Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic relationships in Cucurbita pepo (pumpkin, squash, gourd) as viewed with high frequency oligonucleotide–targeting active gene (HFO–TAG) markers

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cucurbita pepo is a highly diverse, economically important member of the Cucurbitaceae. C. pepo encompasses hundreds of cultivars of pumpkins, squash, and gourds. Although C. pepo has been scrutinized with various types of DNA markers, the relationships among the cultivar-groups of C. pepo subsp. pepo, the more widely grown subspecies, have not heretofore been adequately resolved. We assessed genetic relationships among 68 accessions of Cucurbita pepo, including 48 from C. pepo subsp. pepo, using polymorphisms in 539 high frequency oligonucleotide–targeting active gene (HFO–TAG) fragments, that preferably represent coding regions of the genome. Dissimilarities among accessions were calculated, a dendrogram was constructed, and principal component analyses were conducted. Dissimilarities demarcated the four edible-fruited cultivar-groups of C. pepo subsp. pepo, Cocozelle, Pumpkin, Vegetable Marrow, and Zucchini. Furthermore, the results indicate that the Old World pumpkins as well as the long-fruited cultivar-groups of C. pepo subsp. pepo (cocozelle, vegetable marrow, and zucchini) evolved from spontaneous crossing and gene exchange between pumpkins derived from northern North America and pumpkins derived from southern North America. Consistent with pictorial and narrative historical records, such crossing appears to have occurred in Renaissance Europe within the first decades of the European contact with North America. The Old World pumpkins are more closely related to the long-fruited cultivar-groups than are the native North American pumpkins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andres TC (1987) Cucurbita fraterna, the closest wild relative and progenitor of C. pepo. Cucurbit Genet Coop Rep 10:69–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey LH (1943) Species of Cucurbita. Gentes Herb 6:266–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan CW (1997) Evolutionary changes associated with the domestication of Cucurbita pepo. In: Gremillion KJ (ed) People, plants and landscapes: studies in paleoethnobotany. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp 63–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker DS, Wilson HD (1987) Allozyme variation in the Cucurbita pepo complex: C. pepo var. ovifera vs C. texana. Syst Bot 12:263–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker-Walters DS (1990) Evidence for multiple domestications of Cucurbita pepo. In: Bates DM, Robinson RW, Jeffrey C (eds) Biology and utilization of the Cucurbitaceae. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 96–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchesne AN (1786) Essai sur l’histoire naturelle des courges. Panckoucke, Paris

  • Emerson RA (1910) The inheritance of sizes and shapes in plants. Am Nat 44:739–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erwin AT (1931) Nativity of the cucurbits. Bot Gaz 91:105–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferriol M, Pico B (2008) Pumpkin and winter squash. In: Prohens J, Nuez F (eds) Handbook of plant breeding, vegetables I. Springer, New York, pp 317–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferriol M, Pico B, Nuez F (2003) Genetic diversity of a germplasm collection of Cucurbita pepo using SRAP and AFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet 107:271–282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Formisano G, Roig C, Esteras C, Ercolano MR, Nuez F, Monforte AJ, Pico MB (2012) Genetic diversity of Spanish Cucurbita pepo landraces: an unexploited resource for summer squash breeding. Genet Resour Crop Evol 59:1169–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman A (2004) The compleat squash. Artisan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong L, Paris HS, Nee MH, Stift G, Pachner M, Vollmann J, Lelley T (2012) Genetic relationships and evolution in Cucurbita pepo (pumpkin, squash, gourd) as revealed by simple sequence repeat polymorphisms. Theor Appl Genet 124:875–891

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4(1 art. 4):9

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez Bermejo JE, Leon J (1994) Neglected crops, 1492 from a different perspective. FAO plant production and protection ser no 26. Rome: FAO, pp 63–77

  • Janick J, Paris HS (2006) The cucurbit images (1515–1518) of the Villa Farnesina, Rome. Ann Bot 97:165–176

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janick J, Paris HS, Parrish DC (2007) The cucurbits of Mediterranean antiquity: identification of taxa from ancient images and descriptions. Ann Bot 100:1441–1457

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katzir N, Tadmor Y, Tzuri G, Leshzeshen E, Mozes-Daube N, Danin-Poleg Y, Paris HS (2000) Further ISSR and preliminary SSR analysis of relationships among accessions of Cucurbita pepo. In: Katzir N, Paris HS (eds) Proceedings of Cucurbitaceae 2000, the 7th Eucarpia meeting on cucurbit genetics and breeding, vol 510. Acta Horticulturae, pp 433–439

  • Kosman E, Leonard KJ (2005) Similarity coefficients for molecular markers in studies of genetic relationships between individuals for haploid, diploid, and polyploid species. Mol Ecol 14:415–424

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lebeda A, Widrlechner MP, Staub J, Ezura H, Zalapa J, Křistkova E (2007) Cucurbits (Cucurbitaceae; Cucumis spp., Cucurbita spp., Citrullus spp.). In: Singh RJ (ed) Genetic resources, chromosome engineering, and crop improvement, vol 3. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 271–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi A, Thomas C (1999) An improved procedure for isolation of high quality DNA from watermelon and melon leaves. Cucurbit Genet Coop Rep 22:41–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi A, Thomas CE, Trebitsh T, Salman A, King J, Karalius J, Newman M, Reddy OUK, Xu Y, Zhang X (2006) An extended linkage map for watermelon based on SRAP, AFLP, SSR, ISSR, and RAPD markers. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 131:393–402

