Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Phenotypic and transgenerational plasticity promote local adaptation to sun and shade environments

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adaptive plasticity is expected to be important when the grain of environmental variation is encompassed in offspring dispersal distance. We investigated patterns of local adaptation, selection and plasticity in an association of plant morphology with fine-scale habitat shifts from oak canopy understory to adjacent grassland habitat in Claytonia perfoliata. Populations from beneath the canopy of oak trees were >90 % broad leaved and large seeded, while plants from adjacent grassland habitat were >90 % linear-leaved and small seeded. In a 2-year study, we used reciprocal transplants and phenotypic selection analysis to investigate local adaptation, selection, plasticity and maternal effects in this trait-environment association. Transgenerational effects were studied by planting offspring of inbred maternal families grown in both environments across the same environments in the second year. Reciprocal transplants revealed local adaptation to habitat type: broad-leaved forms had higher fitness in oak understory and linear-leaved plants had higher fitness in open grassland habitat. Phenotypic selection analyses indicated selection for narrower leaves and lower SLA in open habitat, and selection for broad leaves and intermediate values of SLA in understory. Both plant morphs exhibited plastic responses in traits in the same direction as selection on traits (narrower leaves and lower SLA in open habitat) suggesting that plasticity is adaptive. We detected an adaptive transgenerational effect in which maternal environment influenced offspring fitness; offspring of grassland-reared plants had higher fitness than understory-reared plants when grown in grassland. We did not detect costs of plasticity, but did find a positive association between leaf shape plasticity and fitness in linear-leaved plants in grassland habitat. Together, these findings indicate that fixed differences in trait values corresponding to selection across habitat contribute to local adaptation, but that plasticity and maternal environmental effects may be favored through promotion of survival across heterogeneous environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ (2004) Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics Int 11:36–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerly D, Knight C, Weiss S, Barton K, Starmer K (2002) Leaf size, specific leaf area and microhabitat distribution of chaparral woody plants: contrasting patterns in species level and community level analyses. Oecologia 130(3):449–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA (1998) Induced responses to herbivory and increased plant performance. Science 279(5354):1201–1202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA, Laforsch C, Tollrian R (1999) Transgenerational induction of defences in animals and plants. Nature 401(6748):60–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Auld JR, Agrawal AA, Relyea RA (2010) Re-evaluating the costs and limits of adaptive phenotypic plasticity. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 277(1681):503–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin IT (1999) Inducible nicotine production in Native Nicotiana as an example of adaptive phenotypic plasticity. J Chem Ecol 25(1):3–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baythavong BS (2011) Linking the spatial scale of environmental variation and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity: selection favors adaptive plasticity in fine-grained environments. Am Nat 178(1):75–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Becker C, Weigel D (2012) Epigenetic variation: origin and transgenerational inheritance. Curr Opin Plant Biol 15(5):562–567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bell DL, Galloway LF (2008) Population differentiation for plasticity to light in an annual herb: adaptation and cost. Am J Bot 95(1):59–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benard MF (2004) Predator-induced phenotypic plasticity in organisms with complex life histories. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:651–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boege K (2010) Induced responses to competition and herbivory: natural selection on multi-trait phenotypic plasticity. Ecology 91(9):2628–2637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw AD (1965) Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv Genet 13:115–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin SFI, Bloom AJ, Field CB, Waring RH (1987) Plant responses to multiple environmental factors. Bioscience 37(1):49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt TJ, Sih A, Wilson DS (1998) Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol Evol 13(2):77–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue K, Messiqua D, Pyle EH, Heschel MS, Schmitt J (2000) Evidence of adaptive divergence in plasticity: density and site dependent selection on shade avoidance responses in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 54(6):1956–1968

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer AR, Brown CS, Espeland EK, McKay JK, Meimberg H, Rice KJ (2010) SYNTHESIS: the role of adaptive trans-generational plasticity in biological invasions of plants. Evol Appl 3(2):179–192

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Espeland EK, Rice KJ (2012) Within- and trans-generational plasticity affects the opportunity for selection in barbed goatgrass (Aegilops triuncialis). Am J Bot 99(12):2058–2062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans JR, Poorter H (2001) Photosynthetic acclimation of plants to growth irradiance: the relative importance of specific leaf area and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing carbon gain. Plant, Cell Environ 24(8):755–767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca CR, Overton JM, Collins B, Westoby M (2000) Shifts in trait-combinations along rainfall and phosphorus gradients. J Ecol 88(6):964–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier D, Skaug H, Ancheta J, Ianelli J, Magnusson A, Maunder M, Nielsen A, Sibert J (2012) AD Model Builder: using automatic differentiation for statistical inference of highly parameterized complex nonlinear models. Optim Methods Softw 27:233–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway LF, Etterson JR (2007) Transgenerational plasticity is adaptive in the wild. Science 318(5853):1134–1136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghalambor CK, McKay JK, Carroll SP, Reznick DN (2007) Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Funct Ecol 21(3):394–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gommers CMM, Visser EJW, Onge KRS, Voesenek LACJ, Pierik R (2013) Shade tolerance: when growing tall is not an option. Trends Plant Sci 18(2):65–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman JJ, Sultan SE, Horgan-Kobelski T, Riggs C (2012) Adaptive transgenerational plasticity in an annual plant: grandparental and parental drought stress enhance performance of seedlings in dry soil. Integr Comp Biol 52(1):77–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holeski LM, Jander G, Agrawal AA (2012) Transgenerational defense induction and epigenetic inheritance in plants. Trends Ecol Evol 27(11):618–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jepson WL (1925) Manual of the flowering plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Karban R (2011) The ecology and evolution of induced resistance against herbivores. Funct Ecol 25(2):339–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassen R (2002) The experimental evolution of specialists, generalists, and the maintenance of diversity. J Evol Biol 15(2):173–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim E, Donohue K (2011) Population differentiation and plasticity in vegetative ontogeny: effects on life-history expression in Erysimum capitatum (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 98(11):1752–1761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsolver JG (1995) Fitness consequences of seasonal polyphenism in western white butterflies. Evolution 49(5):942–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurepin LV, Farrow S, Walton LJ, Emery RJN, Pharis RP, Chinnappa CC (2012) Phenotypic plasticity of sun and shade ecotypes of Stellaria longipes in response to light quality signaling: Cytokinins. Environ Exp Bot 84:25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R, Arnold SJ (1983) The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37(6):1210–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langerhans RB, Chapman LJ, Dewitt TJ (2007) Complex phenotype–environment associations revealed in an East African cyprinid. J Evol Biol 20(3):1171–1181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leishman MR, Westoby M (1994) The role of large seed size in shaded conditions—experimental evidence. Funct Ecol 8:205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins R (1968) Evolution in changing environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre PJ (2012) Cytogeography and genome size variation in the Claytonia perfoliata (Portulacaceae) polyploid complex. Ann Bot 110(6):1195–1203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michel M (2011) Spatial dependence of phenotype-environment associations for tadpoles in natural ponds. Evol Ecol 25(4):915–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JM (1978) Phenotypic variation, distribution and relationships of diploid and tetraploid populations of the Claytonia perfoliata complex (Portulacaceae). Syst Bot 3:322–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JM, Chambers KL (2006) Systematics of Claytonia (Portulaceae). Syst Bot Monogr 78:1–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JM, Kenton LC, Fellows CE (1984) Cytogeographic patterns and relationships in the Claytonia sibirica complex (Portulacaceae). Syst Bot 9(3):266–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci M, Pollard H, Cruzan MB (2003) Comparative studies of evolutionary responses to light environments in arabidopsis. Am Nat 161(1):68–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausch JH (2008) The evolution of selfing, inbreeding depression, and polyploidy in the Claytiona perfoliata complex (Portulacaceae). Washington State University, Pullman

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez RL (2012) Grain of environment explains variation in the strength of genotype × environment interaction. J Evol Biol 25(9):1897–1901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute I (2013) JMP v. 10.0. Cary, NC

  • Scheiner SM, Berrigan D (1998) The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. VIII. The cost of plasticity in Daphnia pulex. Evolution 52(2):368–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting CD (1986) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17(ArticleType: research-article/Full publication date: 1986/Copyright © 1986 Annual Reviews): 667–693

  • Schmitt J, McCormac AC, Smith H (1995) A test of the adaptive plasticity hypothesis using transgenic and mutant plants disabled in phytochrome-mediated elongation responses to neighbors. Am Nat 146(6):937–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaug H, Fournier D, Nielsen A, Magnusson A, Bolker B (2012) Generalized linear mixed models using AD model builder. R package version 0.7.4

  • Stanton ML, Thiede DA (2005) Statistical convenience vs biological insight: consequences of data transformation for the analysis of fitness variation in heterogeneous environments. New Phytol 166(1):319–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sultan SE, Bazzaz FA (1993) Phenotypic plasticity in Polygonum persicaria. I. Diversity and uniformity in genotypic norms of reaction to light. Evolution 47(4):1009–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sultan SE, Spencer HG (2002) Metapopulation structure favors plasticity over local adaptation. Am Nat 160(2):271–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson JR (1964) Claytonia (Montia) perfoliata: a genecological and evolutionary study [PhD]: University of California at Berkeley

  • Valladares F, Gianoli E, Gómez JM (2007) Ecological limits to plant phenotypic plasticity. New Phytol 176(4):749–763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Kleunen M, Fischer M (2005) Constraints on the evolution of adaptive phenotypic plasticity in plants. New Phytol 166:49–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Via S, Lande R (1985) Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39(3):505–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Via S, Gomulkiewicz R, De Jong G, Scheiner SM, Schlichting CD, Van Tienderen PH (1995) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. Trends Ecol Evol 10(5):212–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weijschedé J, Martínková J, De Kroon H, Huber H (2006) Shade avoidance in Trifolium repens: costs and benefits of plasticity in petiole length and leaf size. New Phytol 172(4):655–666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright SJ, Kitajima K, Kraft NJB, Reich PB, Wright IJ, Bunker DE, Condit R, Dalling JW, Davies SJ, Díaz S et al (2010) Functional traits and the growth–mortality trade-off in tropical trees. Ecology 91(12):3664–3674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zas R, Cendan C, Sampedr L (2013) Mediation of seed provisioning in the transmission of environmental maternal effects in Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton). Heredity (Advance Online 5/23/2013):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker N, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

M. Stanton and K. Rice provided feedback on design and analysis and reviewed early drafts of this manuscript. J. Miller provided insights on patterns of plasticity in Claytonia and comments on the manuscript. N. I. Cacho, B. Baythavong, D. Grossenbacher, J. Haloin, and M. Afkhami provided feedback on analyses and writing. B. Louisell provided field assistance. Funding was provided by student grants from the California Native Plant Society, the Davis Botanical Society, the Botanical Society of America and by the UC Davis Center for Population Biology. The Folsom office of the BLM provided access to work on the Cronin Ranch property.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Patrick J. McIntyre

    Present address: Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 3101 Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, CA, 94720-3160, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Evolution and Ecology, Center for Population Biology, University of California Davis, 2320 Storer Hall, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA

    Patrick J. McIntyre & Sharon Y. Strauss

Authors
  1. Patrick J. McIntyre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sharon Y. Strauss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick J. McIntyre.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 202 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McIntyre, P.J., Strauss, S.Y. Phenotypic and transgenerational plasticity promote local adaptation to sun and shade environments. Evol Ecol 28, 229–246 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-013-9670-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-013-9670-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation