Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

How an integrative STEM curriculum can benefit students in engineering design practices

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

STEM-oriented engineering design practice has become recognized increasingly by technology education professionals in Taiwan. This study sought to examine the effectiveness of the application of an integrative STEM approach within engineering design practices in high school technology education in Taiwan. A quasi-experimental study was conducted to investigate the respective learning performance of students studying a STEM engineering module compared to students studying the technology education module. The student performances for conceptual knowledge, higher-order thinking skills and engineering design project were assessed. The data were analyzed using quantitative (t test, ANOVA, ANCOVA, correlation analysis) approaches. The findings showed that the participants in the STEM engineering module outperformed significantly the participants studying the technology education module in the areas of conceptual knowledge, higher-order thinking skills, and the design project activity. A further analysis showed that the key differences in the application of design practice between the two groups were (a) their respective problem prediction and (b) their analysis capabilities. The results supported the positive effect of the use of an integrative STEM approach in high school technology education in Taiwan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asunda, P. A., & Hill, R. B. (2007). Critical features of engineering design in technology education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 44(1), 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 359–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baroody, A. J., Feil, Y., & Johnson, A. R. (2007). An alternative reconceptualization of procedural and conceptual knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 115–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer Corporation. (2010). Planting the seeds for a diverse US STEM pipeline: A compendium of best practice K-12 STEM education programs. Pittsburgh, PA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental design for research. Hopewell, NJ: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell, P., Pekcan, G., Itani, A., & Velasquez-Bryant, N. (2006). The effects of engineering modules on student learning in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4), 301–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. C., & Ernst, J. V. (2009). Technology-based content through virtual and physical modeling: A national research study. Journal of Technology Education, 20(2), 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everett, L. J., Imbrie, P., & Morgan, J. (2000). Integrated curricula: Purpose and design. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(2), 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havice, W. (2009). The power and promise of a STEM education: Thriving in a complex technological world. In ITEEA (Ed.), The overlooked STEM imperatives: Technology and engineering (pp. 10–17). Reston, VA: ITEEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. R. (1989). The complete problem solver (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschbach, D. R. (2011). The STEM initiative: Constraints and challenges. Journal of sTEm Teacher Education, 48(1), 96–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Householder, D. L., & Hailey, C. E. (Eds.). (2012). Incorporating engineering design challenges into STEM courses. Retrieved from http://ncete.org/flash/pdfs/NCETECaucusReport.pdf.

  • International Technology Education Association. (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Technology and Engineering Educators Association. (2009). The overlooked STEM imperatives: Technology and engineering. Reston, VA: ITEEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, T. (2010). Staking the claim for the ‘T’ in STEM. The Journal of Technology Studies, 36(1), 2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, T. R., Brenner, D. C., & Pieper, J. T. (2010). Two approaches to engineering design: Observations in sTEm education. Journal of sTEm Teacher Education, 47(2), 5–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, T., & Kellam, N. (2009). A theoretical framework to guide the Re-engineering of technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 20(2), 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantz Jr., H. B. (2009). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education what form? What function? Retrieved from http://www.currtechintegrations.com/pdf/STEMEducationArticle.pdf.

  • Leppävirta, J., Kettunen, H., & Sihvola, A. (2011). Complex problem exercises in developing engineering students’ conceptual and procedural knowledge of electromagnetics. IEEE Transactions on Education, 54(1), 63–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. (1999). Research in technology education—Some areas of need. Journal of Technology Education, 10(2), 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. (2005). Coming to terms with engineering design as content. Journal of Technology Education, 16(2), 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mativo, J., & Wicklein, R. (2011). Learning effects of design strategies on high school students. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 48(3), 66–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R. (2004). Issues of learning and knowledge in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14(1), 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schuun, C. D. (2008). Middle-school science through design based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, C., Custer, R. L., Daugherty, J., Westrick, M., & Zeng, Y. (2008). Delivering core engineering concepts to secondary level students. Journal of Technology Education, 20(1), 48–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education of Taiwan (2010). 普通高級中學必修科目「生活科技」課程綱要. [General guidelines of curriculum for senior high school education: living technology]. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.

  • National Academy of Engineering & National Research Council. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Governors Association. (2007). Building a science, technology, engineering and math agenda. Retrieved from http://www.nga.org/files/live/sites/NGA/files/pdf/0702INNOVATIONSTEM.PDF.

  • National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, R., Johnson, J. F., & Emery, C. (1995). Instructional design expertise: A cognitive model of design. Instructional Science, 23(5–6), 321–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Project Lead the Way. (2014). Today’s STEM realities. Retrieved from http://www.pltw.org/.

  • Rittle-Johnson, B., & Alibali, M. W. (1999). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritz, J. M. (2009). A new generation of goals for technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 20(2), 50–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salinger, G., & Zuga, K. (2009). Background and history of the STEM movement. In ITEEA (Ed.), The overlooked STEM imperatives: Technology and engineering (pp. 4–9). Reston, VA: ITEEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M., Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. R. (2011). Relations among conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge, and procedural flexibility in two samples differing in prior knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnittka, C. G., & Bell, R. L. (2011). Engineering design and conceptual change in science: Addressing thermal energy and heat transfer in eighth grade. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1861–1887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taraban, R., Anderson, E. E., DeFinis, A., Brown, A. G., Weigold, A., & Sharma, M. (2007). First steps in understanding engineering students’ growth of conceptual and procedural knowledge in an interactive learning context. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(1), 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendell, K. B., & Rogers, C. B. (2013). Engineering design-based science, science content performance, and science attitudes in elementary school. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 513–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, Y. C. (2003). Critical thinking test-Level I guidebook. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychological Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development, National Taiwan Normal University, 162 HePing East Road, Section 1, Taipei, Taiwan

    Szu-Chun Fan & Kuang-Chao Yu

Authors
  1. Szu-Chun Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kuang-Chao Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuang-Chao Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fan, SC., Yu, KC. How an integrative STEM curriculum can benefit students in engineering design practices. Int J Technol Des Educ 27, 107–129 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9328-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9328-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation