Skip to main content
Log in

Complex environmental effects on the expression of alternative reproductive phenotypes in the bulb mite

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the evolution and maintenance of within-sex reproductive morphs, or alternative reproductive phenotypes (ARPs), requires in depth understanding of the proximate mechanisms that determine ARP expression. Most species express ARPs in complex ecological environments, yet little is know about how different environmental variables collectively affect ARP expression. Here, I investigated the influence of maternal and developmental nutrition and sire phenotype on ARP expression in bulb mites (Rhizoglyphus robini), where males are either fighters, able to kill other mites, or benign scramblers. In a factorial experiment, females were raised on a rich or a poor diet, and after maturation they were paired to a fighter or a scrambler. Their offspring were put on the rich or poor diet. Females on the rich diet increased investment into eggs when mated to a fighter, but suffered reduced longevity. Females indirectly affected offspring ARP expression as larger eggs developed into larger final instars, which were more likely to develop into a fighter. Final instar size, which also strongly depended on offspring nutrition, was the main cue for morph development: a switch point, or size threshold, existed where development switched from one phenotype to the other. Sire phenotype affected offspring phenotype, but only if offspring were on the poor diet, indicating a gene by environment interaction. Overall, the results revealed that complex environmental effects can underlie ARP expression, with differential maternal investment potentially amplifying genetic effects on offspring morphology. These effects can therefore play an important role in understanding how selection affects ARP expression and, like quantitative genetics models for continuous traits, should be incorporated into models of threshold traits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J Mem Lang 59:390–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bashey F (2006) Cross-generational environmental effects and the evolution of offspring size in the Trinidadian guppy Poecilia reticulata. Ecology 60:348–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Sarkar D (2007) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.9975-13

  • Benton TG, Plaistow SJ, Beckerman AP et al (2005) Changes in maternal investment in eggs can affect population dynamics. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:1351–1356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann HJ, Taborsky M (2008) Alternative reproductive tactics and the evolution of alternative allocation phenotypes. In: Oliveira RF, Taborsky M, Brockmann HJ (eds) Alternative reproductive tactics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 25–51

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann HJ, Oliveira RF, Taborsky M (2008) In: Oliveira RF, Taborsky M, Brockmann HJ (eds) Alternative reproductive tactics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 471–489

  • Brody MS, Lawlor LR (1984) Adaptive variation in offspring size in the terrestrial isopod, Armadillidium vulgare. Oecologia 61:55–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burley N (1986) Sexual selection for aesthetic traits in species with biparental care. Am Nat 127:415–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson T, Tuljapurkar S, Childs DZ (2010) Using evolutionary demography to link life history theory, quantitative genetics and population ecology. J Anim Ecol 79:1226–1240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham EJ, Russell AF (2000) Egg investment is influenced by male attractiveness in the mallard. Nature 404:74–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Day T, Rowe L (2002) Developmental thresholds and the evolution of reaction norms for age and size at life-history transitions. Am Nat 159:338–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG, Gutiérrez EE (1991) Male dimorphisms in beetles and earwigs and the question of developmental constraints. Evolution 45:18–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen DJ (1994) Environmental control of horn length dimorphism in the beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Proc R Soc Lond B 256:131–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen DJ (2008) The roles of genes and the environment in the expression and evolution of alternative tactics. In: Oliveira RF, Taborsky M, Brockmann HJ (eds) Alternative reproductive tactics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 83–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS (1989) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Pearson Education Ltd, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox CW, Czesak ME (2000) Evolutionary ecology of progeny size in arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol 45:341–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fox CW, Thakar MS, Mousseau TA (1997) Egg size plasticity in a seed beetle: an adaptive maternal effect. Am Nat 149:149–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerson U, Capua S, Thorens D (1983) Life history and life tables of Rhizoglyphus robini Claparède (Acari: Astigmata: Acaridae). Acarologia 24:439–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson U, Cohen E, Capua S (1991) Bulb mite, Rhizglyphus robini (Astigmata: Acaridae) as an experimental animal. Exp Appl Acarol 12:103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil D, Graves J, Hazon N et al (1999) Male attractiveness and differential testosterone investment in zebra finch eggs. Science 286:126–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hazel WN, Smock R, Johnson MD (1990) A polygenic model for the evolution and maintenance of conditional strategies. Proc R Soc Lond B 242:181–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hazel WN, Smock R, Lively CM (2004) The ecological genetics of conditional strategies. Am Nat 163:888–900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J, Simmons LW (2000) Maternal and paternal effects on offspring phenotype in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Evolution 54:936–941

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J, Simmons LW (2001) Status-dependent selection in the dimorphic beetle Onthophagus taurus. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2409–2414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick LM, Lande R (1989) The evolution of maternal characters. Evolution 43:485–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolm N (2001) Females produce larger eggs for large males in a paternal mouthbrooding fish. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2229–2234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kotiaho JS, Simmons LW, Hunt J et al (2003) Males influence maternal effects that promote sexual selection: a quantitative genetic experiment with dung beetles Onthophagus taurus. Am Nat 161:852–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kruuk LEB (2004) Estimating genetic parameters in wild populations using the ‘animal model’. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 359:873–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michimae H, Nishimura K, Tamori Y, Wakahara M (2009) Maternal effects on phenotypic plasticity in larvae of the salamander Hynobius retardatus. Oecologia 160:601–608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mousseau TA, Fox CW (1998) Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira RF, Taborsky M, Brockmann HJ (eds) (2008) Alternative reproductive tactics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer M, Best N, Cowles K et al. (2006) Coda: output analysis and diagnostics for MCMC. R package version 0.10-7

  • Radwan J (1993) The adaptive significance of male polymorphism in the acarid mite Caloglyphus berlesei. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radwan J (1995) Male morph determination in 2 species of acarid mites. Heredity 74:669–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radwan J (2001) Male morph determination in Rhizoglyphus echinopus. Exp Appl Acarol 25:143–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radwan J (2003) Heritability of male morph in the bulb mite, Rhizoglyphus robini (Astigmata, Acaridae). Exp Appl Acarol 29:109–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Radwan J (2009) Alternative mating tactics in acarid mites. Adv Stud Behav 39:185–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radwan J, Klimas M (2001) Male dimorphism in the bulb mite, Rhizoglyphus robini: fighters survive better. Ethol Ecol Evol 12:69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radwan J, Czyż M, Konior M et al (2000) Aggressiveness in two male morphs of the bulb mite Rhizoglyphus robini. Ethology 106:53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radwan J, Unrug J, Tomkins JL (2002) Status-dependence and morphological trade-offs in the expression of a sexually selected character in the mite, Sancassania berlesei. J Evol Biol 15:744–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radwan J, Unrug J, Śnigórska K et al (2004) Effectiveness of sexual selection in preventing fitness deterioration in bulb mite populations under relaxed natural selection. J Evol Biol 17:94–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Repka J, Gross MR (1995) The evolutionarily stable strategy under individual condition and tactic frequency. J Theor Biol 176:27–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MJ, Pease CM, Morris MR (1992) A genetic polymorphism in the swordtail Xiphophorus nigrensis. Testing the prediction of equal fitnesses. Am Nat 139:21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting CD, Pigliucci M (1995) Gene regulation, quantitative genetics and the evolution of reaction norms. Evol Ecol 9:154–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon B (2000) Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. Trends Ecol Evol 15:397–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shuster SM, Wade MJ (1991) Equal mating success among male reproductive strategies in a marine isopod. Nature 350:608–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuster S, Wade MJ (2003) Mating systems and strategies. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Smallegange IM, Coulson T (in press) The stochastic demography of two coexisting male morphs. Ecology

  • Tomkins JL, Hazel W (2007) The status of the conditional evolutionarily stable strategy. Trends Ecol Evol 22:522–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins JL, LeBas NR, Unrug J et al (2004) Testing the status-dependent ESS model: population variation in fighter expression in the mite Sancassania berlesei. J Evol Biol 17:1377–1388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell N (1996) Mate quality affects reproductive effort in a paternally investing species. Am Nat 148:1075–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Tim Coulson and Mark Roberts for discussion and comments, and The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research for funding (Rubicon Fellowship). All experimental work conducted in this study conforms to the legal requirements of the UK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel M. Smallegange.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 65 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smallegange, I.M. Complex environmental effects on the expression of alternative reproductive phenotypes in the bulb mite. Evol Ecol 25, 857–873 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-010-9446-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-010-9446-6

Keywords

Navigation