(3), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790802260232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, M. (2005). Early childhood development: A question of rights. International Journal of Early Childhood, 37(3), 79. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, B. B. (1992). Hatching the egg: A child-centered perspective on parent’s rights. Cardozo L. Rev., 14, 1747. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/cdozo14&section=82.

  • Wyness, M. (1999). Childhood, agency and education reform. Childhood, 6(3), 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyness, M. (2015). Childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Jenna K. Gillett-Swan

  2. Faculty of Education and Arts, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Jonathon Sargeant

Authors
  1. Jenna K. Gillett-Swan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jonathon Sargeant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenna K. Gillett-Swan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gillett-Swan, J.K., Sargeant, J. Perils of perspective: Identifying adult confidence in the child’s capacity, autonomy, power and agency (CAPA) in readiness for voice-inclusive practice. J Educ Change 20, 399–421 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09344-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09344-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation