Skip to main content
Log in

Early childhood development: A question of rights

  • Articles
  • Published:
International Journal of Early Childhood Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A right to development is one of the basic principles of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Several articles are specifically about protecting and promoting children’s development, and other articles refer to developmental concepts of maturity and evolving capacity. Realizing young children’s right to development is informed by numerous sources: cultural understandings, beliefs and values as well as scientific knowledge and theories. I offer two contrasting ways of thinking about children’s rights to development. The first is summarised as three ‘Ns’, emphasising ‘normal’ development, children’s ‘nature’ and their ‘needs’. The second is summarised as three ‘Cs’: recognising that development is ‘contextual’, ‘cultural’ and respecting children’s ‘competencies’. I explore the potential as well as the limitations of each approach, drawing attention to the tension between universalistic theories and the plurality of pathways through childhood, the respects in which development is a natural versus socio-cultural process, and the implications of recognizing children as active participants, with their own perspective on child development issues, while at the same time ensuring they are adequately guided and protected.

Résumé

Le droit au développement est un des principes de base de la Convention des Nations Unies relative aux Droits de l’Enfant. Plusieurs articles expressément sur la protection et la promotion du développement de l’enfant, et d’autres articles font ré’érence aux concepts de maturité et d’évolution des capacités, propres au domaine du développement.

La reconnaissance du droit au développement des jeunes enfants est inspirée par de nombreuses sources d’information: les conceptions, croyances et valeurs culturelles ainsi que les connaissances et théories scientifiques. Je propose deux façons contrastées de concevoir les droits au développement des enfants. La première, qui se résume à trois “N”, insiste sur le développement “normal”, la “nature” des enfants et ce qui leur est “nécessaire”. La seconde, qui se résume à trois “C” reconnaît que le développement est “contextuel”, “culturel” et respecte les “compétences” de l’enfant. J’explore le potentiel ainsi que les limite de chaque approche, en attirant l’attention sur la tension entre les théories universalistes et la pluralité des voies pendant l’enfance, les points de vue selon lesquels le développement est un processus naturel par opposition à socioculturel, et les implications à reconnaître que les enfants sont des participants actifs, avec leur propre perspective sur le développement, tout en s’assurant qu’ils sont guidés et protégés de façon adéquate.

Resumen

El derecho al desarrollo es uno de los principios básicos de la Convención de las Naciones Unidas sobre los Derechos del Niño. Varios articulos tratan especificamente de la protección y la promoción del desarrollo de los niños y otros articulos se refieren a conceptos del desarrollo de la madurez y de la capacidad evolutiva. El reconocimiento del derecho al desarrollo de los niños pequeños viene por muchas vias: entendimiento cultural, creencias y valores así como conocimiento y teorías cientificas. Propongo dos maneras opuestas de pensar sobre los derechos de los niños al desarrollo. La primera se resume en tres ‘N’, enfatizando el desarrollo ‘normal’, la ‘naturaleza’ de los niños y sus ‘necesidades’. La segunda se resume en tres ‘C’, reconociendo que el desarrollo es ‘contextual’, ‘cultural’ y respetuoso con las ‘competencias’ de los niños. Exploro el potencial y las limitaciones de cada enfoque, Ilamando la atención sobre la tensión entre las teorías universalistas y la pluralidad de los caminos en la infancia, los puntos de vista en los que el desarrollo es un proceso natural frente a uno socio-cultural, asi como las implicaciones de reconocer que los niños son participantes activos, con su propia perspectiva sobre las cuestiones del desarrollo del niño, y al mismo tiempo asegurarse de que son guiados y protegidos adecuadamente.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alderson, P. (1995).Listening to Children. London: Barnardos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderson, P. (2000).Young Children’s Rights: Exploring beliefs, principles and practices. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, C. (2004). ‘Positioning ECCD in the 21st Century’,Coordinators Notebook, 28.

  • Black, M. (2004).Opening Minds, Opening up Opportunities: Children’s participation in action for working children. London: Save the Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyden, J. (1990). ‘Childhood and the policy-makers: a comparative perspective on the globalization of childhood’. In A. James & A. Prout (Eds.),Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, B. (1989).Visions of Infancy: A critical introduction to child psychology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E. (1994).Deconstructing Developmental Psychology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E. (1996). ‘Local, global or globalized? Child development and international child rights legislation’.Childhood, 3(1), 45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., & Moss. P. (2001).Listening to Young Children, the Mosaic Approach. London: National Children’s Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, H. (2003). ‘Children’s Changing Lives from 1800 to 2000’. In J. Maybin & M. Woodhead (Eds.),Childhoods in Context. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (1999).Beyond Quality in Early Childhood Development and Care: Postmodern perspectives. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davie, R., Upton, G., & Varma, V. (Eds.). (1996).The Voice of the Child: a Handbook for Professionals. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davie, R., & Galloway, D. (Eds.). (1996).Listening to Children in Education. London: David Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, M. (1978).Children’s Minds. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (1988).The Beginnings of Social Understanding, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froebel, F. (1885).The Education of Man. New York, London: D. Appleton Century.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodnow, J., & Collins, W. (1990).Development according to Parents. London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, S. (1998). ‘Child Development: old themes and new directions’. In M. Woodhead, D. Faulkner & K. Littleton (Eds.),Making Sense of Social Development. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, T., & Clifford, (1980).Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R.A. (1992).Children’s Participation: from tokenism to citizenship. Florence: UNICEF, ICDC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R.A. (1997).Children’s Participation: the theory and practice of involving young citizens in community development and environmental care. London: Unicef/Earthspan publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockey, J., & James, A. (1993).Growing Up and Growing Old. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, P., Lamb, M., & Sigel, S. (Eds.). (1996).Images of Childhood. New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkin, R., & Newell, P. (1998).Implementation Handbook for the Convention on the Rights of the Child. New York: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A., & James, A. (2004).Constructing Childhood. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A., & Prout, A. (Eds.). (1990).Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Invernizzi, A. (2003). ‘Street-working children and adolescents in Lima: work as an agent of socialization’,Childhood, 10(3), 319–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, V., Ivan-Smith, E., Gordon, G., Pridmore, P., & Scott-Villiers, P. (Eds.). (1998).Children’s Participation in Research and Programming. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellett, M., Forest, R., Dent, N., & Ward, S. (2004). ‘Just teach us the skills please, we’ll do the rest: empowering ten year olds as active researchers’.Children & Society,18(5).

  • Kessen, W. (1979). ‘The American child and other cultural inventions’.American Psychologist, 34(10), 815–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, P., & Woodhead, M. (2003). ‘Children’s Participation in Society’. In H. Montgomery, R. Burr & M. Woodhead (Eds.),Changing Childhoods: local and global. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, P., & Broadbent, V. (2003).Listening to Young Children: Coram Family. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, N.G. (2001).Promoting Children’s Participation in Democratic Decision-making. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, G. (2005).The Evolving Capacities of Children: implications for the exercise of rights. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malaguzzi, L. (1993). ‘History, ideas and basic philosophy’. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini & G. Forman (Eds.),The Hundred Languages of Children. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallory, B.L., & New, R. (1994).Diversity and Developmentally Appropriate Practices: Challenges for Early Childhood Education, New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNaughton, G. (2003).Shaping Early Childhood: Learners, curriculum and contexts. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayall, B. (2002).Towards a Sociology for Childhood: Thinking from children’s lives. London: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maybin, J., & Woodhead, M. (2003). ‘Socializing Children’. In J. Maybin & M. Woodhead (Eds.),Childhoods in Context. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L., Soler, J., & Woodhead, M. (2003). ‘Shaping early childhood education’. In J. Maybin & M. Woodhead (Eds.),Childhoods in Context. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morss, J.R. (1996).Growing Critical: Alternatives to Developmental Psychology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P., Dillon, J., & Statham, J. (2000). ‘The ‘child in need’ and ‘the rich child’: discourses, constructions and practice’,Critical Social Policy, 20(2), 233–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, R. (1992).The Twelve who Survive. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nsamenang, A.B., & Lamb, M.E. (1993). The acquisition of socio-cognition competence by NSO children in Bamenda grassfield of Northwest Cameroon.International Journal of Behavioural Development, 16(2), 429–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2001).Starting Strong: Early childhood education and care. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, B., & Alderson, P. (2003). ‘Beyond anti-smacking’. Child Abuse, 12(5).

  • Prout, A. (2000). ‘Children’s Participation: control and self-realisation in British late modernity’.Children & Society, 14, 304–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prout, A. (2004).The Future of Childhood: towards the interdisciplinary study of children. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punch, S. (2001). ‘Household division of labour: generation, gender, age, birth order and sibling composition’.Work, Employment and Society, 15(4), 803–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold, H. (1982). ‘Little children’s participation in the work of adults, a nascent prosocial behavior’.Child Development, 53, 114–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990).Apprenticeship in Thinking: cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (2003).The Cultural Nature of Child Development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B., Mosier, C., Mistry, J., & Goncu, A. (1993). ‘Toddlers’ guided participation with their caregivers in cultural activity. InContexts for Learning: socio-cultural dynamics in children’s development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segall, M.H., Dasen, P.R., Berry, J.W., & Poortinga, Y.H. (1990).Human Behaviour in Global Perspective, An introduction to cross-cultural psychology. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, E. (1998). ‘Shared care for children’. In M. Woodhead, D. Faulkner & K. Littleton (Eds.),Cultural Worlds of Early Childhood, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.B. (2002). ‘Interpreting and supporting participation rights: Contributions from sociocultural theory’.International Journal of Children’s Rights, 10, 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shonkoff, J., & Phillips, D. (Eds.). (2000).From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development. Board on Children, Youth, and Families, Committee on Integrating the Science of Early Childhood Development.

  • Super, C., & Harkness, S. (1986). ‘The developmental niche: a conceptualisation at the interface of child and culture’.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9, 545–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevarthen, C. (1998). ‘Children’s need to learn a culture’. In M. Woodhead, D. Faulkner & K. Littleton (Eds.),Cultural Worlds of Early Childhood. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisner, T. S. (1989). ‘Cultural and universal aspects if social support for children: evidence from the Abaluyia of Kenya’. In D. Belle (Ed.),Children’s Social Networks and Social Supports, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, B., & Edwards, C. (1988).Children of Different Worlds — the formation of social behaviour. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, M. (1996).In search of the Rainbow: Pathways to Quality in Large Scale Programmes for Young Disadvantaged Children. The Hague: Bernard van Leer Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, M. (1998). ‘Quality in early childhood programmes: a contextually appropriate approach’.International Journal of Early Years Education, 6(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, M. (1990/1997). ‘Psychology and the cultural construction of children’s’ needs’. In A. Prout & A. James (Eds.),Construction and Reconstruction of Childhood. London: Falmer. (First edition 1990; Second Edition 1997.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, M. (1999a). ‘Reconstructing Developmental Psychology — Some first steps’.Children & Society, 13, 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, M. (2002). ‘Work, play and learning in the lives of young children’. In L. Miller, R. Drury & R. Campbell (Eds.),Exploring Early Years Education and Care. London: David Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, M. (2005). ‘Psychosocial impacts of child work’.International Journal of Children’s Rights, 12(4), 321–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, M., & Montgomery, H. (2003).Understanding Childhood: an interdisciplinary approach. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Woodhead.

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper appeared as one of the Ghent papers on Children’s Rights, University of Ghent, 2004

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woodhead, M. Early childhood development: A question of rights. IJEC 37, 79 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168347

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168347

Keywords

Navigation