Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Plastic defence expression in plants

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phenotypic plasticity is the ability of an organism to express different phenotypes in response to changing environments and becomes particularly obvious when plants alter their transcriptome after enemy attack. The resulting alterations affect the metabolic, chemical and morphological phenotype and cause resistance or tolerance phenomena, which allow plants to main high fitness in the presence of enemies. Volatiles released from damaged plants can be received by their neighbours or undamaged parts of the same plant to mount an adequate level of resistance and thereby add a further level of phenotypic plasticity. The induced defence responses also include attraction of the third trophic level and, thus, dramatic changes of the ‘extended phenotype’ of the plant, that is, its surrounding fauna. The underlying interactions are, at least partly, under the control of the plant and, thus, subject to co-evolutionary processes. Fitness costs are a common explanation for the evolution of inducible resistance expression. However, variability in the resistance phenotype can per se be beneficial, because it makes counter-adaptations by the plants’ enemies more difficult. In the case of indirect defences, which are mediated by plant-carnivore mutualisms, signal reliability and reciprocal responses among phenotypically plastic partners appear necessary prerequisites for their evolutionary stabilisation. The expression of resistance and tolerance is induced by enemy attack but is also under control by abiotic factors, such as resource supply, and by biotic parameters, such as current and anticipated competition, efficiency of the expressed resistance and ontogenetic stage. All these levels of plasticity help plants to survive as sessile organisms in a rapidly changing environment and in the presence of mobile enemies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal AA (1998) Induced responses to herbivory and increased plant performance. Science 279:1201–1202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA (2000a) Overcompensation of plants in response to herbivory and the by-product benefits of mutualism. Trends Plant Sci 5:309–313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA (2000b) Specificity of induced resistance in wild radish: causes and consequences for two specialist and two generalist caterpillars. Oikos 89:493–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA (2001) Phenotypic plasticity in the interactions and evolution of species. Science 294:321–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA (2005) Future directions in the study of induced plant responses to herbivory. Entomol Exp Appl 115:97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA, Strauss SY, Stout MJ (1999) Costs of induced responses and tolerance to herbivory in male and female fitness components of wild radish. Evolution 53:1093–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldea M, Hamilton JG, Resti JP, Zangerl AR, Berenbaum MR, Frank TD, DeLucia EH (2006) Comparison of photosynthetic damage from arthropod herbivory and pathogen infection in understory hardwood saplings. Oecologia 149:221–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres MP, Claussen TP, MacLean SFJ, Redman AM, Reichardt PB (1997) Diversity of structure and antiherbivore activity in condensed tannins. Ecology 78:1696–1712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin IT (1988) The alkaloidal responses of wild tobacco to real and simulated herbivory. Oecologia 77:378–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin IT (1998) Jasmonate-induced responses are costly but benefit plants under attack in native populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:8113–8118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin IT, Schultz JC (1983) Rapid changes in tree leaf chemistry induced by damage: evidence for communication between plants. Science 221:277–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beach RM, Todd JW, Baker SH (1985) Nectaried and nectariless cotton cultivars as nectar sources for the adult soybean looper. J Entomol Sci 20:233–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernasconi ML, Turlings TCJ, Ambrosetti L, Bassetti P, Dorn S (1998) Herbivore-induced emissions of maize volatiles repel the corn leaf aphid, Rhopalosiphum maidis. Entomol Exp Appl 87:133–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Björkmann C, Dalin P, Ahrné K (2008) Leaf trichome responses to herbivory in willows: induction, relaxation and costs. New Phytol 179:176–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boege K (2005) Influence of plant ontogeny on compensation to leaf damage. Am J Bot 92:1632–1640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody AK, Price MV, Waser NM (2007) Life-history consequences of vegetative damage in scarlet gilia, a monocarpic plant. Oikos 116:975–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronstein JL (2001) The exploitation of mutualisms. Ecol Lett 4:277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown DG (1988) The cost of plant defense: an experimental analysis with inducible proteinase inhibitors in tomato. Oecologia 76:467–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain SA, Holland JN (2009) Quantitative synthesis of context dependency in ant-plant protection mutualisms. Ecology 90:2384–2392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheong YH, Chang HS, Gupta R, Wang X, Zhu T, Luan S (2002) Transcriptional profiling reveals novel interactions between wounding, pathogen, abiotic stress, and hormonal responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 129:661–677

