Skip to main content
Log in

Oocyte stimulation parameters influence the number and proportion of mature oocytes retrieved in assisted reproductive technology cycles

  • Assisted Reproduction Technologies
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Whether differences in stimulation parameters alter the number and proportion of MII oocytes retrieved.

Methods

Records of 2546 patients were examined, looking at age, day 2/3 follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and estradiol (E2) levels, total dose of gonadotropins administered (including FSH and human menopausal gonadotropin [hMG]), fraction of hMG administered, number of days of treatment with gonadotropins, and the dose of gonadotropins administered per day. We segregated the patients into 3 different classes depending on the trigger method used and 2 groups based on egg freeze vs. ICSI. Multiple regression methods were used to examine associations between stimulation parameters and the total number of eggs, number of immature oocytes (Poisson regression), and the fraction of retrieved oocytes that were immature (Logistic regression).

Results

After adjustments for different triggers and egg freeze versus ICSI, both the #immature oocytes and the immature fraction of oocytes were associated with the total gonadotropin dose (inversely) and the gonadotropin dose/day (positively). Other parameters were associated with the number of immature oocytes but were also associated with the number of oocytes retrieved.

Conclusions

Stimulations using less total gonadotropin and more gonadotropin per day were associated with more immaturity. The type of trigger method used for final maturation was associated with immaturity but was believed to be predominantly due to trigger assignment to patients based on response. The association between use of ICSI and less immaturity was believed to be due to additional time for maturation in the ICSI group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beall S, Brenner C, Segars J. Oocyte maturation failure: a syndrome of bad eggs. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(7):2507–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.02.037.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, the Society of Reproductive Biologists and Technologists, and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Electronic address: jgoldstein@asrm.org. In vitro maturation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(2):298–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.11.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown HM, Dunning KR, Sutton-McDowall M, Gilchrist RB, Thompson JG, Russell DL. Failure to launch: aberrant cumulus gene expression during oocyte in vitro maturation. Reproduction. 2017;153(3):R109–20. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-16-0426.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Check JH. Mild ovarian stimulation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;24(12):621–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-007-9179-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lonergan P, Fair T. Maturation of Oocytes in Vitro. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2016;4:255–68. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-022114-110822.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Witz CA, Daftary GS, Doody KJ, Park JK, Seifu Y, Yankov VI, et al. Menopur in GnRH antagonist cycles with single embryo transfer – high responder (MEGASET-HR) trial group. Randomized, assessor-blinded trial comparing highly purified human menotropin and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in high responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(2):321–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.03.029.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Devroey P, Pellicer A, Nyboe Andersen A. Arce JC; Menopur in GnRH Antagonist Cycles with Single Embryo Transfer Trial Group. A randomized assessor-blind trial comparing highly purified hMG and recombinant FSH in a GnRH antagonist cycle with compulsory single-blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(3):561–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.12.016.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Arce JC, Klein BM, La Marca A. The rate of high ovarian response in women identified at risk by a high serum AMH level is influenced by the type of gonadotropin. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30(6):444–50. https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2014.892066.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Andersen AN, Devroey P, Arce JC. Clinical outcome following stimulation with highly purified hMG or recombinant FSH in patients undergoing IVF: a randomized assessor-blind controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(12):3217–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del284.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin Y, Yang P, Chen Y, Zhu J, Zhang X, Ma C. Factors inducing decreased oocyte maturation rate: a retrospective analysis of 20,939 ICSI cycles. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Feb;299(2):559–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4958-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David H. McCulloh.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gonullu, D.C., McCulloh, D.H., Robinson, L.G. et al. Oocyte stimulation parameters influence the number and proportion of mature oocytes retrieved in assisted reproductive technology cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 38, 2283–2289 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02220-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02220-2

Keywords

Navigation