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levi A, Wechter WP, Harris-Shultz KR, Davis AR, Fie Z (2010) High-frequency oligonucleotides in watermelon expressed sequenced tag-unigenes are useful in producing polymorphic polymerase chain reaction markers among watermelon genotypes. J Am Hortic Sci 135:369–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi A, Wechter WP, Massey LM, Carter L, Hopkins D (2011) Genetic linkage map of Citrullus lanatus var. citroides chromosomal segments into the watermelon cultivar Crimson Sweet (Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus) genome. Am J Plant Sci 2:93–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levi A, Thies JA, Wechter WP, Harrison HF, Simmons AM, Reddy UK, Nimmakayala P, Fei Z (2013) High frequency oligonucleotides: targeting active gene (HFO-TAG) markers revealed wide genetic diversity among Citrullus spp. accessions useful for enhancing disease or pest resistance in watermelon cultivars. Genet Resour Crop Evol 60:427–440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lira R, Montes S (1994) Cucurbits (Cucurbita spp.). In: Hernandez JE, Leon J (eds) Neglected crops: 1492 from a different perspective. FAO, Rome, pp 63–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer FG, Trueblood EE, Heller JL (1999) The great herbal of Leonhart Fuchs, vol 1, commentary. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nee M (1990) The domestication of Cucurbita. Econ Bot 44(3 suppl):56–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris HS (1986) A proposed subspecific classification for Cucurbita pepo. Phytologia 61:133–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris HS (1989) Historical records, origins, and development of the edible cultivar groups of Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). Econ Bot 43:423–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris HS (2000) History of the cultivar-groups of Cucurbita pepo. Hortic Rev 25(2001):71–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris HS (2001) Characterization of the Cucurbita pepo collection at the Newe Ya‘ar Research Center, Israel. Plant Genet Resour Newsl 126:41–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris HS (2007) The drawings of Antoine Nicolas Duchesne for his natural history of the gourds. In: Érard C (ed). Des planches et des mots. Publications Scientifiques, Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris

  • Paris HS (2012) Semitic-language records of snake melons (Cucumis melo, Cucurbitaceae) in the medieval period and the “piqqus” of the “faqqous”. Genet Resour Crop Evol 59:31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris HS, Janick J (2005) Early evidence for the culinary use of squash flowers in Italy. Chron Hortic 45(2):20–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris HS, Nerson H (2003) Seed dimensions in the subspecies and cultivar-groups of Cucurbita pepo. Genet Resour Crop Evol 50:615–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris HS, Yonash N, Portnoy V, Mozes-Daube N, Tzuri G, Katzir N (2003) Assessment of genetic relationships in Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae) using DNA markers. Theor Appl Genet 106:971–978

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paris HS, Burger Y, Schaffer AA (2006) Genetic variability and introgression of horticulturally valuable traits in squash and pumpkins of Cucurbita pepo. Isr J Plant Sci 54:223–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris HS, Lebeda A, Křistkova E, Andres TC, Nee MH (2012) Parallel evolution under domestication and phenotypic differentiation of the cultivated subspecies of Cucurbita pepo. Econ Bot 66:71–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson RW, Decker-Walters DS (1997) Cucurbits. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 85, 89–90

  • Schaefer H, Renner SS (2011) Cucurbitaceae. In: Kubitzki K (ed) The families and genera of vascular plants, vol 10, Eudicots. Springer, New York, pp 112–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott EW (1935) Evidence for the existence of genes controlling shape. Genetics 20:12–21

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott EW, Durham GB (1929) Developmental history of the fruit in lines of Cucurbita pepo differing in fruit shape. Bot Gaz 87:411–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith BD (1997) The initial domestication of Cucurbita pepo in the Americas 10,000 years ago. Science 276:932–934

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith BD (2006) Eastern North America as an independent center of plant domestication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:12223–12228

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Teppner H (2000) Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae)—history, seed coat types, thin coated seeds and their genetics. Phyton 40:1–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Teppner H (2004) Notes on Lagenaria and Cucurbita (Cucurbitaceae)—review and new contributions. Phyton 44:245–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker TW, Carter GF (1946) Critical notes on the origin and domestication of the cultivated species of Cucurbita. Am J Bot 33:10–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker TW, Cutler HC (1971) Prehistoric cucurbits from the Valley of Oaxaca. Econ Bot 25:123–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker TW, Cutler HC (1986) Cucurbits from preceramic levels at Guila Naquitz. In: Flannery KV (ed) Guila Naquitz: archaic foraging and early agriculture in Oaxaca, Mexico. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 275–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhiteneva NE (1930) The world’s assortment of pumpkins. Trudy Prikl Bot Genet Selek 23:157–207

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Laura Massey of the USDA–ARS, Charleston, for expert technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harry S. Paris.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paris, H.S., Doron-Faigenboim, A., Reddy, U.K. et al. Genetic relationships in Cucurbita pepo (pumpkin, squash, gourd) as viewed with high frequency oligonucleotide–targeting active gene (HFO–TAG) markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 62, 1095–1111 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-015-0218-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-015-0218-6

Keywords

Navigation