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cipollini DF (2007) Consequences of the overproduction of methyl jasmonate on seed production, tolerance to defoliation and competitive effect and response of Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol 173:146–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cipollini DF, Purrington CB, Bergelson J (2003) Costs of induced responses in plants. Bas Appl Ecol 4:79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creelman RA, Mullet JE (1997) Biosynthesis and action of jasmonates in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48:355–381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Moraes CM, Mescher MC, Tumlinson JH (2001) Caterpillar-induced nocturnal plant volatiles repel conspecific females. Nature 410:577–580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dicke M (1999) Evolution of induced indirect defense of plants. In: Tollrian R, Harvell CD (eds) The ecology and evolution of inducible defences. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 62–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich R, Ploss K, Heil M (2004) Constitutive and induced resistance to pathogens in Arabidopsis thaliana depend on nitrogen supply. Plant Cell Environ 27:896–906

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doss RP, Oliver JE, Proebsting WM, Potter SW, Kuy SR, Clement SL, Williamson RT, Carney JR, DeVilbiss ED (2000) Bruchins: Insect-derived plant regulators that stimulate neoplasm formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:6218–6223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ebel J (1986) Phytoalexin synthesis: the biochemical analysis of the induction process. Annu Rev Phytopathol 24:235–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa EG, Fornoni J (2006) Host tolerance does not impose selection on natural enemies. New Phytol 170:609–614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Felix G, Meins F (1985) Purication, immunoassay and characterization of an abundant, cytikinin-regulated polypeptide in cultured tobacco tissues: evidence the protein is a ß-1, 3-glucanase. Planta 164:423–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fineblum WL, Rausher MD (1995) Tradeoff between resistance and tolerance to herbivore damage in a morning glory. Nature 377:517–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fornoni J, Núñez-Farfán J (2003) Evolutionary ecology of tolerance to herbivory: advances and perspectives. Comm Theoret Biol 8:643–663

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornoni J, Valverde PL, Nunez-Farfan J (2003) Quantitative genetics of plant tolerance and resistance against natural enemies of two natural populations of Datura stramonium. Evol Ecol Res 5:1049–1065

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost C, Appel H, Carlson J, De Moraes C, Mescher M, Schultz J (2007) Within-plant signalling by volatiles overcomes vascular constraints on systemic signalling and primes responses against herbivores. Ecol Lett 10:490–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner SN, Agrawal AA (2002) Induced plant defence and the evolution of counter-defences in herbivores. Evol Ecol Res 4:1131–1151

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershenzon J, Dudareva N (2007) The function of terpene natural products in the natural world. Nat Chem Biol 3:408–414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goellner K, Conrath U (2008) Priming: it’s all the world to induced disease resistance. Eur J Plant Pathol 121:233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez S, Onoda Y, Ossipov V, Stuefer JF (2008) Systemic induced resistance: a risk-spreading strategy in clonal plant networks? New Phytol 179:1142–1153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • González-Teuber M, Gianoli E (2008) Damage and shade enhance climbing and promote associational resistance in a climbing plant. J Ecol 96:122–126

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Teuber M, Heil M (2009) Nectar chemistry is tailored for both attraction of mutualists and protection from exploiters. Plant Signal Behav 4:809–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gowda JH (1997) Physical and chemical response of juvenile Acacia tortilis trees to browsing. Experimental evidence. Funct Ecol 11:106–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green TR, Ryan CA (1972) Wound-induced proteinase inhibitor in plant leaves: a possible defence mechanism against insects. Science 175:776–777

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerschmidt R (1999) Phytoalexins: what have we learned after 60 years? Annu Rev Phytopathol 37:285–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heichel GH, Turner NC (1983) CO2 assimilation of primary and regrowth foliage of red maple (Acer rubrum) and red oak (Quercus rubra): response to defoliation. Oecologia 57:14–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidel AJ, Dong XN (2006) Fitness benefits of systemic acquired resistance during Hyaloperonospora parasitica infection in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 173:1621–1628

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heil M (2002) Ecological costs of induced resistance. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5:345–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heil M (2004) Induction of two indirect defences benefits Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus, Fabaceae) in nature. J Ecol 92:527–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heil M (2008) Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions. New Phytol 178:41–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heil M (2009) Damaged-self recognition in plant herbivore defence. Trends Plant Sci 14:356–363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heil M, Baldwin IT (2002) Fitness costs of induced resistance: emerging experimental support for a slippery concept. Trends Plant Sci 7:61–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heil M, Karban R (2010) Explaining evolution of plant communication by airborne signals. publ online, Trends Ecol Evol

    Google Scholar 

  • Heil M, Silva Bueno JC (2007) Within-plant signalling by volatiles leads to induction and priming of an indirect plant defence in nature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:5467–5472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heil M, Ton J (2008) Long-distance signalling in plant defence. Trends Plant Sci 13:264–272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heil M, Walters D (2009) Ecological consequences of plant defence signalling. In: Van Loon LC (ed) Plant Innate Immunity. Elsevier, London, pp 667–716

    Google Scholar 

  • Heil M, Koch T, Hilpert A, Fiala B, Boland W, Linsenmair KE (2001) Extra floral nectar production of the ant-associated plant, Macaranga tanarius, is an induced, indirect, defensive response elicited by jasmonic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:1083–1088

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heil M, Greiner S, Meimberg H, Krüger R, Noyer J-L, Heubl G, Linsenmair KE, Boland W (2004) Evolutionary change from induced to constitutive expression of an indirect plant resistance. Nature 430:205–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heil M, González-Teuber M, Clement LW, Kautz S, Verhaagh M, Silva Bueno JC (2009) Divergent investment strategies of Acacia myrmecophytes and the coexistence of mutualists and exploiters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:18091–18096

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hermsmeier D, Schittko U, Baldwin IT (2001) Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. I. Large-scale changes in the accumulation of growth- and defense-related plant mRNAs. Plant Physiol 125:683–700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hilker M, Meiners T (2006) Early herbivore alert: insect eggs induce plant defence. J Chem Ecol 32:1379–1397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoballah ME, Köllner TG, Degenhardt J, Turlings TCJ (2004) Costs of induced volatile production in maize. Oikos 105:168–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodar JA, Zamora R, Castro J, Gomez JM, Garcia D (2008) Biomass allocation and growth responses of Scots pine saplings to simulated herbivory depend on plant age and light availability. Plant Ecol 197:229–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Huhta AP, Rautio P, Hellström K, Saari M, Tuomi J (2009) Tolerance of a perennial herb, Pimpinella saxifraga, to simulated flower herbivory and grazing: immediate repair of injury or postponed reproduction? Plant Ecol 201:599–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntzinger M, Karban R, Young TP, Palmer TM (2004) Relaxation of induced indirect defences of acacias following exclusion of mammalian herbivores. Ecology 85:609–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izaguirre MM, Mazza CA, Biondini M, Baldwin IT, Ballaré CL (2006) Remote sensing of future competitors: impacts on plant defences. Proceedings of The National Academy Of Sciences of the United States Of America 103: 7170–7174

  • Johnston DB, Cooper DJ, Hobbs NT (2007) Elk browsing increases aboveground growth of water-stressed willows by modifying plant architecture. Oecologia 154:467–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Juenger T, Bergelson J (2000) The evolution of compensation to herbivory in scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata: herbivore-imposed natural selection and the quantitative genetics of tolerance. Evolution 54:764–777

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Juenger T, Lennartsson T (2000) Tolerance in plant ecology and evolution: toward a more unified theory of plant-herbivore interaction. Evol Ecol 14:283–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karban R, Baldwin IT (1997) Induced responses to herbivory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler A, Baldwin IT (2001) Defensive function of herbivore-induced plant volatile emissions in nature. Science 291:2141–2144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler A, Baldwin IT (2002) Plant responses to insect herbivory: the emerging molecular analysis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 53:299–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kishimoto K, Matsui K, Ozawa R, Takabayashi J (2005) Volatile C6-aldehydes and allo-ocimene activate defense genes and induce resistance against Botrytis cinerea in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol 46:1093–1102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Korves TM, Bergelson J (2003) A developmental response to pathogen infection in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 133:339–347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maleck K, Levine A, Eulgem T, Morgan A, Schmid J, Lawton KA, Dangl JL, Dietrich RA (2000) The transcriptome of Arabidopsis thaliana during systemic acquired resistance. Nature Genetics 26:403–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martinkova J, Klimesova J, Mihulka S (2008) Compensation of seed production after severe injury in the short-lived herb Barbarea vulgaris. Bas Appl Ecol 9:44–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauricio R, Rausher MD, Burdick DS (1997) Variation in the defence strategies of plants: are resistance and tolerance mutually exclusive? Ecology 78:1301–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire R, Agrawal AA (2005) Trade-offs between the shade-avoidance response and plant resistance to herbivores? Tests with mutant Cucumis sativus. Funct Ecol 19:1025–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller B, Madilao LL, Ralph S, Bohlmann J (2005) Insect-induced conifer defence. White pine weevil and methyl jasmonate induce traumatic resinosis, de novo formed volatile emissions, and accumulation of terpenoid synthase and putative octadecanoid pathway transcripts in Sitka spruce. Plant Physiol 137:369–382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mithöfer A, Boland W (2008) Recognition of herbivory-associated molecular patterns. Plant Physiol 146:825–831

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mondor EB, Addicott JF (2003) Conspicuous extra-floral nectaries are inducible in Vicia faba. Ecol Lett 6:495–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondor EB, Tremblay MN, Messing RH (2006) Extrafloral nectary phenotypic plasticity is damage and resource-dependent in Vicia faba. Biol Lett 2:583–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison KD, Reekie EG (1995) Pattern of defoliation and its effect on photosynthetic capacity in Oenothera biennis. J Ecol 83:759–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray DC, Walters DR (1992) Increased photosynthesis and resistance to rust infection in upper, uninfected leaves of rusted broad bean (Vicia faba L.). New Phytol 120:235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabity PD, Heng-Moss TM, Higley LG (2006) Effects of insect herbivory on physiological and biochemical (Oxidative enzyme) responses of the halophyte Atriplex subspicata (Chenopodiaceae). Environ Entomol 35:1677–1689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Núñez-Farfán J, Fornoni J, Valverde PL (2007) The evolution of resistance and tolerance to herbivores. Annual review of ecology evolution and systematics 38: 541–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver TH, Leather SR, Cook JM (2009) Tolerance traits and the stability of mutualism. Oikos 118:346–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petitt FL, Turlings TCJ, Wolf SP (1992) Adult experience modifies attraction of the leafminer parasitoid Opius dissitus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to volatile semiochemicals. J Insect Behav 5:623–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pichersky E, Gershenzon J (2002) The formation and function of plant volatiles: perfumes for pollinator attraction and defence. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5:237–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pilson D (2000) The evolution of plant response to herbivory: simultaneously considering resistance and tolerance in Brassica rapa. Evol Ecol 14:457–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price PW, Bouton CE, Gross P, McPheron BA, Thompson JN, Weis AE (1980) Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:41–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulice CE, Packer AA (2008) Simulated herbivory induces extra floral nectary production in Prunus avium. Funct Ecol 22:801–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddall AA, Wilson LJ, Gregg PC, Sadras VO (2007) Photosynthetic response of cotton to spider mite damage: interaction with light and compensatory mechanisms. Crop Sci 47:2047–2057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades DF (1983) Responses of alder and willow to attack by tent caterpillars and webworms: evidence for pheromonal sensitivity of willows. In: Hedin PA (ed) Plant resistance to insects. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 55–68

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Saona C, Thaler JS (2005) Herbivore-induced responses and patch heterogeneity affect abundance of arthropods on plants. Ecol Entomol 30:156–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Saona CR, Rodríguez-Saona LE, Frost CJ (2009) Herbivore-induced volatiles in the perennial shrub, Vaccinium corymbosum, and their role in inter-branch signalling. J Chem Ecol 35:163–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy BA, Kirchner JW (2000) Evolutionary dynamics of pathogen resistance and tolerance. Evolution 54:51–63

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz N, Saltz D, Ward D (2006) The effects of herbivory and resource variability on the production of a second inflorescence by the desert lily, Pancratium sickenbergeri. Plant Ecol 186:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilmiller AL, Howe GA (2005) Systemic signalling in the wound response. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8:369–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting CD, Levin DA (1986) Phenotypic plasticity: an evolving plant character. Biol J Linn Soc 29:37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwachtje J, Baldwin IT (2008) Why does herbivore attack reconfigure primary metabolism? Plant Physiol 146:845–851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwachtje J, Minchin PEH, Jahnke S, Van Dongen JT, Schittko U, Baldwin IT (2006) SNF1-related kinases allow plants to tolerate herbivory by allocating carbon to roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:12935–12940

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shirley BW (1998) Flavonoids in seeds and grains: physiological function, agronomic importance and the genetics of biosynthesis. Seed Sci Res 8:415–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shulaev V, Silverman P, Raskin I (1997) Airborne signalling by methyl salicylate in plant pathogen resistance. Nature 385:718–721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simms EL (2000) Defining tolerance as a norm of reaction. Evol Ecol 14:563–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simms E, Triplett J (1994) Costs and benefits of plant responses to disease: resistance and tolerance. Evolution 48:1973–1985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapel JO, Cortesero AM, DeMoraes CM, Tumlinson JH, Lewis WJ (1997) Extrafloral nectar, honeydew, and sucrose effects on searching behavior and efficiency of Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in cotton. Environ Entomol 26:617–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss SY, Agrawal AA (1999) The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 14:179–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sultan SE (2000) Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history. Trends Plant Sci 5:537–542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Traw MB, Bergelson J (2003) Interactive effects of jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, and gibberellin on induction of trichomes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 133:1367–1375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Traw MB, Kniskern JM, Bergelson J (2007) Sar increases fitness of Arabidopsis thaliana in the presence of natural bacterial pathogens. Evolution 61:2444–2449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tumlinson JH, Paré PW, Turlings TCJ (1999) Plant production of volatile semiochemicals in response to insect-derived elicitors. In: Chadwick DJ, Goode JA (eds) Insect-plant interactions and induced plant defence. Wiley, Chichester, pp 95–109

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Turlings TCJ, Tumlinson JH, Lewis WJ (1990) Exploitation of herbivore-induced plant odours by host -seeking parasitic wasps. Science 250:1251–1253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Unsicker SB, Kunert G, Gershenzon J (2009) Protective perfumes: the role of vegetative volatiles in plant defence against herbivores. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12:479–485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Utsumi S, Ando Y, Ohgushi T (2009) Evolution of feeding preference in a leaf beetle: the importance of phenotypic plasticity of a host plant. Ecol Lett 12:920–929

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Buskirk J, Steiner UK (2009) The fitness costs of developmental canalization and plasticity. J Evol Biol 22:852–860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Loon LC, Rep M, Pieterse CMJ (2006) Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annu Rev Phytopathol 44:135–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Nouhuys S, Kaartinen R (2008) A parasitoid wasp uses landmarks while monitoring potential resources. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 275:377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise MJ, Abrahamson WG (2007) Effects of resource availability on tolerance of herbivory: a review and assessment of three opposing models. Am Nat 169:443–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yi H-S, Heil M, Adame-Álvarez R-M, Ballhorn D, Ryu C-M (2009) Airborne induction and priming of plant resistance to a bacterial pathogen. Plant Physiol 151:2152–2161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Wang SP, Jiang GM, Patton B, Nyren P (2007) Responses of Artemisia frigida Willd. (Compositae) and Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel. (Poaceae) to sheep saliva. J Arid Environ 70:111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Ingeniería Genética, CINVESTAV—Irapuato, Km. 9.6 Libramiento Norte, 36821, Irapuato, Guanajuato, México

    Martin Heil

Authors
  1. Martin Heil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Heil.

Glossary

Constitutive resistance

The expression levels of constitutive resistance are not affected by encounters with plant enemies. They, can, however, be subject to phenotypic plasticity with respect to other factors such as, for example, abiotic conditions.

Defence

All strategies that increase plant fitness in the presence of enemies. The term as used here comprises both resistance and tolerance.

Direct resistance

Direct resistance traits are those that directly interact with the plant enemy in order to reduce feeding activity or infection level.

Indirect defence

Indirect defence traits do not directly interact with the plant enemy but rather enhance the presence of ‘enemies of the enemy of the plant’.

Induced resistance

Induced resistance traits change their expression level in response to an encounter with an enemy of the plant.

Phenotypic plasticity

The capacity of a certain genotype to express different phenotypes in response to changing environmental conditions.

Resistance

Plant traits that reduce the degree or probability at which enemies of the plants exert damage.

Tolerance

Tolerance traits minimize the fitness loss that is caused by a certain level of damage.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heil, M. Plastic defence expression in plants. Evol Ecol 24, 555–569 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-009-9348-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-009-9348-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation